When I checked on https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/lattice-token/markets/ seems we have few volume on hoo exchange, is it the green light has been turned on? Since I am an hoo exchange user, and have made a few trades there, I'll probably use those spots to make benefit from trading my LTX later. I'm also a HOO user and have some LTX. but to trade LTX on HOO I think it would be better if we wait for the official statement from the Lattice team. moreover, even you say the green light, but I see the volume is still very low. Read again. He asked about the green light, not saying. Question not statement. And he also said volume is few. His post didn't contradict with what you believe, it's in line.
About Hoo, tho, the scenario were Lattice team themselves who severe ties with HOO due to ethical conflict. So it's very possible that HOO still list LTX pair, it was just without team's blessing |
|
|
|
Where are the dates on your roadmap? They're also not there on the whitepaper, just words. I assume we're at "uniswap lost and liquidity lock" phase? When will the next roadmap expected to be cleared?
It is better if they will have approximate timeline on when those items will be accomplished. But some are not putting dates so people will not expect something on that particular time period. The offer is very attractive with this yield farming feature. However, with so many DeFi projects, how can they be so sure that they will gain customers here and really earn income? They need to find actual use case and not just offer this yield farming, as many defis are already doing it. The exact role of roadmap is to give people something to look forward to, to expect development accomplished, and to gauge team's effort to develop the project at certain time frame. If their reason to remove dates on roadmap is to make people not expecting something at certain time, wouldn't that sounds a bit lazy because it seems like they don't want to put full effort to chase their own target time? |
|
|
|
I hope SEC will try to find where are the scammers who have created the shit scam ubiatar project.
Unless someone submitted formal complaint, they won't conduct any investigation, and I don't think anyone has submitted one so far. I think that we could also still find the identity that has posted by the scammer.
Who? Francesco? Sure, it's an easy task. Even though he has deleted his picture from his linkedin profile, nothing really gone from the internet. Just google "Francesco Raco", you'll see his pictures, like this one that neatly has him showing off his Ubiatar nametag.  Even steemit still have their article about this project, complete with team photos. https://archive.is/RliGB |
|
|
|
|
Where are the dates on your roadmap? They're also not there on the whitepaper, just words. I assume we're at "uniswap lost and liquidity lock" phase? When will the next roadmap expected to be cleared?
|
|
|
|
No sir . We have a vision and when we talk we like to talk with proof. I respect all members here but we have too our project
And we will make the success. By the way it's not a ponzi.
Thanks
Pyramid scheme, multilevelmarketing, HYIP, you can choose whatever terms you'd like. The bottomline is: does your project sell anything or give other benefits for holding other than affiliates, referral bonus, etc? |
|
|
|
Usage of Constellation is giving many features to Lattice and it becomes faster and less expensive settlement due to the use of the Constellation
I haven't used the constellation network yet so really interesting what it will bring to lattice exchange. As I am also looking for alternatives to uniswap, we will see what advantage it will give to dex users. I hope it is user friendly and will require competitive fees, as this is the common problem these days. The fees involved and the liquidity of specific token you want to trade with. Constellation's fee is almost zero, it was stated here on previous post somewhere, but I thought integrating LTX to DAG chain will only happen next year or two? They're currently still on ethereum blockchain |
|
|
|
Firstly thanks for all . I see many criticisms here
I want to ask, did you read the Risk Disclaimer in the ANN.
Secondly about listing and nasdaq
We have said the goals of the developers that mean target
It is not a promise . And we work for the best to our users
Thirdly We know that most projects become scams and this should be curbed. But not all. We are working on success
Note : about the ETD it's just a name . It has nothing to do with Ethereum.
In other words, your disclaimer said that you acknowledge that your project is ponzi and just ponzi, and your member should expect loss at one point sooner or later? |
|
|
|
Wait, were the token also stolen by dev? I thought the main issue with then was they cheated hunter by paying 95% less and later on got a taste how hunters retaliate by ruining their reputation (everything goes spiralling down after that).
