|
Nothing is inifinite on earth, noticing an extraordinary performance in the past 12 (or 15) years doesn't mean it will be like that in the next 12 coming years. If you win 12 times in a row at a roll dice game, would you bet to win the 12 next times? Actually there are certainly less chances for Bitcoin to continue to rise higher than to go lower since more and more people are in profit and will want to take them at some points. Don't forget its ATH was more than 2 years ago now (November 2021).
|
|
|
|
Et puis maintenant, il y a un petit nouveau: Gigaswap, un dex pour les OTC ( sur le reseau ethereum pour l'instant)
Mais bientôt, il pourra gérer n'importe quelle crypto sans qu'elle soit wrappée (en claire du vrai BTC contre du vrai Monero, du Dot ou du LTC) ! à suivre..
C'est ca le lien https://gigaswap.app ? Dis-donc difficile à trouver pour un exchange, à croire qu'ils se cachent. En revanche c'est uniquement des exchanges cryptos contre cryptos qu'ils proposent si j'ai bien compris (contrairement au service que propose OP). Bonjour Je partage avec vous ce groupe Bitcoin OTC Telegram La majeure partie des utilisateurs de ce groupe est située en Europe. Si vous achetez/vendez des crypto-monnaies en Europe contre de l'argent, vous êtes les bienvenus. https://t.me/FiatToBTCCa serait plus vendeur d'expliquer comment ca se passe contrairement. Comment celui qui envoie les fonds en premier est-il sûr de recevoir la contrepartie (en crypto ou fiat)? |
|
|
|
Ce qui est choquant c'est que d'après ce que je comprends CoinEx n'est pas un fiat exchange. Le seul moyen d'acheter et de vendre des cryptos avec/contre fiat étant de passer par des third-party providers qui achètent et vendent à leurs propres prix sans order book et donc sans possibilité de placer de limit order. Ca me paraitrait compréhensible à la limite pour un fiat exchange, même si le client ne se sert pas des fiats, mais là c'est effectivement une petite restriction de plus qui s'ajoute aux autres dans l'univers crypto, qui sera probablement bientôt reprise par d'autres exchanges cryptos malheureusement. https://support.coinex.com/hc/en-us/articles/4406221594009-How-to-Sell-Cryptos-for-Fiat-on-CoinEx |
|
|
|
|
It only applies if you don't except to win money when you gamble but you only gamble for fun IMO. Because the house edge of most games is very hard to overcome, so if you spend half of your winnings for tipping your friends, you have no chance to earn any money in the long run. So IMO it shouldn't be a hard rule, you should only do it in some occasions, and to people who need it or who are generous themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
That's an interesting poll, but I don't believe in the results. You should ask to none/fake gamblers to refrain from participating IMO. Because currently results are 100% for "I can wager against my dearest star player, club and team" and 0% against with 24 voters. While it's pretty well known that most people like betting on their favorite team or player.
|
|
|
|
Wallet is just a collection of addresses, having a new collection won't help your privacy if your transaction history leaves a trail. For example, you create two wallets, but then send coins from these wallets to the same deposit address on some service. Instead you should focus on practicing coin control to make sure that you don't obviously link your coins.
Don't you think it's harder to track all your transactions when they all belong to one same wallet? Once you make one trasaction, the change of the input goes to one other address of your wallet, and you can easily forget where come from the funds of this address, when you want to them several months or years later. While if you use different wallets for different origins, you always know the primary origin of your funds. So I think it's a good idea to do such a thing. Even if it implies to have to manage more HD wallets seeds. |
|
|
|
i don't know why the government keeps raising news about energy use in the crypto industry, do they think that energy use in the crypto industry is much higher compared to other industries? even though the crypto industry also contributes taxes and pays electricity to the country, why is this industry continuously monitored closely as something disturbing by the government. this is unfair and discriminatory against bitcoin..
That's certainly because electricity is not unlimited, you need to built plants and infrastructures in order to generate it and to deliver it. And mining Bitcoin doesn't bring much things to the US unfortunately, it doesn't create jobs or a real economy there. Miners only use american electricity to make money on international crypto exchanges without buying and selling anything in the country except electricity, so if it induces any net cost to the US, they will certainly tax crypto ming or ban it there. |
|
|
|
As a bitcoin trader and holder one should never settle for less
In life I have watched many rich people who want to make more and more money why is this so??
