[ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming)

[coins101]

34 connections

{
    "version" : 91504,
    "protocolversion" : 70019,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 330493.00000000,
    "blocks" : 385026,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 34,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 14.85179595,
    "networkhashps" : 1159289318,
    "moneysupply" : 2575326.48712499,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1430933717,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : ""
}

and 330k spr 

[1714969360]

1714969360

[1714969360]

1714969360

[1714969360]

1714969360

[stonehedge]

and 330k spr 

Just trolling a little 

[coins101]

and 330k spr 

Just trolling a little 

How the pro's troll:

Been syncing for a few hours, gone from 7 to 17 connections.

Code:

{
"balance" : 820215.08398676,
}

[stonehedge]

and 330k spr  

Just trolling a little  

How the pro's troll:

Been syncing for a few hours, gone from 7 to 17 connections.

Code:

{
"balance" : 820215.08398676,
}

If our top secret meeting goes well can I have the 5.08398676?

[stonehedge]

I wonder if it is worth cpu mining on a full node?  

CPU load is < 1% on mine so I might give it a go.  Maybe a few extra SPR every week or two...

Hopefully it won't impact on its node functionality....

EDIT:  16,670 hashes per second says its not worth it

[xojex]

Step-By-Step: Creating a Spreadcoin Node

http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710.0

Very well done contribution!

Thanks George - feel free to edit the guide when ever the need arises.

Thanks to stonehedge for providing the bounty. Mighty kind of you sir.

[CHAOSiTEC]

on a side note, i think its time to debate on upgrading our sources to core.. the question is should we base it on bitcoin core, litecoin core or darkcoin core, that is the question... i will start the process when we have figured out which path to walk...

CHAOSiTEC

We are going to need to upgrade to core code at some point in time, it brings many benefits.

Probably wait until I have a working servicenode implementation ready, ...

But I am not going to stop you if you already want to start porting current spreadcoin code to core.

i work at sea and wont be home for the next 2 weeks anyway, but when i get home i will start the process, besides, it will take some time to do so, so your implementation of a working service node will be done before i have finished anyway ;-p

the question is, which one would the community like us to use as base, each bring their own plusses and minuses...

cleanest, would be bitcoin or litecoin, darkcoin could be beneficial, but could also bring alot of controvercy... depends on our finished product, and what features we would bring over, from there

[stonehedge]

Step-By-Step: Creating a Spreadcoin Node

http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710.0

Very well done contribution!

Thanks George - feel free to edit the guide when ever the need arises.

Thanks to stonehedge for providing the bounty. Mighty kind of you sir.

My pleasure and kudos for sharing it.

[coins101]

Step-By-Step: Creating a Spreadcoin Node

http://spreadcointalk.org/index.php?topic=710.0

Very well done contribution!

Thanks George - feel free to edit the guide when ever the need arises.

Thanks to stonehedge for providing the bounty. Mighty kind of you sir.

Can you add connections from your desktop to the vps - putty, where to get it.

When someone first starts a vps service they may not know they just have a blank machine that needs to be set-up, before they can follow your guide.

If we are aiming for 2,000 instances, that's a lot of people who will never have done any of this before - which is why I think videos work well, alongside your guide.

[georgem]

on a side note, i think its time to debate on upgrading our sources to core.. the question is should we base it on bitcoin core, litecoin core or darkcoin core, that is the question... i will start the process when we have figured out which path to walk...

CHAOSiTEC

We are going to need to upgrade to core code at some point in time, it brings many benefits.

Probably wait until I have a working servicenode implementation ready, ...

But I am not going to stop you if you already want to start porting current spreadcoin code to core.

i work at sea and wont be home for the next 2 weeks anyway, but when i get home i will start the process, besides, it will take some time to do so, so your implementation of a working service node will be done before i have finished anyway ;-p

the question is, which one would the community like us to use as base, each bring their own plusses and minuses...

cleanest, would be bitcoin or litecoin, darkcoin could be beneficial, but could also bring alot of controvercy... depends on our finished product, and what features we would bring over, from there

Definitely bitcoin core, I have already started dissecting it and comparing the changes.