The bounty issue was just the tip of the iceberg, after you follow the whole development of this "project" you can clearly see that it was a scam since the beginning, they never had any real intention to keep going, they just wanted to get the money and then slowly disappear from Telegram, social media, etc. Same goes with Idex exchange, it was just to gain some time and give the people an exchange, but there was no volume, so once again it was a fake move. That's a trick to fool the investors, the scammers were acting like they had been seriously developed the product and then they have no said anything related to the development or progress that happened with the team. i have seen how the campaign was going on in the past. The scammers were delaying the campaign even if the hunters didn't push this scam project to be listed on idex and the scammers will try to did it. Ubiatar didn't even have the volume on idex. Ahh, now I remember how they tricked enthusiasm by having multi account on tg, and switching between users and admin, pretending to be interested or asking technical details while actually no one from real member or cryptocommunity actually that interested or curious. |
|
|
|
As far as I remember, there is no percentage bonus if we participate in purchasing LTX tokens during yesterday's IEO, right? If this is true the price should be able to survive, I also wonder what caused the price to drop, even though they are all bought it for IEO price on that day.
But I still believe, LTX can pass the IEO price in the short time, I also hope the bounty token doesn't have much bad impact later.
Several factors can be attributed, especially that of private investors, am not very sure of the price range of the private investors but i think it was pretty low than the ieo price, again, it is almost a common norm in crypto that every newly launched project will first tank before it will beginning to climb, in my opinion, i think the private investors are dumping their stack, i don't see any other valid reason why price keep tanking, and the circulating supply is very decent, should not be a problem to drag the price down. but i believe lattice is one good project, price will rise in due time. Presale were 0.1, 0.15, and 0.25. So yeah, the earliest presale participants could be profiting and exited the project. But I don't think that's the case. Given they know how fast the IEO were (which can be translated as enthusiasm) they'll most likely expecting to sell at a higher price. As we are moving to realm of speculation now, I'll say it was rather unintentional, the token sales participants (both presale and IEO) were trying to induct a panic sell, wishing they could buy more and cheaper, but well, everybody thinks the same and everything were snowballing |
|
|
|
You tokenization packages seem expensive. How can someone beginner with a nice idea afford you? How many projects you've successfully accomplished under Stobox.
Stobox has a number of ongoin clients. The one which is public is - https://medium.com/@stobox_platform/accelerator-fund-igniter-100-announces-25-million-sto-with-stobox-e642e345a296Even though tokenization brings advantages to any-size busness, we tend to focus on clients with existing revenue-generating business and sufficient funding. The technology of securities tokenization is yet to be adopted in the next 5-10 years. Eventually costs for tokenization will decline and be affordable to an idea-size business. After all, how would you attract finance to an idea-size venue anyway, if there is lack of budget for legal, tecnical and marketing activities. Wasn't it a little bit backwards? Business goes tokenizing their company (or assets, or basically everything) because they need liquid fund. But to do that, to acquire liquidity, they first need to spend some money to pay your service, and it's arguably not cheap. While companies that can afford to pay your rate (or if we borrow your words, clients with existing revenue-generating business and sufficient funding) most likely have some collateral they can give to acquire loan from banks, thus probably won't need your service and doesn't have to tokenize themselves. I didn't try to question your credibility, so don't get me wrong, I was just trying to determine your position here. Let's be realistic. Money make money. Tokenization does not solve the problem of project's attractveness. It solves many other problems, including the problem with liquidity. There are hundreds of thousand, if not millions companies that generate double digit growth and have challenges with financing. Debt is not the solution for most of the cases. These companies are eager to grow, but have certain bolttle-necks which we resolve. Investors are likely to participate in investment opportunities by revenue generating businesses, but the demand for sucurities of an idea-stage company would be very low. Finally, Stobox business model is to focus on revenue generating clients who are eager to shift their relationship with existing investors to blockchain. As well as to attract new investors by showing real growth, paying dividends, and performing marketing actions. I'll have to agree with you on money makes money part. However, how sure are you on your position against competitor, in a sense that, instead of using your platform with their fees, startups and financially challenged companies goes to experienced blockchain individual which probably offered lower price? |
|
|
|
listing fee will be like the first time?
