This question has been asked several times on here, do a little searching to find the answer..

Its basically a hard game to play, you need:

The gems themselves, the ASICS, with all required documentation. (you could always start by ripping some older generation ASICs off a dead miner)
electronics engineering skills (got 4 years of university education?)
programming skills (C, C++, what ever is needed to make the microcontroller to talk to both host and ASIC)
PCB Manufacturing tools (you need more then copper clad and etching tank)

so what do you have?
 
If I was in your shoes, I'd look into reviving dead miners, or get a few U3s, rip the old micro off, and get, say, a Teensy to talk to the chips, try and make it more stable.

All right, i should be all back up and running now

Exactly! Lets see some real evidence on this hardware

oh I fully accept if i cant get it running and we hit a block in the mean time i don't get my cut, just gotta get my arse into gear to get it back up and running.
 at least you still have my donations running, so that increases the chance by 0.5%

I've been having power issues with the laptop the stick is attached to, I keep forgetting to reset the system.. only 4 days down..

That thing look fine..

I would try adding
.. in the cgminer commands, see if that allows it to start hashing, the 512 may be to much for the stick to work on within the 10 seconds

So you're Xircom huh? you lost your account on the 23rd yes? and after that you signed up for Xircom2 on the 24th.

So, do you claim all posts on here as Xircom? Therefore you are Shilling for YM? and being the Shitlord who thinks unfavourably to any hobbyists miners and bitcoin enthusiasts because you invested 10s of thousands into hardware?

Or are you going to say "No that was Beliza who did that!"?

Yep, went though all the snapshots in that list, nothing other then the one presented.

yep, just double checked this, the logged password was changed on January 23, 2016, 12:05:27 PM, last Post from Xircom was January 22, 2016, 07:19:01 PM

There is no other logs in there with password changes Before the suspected "hack".

So..
A:  BTCT seclogs don't record password changes past certain dates(hold 1 month of records), it could of happened over a month back..
B: Xircom2 be lying about getting hacked.. worst case: could be a hacker themselves trying to pull some "Social Engineering" to hack the real Xircom? unlikely, probably just Xircom trying to cover up some mistakes..

or C: gotta live with the fact that there are asholes on here, that push my buttons

So, what are you looking for off them?
if you want a price off me, i'd say AU$15 each, or AU$135 the lot, so about 0.24btc.
since you haven't mentioned where you are, cant say on postage, I would like to say none, but hey, pack 'em tight, shouldn't be any more then AU$25-30 to get to me.

so 0.3BTC?

if not, tell me a better price

So what am I missing here? Is it that Xircom is a hacked account, and what was written here by Xircom is false?
or is the hack after that fact?

"Nicht mehr bei eBay angemeldet" aka "No longer registered with eBay"

Its all good, I just wanted a better way to store my BTC, but have it on multiple systems too (for easier access). I'm just used to the old style of 1 address = your wallet = your security..

I'll just have to keep classic going for a "pay to" target, as a seller of items, receiver of coin, aka merchant (when applicable), one cant just "request" payments off every customer.
 
Yeah, the *.wallet file is a classic thing, just had to play with the HD to see it isn't in there, blockchain.info site has multibit as one of the external manager for their wallet they give you.

I understand the concept better now, thank you, just as long as multibit HD doesn't lose any address information (hence losing coins) over computer issues (crashed on writing data to disk, so data gets corrupted, etc..), just in case of tat happening, multiple instances of the one wallet will be run on different systems, so I should be right..
..Also backups

the hardware wallet idea does intrigue me, I may have to get a Trezor one day..
Also, the automated payments to the devs, I have not one little problem with that, they had that clear at the start of getting the software, if I didn't like it I would of moved on by now. its just like you getting 30 second ads at the start of an online video, they have to pay for their services too.

Watch out, Shitlord here dont talk to no plebs

yep, non-player, hence the obtaining and losing 6btc... thing you big big guy with many moneys so little people mean nothing to you? do you own your own business and treat their employees with no respect? listen Shitlord, without people living off tips every day that work to make you that coffee at starbucks every morning, where would you be? making your own coffee, eh?

