Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 01:32:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 147 »
121  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Tesla considering partnership with peercoin on: June 06, 2015, 07:36:01 PM
I tried to beg/borrow/steal a Tesla Roadster last year for use as a NXT promo vehicle, but Tesla had just stopped selling the Roadster, and had got rid of their promo fleet.
But, heres some concept art:



Tesla (or any other car manufacturer) could certainly use blockchain tech to keep individual vehicle records, but I'm not sure that blockchain tech has any real advantages, as opposed to a centralised database.

Couldn't get the Tesla and had to settle for the NXT Lambo? Cheesy
122  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Bitmark on: June 06, 2015, 07:34:11 PM
"There should be some tangible developments for the community around the week of May 1st."

Any updates on what that might be, or do we just need to wait?

From what I know all we have left now is to wait :p

But not too long Smiley the first deliverable is well under way and I'm free all week with it being my primary focus.

Is BTM dead? We haven't gotten any updates in over a month. There's no news on diff algorithm change. Someone dumped 25k BTM on Poloniex, taking a shit on the price. The only activity in this thread now is people trying to sell what they have before they lose it all.

Is there any active development going on? Can we expect updates? Can we expect marking to be released? Can we expect any news at all? Or is this the end of the line for Bitmark?

It's not dead, people are still around. Mark is currently in a bad situation but is getting it sorted out now. Medic and Neleonele are in contact with him frequently, probably on a daily basis.

The multi user wallet app is supposed to be done or be very close to being done. I'm not sure exactly.

Everyone should be aware that things have been promised multiple times on slack but nothing was delivered. The developer Nathan aka Mark Phenig aka coinsolidation has not logged in to slack for a long time and no code has been uploaded to github. I'm not sure if any code even exists at this point.

Yeah, he hasn't logged in to the BTM slack for a while. But he's still around. Hopefully things get better soon and we can see some code.
123  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Tesla considering partnership with peercoin on: June 06, 2015, 03:24:23 PM
PPCoin was originally advertised as the first energy efficient cryptocurrency. So whether this is true or not, it at least makes sense.

I would love to see PoS grow. Hate how many people in Bitcoin outright reject it. And then they complain about how centralised Bitcoin is getting because of mining and how increasing block sizes leads to even more centralisation.
124  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Bitmark on: June 06, 2015, 03:19:30 PM
"There should be some tangible developments for the community around the week of May 1st."

Any updates on what that might be, or do we just need to wait?

From what I know all we have left now is to wait :p

But not too long Smiley the first deliverable is well under way and I'm free all week with it being my primary focus.

Is BTM dead? We haven't gotten any updates in over a month. There's no news on diff algorithm change. Someone dumped 25k BTM on Poloniex, taking a shit on the price. The only activity in this thread now is people trying to sell what they have before they lose it all.

Is there any active development going on? Can we expect updates? Can we expect marking to be released? Can we expect any news at all? Or is this the end of the line for Bitmark?

It's not dead, people are still around. Mark is currently in a bad situation but is getting it sorted out now. Medic and Neleonele are in contact with him frequently, probably on a daily basis.

The multi user wallet app is supposed to be done or be very close to being done. I'm not sure exactly.
125  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Nxt and the rise to the top. on: June 04, 2015, 08:28:09 AM
TaunSew, you're starting to sound like BlueMeanie. And that should scare you, since BlueMeanie is seriously mentally ill.
126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ★ [GMC] GameCredits - MANDATORY UPDATE • A Multi-Platform Gaming Currency [GMC]★ on: June 02, 2015, 09:54:50 PM
Good work everyone. Nice to see the issues resolved. Smiley
127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Do you trust Poloniex? on: June 01, 2015, 06:05:51 PM
I trust Poloniex the most out of any exchange personally.
128  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Bitmark on: June 01, 2015, 04:38:16 PM
Yeah, it says:

Quote
The wallet has not seen a block in over 60 mins. This is likely because of long block times on the coin network. Please check with an official block explorer and see what's happening.

There hasn't been a block in a long time, so it's just that I guess.

What's going on with the network!? I sent a transaction 3 days ago and there are only 3 confirmations on polo?!

Yeah, the hash power must be really low right now for it to be going this slow. Not sure what we can do other than try to get more people mining again. I think it adjusts in ~30 blocks or something like that, so it should improve a lot soon if we can get just a bit of hashing going again.
129  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Bitmark on: May 30, 2015, 12:15:22 PM
Yeah, it says:

Quote
The wallet has not seen a block in over 60 mins. This is likely because of long block times on the coin network. Please check with an official block explorer and see what's happening.

