Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 11:43:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 [105] 106 107 108 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] S.DICE - SatoshiDICE 100% Dividend-Paying Asset on MPEx  (Read 316128 times)
sunnankar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
July 22, 2013, 06:01:47 AM
Last edit: July 30, 2013, 02:57:44 AM by sunnankar
 #2081

Quote
Was Stuff

First, insider trading makes markets more efficient and should not even be a crime. If there should be a crime then it should be applied to those in a position to wield the violence of the State to change financial outcomes but ironically in the US they are granted immunity.

Second, this has been a great example of subjective value theory and asymmetric information in action.

Third, unfortunately there is no way for Erik to 'take away this suspicion' because of the non-AML/KYC nature of the MPEx exchange. For example, he could of had a second or third or fourth, etc. account(s) that he used to buy shares with. It would be impossible for MPEx to determine whether the accounts were linked. Thus, it is impossible for Erik to either prove or disprove whether he bought any or a large amount of shares over the past month. It is what it is.

So at the end of the day it comes down to the application of the MPEx contract. In this case, it appears it was honored fairly. Sure, there can be some disagreements but under the business judgment rule I doubt any of them rise to the level of materiality. So just pick up your bitcoins and go forward. Bleeting like a stuck sheep is not helpful for your balance sheet.

1711755784
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711755784

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711755784
Reply with quote  #2

1711755784
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711755784
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711755784

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711755784
Reply with quote  #2

1711755784
Report to moderator
1711755784
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711755784

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711755784
Reply with quote  #2

1711755784
Report to moderator
1711755784
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711755784

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711755784
Reply with quote  #2

1711755784
Report to moderator
Abu22
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 22, 2013, 06:42:14 AM
 #2082

And he is the only one that can take away this suspicion that he did insider trading or not.
First, insider trading makes markets more efficient and should not even be a crime.
...
Third, unfortunately there is no way for Erik to 'take away this suspicion' because of the non-AML/KYC nature of the MPEx exchange. For example, he could of had a second or third or fourth, etc. account(s) that he used to buy shares with. It would be impossible for MPEx to determine whether the accounts were linked. Thus, it is impossible for Erik to either prove or disprove whether he bought any or a large amount of shares over the past month. It is what it is.

So at the end of the day it comes down to the application of the MPEx contract. In this case, it appears it was honored fairly. Sure, there can be some disagreements but under the business judgment rule I doubt any of them rise to the level of materiality. So just pick up your bitcoins and go forward. Bleeting like a stuck sheep is not helpful for your balance sheet.
Insider trading is fine when done with a moral conscience, not with greed. It's going to happen in the Bitcoin domain, but that's why we have to watch for signs of when it is being abused.

Of course, the whole nature of Bitcoin and related assets tied with it is quite heavy on the anonymity aspect of things. This allows for relatively easy insider trading and the such. What we're doing is calling him out on it. There is enough evidence to strongly indicate that Erik has in fact manipulated the course of events to lead to this situation ending strongly in favor of himself at the expense of others.

For all we know Erik could have 'sold' the company to himself, as to entirely reclaim it before actually turning it into something competitive with the market. A few months of bad  news to ensure a cheaper buy back, then the "I'm even giving you extra!" B.S ...You're allowing us to maybe break even, not including those who started to sell as this unfortunate coincidence shower continued to pour.

To discount the evidence of what is certainly deserving of the label 'suspicious' would be making a fool of yourself. Erik likely did this exactly because, as you said it's easily viable and quite difficult to prove or disprove; But if Erik expects to walk away from this car crash without answering to some questions, he's gonna need a scammer tag.
Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
July 22, 2013, 09:13:07 AM
 #2083

Erik address public concerns!? HA!

Honestly, to me it looks like this whole thing was a few months in the planning.

-The 'Big announcement' that was meant to be given months earlier was infact this sell off.

-After realizing his demonstration of complete incompetence resulted in lower share price ( Therefor lower buyback costs to him) he followed that path.

- "Hey guys Americans can't play anymore", "new I.T guy with double salary", " 'Hired' a PR that doesn't do PR" , "I'm taking my money from the pool that was never explicitly mine", "I'll address your concerns later" (later of course meaning never), "We're working on the site..just we can't show or tell anything to do with it".

