Latest posts of: ghostlander

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 »

1141

Economy / Long-term offers / Re: [Loan Request] Need funds to run altdice.net - Special conditions

on: October 30, 2013, 09:53:54 PM

Ready to make an initial loan of 1K PXC for Altdice.net. Your conditions?

1142

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: mcxNOW raise 1 MILLION dollars in 12 hours!

on: October 30, 2013, 03:58:54 AM

Quote from: smoothie on October 30, 2013, 02:45:43 AM Has anyone entertained the idea of the exchange getting "hacked" and then claim the funds are now lost? Wasn't that what happened with the 250 BTC donation? RS to get hacked and coins stolen? No way Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on October 29, 2013, 09:14:02 PM Realsolid has made it to the finish line, it really doesn't matter what happens at this point, he has won and won big. There is simply no denying it. To the idiot that posted Realsolid is selling the exchange to users via MCXfee shares, you really need to educate yourself on what it is you bought. After the last shares are sold, I doubt we will hear very much from Realsolid, it won't be long before he sells the exchange and walks away incognito. At this point, there is absolutely no need to run with the BTC in the wallets as that would bring legions of people hunting for him as well possible legal action if found. A couple of years I stated that if he made it to where he is now, "Well done Realsolid, Well Played" Today is that day Well done Realsolid, Well Played! ~BCX~ Very well done actually. He can sell the remaining shares quietly to the Chinese or whoever else and disappear. He's made enough to buy some good real estate in Tassie or wherever else, etc.

1143

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] PhenixEx Notice

on: October 29, 2013, 10:30:36 PM

Quote from: MaGNeT on October 29, 2013, 07:50:46 PM Quote from: ghostlander on October 29, 2013, 07:30:12 PM Quote from: MaGNeT on October 29, 2013, 05:33:18 PM By the way, I still want my 1.288 BTC back and the 13k of PXC you promised for the "Jackpot Mining", but never paid. ZackClark wants his 500,000,000 ADT back. Joerii wants his 10 BTC and 13k (?) WDC back. And a lot of other people want their coins back too. And dont forget Nulo0b. You sponsored him but never paid him too, didn't respond to him either. I recall they spent 24K PXC on the advertising campaign aka Jackpot Mining to promote PhenixEx. 10K PXC at http://explorer.phoenixcoin.org/t/57vEfzgSFs 14K PXC at http://explorer.phoenixcoin.org/t/A3WYKCntXn MaGNeT, if I get it right, the latter is yours and they have never paid back? There was a "UNOCS" timer contest, started by myself. I paid 2,500 PXC, then Mike put in another 2,500 PXC. He kept his word on that one. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=258374.0 The "giveaway", started by myself too. I didn't mind paying for that, was my own idea. Joerii took over after I stopped and put another 500 PXC in the giveaway. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252919.0 What I'm talking about is the "Jackpot mining". https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=283841.0 I paid 24,000 PXC, another PXC supporter sponsored me with 5,000 PXC so in the end I paid 19,000 from my pocket. John asked me for my PXC address but never paid. ---------------- These are the transactions from my main wallet to my "Jackpot Mining" wallet: Status: 34145 bevestigingen Date: 27-8-2013 12:51 To: Pkf8zNFKrM9N6FVKThyVkfnKYdb9Ridi9d Debit: -10000.00 PXC Transaction fee: -0.002 PXC Net amount: -10000.002 PXC Transaction ID: e3dd6b0d317d984bfec1589e62c80592840fc1a0663f20b54e7b2240bde722e7 Status: 39928 bevestigingen Date: 28-8-2013 17:51 To: Pkf8zNFKrM9N6FVKThyVkfnKYdb9Ridi9d Debit: -14012.209 PXC Transaction fee: -0.002 PXC Net amount: -14012.211 PXC Transaction ID: eea30329c9515d46f0e2a257d25c7378c31fd40becb43796440168ed0b5b2178 And received from the supporter: Status: 45752 bevestigingen Date: 29-8-2013 22:15 From: onbekend To: Pbu7sy2aqyfXt9yJE47NWmsCQi44icJ3at (own address, label: jackpot mining incoming Phranky) Credit: 5000.00 PXC Net amount: +5000.00 PXC Transaction ID: 309c96abbe348fd5b9c411b131be3b92c5e9df2e630e8b34c7d1e9506610a25f I used a batchfile to send 0.1 PXC with a 50 PXC fee, every 15 minutes That ended up in the next block for the lucky miner who found it. Hence "Jackpot Mining". That's hilarious. In fact, they promoted their scam of exchange using coins scammed from you. They couldn't return anything because they dumped all the pre-mine a month ago and didn't even care to buy back some. They launched PhenixEx for the sole purpose of further scamming. The game was over when they trapped enough funds on the exchange, so they pulled the sites, split the profits and started to play morons.

