No dip has been recorded last couple of days, instead the price of Bitcoin have been appreciating. As I write this, Bitcoin is trading at $11,181.84 at Coindesk, still maintaining a bulling tone after breaching the $11,000 price level. For anyone that have been following Bitcoin closely, it should be obvious that the market is simply waiting for the slightest positive news and we would be right on track to making new ATH.

Let's look at things this way: Nokia is a popular company that manufactures phones and smartphones are innovated phones, so the emergence of smartphones could not have left Nokia behind. Same way, Bitcoin has been the flagship cryptocurrency and it's not averse to innovative moves in the industry, so what other cryptocurrencies to overcome it are yet to be seen.

When it says maths can help a player to win, it does not assume that maths is going to eliminate the house edge or manipulate the system, rather the whole essence of bringing maths in, is to create some leeway for attaining success in spite of the odds to the contrary. With maths and games like dice and roulette, a player can know before hand, the limits their balance can support and even their chance of landing a win well before the dice/ball rolls, thus creating room for adjustments to be made.

Yes educated guesses are the stock in trade with chart analyses and every seasoned and knowledgeable trader takes them for nothing more or less. It helps to imagine the whole lot of burden the use of navigational aids can spare a pilot or captain and of course, that does not absolve them of their duty of manning their vessels. Simply put, an aid is an aid, but when its place is swapped, you end up in mediocrity!

The texts in bold are actually ambiguous! How does one go about setting some goals and executing them without some strategies in the background? In actuality, at least a strategy is inevitable for any system to work in the first place and then a control mechanism becomes exigent, in order for things to be confined within the safety limits that optimizes performance and minimizes loss. If you have been setting some goals in your dice gaming and have realized them a couple of time, then you're already putting some strategies to work even without knowing it.

You may not have taken cognizance of it, but you've actually been drifting to think that gluing to your trading platform is a way to capture more profits from every market movement. You could not have heard of market noises and false breakouts? Yeah, they're the pitfalls of hobbiest traders.

For a very volatile market as the Bitcoin market, it's chasing the wind to think of trapping the market and it's to the best interest of a trader to maintain a long term biase else swimming against the tide is sure to take the wind out of the sail of every such trader.

I feel the need to add here that Hodling does not translate to resigning oneself to a spectator or being stupid. If one had bought Bitcoin at say $6,000 and overtime price rose to $19,000 and yet the trader sat and watched price plunge again to around $6000, that is being a daft and not anything a smart trader. Nothing says that selling all or some of one's coin at some peak value and buying them back at a lower value(s)   means one have given up on Hodling!

It does not really have to stay permanently above the $11,000 mark to justify that a rally is on the way as the repeated test and retest of that resistance level says it all that pressure have started to mount and experience shows that is usually the prelude of how a resistance level soon becomes a support level.

Being overpriced or underpriced is not a one-for-all-times thing, but a function of time and prevailing market circumstances, so by what time Bitcoin might be priced that much, the market conditions might be such that it is underpriced. At any rate, it's scary and almost unfathomable how 1BTC could be $1M in 2020. IMO, it's a widely held consensuses that Bitcoin would go to the moon some day, but how far it may go, no one can really say.

That's right, the price of Bitcoin might drop right after testing the $11,000 price mark! It's a well known fact in the financial market that once a price level is tested, the significance is that bullish pressure is beginning to mount and sooner than later, a breakout is most likely. As I write, Bitcoin is going for $11,099.99 at Bitstamp, having touched $11,222.36 earlier. A rally is surely on the way, so it's still a good buy for those who have been sitting on the fence.

I do not agree with your take that day trading is difficult rather it is how a trader goes about his trading that either makes or mare his trading career. Trading as a whole is not easy or an all comers affair - be it day or swing trading. Knowing to time the market for a good entry and exit point is a skill any purposeful trader diligently set out to acquire and it comes only with time and lots of practice.

Something worthy of mention here, is that day trading doesn't necessary mean a trader would be glued to their trading terminals all day long, in fact, most day traders end up spending little or time in trading because they do not need to carry out to much researches, because everyday they're abreast with the latest in the market.

Are we talking about a pattern formation here with not even one image to bring people to what page you're looking at? I tried looking up the daily BTC/USD candlestick formation and the head n shoulders pattern you spoke of seems already spent and presently a reverse head n shoulders formation is attempting to round up its second to last lap, so what I see is, rather a surge in the price of Bitcoin a short while from now!

You actually raised some credible points on way forward with Hodling, but the unfortunate thing is that those who the advice is meant for, are likely the last to realize or even use it. It's a good practice to take some profits from time to time and possibly buying back at lower rates than having to undergo the stress of sitting through extreme rates and market conditions. As a matter of fact, Hodling is not suitable for every trader - only those who can survive the vicissitudes of the market are welcome to try.

That's something all those clamoring for the crash of Bitcoin failed to realize that the deeper the plunge goes, the more desperate buyers will become and contrary to expectations, there won't be lost of interest, instead people would be jostling to buy Bitcoin at cheaper rate.

That's true, there will always be people like that in the ecosystem and no one should begrudge them as they're simply playing their path - some people definitely have got to play that role.

The reason why I love this Bitcoin crash is that it happened at a time when the adoption of Bitcoin have greatly increased. The gain in it is that there is going to an increase in the demand for Bitcoin that would most likely lead to price soaring up again.

Thanks, payment received!

That would surely dealt a devastating blow to the psychology of most traders and a good number might want to embark on terminal leave. However, I don't see any of that having half a chance because this is 2018 and the cryptocurrency world have actually moved on since the last time Bitcoin passed that road, These days, there' re obviously a lot more stake holders in Bitcoin than couple of years back, when Bitcoin was still trying to gain acceptance.

He would most likely not see what all the player, who have been that way have learnt, until he receives his very own hard knocks. Martingale overtime have been proven to be a slow but eventual killer, because it definitely gets to a point where a player is immobilized by either maximum bet size or limited fund. Until such a time, it gives especially, newbies the impression that they're invisible unknown to them that some losing streaks can be longer than others!

I only play dice and Roulette games and I have owned accounts in couple of sites. After being active a couple of years, my understanding is that even a 1% profit setting holds no guarantee for any player and the longer a player pushes a particular strategy, the more likely the system catches up with the next move. My suggestion is to always set out with a bunch of tested and working strategies and then to always have them randomized.

It's obvious that 100% is not attainable with any known system, but that does not say anything about the fact that 100% result is nowhere necessary to be able to come off profitable in the market. Any player that is well able to achieve as from 60% success rate is good to end up in profit. In the light of this, I am compelled to ask, for what does most gambling sites disallow some games from contributing to the wager requirements for most of the bonuses they offer?