Re-Listing Fee should be ask directly to the exchange itself. and why to re-listing if LTX can be listed on another exchanges? This, I would agree. If (re)listing fee require same amount like the first time, then it.would be better to allocate the fund to other and bigger exchange. For Dev, pursuing other alternative of available exchange, though, I assume LTX pair will be available on MVP launch? |
|
|
|
You tokenization packages seem expensive. How can someone beginner with a nice idea afford you? How many projects you've successfully accomplished under Stobox.
Stobox has a number of ongoin clients. The one which is public is - https://medium.com/@stobox_platform/accelerator-fund-igniter-100-announces-25-million-sto-with-stobox-e642e345a296Even though tokenization brings advantages to any-size busness, we tend to focus on clients with existing revenue-generating business and sufficient funding. The technology of securities tokenization is yet to be adopted in the next 5-10 years. Eventually costs for tokenization will decline and be affordable to an idea-size business. After all, how would you attract finance to an idea-size venue anyway, if there is lack of budget for legal, tecnical and marketing activities. Wasn't it a little bit backwards? Business goes tokenizing their company (or assets, or basically everything) because they need liquid fund. But to do that, to acquire liquidity, they first need to spend some money to pay your service, and it's arguably not cheap. While companies that can afford to pay your rate (or if we borrow your words, clients with existing revenue-generating business and sufficient funding) most likely have some collateral they can give to acquire loan from banks, thus probably won't need your service and doesn't have to tokenize themselves. I didn't try to question your credibility, so don't get me wrong, I was just trying to determine your position here. |
|
|
|
The "price performance" here is because LTX were on their Shooting Star platform (much like coinbase's MoonBase, I assume) where they select few token to have special IEO. Doesn't necessarily means being delisted like the case of low trading volume like what usually happens with other projects. LTX price just didn't perform like how they predicted (which... the price dive down themselves is not a secret to this community). With AMA coming to us soon and MVP around the corner, price should stabilize. Hope the AMA clears some questions about the project. Being delisted is almost never a good thing for public. Maybe there are some other reasons behind it that we don't know. Hmm... Did you read the article given by the post? Or what Wedosgibas and I said? The explanation is exactly there, if you put some effort to read. The reason was because LTX were on bitmart through shootingstar platform, they require projects within this platform to achieve certain price. And because LTX went down, this condition was not met. Thus, delisted. Simple as that. There were no negative news or reason behind this delisting. |
|
|
|
|
Which one is FAG? Was it the one emerged roughly one month ago, gained huge hype (literally just hype) and died hours later when dev immediately exit scamming and everyone act surprised? And now this token won't run just because their name is poorrug?
|
|
|
|
Don't miss to join this project but I will try to find out the progress of this project or read the white paper. Good, it's important to do your own research, don't hesitate to check the main video in the first post, it does a good job at giving a simple explanation to introduce you to XSL Labs Thank's, I have my own way of seeing that this project is worthy of being defended or fought for in the future. I hope this project is one of my hopes.  The KYC one-stop-platform kinda entice me, I personally think it'll be a huge help to support fintech, both the decentralized and centralized ones. With so many fintech platform requiring KYC, I myself felt overwhelmed and cautious on which platform I've given my ID to. If we can do the KYC in just one place and it works universally to other platforms... it can be huge |
|
|
|
The "price performance" here is because LTX were on their Shooting Star platform (much like coinbase's MoonBase, I assume) where they select few token to have special IEO. Doesn't necessarily means being delisted like the case of low trading volume like what usually happens with other projects. LTX price just didn't perform like how they predicted (which... the price dive down themselves is not a secret to this community). With AMA coming to us soon and MVP around the corner, price should stabilize. |
|
|
|
Well, so far they haven't dumped their token, have they? And so far, there is a huge and solid community supporting them, that's built and proven by time. Did you not aware you're "riding" their name and reputation by now? Publishing on a forum named bitcointalk, not a bitcoinrandtalk, and jokes on you, even your project name were borrowing their name. Why was that if it's not to ride their reputation that's proven by time to be the most favorable crypto? I hate to be the one to say it. You're all cryptocurrency critics yet are arguing for the opposite of the core benefits of cryptocurrency as well as the main problem which the purpose of crypto in Satoshis mission was to remove.