1144

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] PhenixEx Notice

on: October 29, 2013, 07:30:12 PM

Quote from: MaGNeT on October 29, 2013, 05:33:18 PM By the way, I still want my 1.288 BTC back and the 13k of PXC you promised for the "Jackpot Mining", but never paid. ZackClark wants his 500,000,000 ADT back. Joerii wants his 10 BTC and 13k (?) WDC back. And a lot of other people want their coins back too. And dont forget Nulo0b. You sponsored him but never paid him too, didn't respond to him either. I recall they spent 24K PXC on the advertising campaign aka Jackpot Mining to promote PhenixEx. 10K PXC at http://explorer.phoenixcoin.org/t/57vEfzgSFs 14K PXC at http://explorer.phoenixcoin.org/t/A3WYKCntXn MaGNeT, if I get it right, the latter is yours and they have never paid back?

1145

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [PROBLEM] Block Explorers needed

on: October 29, 2013, 02:33:34 AM

Quote from: Walter Rothbard on October 29, 2013, 02:09:31 AM Quote from: ghostlander on October 29, 2013, 01:22:54 AM Why don't you place some banners instead of those useless donation addresses? I imagine most of his traffic expense is for the API, not for the browser interface. If a daemon, SQL and Abe run on the same VPS, there is no traffic wasted except for the HTML output which is miserable. Plain text API outputs are negligible absolutely in means of traffic. Performance depends mostly on memory size and hard disk read/write/access speed. SSD space is expensive unfortunately.

1146

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [PROBLEM] Block Explorers needed

on: October 29, 2013, 01:22:54 AM

Quote from: dreamwatcher on October 29, 2013, 01:10:12 AM Cost it does, and almost nobody donates to keep them up. Cryptocoinexplorer.com is spread over 4 VPS now (3 For the production ABE explorers, 1 for CCE3 testing). I am developing CCE3 to lower my costs by allowing me to have more explorers per server, but this does not reduce the cost of running the coin daemons needed for the explorer software to run. Hopefully I will be able to carry most of the Alt coins when I release CCE3 and convert all the explorers to CCE3, but I am going to have to find a way to monetize the service. I cannot continue to pay in both time and money to provide the service to the community. I look at some of the things people pay large sums of coin for in the alt-coin community, scams and junk. Yet services they use everyday (not just my explorer service) get virtually nothing in donations to keep running. Why don't you place some banners instead of those useless donation addresses?

1147

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] PhenixEx Notice

on: October 27, 2013, 03:21:28 PM

That's good Mike has taken down his block explorer and exchange sites finally. They were lame like everything else he did. Anyway, I'm sure Mike and John will bite their share of justice, and that will serve a good example for all big time crypto scammers of the present and future. By the way, the new PXC block explorer is online at explorer.phoenixcoin.org. Better and faster.

