There is weight displayed in the Coin Control window. Is there a way to see this information through RPC? No, the Coin Control works only through the Qt GUI. There was no demand for any command line interface. Could it be added to the 'listunspent' command? Looks like calculating the weight is fairly simple, if I understand the source correctly: (unspentvalue * nTimeWeight) / 24 hours ? It is pretty much. /* Two divides to avoid overflows on 32-bit systems */ bnCoinDayWeight = (CBigNum(nValue) * nTimeWeight) / COIN / (24 * 60 * 60);
listunspent RPC is an incredibly slow thing. It takes maybe 20x more time than the Coin Control to deliver a result. I think a custom RPC call could do better. Load all eligible inputs into a std::map using hash and weight, sort it in a descending order and display with some additional data such as value, date or number of confirmations.
|
|
|
There is weight displayed in the Coin Control window. Is there a way to see this information through RPC? No, the Coin Control works only through the Qt GUI. There was no demand for any command line interface. When do these coins stake ? The staking works differently Jere you dont have stake weight you have coin age . But when will the staking start ? Ive had my wallet on for days and days but nothing.
If a tribar in the lower right corner is yellow rather than gray, staking works. Mouse over to see the details. Yes I know and it is yellow its just other coins tell you your weight and the weight on the network and the estimated wait till the next stake and this wallet doesn't do that it says I have over 700stake days on. So what does this mean what do I compared my stake age to so I can figure out how long I mist wait till I get a stake. 700 coin days in a single input should stake soon. However if this weight is shared between many inputs, there is more to wait. As it has been mentioned before, staking is a stochastic process. In other words, it's a matter of luck and patience. I see a few "unlucky" inputs in my wallet which haven't staked since late May. Those "lucky" have staked 3 times in this time frame.
|
|
|
i think after bitcoin new wallet will be release 1.13? i think)
if Tranz could make us a fresh wallet with some optimization
Rebasing won't help. Most of memory consumption comes from the block index. The chain is over 4 million blocks long and keeps growing fast. Deal with it.
|
|
|
I have committed the automatic reindexing to GitHub: Automatic Reindexing ImplementedPreviously, if your block index got corrupted somehow due to a hardware error, OS crash or whatever, you could see a pop-up saying "Error loading block index, see debug.log for details". Not very informative and probably not helpful much. You were left with a broken block index and had either to resync from the genesis block (a matter of a day or two), download a bootstrap.dat and let it ride (a matter of half a day) or get a block chain snapshot somewhere. This trouble is no more. Now, the wallet detects a broken block index and starts reindexing automatically. It isn't a quick process as our block chain is almost 2 million blocks, but 20% faster than bootstrapping. You also waste no traffic as the wallet scans your existing block chain files to rebuild the block index together with the UTXO data base. You can force reindexing any time with the -reindex option. If anyone can compile it yourself, try this option before it gets into a production release. It works well for me, but more testing is better.
|
|
|
There is weight displayed in the Coin Control window. Is there a way to see this information through RPC? No, the Coin Control works only through the Qt GUI. There was no demand for any command line interface. When do these coins stake ? The staking works differently Jere you dont have stake weight you have coin age . But when will the staking start ? Ive had my wallet on for days and days but nothing.
If a tribar in the lower right corner is yellow rather than gray, staking works. Mouse over to see the details.
|
|
|
Just to let you guys know, it is entirely possible to improve the OpenCL kernel of this miner by eliminating scratchpad registers (register spills). I am currently getting 795KH/s, a 30% increase in speed, with a RX 480 and a heavily modified kernel. It is also possible to optimize the generated GCN code and make the kernel even faster.
I am currently focused on Ethereum mining because it is more profitable, but I might release my custom NeoScrypt kernel when I have a chance.
It's definitely possible. There are 192 scratchpad regs for Tahiti. It's also important to keep the ISA size small enough to fit the GCN code caches. I have no RX 480 and cannot optimise for it right now. If you care to share your work, I'm sure some donations and thanks will go your way.
|
|
|
Guys, I am using NSGminer on zpool.ca but sometimes I get pool is sending mismatched block contents to us (0 is not 1-1) or other numbers. What does it mean? Can someone help me please? Thank you very much Gee Zpool is an autoswitching pool. NSGminer doesn't like this. It works best with a single chain.
|
|
|
How long does staking take ? I have been staking fpr almost 2 days and the coins haven't even matured ? Does it take a week or something ? I really wanna start generating coin over here.
