Would it alter and/or affect certain features they have? Like, telegram with their so-called super encryption (although I doubt its secrecy these days as I witnessed one specific group has an admin that can pull your numerical ID and the dates of your account creation), or others?
I am careful with the term "alter" as it indicates manipulation of the companys code and violation of TOS, but since Telegram could run on top of the framework layer, there would be a lot more communication alternatives which provide more features than using Telegram within their APP. I'm sorry, I failed to understand. Would you please rephrase in an easier sentence? And, if I may try to understand, you will not violate TOS of each app, will it be possible, to allows integration for many apps without changing some of their code? |
|
|
|
Why would people use your service instead of the good old twitter? There's already a crypto accounts and followers tweeting and retweeting things crypto-related (which means it already has its own crypto-environment", and more importantly, they're free.
Hi Mike, --snip-- Still a bit confused, so let's walk the thread slowly. Your project is about integrating social medias like twitter, telegram, and discord into one interface, and cross them all? Like, a telegram account can message a discord user? Yes, with help of bridges and dummy accounts we will provide cross communications, even if you donīt have a telegram account you can still access the chat and message other users. There are two options so far: Using shared dummy accounts, which will delete your history and access after some time and creating a unique account from within the framework with a few clicks (without adding any additional informations, as all required informations are stored in one database). So you can store all your user credentials on the blockchain (creating and updating data does charge a transaction fee) and login one time with your wallet (signed message) to access all networks. The DOMO Community will be the very first usergroup utilizing and testing this new environment, we will open up more features to the public over time, if the Community agrees to do so. So by spreading Domocoins to everyone, we make sure we have a big userbase to test the framework on and add (or delete) features and functionalities. One of the reasons, why I am spreading Domocoins with airdrops, bountys and partnerships like crazy. If you want, you can help us spread the word (so everyone owns at least 1 DOMO) and earn a Masternode (1000 Domocoins) for your effort. Would it alter and/or affect certain features they have? Like, telegram with their so-called super encryption (although I doubt its secrecy these days as I witnessed one specific group has an admin that can pull your numerical ID and the dates of your account creation), or others? |
|
|
|
What a kind of massive platform, looks pretty good by its looking. However, I wonder if you will doing such public sale of your tokens?
Thank you for your kind words. Actually we are starting our Private Sale round, that it's available on our website Is this correct that there are two tokens in your project, STK and SCT? What's the difference and how they complete each other?
Yes, it's correct. We elaborated an hybrid system (STK + SCT) STK are the tokens used for obtaining the monthly SCT airdrop, discounts, VIP status, Free tickets for exclusive VIP lotteries (instead of average lotteries). Users will be able to receive advantages by holding/using them on Fidelity Suite Platform. SCT are tokens with a fixed value and they are backed up by FIAT. SCTs will be used by merchants as a form of loyalty reward and by users for redeeming prizes. The SCT fixed value will permit merchants to use Fidelity Suite platform safely without analyzing cryptocurrency price oscillations. If you have more depth questions I invite you to take a look at our Whitepaper & FAQ section on our website. You are also invited to join our Telegram Group https://t.me/FidelitySuiteAnd this SCT is... Soma Community Token? There's already a token with SCT as their symbol, wouldn't it be a problem with the contract details? Actually not a problem, because SCT and Soma Community Token will surely have different contract address, that bring them unique. Regarding the ticker we don't aim to have SCT listed on exchanges for trading activities (SCT are meant to be used in the daylife as a reward by merchants). In the end, for what concern the long term vision, we don't exclude the fact that we may develop our own native SCT blockchain. So your Suitecredit will never leave your system, thus never be listed on CMC, and can never be mistaken with Soma Community? The ones that works as a trading coin, a token that will be used to be encashed into fiat, etc, will be the STK? |
|
|
|
Why would people use your service instead of the good old twitter? There's already a crypto accounts and followers tweeting and retweeting things crypto-related (which means it already has its own crypto-environment", and more importantly, they're free.
Hi Mike, --snip-- Still a bit confused, so let's walk the thread slowly. Your project is about integrating social medias like twitter, telegram, and discord into one interface, and cross them all? Like, a telegram account can message a discord user? |
|
|
|
Twitter is banning real accounts for no reason. Twitter is centralized, not on a blockchain and we would have many opportunities with DOMO. Since its community oriented, we will be able to build our own environment as we wish. Things that are needed or wanted could be implemented easily or linked to each other. I rly like this vision, could change many things and open new doors. Yes, you need at least 1 DOMO to get in (as for now), but it shouldnt be a problem to get DOMOS for free to hop onboard. I would donate some  Is it too much to assume (judging from the tone of your post) that you spoke in behalf of the development team? If so, you perhaps can help me with my question |
|
|
|
What a kind of massive platform, looks pretty good by its looking. However, I wonder if you will doing such public sale of your tokens?
Thank you for your kind words. Actually we are starting our Private Sale round, that it's available on our website Is this correct that there are two tokens in your project, STK and SCT? What's the difference and how they complete each other?
