After weeks of silence, you came back here without even addressing my question, I think it's rather evasive. Another thing that I see, I tried to check your website (again) and noticed that your web is not secured, wouldn't it be a concerning matter that a project that runs on social media platform couldn't afford an SSL??

As there is no token sale event, the possible foul play they will use is probably (if we may entertain us with this theory) the rug pull, this is why I asked for token allocation in percentage, so we can learn how much is for what and how much is held by team. As OP was online few days ago, I am sure they know about this accusation, I would be very happy to hear explanation or anything to thwart the accusation

A bit curious on why you edited almost all of your posts here, and I just realized that I haven't ask, are all the cars in your photo is actually (and already owned) by you? Or are them rented from a dealer, or just a random image from internet for illustration purpose?

I also can't find your whitepaper

#Proof Of Registration
Forum Username: Miiike
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=552299
Telegram Username: @Mi_iike
Participated Campaigns: Signature Campaign
Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1q623yvktz3rxjus5emgv9wxhdtsqygaygdhtk94

Your previous project didn't seems to have a bright future, seeing from how the thread went silent with no updates and all in just few months and their telegram channel is no longer available. So what is the logical reason for why people should trust you with your next project?

Your project is a token running on existing chain, there's a better suited board for that. Please move your topic to the correct board. As for details of your project, one simple question to begin: on what platform are you actually on?

Refresh the page once or twice. I experienced the same issue (page inaccessible) when I tried to learn more about them. Refreshing helps fix the issue.

Your features are a very low cost transaction fee and lightning fast transaction which I can see will be an appealing factor for gaming and metaverses, even the coon trader themselves seek these feature.

One thing that need to be asked though, as you're standing on your own blockchain, and most metaverses are on ERC, BEP, and Matic, your features will not be useful unless those projects move chain, which I can imagine will be a very difficult decision that's followed by many complications

Oh wow. Haha. I mean something that's more readily readable by common human, not lists of codes specifying umm... I don't even know what's those line of codes shows me (sorry).

Maybe a pie chart? With something like:
3% for team
17% for presale
50% for public sale
and so on

I appreciate the gesture, it should helps clear some doubt from people. If you don't mind to clear another mystery that shrouded your project, can you point us out to your tokenomy? I couldn't find them in your github (and within it, your very drafty draft of whitepaper) or website, and as far as people can learn from the ann is that you allocate 3 million tokens for team, assuming that sentence on your post is talking about team allocation and not other things

To once again confirm, so you're not the developers of Crystal-dilithium? You're just a project riding their tech, comparable to a token that use BEP tech? Then this statement should not be on your post at all. It heavily mislead people that you've been working on this project for 6 years while factually you just established yourself (based on your website age) less than one week ago.

Wait, I don't think I understand correctly of what happened here. You didn't invent the cryptography (the crystal dilithium), you're simply working on their... chain? System? Technology? (I'm not sure which terms is correct because this is the first time I stumbled upon crystalsdilithium).

If so, why'd you need 6 years to develop your project?

These stamps (from the way I get it after I look at the website) represent each of real stamps around the world? I mean, these stamps are based on the real ones and not created by dev's designer or fans?

You mean you're "proposing a possible scenario of price growth", not promising. Because promising but not guaranteeing sounds awfully like giving empty words (like, "I promise I'll meet you tomorrow at 6, but I'm not guaranteeing that I'll meet you tomorrow at 6.")

I think it would be better if you divulge more on how each of your CC coin backed by ownership (I am assuming you refer to "membership") in the platform. Wouldn't it imply that if your user decreases, your price will also devalued?

How will you get past the government regulations? As far as I know, government of some countries are getting involved in internet censorship by forcing the ISP to block certain content or website.

By this case, even if you create a platform where everybody can share whatever they want (let's use the obvious material that's being censored on many countries here) like porn, if the government and the ISP blocked these users from being accessible, or even further, your own platform itself, then your feature got instantly obliterated

Like what @nimogasm said, why can't this announcement be shorter? You made 5 posts full of words and no graphic or anything to help people visualize. I couldn't even read the whole posts, so forgive me if it's actually been explained somewhere in your post: if the selling point is an anonymous browser, wouldn't brave browser and duckduckgo already have this? I'm trying to ask your point of differences from them

Link to your whitepaper is wrong, it redirect us to your twitter page. I can't find the document on your website either. Another question is about your tier 3 holders, what do you mean by they can be a validator? Like they have a say on how legit or not a project crowdfunding on your platform is?

What makes you so sure that the token price will doubled once listed? If any, past history of token with... little to zero quality (which, given how you choose to ignore critical comments above instead of answering them, we can assume you fall on this category) would be dumped the second it hit markets.

How will buying property in your token be more affordable for people? They'll still need to buy the token with fiat, which means they'll still need to spend the exact same amount (if not more, given your token price fluctuates) as if they buy in fiat

I think you understand my question wrongly. If I may use an illustration:

Suppose there is a token called Mii that works on ERC, BSC, Matic, and Tron. What you propose is a feature where there will be a graph that shows this token's price growth on every chain, right? And mostly (as you also agreed) investors would measure their portfolio on USD and not on the chain's main coin (to make it clearer, people would measure their growth with Mii-USD instead Mii-ETH or Mii-BNB).

I can't be sure how will you serve this graph, but I imagine there will be one graph with multiple lines that represent the growth of Mii in each chain it's on, like Mii on ERC is represented in red line, Mii on BSC is on blue line, etc. But, since most token developers has a way to automatically balance their rate cross-chain, wouldn't these lines on your graph shows an almost identical figure, which renders the feature rather useless.

I'm not saying it's a stupid idea, I actually think it is quite beneficial for people who want to arbitrage their portfolio cross-chain if the graph's update rate is very fast and a token developers didn't adopt the auto-balancing method, I just tried to understand the likelihood of this event (a very up-to-date graph that's renewed in seconds and a project that didn't use auto-balancer) to happen and whether the feature will survive if the likelihood of the event is somewhat low.