I'll quote from the Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto:
"What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust,
allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted
third party."
If you'll are trying to trust the team on a project created to remove the need for trust. Well folks, please get some logical understanding before teaching those trying to learn the opposite of what the mission of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency is in regard to trust.
I hate to be the one breaking it out to you, but we're in 2020, it's not 2017 anymore. The mayhem of the waves of scam brought by 2017-2018 morphed cryptocommunity, they need to do researches on new projects, they need to know essential info and be assured their investment will be safe. And (again, I repeat myself) so far you didn't show any good sign. Not only you refused to answer essential info asked, you're also inconsistent in attending this thread, only clocking in every two or three weeks, and going evasively aggressive in purpose to avoid answering questions. Should this kind of behavior encourage people to invest? Would you invest on someone who refuses to tell you anything they asked? Here, I'll quote the first article shown by google if you searched the meaning of trustless cryptocurrency to reply your ultimate weapon of "bitcoin this so i this and nakamoto that so I that" It’s important to consider that trustless systems do not completely eliminate trust, but rather distribute it in a type of economy that incentivizes certain behaviors. In such cases, trust is minimized but not eliminated. I think you'll need to redefine your "trustless" understanding, or perhaps learn more about the culture of recent cryptocurrency ICOs. |
|
|
|
From what I gathered from your WP, you basically offered a platform where people can store their data, then use the platform to login, perform KYC/AML, and the likes of it?
We propose several distinct things that can be used synergistically. An interoperable decentralized identifier that works within our ecosystem but that can be used on other systems because of its generic syntax (w3c standard). This DID can (not necessarily) be verified by KYC and thus ensure the authenticity of the users' identity if they wish to share information about themselves, this will be particularly useful in dating or social platforms and more... A decentralized app platform automated by Smart Contract using our DID to ensure the protection of user data. This app store will bypass Google and Apple. A modular decentralized app (ONE) on which any exterior actor will be able to build an extension of its current service while benefiting from our decentralized identifier. The whole will work in synergy. I'd like to highlight DID for KYC first. Is there any plan (and how will it be implemented) to integrate this feature with crypto projects in general? I'm talking about mandatory ICO, exchanges' withdrawal, and things alike. Can we integrate your platform to another platform although they have no record of partnership with you? For instance, let's say I'm on ABC exchange and I'm required to do KYC. However, I'm reluctant to share my ID to ABC, given it is a new and questionable exchange. And it is known that ABC has no prior partnership with you. Is it possible that (perhaps in the future, with your platform so much advanced and developed) we just upload a certification from you on ABC's selfie or gov ID field to bypass the KYC? In other words, instead of giving our ID details to ABC, we just share a certification from you (or perhaps a link) and ABC will acknowledge it as a legal verification |
|
|
|
|
From what I gathered from your WP, you basically offered a platform where people can store their data, then use the platform to login, perform KYC/AML, and the likes of it?
|
|
|
|
|
Surely you have some ways to prevent scammers using your platform to create more trash projects, right? I can't imagine what'll happen to crypto world if literally anyone can issue new project, given that we're already littered with scams even without platform that can be used to facilitate token creation
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
Proven by time? What had to be proven of them? The proof was in the cryptographic algorithm that is instantly proven by logic. Not time. You folks seem to have 0 decentralization understanding. You'll are complaining that a decentralized project doesn't have centralized info? Are you'll for real? Go work at a bank.
