▄■▀■▄ 🌟BITVEST.io🌟 💰WIN BY 🔶PLAY 📈INVEST➡🔺🎲🎰🔲 | BET CONTEST ▄■▀■▄

[Eternad]

I have sent responses from PM on bitcointalk, to not getting a confirmation on the withdraw.
Seeing there is a recent support ticket now.

I'll sort this out accordingly.

God all mighty! You are still concerned about a single withdrawal. What about those who were part of your signature campaign! Come on if you are so good then pay those who participated and the campaign manager. It is important that you do those payments first before coming out with your shit story. You and your BM have done enough damage to the community. My recommendation avoid any excuse with the payment of signature campaign.

Actually, he already addressed your question on the same post just above lightlord comment that you quoted. Campaign is planned to restart in few days from now and probably the campaign manager is communicating with him in the background.

Lightlor should escrow a month budget or more budget then refill it in timely manner to give him enough time whenever he has personal issue.

[Mate2237]

~

What happened to the two campaigns. Can you refill the wallets?  Eloncoin and Bitvest

In regards to this, the campaign is planned on being restarted, like in a couple days, and/or when the campaign manager is able to restart upon refilling the coins accordingly

The issue is not really relaunching the campaign but your poor communication with the manager and the community at large. Because you have to be active to respond questions from the community and the campaign manager. The two campaigns were paused because of your poor communicational skills with the manager and the community. I was a participant in Eloncoin and our last week was not counted and wasn't paid because you're no where to be found. No respond from you for about a month so he has to paused the campaign. Responding communication is the pivotal aspect in any campaign and once there is communicational breached most between the manager and the representative of them project then they must be a problem in that campaign and the project because those who are using the service must asked questions and that who want to use the service too must ask questions and when there is no respond then, there will be no trust. And I think you saw what happened to Cryptomus last two weeks.

If you know you won't be active to respond to the manager and others in the forum then there is no need for you to relaunched the campaigns because what happened would still repeat itself and and what happened to others might repeat again so to avoid that, you can leave it but if you know, you will be active to respond and communicate with others then you can launch the campaigns again by refilling the escrows.

That is my humble suggestion.

[Cantsay]

That is my humble suggestion.

I agree, that’s not a great way of doing business - if you know you won’t be consistent then announce it - don’t just come and provide funds for a few weeks go offline for a month return and put the campaign on hold and then come back to resume it.

There are users who left their current campaign to your campaign only for them to see that it’s not consistent. I have seen those two campaigns being paused and resumed several times because of lack of communication from the who’s supposed to refill the wallet.

If it continues that way forum members might become more hesitant to join because they know it won’t even last for a month.

[Findingnemo]

~

What happened to the two campaigns. Can you refill the wallets?  Eloncoin and Bitvest

In regards to this, the campaign is planned on being restarted, like in a couple days, and/or when the campaign manager is able to restart upon refilling the coins accordingly

The issue is not really relaunching the campaign but your poor communication with the manager and the community at large. Because you have to be active to respond questions from the community and the campaign manager. The two campaigns were paused because of your poor communicational skills with the manager and the community. I was a participant in Eloncoin and our last week was not counted and wasn't paid because you're no where to be found. No respond from you for about a month so he has to paused the campaign. Responding communication is the pivotal aspect in any campaign and once there is communicational breached most between the manager and the representative of them project then they must be a problem in that campaign and the project because those who are using the service must asked questions and that who want to use the service too must ask questions and when there is no respond then, there will be no trust. And I think you saw what happened to Cryptomus last two weeks.

If you know you won't be active to respond to the manager and others in the forum then there is no need for you to relaunched the campaigns because what happened would still repeat itself and and what happened to others might repeat again so to avoid that, you can leave it but if you know, you will be active to respond and communicate with others then you can launch the campaigns again by refilling the escrows.

That is my humble suggestion.

This story with LL and pausing stopping campaign is never ending story.

But I checked the campaign thread just now there is no pending amount that has to be paid, Brainboss stopped when he knees that there's not enough budget remaining in the escrow wallet to cover more weeks so you may not aware of the announcement made by the manager.

I suggested multiple times, if he is too busy then he should hire someone to these jobs but it's his business so he can do whatever and however he wants.

[Mate2237]

That is my humble suggestion.

I agree, that’s not a great way of doing business - if you know you won’t be consistent then announce it - don’t just come and provide funds for a few weeks go offline for a month return and put the campaign on hold and then come back to resume it.

There are users who left their current campaign to your campaign only for them to see that it’s not consistent. I have seen those two campaigns being paused and resumed several times because of lack of communication from the who’s supposed to refill the wallet.

If it continues that way forum members might become more hesitant to join because they know it won’t even last for a month.