After a solid 2-3 months of all this negative news... Share prices fell!? Market confidence was lost!? ..Then some anon decides to buy a few mil because obviously SDice was appearing to have such a bright future ahead of it.

I mean if this really is coincidence (like the coincidence when he was calc'ing employee payments during the $2xx/btc peak...and randomly timing it so well that his payments where strongly in his favor - paying from random intervals in the month where btc price was 100< )

This chain of events is indicative of something different to Erik's story - 'Everything was just by chance, good timing'

I mean open your eyes! I can't believe there are still people bleating 'good job erik, ur tha  best ontroponor evar'. Get an idea of the full context on what has happened here and it'll paint a pretty clear picture of what has really been going on.

+1

Abu22.

Those who disagree with you are absolutely out to lunch.

This entire operation reeked of a scam from about 3 months ago until this point.  The recent "anonymous" sell-off just proved Abu's point.
I do not understand those defending Erik at all.  This was a scam.  If I had the choice, Mr. Voorhees would get a scammer tag for this stunt.
Well, technically you do have the choice: it's called Trust, you can post your trust to him here.
AFAIK scammer tags have been obsoleted long ago, I'm not sure why people aren't using trust more...

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
July 22, 2013, 09:27:07 AM
Last edit: July 22, 2013, 09:38:22 AM by freedomno1
 #2084

Well as a sidenote the hero member that didn't do their research needs to review this thread and see if abu made a good point.  Wink
Pg 100 reference
Misterbigg was just trolling on the other hand pretty sure luv was not Smiley

Either way keeps observing the seller will eventually reveal itself someday I think

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
CMMPro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 22, 2013, 11:14:03 AM
 #2085

Has anyone done any analysis on where the money (btc) came from and went to?

Maybe we can find out more from the blockchain.
Herbert
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 488
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
July 22, 2013, 11:52:45 AM
 #2086

Has anyone done any analysis on where the money (btc) came from and went to?

Maybe we can find out more from the blockchain.
I think we don't even have transactionIDs, right?

www.bitcoinmonitor.net - Free payment notification via email, newsfeed, xpmm/jabber, url callback and full API access!
Send SMS with www.txt4coins.net! No registration, pay-per-use, full API access, bulk messages - All inclusive!
sunnankar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
July 22, 2013, 03:19:02 PM
Last edit: July 30, 2013, 02:58:06 AM by sunnankar
 #2087

Quote
Was Stuff

If you are not accusing Erik of acting illegally then what are you discussing and to what end? It is fairly clear from the facts which can be articulated, not some non-articulated emotions, that the MPEx contract was complied with.

He has already made statements and conducted the deal. For whatever reason, more likely your own investment decisions rather than the investment, you are angry and upset with the outcome. Additional statements cannot prove or disprove what you are seeking. Instead it would take blockchain analysis with cooperation from MPEx that would disclose confidential information in violation of the MPEx account agreement. Consequently, I think it is a fairly fruitless search.

The tender offer was at a 75% premium to market. And that is measured in BTC; almost all shareholders, either IPO or otherwise, have or should of made tremendous gains with SD using USD, a more stable unit of account, as the numeraire.  So profits have been exceptional both ways. Sure, you may think your shares are worth more than that but the MPEx contract set the terms and MPEx shareholders have no voting rights. And a premium, instead of a discount, sure is nice! I remember when one of my Canadian oil stocks that paid a monthly dividend got bought out for a 65% premium to market by the Chinese. Sure, I thought it was worth more because it has merely had a bad quarter from the refinery's performance but oh well. Pick up the profits and move forward.

Quote
Out of curiosity, if he indeed would have insider traded and sold those mpex shares to the buyer weeks/days later for a premium, would you find this unethical behavior towards his mpex shareholders?

No, for the reasons stated in this article.

ex-trader
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 22, 2013, 04:59:31 PM
 #2088


Guys.....

The deal has been done, people have been paid. Get over it and move onto other investments.
lubah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 360
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 22, 2013, 05:27:14 PM
 #2089

how does this deal impact shares of g.sdice on bitfunder? 

the day the announcement came out - equivalent shares spiked up on bitfunder but it still seems to be a tradable security on that exchange....

any thoughts on what happens on bitfunder?   do shareholders just receive a dividend and then its delisted?   

