|
Meatball
|
 |
July 12, 2011, 08:30:03 PM |
|
Ah, nice! Thanks V2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
lolcat
|
|
July 12, 2011, 09:33:27 PM |
|
I just watched him order it  |
|
|
|
|
|
V2-V3
|
|
July 13, 2011, 07:16:24 PM |
|
Hey Back, are you guys having to pay for these Radeon's out of pocket or are you getting them through a sponsor or something? I'd hate to think you guys are stuck footing the bill and fees aren't covering everything...
I ordered the card from newegg and donated it to the pool. I really want to see the pool grow and am trying to attract some more attention to bitclockers. |
|
|
|
|
|
lolcat
|
|
July 14, 2011, 03:04:05 AM |
|
I'm workin' hard for that 6950 |
|
|
|
|
OCedHrt
Member
 Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
July 14, 2011, 12:13:43 PM
Last edit: July 14, 2011, 12:24:45 PM by OCedHrt |
|
Are there still block payout issues on BitClockers? http://bitclockers.com/blockhistory/block/48Most of the workers did not get paid. And I have a total of 6607 shares for total earnings of ~0.16766873. That's a really bad rate per share. I know the pool isn't PPS, but are we that unlucky? At average luck we should be getting close to 0.00003198/share but I'm only getting 0.00002538/share. Seems like terrible luck. A total of 22774221 shares for the last 13 blocks. That's 0.00002854/share. Or 1751863 shares/block. And 48428226 for the last 25 blocks. That's even worse at 1937129 shares/block. |
|
|
|
backburn (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
★Trash&Burn [TBC/TXB]★
|
|
July 14, 2011, 06:55:16 PM
Last edit: July 14, 2011, 07:10:39 PM by backburn |
|
Block was so fast it didn't hit the update balance trigger. Was caught and automatically fixed within a few hours. You are good to go  As far as terrible luck, donno what to say. I think the current graph says it all:  Current block average is 73,000 shares under difficulty (1,563,027) for a luck of +4.67% |
|
|
|
|
burp
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 14, 2011, 07:10:17 PM |
|
Bitclockers is basically unusable for me. I'm getting very high variances on the pool connectivity (which happens nowhere else).. changes from 1/2 to 10 seconds. % httping -h pool.bitclockers.com -p 8332 [21:08:03]
PING pool.bitclockers.com:8332 (http://pool.bitclockers.com:8332/):
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=0 time=969.53 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=1 time=905.77 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=2 time=1097.10 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=3 time=773.19 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=4 time=634.67 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=5 time=926.27 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=6 time=786.47 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=7 time=578.01 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=8 time=4005.03 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=9 time=931.53 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=10 time=1148.74 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=11 time=3763.78 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=12 time=885.18 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=13 time=1049.96 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=14 time=983.03 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=15 time=874.24 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=16 time=3808.05 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=17 time=9919.28 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=18 time=978.05 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=19 time=971.40 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=20 time=803.95 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=21 time=902.08 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=22 time=3945.37 ms
connected to pool.bitclockers.com:8332, seq=23 time=981.57 ms
ICMP ping is at stable 220ms, so this is defenitely a problem on your side |
|
|
|
|
backburn (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
★Trash&Burn [TBC/TXB]★
|
|
July 14, 2011, 07:12:35 PM |
|
Burp: Try pool2.bitclockers.com or pool3.bitclockers.com on your miners. Might be closer to you.
|
|
|
|
|
burp
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 14, 2011, 07:14:29 PM
Last edit: July 14, 2011, 07:49:58 PM by burp |
|
Burp: Try pool2.bitclockers.com or pool3.bitclockers.com on your miners. Might be closer to you.