1148

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] [PXC] Development Takeover

on: October 22, 2013, 02:26:34 PM

Phoenixcoin New Specification for v0.6.5.0 (hard fork at block #154000) total coin supply: 98 million (before: 168 million advertised) block target: 90 seconds (before: 45 seconds) block reward: 50 PXC (before: 25 PXC) block reward halved: every 1000K blocks (before: every 1680K blocks) retarget: every 20 blocks (before: every 126 blocks) max. difficulty change: 2% (before: 9%) averaging window: combined 100 + 500 blocks 0.25 damped (before: 126 blocks) future time stamp limit: 30 minutes (before: 2 hours) past time stamp limit: median of 19 blocks (before: median of 11 blocks) The averaging algorithm is under simulations now and may be tuned up a little, but everything else is very much final. The current coin generation rate is unchanged. The hard fork is due in about 40K blocks from this moment which is more than enough to complete everything planned in time with no surprises. Beta builds will be released for testing later. More technical details on the hard fork are in this or this thread.

1149

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solution to a 51% attack?

on: October 14, 2013, 04:59:33 PM

Quote from: akumaburn on October 14, 2013, 05:51:26 AM 0. The actual implementation of the code only acts on the 6th received block as that is what is necessary for a full confirmation. To further clarify: if 5 blocks are sent by one peer, and another block is received by the same peer that has a timestamp within 10 minutes of the first block sent by that initial peer, the peer that sent those 6 blocks is banned. 1. Ip address is used for peer identification. 2. If there are many peers attacking the converging node will be banned and the network will be segmented for a few hours before repairing itself. 3. Faking timestamps is a whole other issue, but Bitcoin generally has resolved this by limiting how far in the future timestamps can be(+2h), thus while such an attack may work, it is fairly easy to counter by limiting the range of the timestamps/mode of determining the current time. Don't blame us for this, blame the people who decided a non-accurate timestamp was A-OK. I will look into a way around this inherent flaw in Bitcoin as it seems a hornets nest ready to unravel. The defense makes no distinction between an attacker and someone who has > 51% of the hashpower... they are equally threatening. 4. Cryptocoin mining should be as distributed as possible, these mega-multi-pools only cause trouble by creating mass spikes of supply where its not wanted and the market no longer needs it. With regards to the third point, I may decide to abandon the standard Bitcoin client entirely and come up with a new client from scratch and perhaps even a new blockchain (time and life allowing). There are many design decisions that were made by the Bitcoin team that I disagree heavily with. It's time-laxity being one of them. Your cure is worse than the disease. Said enough I suppose. Good luck with your ambitious plans.

1150

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solution to a 51% attack?

on: October 13, 2013, 10:12:28 PM

Quote from: akumaburn on October 13, 2013, 09:22:43 PM Quote from: ghostlander on October 13, 2013, 09:19:18 PM Quote from: akumaburn on October 13, 2013, 08:53:32 PM Quote from: ghostlander on October 13, 2013, 08:46:53 PM Quote from: akumaburn on October 13, 2013, 08:40:31 PM Correct me if I am wrong, but the longest valid chain is the accepted chain no? No if it's behind the last checkpoint for instance. Yes, but checkpoints don't affect this system(other than the hard checkpoints we manually put in), as the auto-checkpointing is done locally and only stored in memory, it is lost upon closing the client. That's what I'd like you to explain in depth including why you think it's better than ACP which is a proven solution. I have modified my post accordingly, By ACP, I assume you mean feathercoin's solution, I've not read that much about it in detail however from what I know ACP may be "proven" but its still centralized... all one has to do is take down the checkpoint server(s) and then proceed with the attack. This is a decentralized defense system that does the same job, arguably better for certain kinds of attacks. It is centralised to some extent, though optional while enabled by default. Clients may unsubscribe if they wish to. In order to take down the master node(s), the attackers have to find those first as their IPs are not coded in the client. Even if they succeed, a new master node may be set up in a matter of minute. Quote This system will simply remove(as best it can) all the longest chains that had any 6 blocks in a row that were produced too quickly (contain 6 blocks produced < 10 minutes).(Past block 100K) Goldcoin's block target of 2 minutes and 60 blocks to retarget assumed. Your white paper says: "No one peer may transmit more than 5 blocks every 10 minutes, regardless of their origin." Do you understand there is quite a big difference between both statements? What do you use for peer identification? What if there are many peers attacking? What if they fake time stamps? What if it's a legit pool like Multipool or Middlecoin? There are many ifs.