I didn't wait to find out and have made a nice profit in just a short amount of time but seems strange you can still buy/sell these shares if indeed it has gone private and been sold...
RationalSpeculator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250

This bull will try to shake you off. Hold tight!


View Profile
July 22, 2013, 06:18:43 PM
Last edit: July 29, 2013, 07:05:57 PM by RationalSpeculator
 #2090

... almost all shareholders, either IPO or otherwise, have or should of made tremendous gains with SD using USD, a more stable unit of account, as the numeraire.  So profits have been exceptional both ways.

I think I debunked this with actual USD numbers here.

I heard of someone who had been accumulating shares since the second IPO @0.0064 at the start of February 2013 (company value of $16 million). His continued buying was careful, always making sure P/E based on expected profits was below average. This strategy justified buying around 0.0030 or $40 million end of April, giving him an average buy price of $30 million.

Equally he started selling when P/E became way overvalued based on expected profit, which happened in the weeks before the buyout when turnover was collapsing while company was still valued around 0.0018 or $17 million. If it was not for the seemingly irrational large bullish buyer in the weeks leading up to the buyout, the price would have likely dropped even more keeping the P/E acceptable, and he would have held on to all shares.

After the buyout his average sale price was around $30 million, the same as what he payed for it. However if he would not have sold 1/3th of his shares for $20 million, just 1 day before the buyout, he would have made +20% instead of just breaking even. On the other hand he was at -40% loss if there would have been no buyout and value of shares would today still have been 0.0018 (or $17 million).

No returns = not rewarded for the risk taken = wasted time and energy. That can happen but if it's due to neglect of the CEO towards the business than it's justified to feel disappointed and address it I think.
sunnankar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
July 22, 2013, 11:22:19 PM
Last edit: July 30, 2013, 02:58:27 AM by sunnankar
 #2091

Quote
Was Stuff

Regarding the difference between the lawyer or investment banker and the relationship of the CEO, in this case it seems to come down to the usurping of a corporate opportunity versus the agency relationship. Given the large premium it is highly unlikely there was any usurping of a corporate opportunity and even if there was then shareholders have been adequately compensated or at least enough that they have very little left to grieve about. There appears to have been no fraud or self-dealing; in fact, to the contrary it seems as if Erik was managing SD for free when he should have been drawing a salary.

In regards to (a), it is impossible for Erik to either prove or disprove whether he did engage in insider trading.

As a result, (b) is an irrelevant question.

So, it is not that Erik is ignoring the question but merely that it is impossible to definitively answer.

Sure, it smarts a bit selling shares a day before the buyout. Personally, I have been zapped like this more than once in the public markets like NYSE or NASDAQ so I know what it feels like. But that is also part of what makes the markets so fun.

It is what it is and no one forced the sale the day before the buyout nor was there any fraudulent information, unless that is what you are asserting?, disseminated by Erik to which you would reasonably rely on to your detriment in making the sale.

Abu22
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 23, 2013, 02:19:17 AM
 #2092

sunnankar, you smell of shill pretty bad.

Are you in fact trying to deny the evidence that purports a high level of deceit and manipulation occurring within this situation. As it has been restated many times, this is not an issue of legality, but one of ethical concern. It may be perfectly legal to put live insects and spiders into a hot frying pan... It is society's role to be outspoken when it feels, 'what is deemed legal/illegal' does not match what the opinion of the public is. Hell, we're all here in bitcoin land because we're unhappy with the legal printing of money, frac reserve banking, corporate interest regulations etc. This is no different.

Just because what is occurring is 'allowed' to occur, DOES NOT infer we should allow for it to continue unhindered, as if we were okay with how it happened.

There isn't much of a straightforward way for Erik to prove once and for all the legitimacy of his claims, but his track record of lack of explanation towards other unscrupulous behavior indicates that this is no different... A mound of (justified) accusations are at Eriks feet but all he is willing to do is sweep them under the carpet.

How you can possibly say we should negate this potential multi million dollar scam simply because you can see no clear solution...When there is a plethora of evidence that strongly suggests Erik has fleeced his investors due to his newly acquired bitcoin lust.