Poor communication affects campaign very badly. And the only thing was that the campaign manager knows how to manage campaign and that is why things are okay even when he came back. If not things wouldn't be okay for him here. The manager always pre informed the participants ahead so when the payment did com we have already aware so there was no much effect again. And as your said there were many times the campaigns were put on hold because of lack of communication with lightlord.

So I am still say that if the coming back will be as the same like before then it is better he didn't come back because it might not favor him this time. This forum is purely on active communication and not coming and going like an Abiku children.

This story with LL and pausing stopping campaign is never ending story.

But I checked the campaign thread just now there is no pending amount that has to be paid, Brainboss stopped when he knees that there's not enough budget remaining in the escrow wallet to cover more weeks so you may not aware of the announcement made by the manager.

I suggested multiple times, if he is too busy then he should hire someone to these jobs but it's his business so he can do whatever and however he wants.

Didn't you check the spreadsheet too? Though I was working in Eloncoin and the campaign manager told that if the escrow wallet was refilled then he would pay us and if it didn't then no payment and we worked till the end of the week and since LL didn't come only and didn't tell BB anything so he has to stopped the campaign.

[Odusko]

That is my humble suggestion.

I agree, that’s not a great way of doing business - if you know you won’t be consistent then announce it - don’t just come and provide funds for a few weeks go offline for a month return and put the campaign on hold and then come back to resume it.

There are users who left their current campaign to your campaign only for them to see that it’s not consistent. I have seen those two campaigns being paused and resumed several times because of lack of communication from the who’s supposed to refill the wallet.

If it continues that way forum members might become more hesitant to join because they know it won’t even last for a month.

The good thing with all of this is that, LL is not owing outstanding signature payment and also we are not seeing any cases of unpaid winning with both casinos, so we are good with that for now, because we already used to LL ways of operating this two companies, he is the sole actor in the game and you know how it is, he can't be everywhere at the same time so there will definitely be some lacking behind in so e of the service such as in this case, but then we need to pay more attention to what is coming ahead and what we should expect from LL and his companies, since we are used to this already, and to those that have lamented on the negative impact of inconsistencies on a business, you guys should already known that both bitvest and it sister casino have been in operation for a long time now, and their already build a big community through all of this, so I believe lightlord already have a plan against the impact of his way of operations.

[arwin100]

That is my humble suggestion.

I agree, that’s not a great way of doing business - if you know you won’t be consistent then announce it - don’t just come and provide funds for a few weeks go offline for a month return and put the campaign on hold and then come back to resume it.

There are users who left their current campaign to your campaign only for them to see that it’s not consistent. I have seen those two campaigns being paused and resumed several times because of lack of communication from the who’s supposed to refill the wallet.

If it continues that way forum members might become more hesitant to join because they know it won’t even last for a month.

The good thing with all of this is that, LL is not owing outstanding signature payment and also we are not seeing any cases of unpaid winning with both casinos, so we are good with that for now, because we already used to LL ways of operating this two companies, he is the sole actor in the game and you know how it is, he can't be everywhere at the same time so there will definitely be some lacking behind in so e of the service such as in this case, but then we need to pay more attention to what is coming ahead and what we should expect from LL and his companies, since we are used to this already, and to those that have lamented on the negative impact of inconsistencies on a business, you guys should already known that both bitvest and it sister casino have been in operation for a long time now, and their already build a big community through all of this, so I believe lightlord already have a plan against the impact of his way of operations.

Even if there's history of payment delay on signature campaigns LL still manage to go back and pay all his dues. But only see that pending accusation made by other guy in this thread what people want to see right now is a settlement of that case. Or maybe at least he give answer regarding on that situation happen to that person.

Inconsistency is bad for business and those negative experience of people make other wonder if its still good to gamble on their casino. But if everything will be settle and no single piece of accusation will be posted against them then provably that people will have no doubt on current situation in their casino. But even though those cases still happening we can't deny the fact that Bitvest and any other casino built by Lightlord is well known platform so hopefully he can retain the good reputation they built for many years.

[Findingnemo]

Didn't you check the spreadsheet too? Though I was working in Eloncoin and the campaign manager told that if the escrow wallet was refilled then he would pay us and if it didn't then no payment and we worked till the end of the week and since LL didn't come only and didn't tell BB anything so he has to stopped the campaign.

That is what he promised, isn't it? Look at what he wrote

payment for the week is only guaranteed if the escrow wallet gets refilled, you're not entitled to receive payment if the wallet doesn't get refilled as the campaign is paused currently and the campaign will get stopped if the weeks goes by without a refilled but whenever the wallet gets refilled, this week payment will be accounted for.

Where he mentioned the participants would be receiving payments if wallet gets refilled, if not then there is nothing and then he obviously stopped the campaign so there is no due left as you were saying.