1151

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solution to a 51% attack?

on: October 13, 2013, 09:19:18 PM

Quote from: akumaburn on October 13, 2013, 08:53:32 PM Quote from: ghostlander on October 13, 2013, 08:46:53 PM Quote from: akumaburn on October 13, 2013, 08:40:31 PM Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on October 13, 2013, 08:27:43 PM Why do keep fixating on "longest chain"? ? ? The longest chain does not determine the accepted chain. With no disrespect intended it is clear that you do not even have a basic fundamental understanding of 51% attacks or any other for that matter. Everything proposed as "protection" in this thread is flawed to say the least. ~BCX~ Correct me if I am wrong, but the longest valid chain is the accepted chain no? No if it's behind the last checkpoint for instance. Yes, but checkpoints don't affect this system(other than the hard checkpoints we manually put in), as the auto-checkpointing is done locally and only stored in memory, it is lost upon closing the client. That's what I'd like you to explain in depth including why you think it's better than ACP which is a proven solution.

1152

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solution to a 51% attack?

on: October 13, 2013, 08:46:53 PM

Quote from: akumaburn on October 13, 2013, 08:40:31 PM Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on October 13, 2013, 08:27:43 PM Why do keep fixating on "longest chain"? ? ? The longest chain does not determine the accepted chain. With no disrespect intended it is clear that you do not even have a basic fundamental understanding of 51% attacks or any other for that matter. Everything proposed as "protection" in this thread is flawed to say the least. ~BCX~ Correct me if I am wrong, but the longest valid chain is the accepted chain no? No if it's behind the last checkpoint for instance.

1153

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] [PXC] Development Takeover

on: October 13, 2013, 07:28:55 AM

Quote from: Joerii on October 13, 2013, 01:28:01 AM Now without any plans of adding value, I don't see a future for Phenixcoin, sorry to say. The only thing you guys have going for you is Ghostlander's support. A very intelligent an capable guy. Maybe there's still hope if you find people who can innovate for PXC. But why would they innovate for PXC instead of for a coin with a better reputation ? Any coin is a tool for people to use. If the tool functions poorly or broken simply, it doesn't matter if you have any ambitious plans of use for it.

1154

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solution to a 51% attack?

on: October 13, 2013, 07:15:23 AM

Quote from: akumaburn on October 12, 2013, 03:15:04 PM @ghostlander it's not based on the assumption of a single peer, remember that in p2p networks as the network grows larger there is always a convergence point, it will segment the network for 4 hours before allowing them to continue, the segmentation is limited by how many nodes the attacker controls and is a good defense for a large network. How are you going to stop an attack done by a pool relaying blocks through a dozen of peers located in different subnets? There are many other possible scenarios. Have you got any simulations done on what you call a network segmentation? Your white paper is not backed by any practical research, I see only some theories which are not impressive. Exchanges can protect themselves without them.

1155

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solution to a 51% attack?

on: October 12, 2013, 01:17:54 PM

Quote In a nut shell, a 51% attacker controls the majority of the network's mining power, and since the network automatically chooses the longest blockchain to be the correct one, this gives the attacker control over transactions. This allows them to repeatedly spend the SAME coins on an exchange over and over again. This paragraph and the rest of white paper is full of nonsense unfortunately. First of all, not everyone who has 51%+ of network hash power is an attacker. One may mine blocks like anyone else and include other users' transactions in the blocks mined. On the other hand, one may mine empty blocks only and ignore other users' transactions completely, thus paralysing any coin movement on the network. It may be done with less than 51% of hash power to a lesser success though. Double spending is a different matter which involves two block chain forks with coins spent on one of them and unspent on the other which must become the primary chain eventually. Time warps are for difficulty manipulations at retargets. Finally, your defence concept is based on a false assumption of the attacker coming from a single IP or whatever you use for identification. There may be dozens if not hundreds of peers deployed worldwide for a distributed attack. There is no reliable decentralised solution currently to fight back 51% attacks of any kind.

