Given they were actually online since and didnt answer the reason why they choose such tokenomy (create a massive token and burned hald of them instead of directly created just half the amount burned) or the team, it shows the quality of the project

This part of the post implies that you're not part of the team, found the project by accident, and posted this announcement just out of interest. But you bothered to create a specific account just for posting for the project and closed the post with a signature as the team.

Buy a copper membership, it'll enable your rank to display images. It is not mandatory, the forum never forces anyone to spend their money on it, but it'll surely make your thread looks more professional and it'll be more convenient for anyone who visit this thread if they can directly see what you tried to show.

Been wanting to give a comment on this project since I first saw the thread published, but decided to go against it and just gave them a read, thinking a benefit of the doubt is probably good for once in a while. But, their silence seems encouraging doubts, as they don't even care to defend and/or answer queries here.

I think it is safe to assume that both are owned by aXpire and the possibility of a fraud attempt to create a "phising" site is relatively low, their official twitter (the one listed axpire.io as their official page) also "announced" the axpire.com as their site, its on their cover photo.

Ok, so basically I can add more and more to gain more (that's a lot of "more) anytime I want if I had whitelisted before 11th, and not bound to the date like a snapshot where I have to have the amount I desired to be locked before 11th  and after that anything I add will not be calculated toward my "stake"?

Wondered about the same thing too, why created an ann so late while the project itself is already working and running. Not that it's bad, late is better than never, it just made me really wanted to know the reason behind the decision.

And for anyone who got curious and (for a second) wondered if this is real, that they're a sister of a company that partnered with giant corporates as listed, here's the link for the ann from LSG's site

https://www.lsg.com/Content/downloads/press-release/Press-Release-In-partnership-with-LSG-aXpire-is-launching-Bilr.pdf

But they do utilize ANSR to upgrade (or buy credit), as quoted from their explanation on previous page, below. I assume the USD value shown on their website is the rough equivalent of ANSR rate at the time people do the upgrade.

I wondered if this is the reason why LTX soared to the sky. Anyway, I don't really get the date, the announcement said it's on 10, but the article body said we need to be whitelisted between the published date (around 5 days ago) to 11th?

Leaving the issue of cheaters and their tricks for a while and focusing on topic about wallet (and its creation fee) How possible/far-fetched is it to develop a payment method where users can auto-convert their ANSR to XLM (instead of USDC) upon withdrawal and withdrawing them directly to an XLM exchange address (that is free)?

Although I think user wouldn't mind throwing 1 XLM and create an XLM wallet for the sake of future use of every XLM token, but let's assume there's someone that didn't want to spent even one penny if they can, it seems this withdrawal method (if possible) will entice them.


I would suggest a "report" button next to every question or answer like the one this forum have, that'll notify the moderator or admin about some wrongdoings. I think it'll have added benefits other than fighting unoriginal and low quality q/a, like misplaced answer (NSFW content on SFW section), or deliberate misleading answers.


What? Oh LOL, no. I literally smiled when I typed this due to the irony. Granted, if you check my post history, I usually asked and criticized questionable projects, like ones without clear team, or shady background, or last-minute webpage and social media, but I checked yours and actually find myself quite satisfied, even interested. Hence, the questions, which ironically seen as doubts and scepticism, while other projects that I find myself sceptic about seems rarely confronted me about my horde of questions.

This is umm... like... what? Bumping an old project? Awaking it? Or resurrecting the dead project? I peeked at your telegram and the last update happened on December 2019? What'd you do the past year and why do you decide to resurface now?

It's roughly like the case of eos with wombat (wombat allows free eos address creation)? And about the USDC, one question that crossed my mind when reading this was the "trading fee". As withdraw-er basically trade their ANSR to USDC (though backended), will they receive the USDC in full amount or will there be a tx fee for converting them?

And sorry about the confusion, I was not referring to your... website (?) or other media of yours, I was referring to my posting format. I forgot to delete one bbcode when I snipped our conversation, resulting a rather untidy looks because my post were mixed up with the quoted post.

I have to say out front that I'm not familiar with Lobstr, so I didn't know how it works (I barely roam around XLM), but I assume (from a brief visit to their site) they're a wallet provider? If I am correct, does it means the one and only withdrawal method is to that platform? Or would the users be able to withdraw to whichever xlm address they want to?

edit: just noticed an untidy posting format

If I may jump in to join the conversion, what'll be the preventive measure for multi account? Even with 30/month limitation, if someone created 100 accounts and (let's say) tweaked posting bots that trash posting on this forum a bit, it'll still be troublesome

And ads. I see that the pro packages include a "no ads" benefit, so there is a plan to populate the site with ads. It's not something wrong, though, just pointing out the obvious.

Like @mandor, I am also curious about spam filter. One thing that keeps crossing my mind is how you plan to prevent people from abusing the system by asking "what day is today?" or "what number comes after 1?" to reap the reward.

So why don't you just create half of the total supply from the start? I mean 5x10^14 (too lazy to think the proper numeral for that many zeros) instead of 1x10^15? Wouldn't it brings you to the same situation? With less works too, since you don't have to send the token to 0xdead

Do I get this correctly: user earned fixed token for posting questions, and others also earned some token for answering the question? So who'll buy the token?

I had this ghostly memory of a project with same characteristic not so long ago, with enormous total supply which immediately halved, and I think I've never heard of that project again anymore. I can't help buy wonder if the team behind this is the same as that project.

Well, if we traced back, I am not the one suggesting binance, or saying anything about it at all. I am simply suggesting to go with just latoken instead of taking exmarket too. Ask the one bringing binance into the topic, @pintadj

I didn't say the team don't hold anything, I asked, there's a huge difference between statement and question. I say or made statement when I know something. I asked because I wanted to know.

If it is not clear enough, here, according to their tokenomy, the total supplies are divided as follows:


No team, no development allocation. Unless that by "marketing" they meant it "team and development". Hence, I asked if team really didn't allocate anything for them