Want me to be on the same level as you with BTC/Cash? hand some over so we can talk, Shitlord. whats this, don't want to lose like real people?
maybe you're going to now with Yesminer, sucks to be you.

so you bought zeus miners, a company that showed its hardware to people when they requested it, gave samples to the reviewers, and sold previous hardware.

So you bought from Mining ASIC Technologies, that one was sus as hell, buy they got a small number of units, showed their hardware, got some out, still many more that didn't get hardware. (you probably bought up all their stock, left the small people that bought 1 or 2 in the dust)

So you bought Spondoolie Techs SP20e, a company that showed its hardware to people when they requested it, gave samples to the reviewers, and sold previous hardware.

none of that mean Nothing, tell me your investments that you have LOST in. what? cant do that? to much of a Shitlord? don't want to talk to no plebs?

your previous dealings still do hold account for the people you gave money to, still with their refuesal to give reviewers a miner to look at, and no hardware for them to show, it doesn't hold water here.

Fare enough, if the Devs say upgrade, and you want to still use their software, you do as they ask, best way for security that they can implement.


yep, I see it, it also changes address each time..


so tip jars are bad practice? mining target addresses are bad practice? here I thought bad security (simple passwords/phrases) was the bad practice.
even if I uses multi addresses that all run off one key, if that key was "Password", its not 1 address compromised, its all of them. Please prove me wrong.

I understand the concept to "spread you BTC over different addresses", but I don't see how using the same key to several addresses makes any difference to security.
Also, cant import keys? how you Blockchain.info to *.wallet then? is that not "importing" a key?


um, did not the author want to drop classic? if not, why HD then? why not continue with classic? what am I missing here?

A: slightly drunk, made reading 10x harder..
A2: I'm used to 2-5 sentences per chunk of text, aka paragraph (you had 13 odd), it just me, I'll continue to do my trick, Ctrl+C Ctrl+V count the periods and return on the 3rd one...
III: You lazy son of a.. I know, it'll have very little change since the 1 lot of photos, maybe less wires for external control?
Quattro: I can see these be a nice replacement for them N-RM! or even 2 of 'em to replace the Avalon Modual3 I have cooking out 270GH/s, oh yeah!

anyway, I'll keep my eye on Bitfury for any info on when they sell them chips, and continue to hound them..

oooo, look at that, proof you gave people money, still no proof that they are not a scam or have any form of hardware..

so you're in the mentality to remove someone that has a different opinion to you? what are you? a SJW special snowflake? need your "safe space" on the internets? want a tissue for your daddy issue?


just to let you know, i lost 6BTC over a simple scam, i was given dates and times on when my product was delivered, etc. etc.
you dont just throw money down with someone who has "lol, preorder now, get your hardware when we make it, pay more get bonus!!"
if you ever had your eyes in the other "companies" that attempted to sell hardware, you'd know that you have lost out big time. these guys, like BFL can just "sorry, we cant give you hardware, brb, Hawaii!"

SHA256 only, so basically bitcoin only, there are some other SHA256 coinage out there, but they may or may not be worth it (here is an old list, some may not be active anymore: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=482002.0)

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CryptoNight its a different computational cryptography for mining, so it is unsuitable for the SHA256 processing cores in the ASIC. looks like cryptonight is designed for CPUs with 2MB of L2 cache and random number generator.

ccminer is a different program to cgminer, also the "-a" switch is for algorithm change.

So basically, No, you cannot use the BM1384 ASIC for other algorithms.

So, you wanted to drop the "Classic" for HD eh? with not a real easy path to "upgrade".. so following this "upgrade" path requires me to basically create a new wallet with HD and dump all coins from the "Classic" to it..

simple question, where the hell do you see the new wallet address in HD? I've clicked and flipped windows and boxes within this program to find a proper Ctrl+C/Ctrl+V to add in a "send to" address for classic.

since HD rotates addresses, looks like this makes it had to maintain a single public address/vanity address?

..and yes, I'm one of them "why change? whats wrong with Classic?" trying to change over.. I don't want to go down that path in here, there is already enough about it, just be happy that I'm willing to move over..