1156

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] PhenixEx Notice

on: October 12, 2013, 11:17:23 AM

Quote from: Joerii on October 12, 2013, 09:19:39 AM Well, Chondrite as a budding poker player I'm sure you understand the pott odds are very good for this hand ;-) If he doesn't answer, at least I gave him a great chance. He deserves a heads up before a name and shame of the magnitude that's about to happen. I'm talking a shitstorm of apocalyptic proportions here. Who's with me, anyway ? Well, the last names of Mike and John are known already. PhenixCoin in ashes after developer goes AWOL More to follow. If they scam people this way, they get their fair share of fame. I don't want Phoenixcoin to be associated with scammers.

1157

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] [PXC] Development Takeover

on: October 12, 2013, 03:46:09 AM

Quote from: Joerii on October 10, 2013, 10:50:45 PM I'm sorry to say that after quite a bit of consideration I am bowing out as community leader for PXC. Last week I found out that Mike has sold the pre-mine. That upset me so much that I was literally sick for two days. Couldn't sleep at night. Epic betrayel, after months of him swearing that he would never sell the premine, and me defending him at every turn. I'm done with Phenixcoin and to be honest, the whole cryptoscene has left a bad taste in my mouth and a vaccuum in my savings account. I took a break from the forums for a while and now I'm back to try and clean up some of the mess left by Mike and John. Check out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299765.0 Joerii, sad to see you go. There is little I can do about it, at least I can tell people the real story behind the PXC pre-mine. Mike had mined about 1 million PXC (~20K blocks) before the currency was released to the public. These coins were the community property, and they were supposed to be used for bounties, prizes, give-aways, etc. In a matter of fact, only a small part of them was used for this purpose as none of the PXC projects ever reached production level. Most of these coins (816K) were accumulated in his wallet at Pbg8ZUXw84QC575GRDLJyMYFmm35Pyn9i2 address. They were supposed to be kept there, but 410K went to Puk5qvEyvt85rGQwuH4R4TjhwrRPSdnJwm between 31-May and 8-Jul, and 318K to PoEicfiNj1mQvLgaT27GSSMPUDBTzsNS16 between 11-Jul and 21-Jul. Both of them are Cryptsy addresses. PXC had been listed there on 24-May, but Mike asked Vern to make a one week delay, so the actual trading took place on 31-May. So, he sold it all before people realised the UNOCS Bridge and other projects he was supposed to work on were a complete failure. He knew it better than anyone else. Now you all know what a piece of shit Mike Burns is. P.S. Our new web site, Phoenixcoin.org, is online. EDIT: Let the following be here as well. Mike sold most of his BTC redeemed from the pre-mine dump to USD. 157ukbZ9d3CfjqKjjUF3aSHfrdpVJEtpHr is his address and this is his #bitcoin-otc trust profile. Funny thing, he was scammed for 8.5 BTC there while sending first. I'm quoting his Bitcoin-OTC IRC when he was complaining of being ripped off and bragging of selling the pre-mine (http://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-otc/logs/2013/07/17): Quote 07:55 iamatrix ;;rate powerball -10 sent 2BTC for ppUSD - No payment 07:55 gribble Rating entry successful. Your rating of -10 for user powerball has been recorded. 07:56 BigBitz wrk\|;;ident powerball 07:56 gribble Nick 'powerball', with hostmask 'powerball!4a22b9a7@gateway/web/freenode/ip.74.34.185.167', is identified as user powerball, with GPG key id None, key fingerprint None, and bitcoin address 1Js7mmogwSJJpMrRZD58KewYSic2xSVXC1 07:56 BigBitz wrk\|;;getrating powerball 07:56 gribble Currently authenticated from hostmask powerball!4a22b9a7@gateway/web/freenode/ip.74.34.185.167 . User powerball, rated since Mon Jul 15 13:34:00 2013. Cumulative rating -7, from 4 total ratings. Received ratings: 3 positive, 1 negative. Sent ratings: 2 positive, 0 negative. Details: http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=powerball 07:56 bock ouch 07:56 iamatrix glad I did nto send the 10 he wanted 07:56 BigBitz wrk\|Hmm. 07:56 BigBitz wrk\|;;ident iamatrix 07:56 gribble Nick 'iamatrix', with hostmask 'iamatrix!iamatrix@ip68-96-243-6.lv.lv.cox.net', is identified as user iamatrix, with GPG key id 9B414D79230AB219, key fingerprint 38DAFEAEC539B964D8B5835F9B414D79230AB219, and bitcoin address 157ukbZ9d3CfjqKjjUF3aSHfrdpVJEtpHr 07:57 BigBitz wrk\|yeah gotta be careful with PayPal bro. 07:57 iamatrix ya.. had two other great trade.. 1 1.5 and the other 21.8 so all good 07:58 coingenuity powerball: care to answer? 