How you can say that he doesn't at least owe his investors an in depth explanation, supported by evidence of his recent actions is beyond me. Many people (rightly so) feel wronged by Eriks actions and it it is important that these issues get addressed. Millions of dollars is not a trivial matter.
Blank
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0



View Profile
July 23, 2013, 11:23:49 AM
 #2093

Regarding the Gamma SatoshiDICE Pass Through (G.SDICE)

Please note that due to my vacation in Spain, the payout and buy back of the S.DICE shares will not happen until the 28th.
I am sorry for this but I do not have my gpg key and such on my laptop they are on a dedicated computer of which I currently do not have access to.
Best Regards
DeaDTerra


So basically he is on holiday so cannot do the buyback just yet.
DeaDTerra
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 23, 2013, 11:56:54 AM
 #2094

Regarding the Gamma SatoshiDICE Pass Through (G.SDICE)

Please note that due to my vacation in Spain, the payout and buy back of the S.DICE shares will not happen until the 28th.
I am sorry for this but I do not have my gpg key and such on my laptop they are on a dedicated computer of which I currently do not have access to.
Best Regards
DeaDTerra


So basically he is on holiday so cannot do the buyback just yet.
Once I get back to my dedicated computer, I will do the buyback Smiley
Terrible sorry for the delay but it was an unexpected event.
//DeaDTerra
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1042

👻


View Profile
July 23, 2013, 11:57:23 AM
 #2095

Will you take 5% out of it?
DeaDTerra
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 23, 2013, 11:58:50 AM
 #2096

Will you take 5% out of it?
No,
The argument is that it was not a dividend but a buyback and hence I can't take a % of it.
It is a valid argument and hence I won't be taking any cut.
//DeaDTera
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1042

👻


View Profile
July 23, 2013, 12:01:35 PM
 #2097

Thanks. Just bought quite a lot of shares below 0.0035 Smiley
freeAgent
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 240
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 23, 2013, 03:30:15 PM
 #2098

Regarding the Gamma SatoshiDICE Pass Through (G.SDICE)

Please note that due to my vacation in Spain, the payout and buy back of the S.DICE shares will not happen until the 28th.
I am sorry for this but I do not have my gpg key and such on my laptop they are on a dedicated computer of which I currently do not have access to.
Best Regards
DeaDTerra


So basically he is on holiday so cannot do the buyback just yet.

I believe you have S.DICE-PT confused with GSDPT.  They're different passthroughs as far as I know.  Trading is halted on S.DICE-PT (on the BTC-TC exchange), but GSDPT is still trading.
DeaDTerra
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 23, 2013, 05:51:13 PM
 #2099

Regarding the Gamma SatoshiDICE Pass Through (G.SDICE)

Please note that due to my vacation in Spain, the payout and buy back of the S.DICE shares will not happen until the 28th.
I am sorry for this but I do not have my gpg key and such on my laptop they are on a dedicated computer of which I currently do not have access to.
Best Regards
DeaDTerra


So basically he is on holiday so cannot do the buyback just yet.

I believe you have S.DICE-PT confused with GSDPT.  They're different passthroughs as far as I know.  Trading is halted on S.DICE-PT (on the BTC-TC exchange), but GSDPT is still trading.
https://bitfunder.com/asset/G.SDICE
And
https://btct.co/security/GSDPT
Are the PTs I operate Smiley
//DeadTerra
kokojie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1003



View Profile
July 23, 2013, 05:59:28 PM
 #2100

Regarding the Gamma SatoshiDICE Pass Through (G.SDICE)

Please note that due to my vacation in Spain, the payout and buy back of the S.DICE shares will not happen until the 28th.
I am sorry for this but I do not have my gpg key and such on my laptop they are on a dedicated computer of which I currently do not have access to.
Best Regards
DeaDTerra


So basically he is on holiday so cannot do the buyback just yet.

I believe you have S.DICE-PT confused with GSDPT.  They're different passthroughs as far as I know.  Trading is halted on S.DICE-PT (on the BTC-TC exchange), but GSDPT is still trading.

Not only trading was halted, S.Dice-PT has already paid their shareholders in full, taking 0% cut, and this happened like 3 days ago. I'm not sure why GSDPT has not been halted, and also why it hasn't paid its shareholders, surely there's internet in Spain?

btc: 15sFnThw58hiGHYXyUAasgfauifTEB1ZF6
Pages: « 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 [105] 106 107 108 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!