Block reward and optimal stake (excerpt): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=586674.msg7744291#msg7744291In a nutshell: - coins are staking after 5 days; - minimum stake amount is 20 ORB; - staking is a stochastic function (it depends on luck, among other factors like stake amount and coin age - i.e. the "weight"). This is an old guide. Coins are eligible for staking after 1 day now, but it doesn't make much difference. There is weight displayed in the Coin Control window. I see my inputs are staking successfully with their weight of 800 on average currently. An input of 20 ORB will not exceed the weight of 300 (20 coins * 15 days). Do your math.
|
|
|
Then, after the Hard Fork, the new neoscrypt mining software was not optimised for 290's or 390's - an innocent mistake.
It wasn't optimised for anything. The hard fork was delayed already. The initial OpenCL miner produced something like 150KH/s for an R9 280X. No CUDA miner, it appeared a few months later. It was private OpenCL kernels and fast CUDA miners which hurt NeoScrypt OpenCL mining in 2015.
|
|
|
looks a bit quiet around this thread now, is there a feathercoin slack?
Slack has been abandoned a year ago when a group of community members tried to take over the development in a somewhat aggressive way. Slack was a rather uncensored battlefield. When the argument was over, the current development team left it.
|
|
|
A status update. I'm trying to add automatic reindexing to the client, so if a block index fails for some reason, the client rebuilds it automatically. No need to download the whole block chain again. Anyway, we are going to have a new release in about 2 weeks, so everyone can update in time before the block #2M.
|
|
|
Got two used R9 280X for cheap. Both with the Elpida/Micron memory (EDW2032BBBG). No surprise they only do about 455KH/s at their default clocks, 1000MHz core / 1500MHz memory. That's because of shitty timings set in the BIOS by greedy and clueless OEMs. Those Radeons with the Hynix AFR memory (H5GQ2H24AFR) produce about 480KH/s at the same clock speeds thanks to AMD providing better tuned memory straps. So I hacked their BIOSes to set correct memory timings. Hash rate improved to 495KH/s at the same clocks or 510KH/s with a core overclock to 1050MHz. +9% performance on memory timings alone, definitely not bad.
|
|
|
is this mine worth to mine?
Seems so. If there are people out there mining it, don't you think they do it for pure fun?
|
|
|
I'd too agree that the worst problem at the moment with Bitcoin online is indeed blockchain syncing.
That's why you use a light wallet. There are many of those with bitcoin, like Electrum. The nodes you connect to do all the work for you. IIRC you can connect to multiple nodes to the same wallet to cross-reference blocks. A light wallet is of no help to the network. Some people run full nodes because they want to support the network. They spend disk space, CPU time and network traffic yet it makes them feel better.
|
|
|
i can make a thread about u being a scammer and what? its not my coin but i have been with it for long time and i know its good.
and the guy who posted thread didnt loose any coins, hes just trolling as usual.
You're welcome to start any threads you like. A good laugh never hurts. I don't care what you do with that coin. The hard fork looks suspicious at the very least, but I don't really care to investigate any further. This thread is about Hobonickels.
|
|
|
4% to 5% interest every week and a multilevel referral programme are clear signs of a fraud.
|
|
|
I stopped staking this coin. it takes forever to sync and hogs memory.
I wish we could swap the coins to a new blockchain. Would also be nice to have more uses for this coin besides just staking.
masternodes would be nice tiered staking, higher balances = more interest maybe some in wallet games.
I have always enjoyed this coin, but it seems like we are not keeping up with the times.
maybe check EXCL guys now, they restarted the chain and coin runs smooth. its not as old as HBN but had similar issues with staking and CPU. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1546005.0i did sell all my HBNs but fuck.... i bought em back cheaper now..... Not very kind of you to come here to promote your coin after a rather questionable hard fork. Exclusivecoin / kingscrown / richiela "reboot" scam <BITTREX ENABLED SCAM>----- Guys, if you really want to see any HBN improvements, your best bet is to motivate Tranz for the future development. No one will come out of nowhere to work for all of you holding bags and waiting for a pump. Be generous.
|
|
|
gost, what is with our website? and blockexplorer?
Nothing wrong actually on my side. We celebrate Orbitcoin's 3rd birthday and I have forgotten to order a domain name renewal in the process.
|
|
|
Great news, maybe it's a step toward Android ?
Many people want a fully functional wallet for Android, i.e. with staking. However most Android phones/tablets on the market come with 1Gb of RAM (maybe a few hundred Mb available actually). That's enough for a light weight Electrum style wallet with no staking. I think 2Gb is a must for an Android port of our Qt wallet. While a fully functional wallet would be awesome, couldn't a "basic" wallet (send, receive) bring more people to OrbitCoin ? It would probably. Those light weight wallets are dependent on server infrastructure to get block headers and other necessary data from. It means a few more VPS to spin up. In addition, someone has to take care of this wallet's code base and follow the general development. I'm not sure if there is enough demand right now to justify costs and time required for this task. On the other hand, if our current wallet is ported to Android, it's pretty much a one time effort. No additional servers required and no separate code base to maintain. More or less.
|
|
|
|