07:58 Ssateneth ;;events 74.34.185 07:58 gribble http://otc.armed.us/otc/?74.34.185&&&&& 07:59 bock since paypal is revertable, I never do BTC fist 08:00 bock it's risky for the BTC seller anyways 08:01 Ssateneth ACTION just slammed down 3.5k for a 4k 60hz monitor he'll likely never use to its full potential. 08:01 iamatrix ya I see that.. oh well.. 08:02 coingenuity http://blockchain.info/address/1Js7mmogwSJJpMrRZD58KewYSic2xSVXC1 leads to http://blockchain.info/address/1GbUQvYGSmiBEgsf3W4RWNqykyXGgUjSuA 08:02 coingenuity quite a few coins deposited 08:02 hylje if you would use it to its full potential you'd have to buy another in order to not be limited by it 08:02 coingenuity looks like an exchange to me 08:03 benten btc goin up or down! 08:03 iamatrix ya it was BTC-e 08:03 bock up up up up up up 08:04 coingenuity http://blockchain.info/address/18SaGKDdzect9FqTEQ3k3Rgcj4gggwD34E yeah, coins running through mixers like that is probably btce customers 08:06 coingenuity http://blockchain.info/address/1CM6qtxH4Pw5NeoLr37WAW2BqJYU6KmXUS and here's his cold storage 08:06 iamatrix I had a witdraw request into BTC-e to RedPass, then they stopped doing RedPass and cancelled the transaction, So I went looking for something else and found this place.. 08:06 bock we need a paypal trust database, listing the verified paypal accounts that made transactions and are not traced to scammers 08:06 coingenuity yall need to stop donating so many btc to that scammer... 08:06 coingenuity http://blockchain.info/taint/1CM6qtxH4Pw5NeoLr37WAW2BqJYU6KmXUS whoa. 08:06 benten what companies are worth investing in these days 08:07 iamatrix problem with that is Paypal would have a list then, or could lookup suspected accounts 08:07 coingenuity Phraust: how come so many of your coins are in that scammer's taint? 08:07 BigBitz wrk\|Google. 08:07 BigBitz wrk\|:D 08:07 bock benten: Osram! 08:08 allban iamatrix you have any funds on btc-e you want to create a voucher for and sell ? 08:08 coingenuity http://otc.armed.us/otc/?4a22b9a7@&@74.34.185.167* ~> scammer's bitcoin address ~> http://blockchain.info/taint/1CM6qtxH4Pw5NeoLr37WAW2BqJYU6KmXUS 08:08 coingenuity i'm curious why that is. 08:08 iamatrix not right now, but will tomorrow.. 08:09 iamatrix I play in Alt coins.. then convert to BTC 08:10 allban yeah did like 60% profit on some dgc couple of days ago, would have been more if i didnt get scammed at the time to load up some coin hehe 08:10 iamatrix lol.. have you played with PXC? 08:11 allban i put the btc back in btc-e when the rally began on pxc/xmp :/ 08:11 allban and now 100% fiat on btc-e 08:11 iamatrix its gonna happen again monday/tuesday 08:11 iamatrix PXC is mine 08:11 allban thinking of re-buying some 50k+ alphacoin also, should not be much lower, so only upside 08:12 iamatrix seen this? http://www.coindesk.com/feathercoin-phenixcoin-and-worldcoin-partner-to-form-unocs-the-united-ope... 08:12 allban hehe have 27.8 pxc from multipool i see now 08:12 iamatrix I have 800K 08:13 allban yeah, but will it hurt the value or help it on those coins 08:13 allban thats a chunk of change m8 08:13 coingenuity lol 08:13 coingenuity MOAR BUBBLEZ 08:13 iamatrix Im built what the count down timer is counting down too.. 08:14 BigBitz wrk\|;;ticker 08:14 gribble MtGox BTCUSD ticker \| Best bid: 98.25014, Best ask: 98.25999, Bid-ask spread: 0.00985, Last trade: 98.25999, 24 hour volume: 16488.41384500, 24 hour low: 96.18000, 24 hour high: 100.00000, 24 hour vwap: 98.27109 08:14 iamatrix We are building all the platforms, we are using FTC and WDC for marketing and their communities 08:14 allban you own 25% of the pxc coins .. 08:15 iamatrix 1M pre-mine 08:15 iamatrix gave away almost 200K so far 08:15 coingenuity not only is it pre-mined, but its gambling-based...sigh 08:16 coingenuity im going to retire from bitcoin and go farm corn in nebraska where they dont have internet, bai 08:16 iamatrix not really, just how it shown under unocs for now 08:16 coingenuity iamatrix: nothing personal, sorry 08:16 coingenuity ACTION quiet now 08:17 iamatrix lol its not personal its business 08:17 iamatrix Im not out to make miners happy, I out to make money.. 08:19 coingenuity so each one of those things is worth....how much 08:19 coingenuity 0.0002? 08:19 iamatrix its only 1.5 months old 08:19 iamatrix and he have not released anything yet 08:19 coingenuity i'm just calculating a market cap 08:20 iamatrix depending on the day, aruond 100k 08:20 allban coingenuity $ 97,486 08:20 allban http://coinmarketcap.com/ if you trust that 08:20 coingenuity heh 08:20 coingenuity gamblers be gamblin 08:22 iamatrix we have full merchant services comming and other things.. I was in Adult for 20 years, but kids are getting to old for that now 08:22 coingenuity heh 08:22 coingenuity i0 isnt even on that page any more allban 08:22 coingenuity thats funny 08:22 coingenuity anyone want some i0coins? xD 08:22 coingenuity somehow ixcoin is still there

