|
WTF is this bullshit with every goddamn retard on the site posting some new martingale shit?
|
|
|
|
|
Ho hum. You can also "win" a majority of the time with a martingale.
|
|
|
|
|
Even if, in some period of years, it becomes possible to crack Bitcoin (I assume the day will arrive sometime), that is probably not the first thing TPTB would do with it. In fact, it is more likely they'd sit on the capability and not use it, because it is a capability that is much more useful to have if nobody knows you have it.
I'd assume by the time it becomes possible for the kind of bad guys I'm more worried about to do this, work will be done to transition to some more resistant technology. I will leave it to those more knowledgeable than I to find these.
|
|
|
|
|
Dunno if this is still active, but here:
1GeBcfnMq9vK8yERhxiFt1E5B3xjKKaDcN
|
|
|
|
The rake they take is their own money  I talk about the 'freerolls' , which doesnt make any money for them , actually losing their profit. So basically the only hope is that people who join freerolls may win or lose and comeback and get some chips. Thats all the hope . Nonsense. I win money from other people and play with that. They rake it over and over again. It doesn't matter who plays the hands, just so long as they're played and raked. |
|
|
|
|
Down here, too. Boo, hiss.
|
|
|
|
I dunno if someone else already posted this here coz i didnt go through all the pages, but Joey and his mom (if it isnt one person) are frequenting sealswithclubs.eu poker site , they have probably 50 or more accounts there already. You can spot him or her when the promote they cam shows or if joey talks about how much he wants to suck cock. HE and his mom like cher a lot.
I feel sorry for this poor boy if his "mom" is real.
Their original accounts are banned and any socks they have are banned on sight as soon as they start up their horseshit again. His mom exists, and that cocksucking piece of garbage son of hers and his whore of a mother deserve each other. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is a store of value and a means for exchange, two of the functions of money which are not separable.
[Not to be confused with legal definitions within a body of law that have similar sounding names.] Yeah, right, I hate it when people change the meaning of words either by ignorance or with a purpose to deceive. So you'd rather FinCEN use your definition and regulate Bitcoin exactly like they would a prepaid card? No, thanks. |
|
|
|
Zero to hero makes no profit for sealswithclubs tough.
I pay rake. |
|
|
|
how to join Beta test?
I guess just go to www.dragons.tl and download the appropriate client, run it and create an account. It's been in open alpha for a while, it's just moving to beta. I'd guess whatever is on the site now will be good, and while I asked earlier today, I will only get a new one if it is needed. Basically, the client appears to download all the content it needs from the server every time it starts. |
|
|
|
So do we have to download a new client? |
|
|
|
freerolls permanently coming down?
Nope, we didn't even miss an hour. All that's happening is that now freerolls will alternate between 3 Prizes (the old way) and 30 Prizes (a bunch of 1 chip prizes and a few bigger ones) so that more players can get right in to something else, the "1 Chip", "1 Chip Turbo" and "1 Chip Rebuy" that run at :45 every hour now. That's a very good idea. It's important to have some way for people who like to do the "zero to hero" thing. Seals freerolls (back when you could win the 50 chipper three times a day if you tried) were how I started in Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Disagree completely, "tested to be fair in laboratories", I think you are picturing it a litle too much fairy tale. In practice everything happens more lax then you imagine.. Example? Absolute Poker was licensed by a respectable gaming commission. Didn't stop them from cheating the players for massive amounts through software hacks ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cereus_Poker_Network) Well, I frankly think little of most of these gaming commissions. Particularly the Kahnawake Gaming Commission, which resisted suspending these clowns for far too long. However, the software hacks were not related to the deal. The deal could have been (and as far as I know was) perfectly fair. The problem was insiders had access to information (like other player's hole cards) that they could exploit to cheat. Similarly, even without insider access, players can collude by sharing hole card information. In that case, as well, the RNG dealing the cards would be perfectly fair. But players would be obtaining an unfair (and against the rules) advantage by cheating. |
|
|
|
I'm interested to see how this plays out.
There are so few options you have when dealing with a serial-scammer - I'm real curious if you can get him to do the right thing.
Scum will never do the right thing. They don't have it in them. That's why you just have to wreck their shit, or whatever they have. |
|
|
|
This site if filled with shitty ass players that don't even know how to play. Advice to anyone that's going to go there, don't call ANYTHING when somebody bets high because there's a 95% chance they'll have the nuts, or else they will just fold. If you want to play against idiots I recommend you go here, it's almost like playing against someone who isn't even there, you can just take all there chips. Just made $3,000 and withdrew it all, thanks.
From what I've played the standard is better than expected. Yeah, there's some shit players, but I thought it would be worse. Go on any of the big poker sites and for similar stakes you'll find a lot worse players. Had this moron on ignore for a while. What's hilarious is this loser started out as a rigged screamer. Now he's a huge winner, who is somehow angry that he's winning all this money. Uh-huh.  |
|
|
|
And the giant online casinos could care less about being provably fair. It's only us smaller single owner / operator types who have to have a provably fair system. The giant online casinos are under a considerable amount of scrutiny, and would be caught by people like the Wizard of Odds and others if the deal was rigged. One problem with one kind of gambling (poker) though is that the issue isn't really whether the deal is fair. No major site has ever been caught rigging the RNG, and only one very early on (Planet Poker) was found to be using a blatantly broken RNG (it was basically totally cracked). The problem in online poker is much less the deal than that you might be cheated by other players colluding, something that can and does happen pretty often. It would be, in the first place, highly impractical to generate provably fair numbers for the largest of the online poker rooms (or casinos for that matter), but even if you did it, you wouldn't have eliminated the main source of getting cheated. |
|
|
|
WTF kind of post is this - wait till BTC get's to zero - then see just how pissed everyone is.
About the only thing that would take value to zero would be an actual crack of the entire system. I'm very confident that is not happening any time soon. Even the very few entities that could do it some time in the mid-term future (a decade or two) have no rational motivation to do it. Oh, but back to the original subject: $69.21? WTFFF? (What the fucking fuckity-fuck.) I don't think that's a rational valuation. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