There hasn't been a block in a long time, so it's just that I guess.
130  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Bitmark on: May 30, 2015, 06:42:58 AM
hin dev, is wallet ok?
i see status wallet on bittrex was blocked for  1096 minutes.
i can't transfer my btm to anywhere, can you help bittrex ro solve this??
thanks

Slow block maybe? Or does blocked mean that they froze it?
131  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitShares Loves Puppies on: May 29, 2015, 08:39:18 AM

“Jim Willie is essentially an Icon in the new economy movement and I am not entirely certain he realizes it yet. 

What's this about NEM? I'm confused.
132  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: I am pretty confident we are the new wealthy elite, gentlemen. on: May 20, 2015, 09:19:17 AM
man that title could not reek anymore of bagholder, regardless if the market situation
 
 
...
  
I'm a simple a man with simple dreams of a waterfall pool with seven Russian women in mermaid outfits around it.  
  
You, and your Monero hating ass?  Enjoy the bargain bin, sucker.  
  
Tammy and her two shitty kids will always love you for who you are on the inside.

Cheesus you're classy. With all your activity lately here and on reddit and polo, and posts like this, I can't decide if you're a concern troll or just like 14 years old.

Actually for once this isn't a MoneroMan88 situation. Americanpegasus is actually a real guy: http://www.reddit.com/r/AmericanPegasus/

He's pretty infamous on /r/Bitcoin and /r/Buttcoin as well if anyone here reads reddit.
133  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: the situation with Doge on: May 17, 2015, 10:12:13 AM
From what I've been told Doge is currently a lot less inflationary than Bitcoin is. Something like Bitcoin is around 100% more inflationary.
134  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Which is the most annoying altcoin? on: May 17, 2015, 10:09:26 AM
Monero

Risto lives in Finland and the insane jails there allow access to the internetz.   Shocked  If there was a power shutdown effecting all of Finland, Monero threads would be "deaded" because they're all schizo Risto socks.   Shocked  Shocked

Think he lives in Estonia unless things have changed recently.
135  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: I am pretty confident we are the new wealthy elite, gentlemen. on: May 16, 2015, 07:33:39 PM
I am so worried that for some reason Americanpegasus seems to think just like I do. I hope that doesn't mean I'm crazy beyond rehabilitation.

In the words of Satoshi:  "We're either going to the moon, or we're going to zero.  Nothing in between.  #YOLOSWAG"

Wtf is with this Monero cheerleading? Not that Monero is bad or anything, but I thought you were supposed to be working Pegasuscoin.
136  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Nxt and the rise to the top. on: May 13, 2015, 09:54:53 PM


Please provide info on which trading houses are having problems with the wallet, if you can. I would like to get them some help. I haven't heard the problem you claim since Mintpal were saying they were interested in integration.



Sorry that I forgot to respond to this. Cryptsy is THE house that I know very well off that has had and still has continuous problems with NXT... as recently as 2 weeks ago with withdrawals not being possible FOR OVER A WEEK!. It is a well know fact that Cryptsy has had all kinds of problems with NXT since the very beginning and they don't seem to be even close to resolves for they continue to pop up.

I guess you were kind of counting on my not providing a straight answer (that would be a first, just for you to know). There have been others, including the one you mention too but I don't hyave first person, direct knowledge of them, therefore I don't mention them specifically. Cryptsy, being one of the biggest, I guess qualifies enough, right?

So, to put the baby to rest so to speak, IT IS INDEED A PROBLEM that a correlation clearly exists between the "success" of the platform and the decimation suffered by the price in recent months. FACT.

It is more than probable, for a huge percentage of crypto users will agree with that (and no, I don't have the specifics, but you yourself, in another thread, offer the BIGGEST corroboration of this possible), that the complexity of the coin, the wallet and the project, defined by me as the "intimidation factor", would precisely be he CAUSE you so direly are looking for FACT number one. Which, of course, were the points I wanted to hammer across in search of corrective solutions, before they were (tried to) diluted by you and other fan boys absolute nonsense in the last 2 pages of posts.