Yes, it's correct. We elaborated an hybrid system (STK + SCT) STK are the tokens used for obtaining the monthly SCT airdrop, discounts, VIP status, Free tickets for exclusive VIP lotteries (instead of average lotteries). Users will be able to receive advantages by holding/using them on Fidelity Suite Platform. SCT are tokens with a fixed value and they are backed up by FIAT. SCTs will be used by merchants as a form of loyalty reward and by users for redeeming prizes. The SCT fixed value will permit merchants to use Fidelity Suite platform safely without analyzing cryptocurrency price oscillations. If you have more depth questions I invite you to take a look at our Whitepaper & FAQ section on our website. You are also invited to join our Telegram Group https://t.me/FidelitySuiteAnd this SCT is... Soma Community Token? There's already a token with SCT as their symbol, wouldn't it be a problem with the contract details? |
|
|
|
Umm... Something that's in major language, perhaps? I don't even know what the articles about. Maybe the keywords in english? Can you use google translator ? If I would bother translating every pages, sure. But it'll rather be bothersome. If you can instead tell the keyword or redirect me to an international articles? |
|
|
|
|
Is this correct that there are two tokens in your project, STK and SCT? What's the difference and how they complete each other?
|
|
|
|
Given the production capacity, can I safely assume that you're a big company? If i am correct, why do you still need ico?
At the moment we have only our own transport company that will provide the logistics of the enterprise, ICO needs to attract funds for the purchase of land, building of the production building and the purchase of equipment. In fact, we are a startup, but with extensive experience in implementing similar projects. How long does your company established, then? And what makes you so sure with the capacity and its future demands, given that you're relatively new? |
|
|
|
Project Dead ?
He is online and actively posts comments promoting his service on other ico threads, but didn't bother coming here. Kind of safe to say he took evasive step and a cautious step should be taken |
|
|
|
Umm... Something that's in major language, perhaps? I don't even know what the articles about. Maybe the keywords in english? |
|
|
|
|
Hi, can you please direct me to some article or news about your company or your founder? I find it odd that despite the claim of being in business for 50 years (which imply it is a rather strong company) there were no mention of you.
|
|
|
|
|
Given the production capacity, can I safely assume that you're a big company? If i am correct, why do you still need ico?
|
|
|
|
Your service will allow content owner to sell their pictures for tokens, what will be the rights of the content buyer possess? Like, do they legally allowed to use the contents as they see fit?
Maybe you know the site " https://stock.adobe.com/images/" where you can buy licenses of pictures. They sell a standard license (Cannot use asset prominently in merchandise or products for resale) and a premium license (Asset may be featured in merchandise or products for resale). A similar solution would be possible for our App. Ofc you could also create custom licenses. Just imagine seeing a picture posted on SocialX by a someone you donīt even know but having the option to directly buy the licensing rights and using it on your website. It would be a win-win situation. Weīll always try to create the best solution possible, so feel free to leave your recommendations My concern lies on the recent MO of scam ICO where the scammers use someone's pic as their fake team profile. With the possibility that if they buy a full license of someone's content (in this case, the content owner's selfies) and they're entitled to use the bought content as they sees fit, wouldn't this complicate some cases? |
|
|
|
|
Your service will allow content owner to sell their pictures for tokens, what will be the rights of the content buyer possess? Like, do they legally allowed to use the contents as they see fit?
|
|
|
|
|
Why would people use your service instead of the good old twitter? There's already a crypto accounts and followers tweeting and retweeting things crypto-related (which means it already has its own crypto-environment", and more importantly, they're free.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you be... maybe a little bit more explaining about this project? I need to take a look at your site to learn that this is indeed an ICO, and I find it rather difficult to read white text with your background. So if you can add the essential info here, it'll be nice
|
|
|
|
This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters
There were not any kind of mention of forbes as the source, and although there is a guideline for the proper way to cite sources, but as you kept insisting that what you do is not wrong, let's clear this issue by this way, kindly show the legal permit issued by forbes that you're allowed to copy part of their article. With this said, I'd like to point us out to one of forbes article, a fraction at least. All of the information, content, services and software displayed on, transmitted through, or used in connection with the Website or Other Channels, including for example, advertising, directories, guides, articles, opinions, reviews, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, software, data, and all other related matters, including without limitation, the selection and arrangement of the aforementioned and the "look and feel" of this website (collectively, the "Content"), are protected under applicable copyrights and other proprietary (including but not limited to intellectual property) rights and are the intellectual property of Forbes, and its affiliated companies, licensors and suppliers. Forbes actively protects its rights to the Content to the fullest extent of the law. The copying, rearrangement, broadcast, rewriting for broadcast or publication, redistribution, modification, use or publication by you in any medium, directly or indirectly, of any such matters or any part of the Website, including the removal or alteration of advertising, except for limited rights of use granted hereunder, is strictly prohibited. You may not use such material except as provided in these Terms and Conditions.
As most of us have a copy of your WP and the said forbes article is available for public, it'll be safe to say that the evidences (should the need arise) is available and present. You might want to consult to Mr. David Meszaros for this, as he is listed as your legal advisor on the team structure. |
|
|
|
Well?
Like I mentioned before these are common terms. Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community. Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second. So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam |
|
|
|
this is just talking about blockchain in general not coinware whilst, its a common term.
Good day
The term is a simple word and worldly use in the ecosystem
There is a huge and clear difference between accidentally having a similar idea of common term and plagiarism. As shown in evidence, the words are verbatim. Learn the difference. Nothing like plagiarism because we never follow the path of bitfinex and this quite a new exchange with unique feature Let me invite you to learn about the definition of plagiarism, as quoted from one of the definition by plagiarism.org; "to use (another's production) without crediting the source". And allow me to invite the three of you to learn about what can be considered as plagiarism, as cited from plagiarism.org as well 1. turning in someone else's work as your own
2. copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
3. failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
4. giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
5. changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
6. copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not
Well? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
