[ANN][SHIFT] The New Web | IPFS/Phantom | ShiftNrg.org Hosted Decentralized!

[ttookk]

Looks like the giant wallet at Bittrex sold around 10%. That's quite reassuring, actually.

[Atomjuice]

I updated my old wallet 1,5,1 (now I have 1,5,1 (v3.0 1.6.0), but I lost all the coins in my old wallet (luckily I hav about 7000 on Bittrex, or they would have vanished as well!)...I'm mining on Bitcause with Dual Claymore miner..is that ok? Do I do anything else to update things? I just forgot the new wallet and am mining directly to Bittrex. My setup is as follows:

windows 7 64 ultimate
8gb dram each rig
1 rig 5 x r7 370 4gb cards

2nd rig
windows 7 ultimate 64
2 x r9 370x cards

3rd rig
windows 10 pro 64
2x r9 390x cards
16gb dram
17 6700k

...I've mined a lot of various coins, but seems like there is enough competition now that folks don't want to share how to easily mine coins. I just would like to use Suprnova..I like it...a simple bat file ( a complete example for Claymore Dual miner or ethminer bat file and conf file (for both) would really boost my confidence is supporting this project further with hashpower I have...thanks:)

[Atomjuice]

dumped your coin...no support...sorry...was a good idea, just undisciplined and losing hashpower and getting delisted at markets...pity...

[psyx80]

dumped your coin...no support...sorry...was a good idea, just undisciplined and losing hashpower and getting delisted at markets...pity...

this is called manipulation of the market, that this was not the community up to the market to participate actively, creating support costs and do not just stand on the price of 1000 Satoshi, but to raise the purchase price and buy out the volume at the keypad, thereby reducing its impact on the market, and distribute it assets, it was impossible to make a big dumping. This should be dealt with, and the development team, which should be a money manager, not just programmers. otherwise, we will always see what one person will always push the market and do not give him to grow up in value.

[free-bit.co.in]

Coin is seriously undervalued,also the new wallet looks dopee 

I'm continuing to mine this coin,also I bought some more SHIFT just in case 

[ExEric3]

How I can add my shift node to official stats page? (http://stats.shiftnrg.org)

https://github.com/shiftcurrency/shift/wiki/Shift-Network-statistics:-listing-a-node

[cbux]

dumped your coin...no support...sorry...was a good idea, just undisciplined and losing hashpower and getting delisted at markets...pity...

this is called manipulation of the market, that this was not the community up to the market to participate actively, creating support costs and do not just stand on the price of 1000 Satoshi, but to raise the purchase price and buy out the volume at the keypad, thereby reducing its impact on the market, and distribute it assets, it was impossible to make a big dumping. This should be dealt with, and the development team, which should be a money manager, not just programmers. otherwise, we will always see what one person will always push the market and do not give him to grow up in value.

Isn't the whole point of crypto to be trust less and believe in the math??  What you suggest is no different than the fiat model and the Fed.  It's already concerning that the dev team made a significant change, especially without community consent, and we're seeing the consequences.  Changing the block reward, which changes the inflation, is exactly what the Fed tries to do by changing interest rates to increase or decrease inflation.  In my eyes this move was unforgivable.

[Tmdz]

I think its more of a move towards the hybrid pow/pos that is on the road map.

The original ann said the block time was meant to be 50 sec but up until the fork it was the same as ETH 14 secs, so changing the block time to 50 sec was completely justified.  Cutting the reward really was not needed as simply changing that block time to 50 secs would reduce block reward.  But thats what it is.  Don't bother mining just buy the coin, I think shift will still be a solid long term project.

[vigZ]

dumped your coin...no support...sorry...was a good idea, just undisciplined and losing hashpower and getting delisted at markets...pity...

this is called manipulation of the market, that this was not the community up to the market to participate actively, creating support costs and do not just stand on the price of 1000 Satoshi, but to raise the purchase price and buy out the volume at the keypad, thereby reducing its impact on the market, and distribute it assets, it was impossible to make a big dumping. This should be dealt with, and the development team, which should be a money manager, not just programmers. otherwise, we will always see what one person will always push the market and do not give him to grow up in value.