I have noticed that the rich always want more for there him self even though he has more him still want more to himself, so I will advise us as a bitcoin holder or trader don’t think because you are in your comfort zone makes you feel better that a fat lie I have realized that Comfort zone only makes us feel weaker and lazier
Most rich trader today keep this phase “ The pursuit of excellent is the bests “ so as I young trader don’t always see yourself as someone who is weak and lazy always sand strong in getting what you want at a best level.
You're talking to trader and crypto holders, but I don't understand how your advise could apply to a holder actually. What a holder could do to be better as you say? You don't need skill to hold cryptos, so you can't improve them. If you are trying to suggest they should hold the longer they can, it has nothing to do with skills, or being better. And there is no guarantee for them to get richer by doing that. It's just asking them to be more patient in order to face an higher volatility. |
|
|
|
VPN is something that is popular and widely used, including for gambling. Regardless of privacy issues or access to sites that are prohibited in a country. Regardless of whether a casino's policy allows the use of vpn or not, are there any differences in protection for gamblers when they come from countries where gambling is legal?
Such as protection for gamblers who are cheated by casinos because their games are considered suspicious or because their accounts are blocked unilaterally by the casino. If yes, how do report it? if there isn't then there is no difference between countries that legalize gambling and those that don't
There are very few ways to report such things unfortunately, since most crypto casinos are based at offshore jurisdictions like small islands or small countries far from most customers countries, providing poor regulation and protection for customers. So you can try to report to their gambling authorities but it could more efficient to report your dispute here, in the Scam Accusations section, on specialized sites like Casino Guru or Ask Gamblers, on review ones like Trust pilot, or on social medias. |
|
|
|
|
Cryptos shouldn't be like that. Because it means, people oustide of new technologies shouldn't use cryptos. And they will always stay reserved to a few part of the humanity unlike most progress. This is not acceptable, because it's not the goal of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. So we should find solutions to allow anybody to use cryptocurrencies without fear, if they need to. Technology must adapt to humans and not the other way around.
|
|
|
|
|
It's true, that's why they had so much success during the covid pandemic but casinos online are not the same than land-based casinos, they've not the same atmosphere, neither the same services. One good thing is that you don't have to manage chips. Everything is done by the computers of the platforms. And not having to calculate and check that, is a very good progress offered by the technology and this new way of gambling.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you leave a collateral to the borrower or to one escrow? Because how will you refund the loan if you lose all your bankroll? There is no guarantee you will return any fund if you lose without collateral. You could just say sorry bro, I lost it all I can't refund you and disappear elsewhere, even if you had good intentions initially. Gambling games/games of chance are random, it's their goal, so you can't predict your success unless you have a very efficient strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
Now you can invest in liquidity pool like Defi, it's safer than custodial centralized casinos bakroll, because they can't do exit scam and leaving with all the coins borrowed to the investors, or addind suddenly new requirements or restrictions for withdrawing your funds to prevent users claiming their funds. In addition they allow more transparency on the use and evolution of the bankroll by the casinos using the protocol and the liquidity pool.
|
|
|
|
|
Dingue cette histoire comment on peut envoyer 50000btc comme ca, ou accepter de les laisser? C'est un marché avec les autorités? Ou alors c'est la police/les autorités allemandes qui racontent ça pour ne pas dire qu'ils les ont "piqué" en pratiquant une perquisition illégale au regard du droit du pays dans lequel elle a été pratiquée (en Allemagne ou en Pologne d'après ce que je comprends)? Parce que céder 50 000 btc comme ca contre rien du tout, je comprends pas l'intérêt.
|
|
|
|
|
I think cryptos with features not supported by Bitcoin could be promising. Many technologies and features are emerging in the crypto universe and are not available in the BTC unfortunately : Web3, DeFi, GameFi, DAO, NFT, smart contracts, dApps, tokens, obfuscation, instant payments/transactions, cheap ones. One of them offering it could be the next Bitcoin. But marketing/adoption is also important and we know Elon Musk had plans for developping the economy of Dogecoin for example
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure you are using Trust Wallet and you've seen that on this wallet precisely? Could you share a screenshot of those balances and those messages please? Because I've never seen that or heard about it, on Trust wallet before. I guess you are confusing it with another wallet. In addition I wonder how you could get $3 from a dust attack, attackers doing it would be ruined very quickly if they would pay such amount for tracking random transactions, so you've made a mistake or you are targeted by someone very interested.