So, I would suggest that an efforts of significant proportions should be made to significantly REDUCE that complexity and to try to eliminate the "intimidation factor". I am convince such efforts could produce significantly positive results in adoption, at least inside crypto. And by that I mean going WAY BEYOND the scope of what has been done so far that, frankly, has only contributed to a clutter of "information" near impossible to sort out and, again, producing the exact opposite of the expected effect: Scaring people off rather than inform them and, through that information, making the intimidation disappear. I would even suggest something like one of two videos, as a good starting point. Perhaps a very simple FAQs section in the BTCT thread and on the Forum... NOT OPEN TO "CLARIFICATIONS" OR DEBATE, just simple, straightforward answers to common question. Perhaps also a whole thread dedicated to people who is new to the coin and (separated) the platform, in which to bring up the very basics along with the new features, again, in a simple, easy to understand BY EVERYONE, manner. I don't know, there are many actions that should be taken... first one, by a long shot, eliminating condescending post from fan boy jerkoffs with an agenda. Or, in more "civilized" terms, the solution would start only when recognition that the problem exist is achieved. In your particular case, starting by admitting that, precisely, yourself. Then -and only then- a debate, a productive one, is possible.

Not very likely, I'm afraid, if my intuition is to be trusted...

SuperNET will go a long way towards making NXT(and other cryptos) accessible.

The default mode of the GUI is a 'basic' mode, while the 'advanced' mode is built on top the NXT NRS, which I assume is one of the things you take issue with.

The Jay framework (http://jnxt.org/jay/) also falls under the umbrella of SuperNET and is going to provide something that's more lightweight.

There's all kinds of different things going on now that aim to improve the user experience.

I've heard a lot of hype about what SuperNet is going to do for NXT, VeriCoin, Opal, etc... And I hope that it does. SuperNet is an ambitious project, and sometimes the really big projects don't always work out. I hope that NXT isn't hanging all its hopes on SuperNet. I'd hate to see NXT go down if SuperNet fails. NXT has too much going for it to allow that.

From what I can tell it's not at all. There's a good amount of separation between the two projects from my viewpoint.
137  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Nxt and the rise to the top. on: May 13, 2015, 08:37:29 PM


Please provide info on which trading houses are having problems with the wallet, if you can. I would like to get them some help. I haven't heard the problem you claim since Mintpal were saying they were interested in integration.



Sorry that I forgot to respond to this. Cryptsy is THE house that I know very well off that has had and still has continuous problems with NXT... as recently as 2 weeks ago with withdrawals not being possible FOR OVER A WEEK!. It is a well know fact that Cryptsy has had all kinds of problems with NXT since the very beginning and they don't seem to be even close to resolves for they continue to pop up.

I guess you were kind of counting on my not providing a straight answer (that would be a first, just for you to know). There have been others, including the one you mention too but I don't hyave first person, direct knowledge of them, therefore I don't mention them specifically. Cryptsy, being one of the biggest, I guess qualifies enough, right?

So, to put the baby to rest so to speak, IT IS INDEED A PROBLEM that a correlation clearly exists between the "success" of the platform and the decimation suffered by the price in recent months. FACT.

It is more than probable, for a huge percentage of crypto users will agree with that (and no, I don't have the specifics, but you yourself, in another thread, offer the BIGGEST corroboration of this possible), that the complexity of the coin, the wallet and the project, defined by me as the "intimidation factor", would precisely be he CAUSE you so direly are looking for FACT number one. Which, of course, were the points I wanted to hammer across in search of corrective solutions, before they were (tried to) diluted by you and other fan boys absolute nonsense in the last 2 pages of posts.

So, I would suggest that an efforts of significant proportions should be made to significantly REDUCE that complexity and to try to eliminate the "intimidation factor". I am convince such efforts could produce significantly positive results in adoption, at least inside crypto. And by that I mean going WAY BEYOND the scope of what has been done so far that, frankly, has only contributed to a clutter of "information" near impossible to sort out and, again, producing the exact opposite of the expected effect: Scaring people off rather than inform them and, through that information, making the intimidation disappear. I would even suggest something like one of two videos, as a good starting point. Perhaps a very simple FAQs section in the BTCT thread and on the Forum... NOT OPEN TO "CLARIFICATIONS" OR DEBATE, just simple, straightforward answers to common question. Perhaps also a whole thread dedicated to people who is new to the coin and (separated) the platform, in which to bring up the very basics along with the new features, again, in a simple, easy to understand BY EVERYONE, manner. I don't know, there are many actions that should be taken... first one, by a long shot, eliminating condescending post from fan boy jerkoffs with an agenda. Or, in more "civilized" terms, the solution would start only when recognition that the problem exist is achieved. In your particular case, starting by admitting that, precisely, yourself. Then -and only then- a debate, a productive one, is possible.

Not very likely, I'm afraid, if my intuition is to be trusted...

SuperNET will go a long way towards making NXT(and other cryptos) accessible.

The default mode of the GUI is a 'basic' mode, while the 'advanced' mode is built on top the NXT NRS, which I assume is one of the things you take issue with.