More importantly, I won't use the word term 'work' for being a part of the sig campaign.

I don't want to derail their ANN further, you can continue this discussion in the following thread if you'd like to : 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝

[slaman29]

Thank you @FindingNemo for reminding people not to post the same old tired shit about campaigns on Bitvest thread.

I can't stand this nonsense shit really. Everybody knows BV is like this with campaigns so go deal with it elsewhere on Services page or find another campaign.

I hate that all these ANN threads aren't gamblers gambling but users whining about freebets and bonuses and campaigns. Obviously, I'm not saying all of you but you know who you are... guys with casino sigs but hardly actually even bet. Can't even find them betting on BV! Scum of the forum.

[avp2306]

Thank you @FindingNemo for reminding people not to post the same old tired shit about campaigns on Bitvest thread.

I can't stand this nonsense shit really. Everybody knows BV is like this with campaigns so go deal with it elsewhere on Services page or find another campaign.

I hate that all these ANN threads aren't gamblers gambling but users whining about freebets and bonuses and campaigns. Obviously, I'm not saying all of you but you know who you are... guys with casino sigs but hardly actually even bet. Can't even find them betting on BV! Scum of the forum.

The statement is clear that there's no guarantee for the participants to get a payment not unless the wallet has been refilled so there's no need to whine about campaign payments  especially that this is well announced by the manager.

Also for people which participate their campaign for long time they know that delays is normal so I guess there's no problem with them with this cases. I guess those issues only come up with new participants which doesn't read clearly the announcement made on sig campaign thread.

Its important to understand the post made so that they don't hope for anything unsure.

[cryptocoupons]

Thank you @FindingNemo for reminding people not to post the same old tired shit about campaigns on Bitvest thread.

I can't stand this nonsense shit really. Everybody knows BV is like this with campaigns so go deal with it elsewhere on Services page or find another campaign.

I hate that all these ANN threads aren't gamblers gambling but users whining about freebets and bonuses and campaigns. Obviously, I'm not saying all of you but you know who you are... guys with casino sigs but hardly actually even bet. Can't even find them betting on BV! Scum of the forum.

The statement is clear that there's no guarantee for the participants to get a payment not unless the wallet has been refilled so there's no need to whine about campaign payments  especially that this is well announced by the manager.

Also for people which participate their campaign for long time they know that delays is normal so I guess there's no problem with them with this cases. I guess those issues only come up with new participants which doesn't read clearly the announcement made on sig campaign thread.

Its important to understand the post made so that they don't hope for anything unsure.

I agree, it's crucial to keep the Bitvest thread focused on gambling discussions rather than campaign complaints. If there are issues with campaigns, they should be addressed on the Services page or by finding another campaign. Let's keep the forum engaging for gamblers and minimize unnecessary whining.

[virasog]

Thank you @FindingNemo for reminding people not to post the same old tired shit about campaigns on Bitvest thread.

I can't stand this nonsense shit really. Everybody knows BV is like this with campaigns so go deal with it elsewhere on Services page or find another campaign.

I hate that all these ANN threads aren't gamblers gambling but users whining about freebets and bonuses and campaigns. Obviously, I'm not saying all of you but you know who you are... guys with casino sigs but hardly actually even bet. Can't even find them betting on BV! Scum of the forum.

You are very true here as we only see complaints about the signature campaign being paused or payment not made of the last weeks etc but we need to know the latest updates and trends in the bitvest site here. I can't say how many signature participants are actually gambling on the platform who pay them for advertisement.
If you talk about me i do gamble on the platform mentioned on my signature.
One way to encourage this is to give signature payments to the participants on the gambling site platform. This may encourage people to gamble too.

[slaman29]

Nice of everyone to agree about my post (by further posting about anything other than actual gambling on BV lol).

Come on guys, where are yours? If anyone sees me in chat, and PMs me when I'm online gambling, I'm giving you a small tip (using the chat). Lv3 and above only tho don't want all those damn bot players PMing me.

[sunsilk]

While it's no longer something new for most of the folks who knew how issues like this come out every now and then. There were times before that they were fine and okay and it means that the hot wallet has been filled and not yet dry.

This time, that seems to be the issue and it only needs to be refilled.

Everyone isn't impressed with that and we thought that they were able to improve from past issues like this.

in my opinion, the inconsistency carried out by Lightlord will have a big impact on Bitvest in the future, how can players be calm when the hot wallet is often empty, Lightlord once claimed he was having health problems, hopefully it's not serious.

bitvest is a site that has been running for quite a long time and also has a lot of users from this forum, I have an account on bitvest too but I'm quite surprised why lightlord hasn't updated bitvest, the site looks old school, but I'm already in love with bitvest especially with the investment concept that they provide

He has replied already and it seems that the withdrawal has been done already if he had replied to the ticket by confirming the receiving address.