[CHAOSiTEC]

on a side note, i think its time to debate on upgrading our sources to core.. the question is should we base it on bitcoin core, litecoin core or darkcoin core, that is the question... i will start the process when we have figured out which path to walk...

CHAOSiTEC

We are going to need to upgrade to core code at some point in time, it brings many benefits.

Probably wait until I have a working servicenode implementation ready, ...

But I am not going to stop you if you already want to start porting current spreadcoin code to core.

i work at sea and wont be home for the next 2 weeks anyway, but when i get home i will start the process, besides, it will take some time to do so, so your implementation of a working service node will be done before i have finished anyway ;-p

the question is, which one would the community like us to use as base, each bring their own plusses and minuses...

cleanest, would be bitcoin or litecoin, darkcoin could be beneficial, but could also bring alot of controvercy... depends on our finished product, and what features we would bring over, from there

Definitely bitcoin core, I have already started dissecting it and comparing the changes.

my own vote is also bitcoin core, cleanest implementation, and easiest to update towards if needed in the future...

[Viper1]

Been awhile since I've been around so not sure about what's all happened. But why would you not use darkcoin DASH? That's what the original coin was based on.

[CHAOSiTEC]

Been awhile since I've been around so not sure about what's all happened. But why would you not use darkcoinDASH? That's what the original coin was based on.

alot of darkcoinDASHs functions are disabled in spreadcoin, so we do not use that many things from darkcoinDASH, so unless you want all the darkcoinDASH stuff, there is really no need to base it off of darkcoinDASH... but as i said, im putting it up to the community to decide.

Also, basing it on DASH would mean that we would have to do a hardfork (depending on features), basing it on bitcoin means we would avoid that

edit: strike darkcoin, add DASH

[stonehedge]

Been awhile since I've been around so not sure about what's all happened. But why would you not use darkcoin DASH? That's what the original coin was based on.

Dash was a fork of Litecoin back then and is now ported to Bitcoin core for a number of beneficial reasons.

[coins101]

Been awhile since I've been around so not sure about what's all happened. But why would you not use darkcoinDASH? That's what the original coin was based on.

alot of darkcoinDASHs functions are disabled in spreadcoin, so we do not use that many things from darkcoinDASH, so unless you want all the darkcoinDASH stuff, there is really no need to base it off of darkcoinDASH... but as i said, im putting it up to the community to decide.

Also, basing it on DASH would mean that we would have to do a hardfork (depending on features), basing it on bitcoin means we would avoid that

edit: strike darkcoin, add DASH

Am I right in saying that Spread does have Darksend, or it can be turned on?

That is something that might come in very, very handy.

[CHAOSiTEC]

Been awhile since I've been around so not sure about what's all happened. But why would you not use darkcoinDASH? That's what the original coin was based on.

alot of darkcoinDASHs functions are disabled in spreadcoin, so we do not use that many things from darkcoinDASH, so unless you want all the darkcoinDASH stuff, there is really no need to base it off of darkcoinDASH... but as i said, im putting it up to the community to decide.

Also, basing it on DASH would mean that we would have to do a hardfork (depending on features), basing it on bitcoin means we would avoid that

edit: strike darkcoin, add DASH

Am I right in saying that Spread does have Darksend, or it can be turned on?

That is something that might come in very, very handy.

darksend would need the masternodes, which is not activated, neither is darksend

[stonehedge]

Things getting a bit spicy on Trex

[coins101]

...
darksend would need the masternodes, which is not activated, neither is darksend

I'm pretty sure darksend is in there somewhere, or could be.

ServiceNodes could run darksend.

edit

no, its not in there yet, but can be added.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg10076304#msg10076304

[Viper1]

Been awhile since I've been around so not sure about what's all happened. But why would you not use darkcoin DASH? That's what the original coin was based on.

Dash was a fork of Litecoin back then and is now ported to Bitcoin core for a number of beneficial reasons.

Ah ok. Then doing the same here would make sense. Thanks.

[CHAOSiTEC]

Things getting a bit spicy on Trex

maybe because of the community's commitment to do what needs to be done :-)

we all need to do our part, and that will ultimately show in the value of the coin.