The Jay framework (http://jnxt.org/jay/) also falls under the umbrella of SuperNET and is going to provide something that's more lightweight.

There's all kinds of different things going on now that aim to improve the user experience.

Really? Please take another look at this video linked in that page: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74tdKxKVZHU

I will not even add anything else, it really does speak volumes by itself.

It says in the title that it's a development video though.

The point is that the foundations are being laid out to build on top of. Things will become more abstracted over time as people continue working on improvements.
138  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Nxt and the rise to the top. on: May 13, 2015, 05:33:30 PM


Please provide info on which trading houses are having problems with the wallet, if you can. I would like to get them some help. I haven't heard the problem you claim since Mintpal were saying they were interested in integration.



Sorry that I forgot to respond to this. Cryptsy is THE house that I know very well off that has had and still has continuous problems with NXT... as recently as 2 weeks ago with withdrawals not being possible FOR OVER A WEEK!. It is a well know fact that Cryptsy has had all kinds of problems with NXT since the very beginning and they don't seem to be even close to resolves for they continue to pop up.

I guess you were kind of counting on my not providing a straight answer (that would be a first, just for you to know). There have been others, including the one you mention too but I don't hyave first person, direct knowledge of them, therefore I don't mention them specifically. Cryptsy, being one of the biggest, I guess qualifies enough, right?

So, to put the baby to rest so to speak, IT IS INDEED A PROBLEM that a correlation clearly exists between the "success" of the platform and the decimation suffered by the price in recent months. FACT.

It is more than probable, for a huge percentage of crypto users will agree with that (and no, I don't have the specifics, but you yourself, in another thread, offer the BIGGEST corroboration of this possible), that the complexity of the coin, the wallet and the project, defined by me as the "intimidation factor", would precisely be he CAUSE you so direly are looking for FACT number one. Which, of course, were the points I wanted to hammer across in search of corrective solutions, before they were (tried to) diluted by you and other fan boys absolute nonsense in the last 2 pages of posts.

So, I would suggest that an efforts of significant proportions should be made to significantly REDUCE that complexity and to try to eliminate the "intimidation factor". I am convince such efforts could produce significantly positive results in adoption, at least inside crypto. And by that I mean going WAY BEYOND the scope of what has been done so far that, frankly, has only contributed to a clutter of "information" near impossible to sort out and, again, producing the exact opposite of the expected effect: Scaring people off rather than inform them and, through that information, making the intimidation disappear. I would even suggest something like one of two videos, as a good starting point. Perhaps a very simple FAQs section in the BTCT thread and on the Forum... NOT OPEN TO "CLARIFICATIONS" OR DEBATE, just simple, straightforward answers to common question. Perhaps also a whole thread dedicated to people who is new to the coin and (separated) the platform, in which to bring up the very basics along with the new features, again, in a simple, easy to understand BY EVERYONE, manner. I don't know, there are many actions that should be taken... first one, by a long shot, eliminating condescending post from fan boy jerkoffs with an agenda. Or, in more "civilized" terms, the solution would start only when recognition that the problem exist is achieved. In your particular case, starting by admitting that, precisely, yourself. Then -and only then- a debate, a productive one, is possible.

Not very likely, I'm afraid, if my intuition is to be trusted...

SuperNET will go a long way towards making NXT(and other cryptos) accessible.

The default mode of the GUI is a 'basic' mode, while the 'advanced' mode is built on top the NXT NRS, which I assume is one of the things you take issue with.

The Jay framework (http://jnxt.org/jay/) also falls under the umbrella of SuperNET and is going to provide something that's more lightweight.

There's all kinds of different things going on now that aim to improve the user experience.
139  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Cryptonote implementation using Proof of Stake? on: May 12, 2015, 05:59:35 PM
Pebble is DPOS CryptoNote coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=909624

Interesting, I wasn't aware that a DPoS CN coin existed.
140  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Cryptonote implementation using Proof of Stake? on: May 12, 2015, 01:37:23 PM
I have been looking for something to set Pegasus coin apart, and I think this might just be the thing.  
  
Is it technically possible to create a cryptonote implementation (ala Monero) that is inflationary via PoS?

Oh my god.

The legendary americanpegasus has graced us lowly bitcointalk plebs with his presence. https://www.reddit.com/r/AmericanPegasus/ and often https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin as well, for those who don't frequent reddit.

And it seems Pegasuscoin is still on track!

To answer your question crypto_zoidberg is working on that project now, codename: Louis D'Or.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887482.0



Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 147 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!