And it's been more than a week already since the BCH withdrawal was asked.

I assume that everything is good and clean now. Otherwise, he'd be back here to say if it's done or not yet.

[ultrloa]

While it's no longer something new for most of the folks who knew how issues like this come out every now and then. There were times before that they were fine and okay and it means that the hot wallet has been filled and not yet dry.

This time, that seems to be the issue and it only needs to be refilled.

Everyone isn't impressed with that and we thought that they were able to improve from past issues like this.

in my opinion, the inconsistency carried out by Lightlord will have a big impact on Bitvest in the future, how can players be calm when the hot wallet is often empty, Lightlord once claimed he was having health problems, hopefully it's not serious.

bitvest is a site that has been running for quite a long time and also has a lot of users from this forum, I have an account on bitvest too but I'm quite surprised why lightlord hasn't updated bitvest, the site looks old school, but I'm already in love with bitvest especially with the investment concept that they provide

He has replied already and it seems that the withdrawal has been done already if he had replied to the ticket by confirming the receiving address.

And it's been more than a week already since the BCH withdrawal was asked.

I assume that everything is good and clean now. Otherwise, he'd be back here to say if it's done or not yet.

Might be good if he confirm about this situation since it able to make people see that Bitvest is fine and solving those issues what people raised to them. He can't leave just like  that if the issue has been solve since he also need to give a little credit for the efforts made by lightlord to solve his issue.

We can only say everything is done if there's a confirmation made or the affected user will just totally banish and never post any claims again since, we can't also deny the fact that there are people that after their issue has been solve they go away then never participate on any discussion on the thread then decide to choose a new casino for change.

[sunsilk]

He has replied already and it seems that the withdrawal has been done already if he had replied to the ticket by confirming the receiving address.

And it's been more than a week already since the BCH withdrawal was asked.

I assume that everything is good and clean now. Otherwise, he'd be back here to say if it's done or not yet.

Might be good if he confirm about this situation since it able to make people see that Bitvest is fine and solving those issues what people raised to them. He can't leave just like  that if the issue has been solve since he also need to give a little credit for the efforts made by lightlord to solve his issue.

We can only say everything is done if there's a confirmation made or the affected user will just totally banish and never post any claims again since, we can't also deny the fact that there are people that after their issue has been solve they go away then never participate on any discussion on the thread then decide to choose a new casino for change.

We're not obliged to ask him that and as well as him in verifying that. But just for goodness sake letting the community know if things have been settled or not yet.

But if there is no response at all after the reply of lightlord. It's very likely that things have been resolved already and they're in good terms now.

And we take that silence is a yes, I guess.

[AbuBhakar]

I agree, it's crucial to keep the Bitvest thread focused on gambling discussions rather than campaign complaints. If there are issues with campaigns, they should be addressed on the Services page or by finding another campaign. Let's keep the forum engaging for gamblers and minimize unnecessary whining.

There’s nothing much to discuss on Bitvest casino since they just offer limited games which almost all casino offer in their house game. They don’t have promotion here aside from the on/off signature campaign.

ANN thread discussion usually start from promotion or something new in the casino. Bitvest doesn’t have something new to offer that’s why user here keeps focusing on campaign discussions which is easier to create post rather than the actual which only few play these days.

[avp2306]

I agree, it's crucial to keep the Bitvest thread focused on gambling discussions rather than campaign complaints. If there are issues with campaigns, they should be addressed on the Services page or by finding another campaign. Let's keep the forum engaging for gamblers and minimize unnecessary whining.

There’s nothing much to discuss on Bitvest casino since they just offer limited games which almost all casino offer in their house game. They don’t have promotion here aside from the on/off signature campaign.

ANN thread discussion usually start from promotion or something new in the casino. Bitvest doesn’t have something new to offer that’s why user here keeps focusing on campaign discussions which is easier to create post rather than the actual which only few play these days.

Nothing much to discuss unless there's an issue happened and we could see how the flow of discussions came since we can't deny that many are curious to know if there's a settlement will happen regarding on the issue presented.

But for sure later on once there's nothing to discuss especially if the issue has been solve or people don't have anything much to talk about then maybe this thread will goes down again. The campaign discussion open up due to the confusion from the past announcement posted by manager since there are few people didn't understand the posted words on signature thread but I believe that has been settled already and they understand those participant already understand the situation.

[UncleJAthletics]

Hot wallets empty again, withdrawals unavailable for a day now.

[sunsilk]

Hot wallets empty again, withdrawals unavailable for a day now.

Did it just happen on this day?

If it's empty again then everyone who's requesting a withdrawal today or so will have to wait until lightlord or any representative fills it once again.

Hoping to hear if it's actually empty again from other players there to verify.