Isn't the whole point of crypto to be trust less and believe in the math??  What you suggest is no different than the fiat model and the Fed.  It's already concerning that the dev team made a significant change, especially without community consent, and we're seeing the consequences.  Changing the block reward, which changes the inflation, is exactly what the Fed tries to do by changing interest rates to increase or decrease inflation.  In my eyes this move was unforgivable.

It is in line with keeping to a 50 second block time while keeping the inflation consistent. 1 shf every 50 seconds is a lot better than 2 shf every 15 seconds long term.

[ShiftConnect]

dumped your coin...no support...sorry...was a good idea, just undisciplined and losing hashpower and getting delisted at markets...pity...

this is called manipulation of the market, that this was not the community up to the market to participate actively, creating support costs and do not just stand on the price of 1000 Satoshi, but to raise the purchase price and buy out the volume at the keypad, thereby reducing its impact on the market, and distribute it assets, it was impossible to make a big dumping. This should be dealt with, and the development team, which should be a money manager, not just programmers. otherwise, we will always see what one person will always push the market and do not give him to grow up in value.

Isn't the whole point of crypto to be trust less and believe in the math??  What you suggest is no different than the fiat model and the Fed.  It's already concerning that the dev team made a significant change, especially without community consent, and we're seeing the consequences.  Changing the block reward, which changes the inflation, is exactly what the Fed tries to do by changing interest rates to increase or decrease inflation.  In my eyes this move was unforgivable.

In an ideal world it should be, but the reality is different. While you want a natural price discovery, each and every market depends on liquidity providers. This is the case for every trading commodity, whether it is Bitcoin, Dollar, Corn, Gold or SHIFT.

There are two sides to a cryptocurrency: miners and investors. While miners secure the blockchain and process transactions, investors buy, hold and sell. High inflation unfairly rewards miners who create constant sell pressure, high deflation eventually leads to an unsecured network if supply outweighs demand. Neither inflationary nor deflationary currencies are worth striving for, the middle ground is. The decision wasn't easy but in retrospect we have been incredibly rewarding for miners ever since the V1 launch and had to adjust our model to give credit to speculative investors.

If you look at the 600+ currencies listed on Coinmarketcap, you cannot say that even 1 is truly 100% decentralized, not even Bitcoin. Is hosting our downloads on GitHub centralization? Are 5 developers, marketers and designers managing this coin centralization? Is our sole correspondence in a Slack group centralization? The answer to all is yes. But that is a necessity to develop SHIFT and provide the best service to our community that we can.

However, we do not advertise SHIFT as a decentralized currency with only the little most necessary form of governance. Our intention will always be to bring the brightest minds into our team to make the best decisions we agree on to bring to live our flagship product: a decentralized, uncensored, immutable and distributed network to host content for every person on this globe.

And that is a sensitive process which will always need adjustment and interference from the team. But it will always be to the highest and most honorable standards with the pure intention to deliver an unrivaled, groundbreaking product everyone can benefit from, miners as well as speculators as well as users.

[kondiomir]

Seems like they already delisted Shift from their exchange, and not updated to the last version.
All the Shift coins there are stuck.  

Worst possible situation then.. We will contact them and assist in updating so users can remove their coins.

Thanks!

Any success today ?

Bleutrade not answering me..

[bigs21024]

i wish i had a few of these to hold this looks as if it will do well

[vigZ]

i wish i had a few of these to hold this looks as if it will do well

The project is making really good progress. You can buy some on bittrex. Hopefully poloniex will add shift to its exchange soon.

[Dev_Sempak_coin]

anyone succes using claymore mining ?
i want to use claymore but i get some problem and can't connect

[ShiftConnect]

Bleutrade not answering me..

No reply either so far but we'll stay on it.

While not the fastest they are usually reliable to sort things out.

[X1235]

Do you see the pattern in this tendency?

Expanse


Shift

[trnpall]

shift is so undervalued should easily get to 20 cents, with the mining reward and strong market

[kondiomir]

Bleutrade not answering me..

No reply either so far but we'll stay on it.

While not the fastest they are usually reliable to sort things out.

Seems like Bleutrade is running now with the last version.
All OK now.

[gerb]

Do you see the pattern in this tendency?

Expanse


Shift

everything at its time 

[jeffdoubleyou]

Looks like epool.io has gone away