Thanks, pool2 and pool3 have no such issues for me I'm sure though this isn't a distance-latency issue, as the ICMP ping is low for all pools. PS: Are you sure the pool hashrate display is correct? Live Statistics Hash Rate: 245.60 Gh/s Active Workers: 633 Shares This Round: 198,229 Current Round Duration: 1 hours 11 minutes 198229*2^32 / (71*60) / 10^9 = 199.856120215677 |
|
|
|
|
|
V2-V3
|
|
July 14, 2011, 10:00:19 PM |
|
Hash rate is a 15 min average not an average of the entire round
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wuked
|
|
July 14, 2011, 10:31:03 PM |
|
Hash rate is a 15 min average not an average of the entire round
Even so, your calculations are wrong unless you aren't using difficulty of 1. Your site has been showing over 250GH/sec for the last few hours... Active Workers: 625 (last 10 minutes) Current Round Started: Thu, Jul 14th, 02:42:42 pm Current Round Duration: 1 hours 43 minutes Current Round Shares: 269,442 269442 *2^32 / (103*60) / 10^9 = 187 GH/sec average over the last block. So how can you average 187GH/sec over a period of this block of 1hr 43 minutes, when you are reporting an average of 250GH/sec every 15 minutes ? I did raise this point already on the 22nd of June! : http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10127.msg258618#msg258618 |
|
|
|
|
lodcrappo
|
|
July 14, 2011, 10:56:39 PM |
|
Hey I'm finally not on noob restriction, just thought I'd add that this is a good pool with very helpful folks.
Been quite pleased with it.
|
|
|
|
|
CrazyGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1973
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 15, 2011, 04:30:39 AM |
|
Wow, awesome day for the bitClockers pool!!! 6 blocks in one day with about 265gh/s average. I am mining at around 750 mh/s and this is the first time I've ever made 1BTC in a day. Looks like bitclockers took all the other pools' luck today. Here's to hoping the luck continues. Jine: Isn't it funny how everybody starts questioning the functionality of the pool during bad luck, but never bother to ask if the pool is "really solving all these blocks" when having great luck? I'll bite, is bitclockers really solving all these blocks today?? If anyone is looking for a new pool I highly suggest bitclockers, they really put some thought into the interface and provide some great personal and group graphs/charts and statistics. Plus they give away a free graphics card each month! |
ASICPuppy.net ASIC Mining Hardware and Accessories - Compac F in stock!
|
|
|
|
V2-V3
|
|
July 15, 2011, 06:52:54 AM |
|
Hash rate is a 15 min average not an average of the entire round
Even so, your calculations are wrong unless you aren't using difficulty of 1. Your site has been showing over 250GH/sec for the last few hours... Active Workers: 625 (last 10 minutes) Current Round Started: Thu, Jul 14th, 02:42:42 pm Current Round Duration: 1 hours 43 minutes Current Round Shares: 269,442 269442 *2^32 / (103*60) / 10^9 = 187 GH/sec average over the last block. So how can you average 187GH/sec over a period of this block of 1hr 43 minutes, when you are reporting an average of 250GH/sec every 15 minutes ? I did raise this point already on the 22nd of June! : http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10127.msg258618#msg258618umm, I was playing with my miners today and had been watching the hash rate of the pool and my aggregate miners constantly. I have seen the hash rate bounce up and down a lot not as the solid 250GH you are claiming. It was over 300GHash at the start of the block but when the pool hoppers pull out the hash rate gets volatile |
|
|
|
|
|
lolcat
|
|
July 15, 2011, 08:36:04 PM |
|
Wow, awesome day for the bitClockers pool!!! 6 blocks in one day with about 265gh/s average. I am mining at around 750 mh/s and this is the first time I've ever made 1BTC in a day. Looks like bitclockers took all the other pools' luck today. Here's to hoping the luck continues. Jine: Isn't it funny how everybody starts questioning the functionality of the pool during bad luck, but never bother to ask if the pool is "really solving all these blocks" when having great luck? I'll bite, is bitclockers really solving all these blocks today?? If anyone is looking for a new pool I highly suggest bitclockers, they really put some thought into the interface and provide some great personal and group graphs/charts and statistics. Plus they give away a free graphics card each month! Go BitClockers! |
|
|
|
|
|
digger
|
|
July 15, 2011, 10:15:07 PM |
|
you site has been included in this site
who find the bitcoin blocks?
http://digbtc.com
|
|
|
|
|
lolcat
|
|
July 15, 2011, 10:18:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
coblee
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1653
Merit: 1286
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.
|
|
July 15, 2011, 10:56:55 PM |
|
Doesn't look like you are including bitclockers. Might be because bitclockers doesn't expose the block ids. Why is that? Why doesn't bitclockers show the block ids here? http://bitclockers.com/blockhistory |
|
|
|
|
lolcat
|
|
July 15, 2011, 11:04:44 PM |
|
That's a bummer  |
|
|
|
|
|
dalamchops
|
|
July 17, 2011, 05:56:44 PM |
|
pool getting ddosed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