1158

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Offical launch of PhenixCoin.com

on: October 10, 2013, 10:40:26 AM

Quote from: greenbone on October 10, 2013, 02:59:41 AM Quote from: Phoenix48 on September 27, 2013, 03:07:47 AM I made a fresh install and the client is not syncing at all even with all the addnode i could find. Is the coin dead? Can anyone post a valid blockchain to download? Im having the same issue, client wont sync ... blockchain link would be nice ... Update your client. v0.6.4.11 is broken in several ways. [ANN] [PXC] Development Takeover

1159

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] [PXC] Development Takeover

on: October 09, 2013, 05:46:47 PM

Quote from: Scooby903 on October 09, 2013, 03:29:23 AM Anyone feel generous enough to reimburse me for the Coins-E debacle? I lost 9980 PXC because of their incompetence In theory, the coins are not lost. If I understand the situation right, Coins-E failed to update their PXC daemon before the last hard fork and sent your coins while on the wrong block chain. Once they upgraded the daemon and switched to the correct block chain, the transaction disappeared and the coins re-appeared in their wallet. If they didn't repeat the transaction or credit the coins back to your balance, it was a scam. Use Cryptsy instead.

1160

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] [PXC] Development Takeover

on: October 09, 2013, 01:25:10 PM

Quote from: aa on October 08, 2013, 11:54:46 PM So, OP, anything new? Work in progress. Is there anything special you expect me to do?

Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 »