|
|
|
|
What is the essence of buying and hodling Bitcoin like is it to accumulate it till it attains ATH then we sell it off and wait for a dip and start buying and holdling again or just accumulate it and start using it as a digital means of exchange or are we going to continue till the 21 million Bitcoins have be mined, already 19 millions have been mined remaining 2 million because overtime, i have come across several topics about buy and hodl bitcoin so i actually wish to know the sole objective of acquiring bitcoins.
If it's you real plan, you should change it asap because nobody currently living on Earth is likely to be alive when the last BTC will be mined. It's currently scheduled for the year 2140, in 116 years. So maybe our next children will see it but even baby born today won't see it unless few of them will be able to break the longevity record on Earth, if Bitcoin still exist though. It's not a matter concerning our generation anyway. |
|
|
|
40 ou 42 c'est combien comme différence ?
2k non? Je comprends pas la question. L'essentiel c'est que finalement il n'y ait pas eu de dip et de panic sell à cause de l'effet buy the rumor, sell the news qui était attendu par beaucoup de monde, il a eu lieu dans une certaine mesure mais il a été très bref finalement puisque le mois cloture au-dessus des 40k. Après parfois pour une raison ou une autre, le marché met du temps à réagir. |
|
|
|
|
Le mois va se terminer assez largement au-dessus de 40k, aux alentours de 42k manifestement. L'année commence donc tres bien, et on peut dire que le premier mois des ETF s'est bien passé sans gros dip comme on aurait pu le craindre. Bitcoin a pris de bonnes résolutions visiblement. Maintenant on attend de voir la suite, une année qui commence peut mal se terminer, ou même tomber dans rouge dès les premiers mois sans se relever.
|
|
|
|
This is unacceptable. There's no reason for a book to hold your money hostage for over two months. I wish you luck in recovering your funds. Too many people accept the terms of service and allow a book to confiscate deposits. If the ToS says that you can shoot a person, it doesn't mean it's legal to shoot a person. Your Stake Account(s), retain all monies in such Stake Accounts and ban You from future use of the Website. This is too intrusive. Source of Funds and Source of Wealth. I agree with you, especially since it's written in their T&C they only require KYC documentation " to determine the identity and location of a Player." However, source of funds and source of wealth have nothing to do with the identity and the location of one customer. 4.8 Stake reserves the right, at any time, to ask for any KYC documentation it deems necessary to determine the identity and location of a Player. Stake reserves the right to restrict the Service, payment or withdrawal until identity is sufficiently determined, or for any other reason in Stake’s sole discretion. Stake also reserves the right to disclose a Player’s information as appropriate to comply with legal process or as otherwise permitted by the privacy policy of Stake (owner and operator of Stake), and by using the Service, you acknowledge and consent to the possibility of such disclosure. https://stake.com/policies/termsActually their T&Cs only allow them to ask proofs of funds and wealth in case of money laundering or terrorism financing suspicions, they call it " Enhanced KYC diligence" but they've never talk about that till now. They've just accused OP of multi-accounting from what I read. B. Enhanced Due Diligence and Ongoing Monitoring
Stake performs ongoing monitoring on its users in order to detect any behaviours or indicators that might raise suspicions in regard to money laundering and terrorism financing practices. For that purpose, Stake has implemented a set of red flag indicators that help it determine such behaviours and require further action from Stake in assessing the customer information.
Whenever one of those red flags is triggered, the user account will be suspended and Stake will pursue enhanced due diligence. Enhanced KYC diligence under this policy is deemed to include, but not limit to, the provision of:
Full legal name;
Country of citizenship;
Permanent Address (which, for an individual, must be a residential or business street address, and for an entity, must be a principal place of business, local office or other physical location);
Identification number (either a taxpayer identification number, or, if unavailable, a passport number and country of issuance, alien identification card number or number and country of issuance of another government-issued document evidencing nationality or residence and bearing a photograph or similar safeguard);
Identification Document; and
Source of Funds and Source of Wealth. https://stake.com/policies/anti-money-laundering |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
