Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 09:37:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 139 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BTC-TC] Virtual Community Exchange [CLOSED]  (Read 316321 times)
ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 02, 2013, 04:49:30 AM
 #401

hey  something is up i try to log in i get   

Error:

Xcoind backend failure in getbalance at 774
 

Same here.
Deprived
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 02, 2013, 04:52:28 AM
 #402

Yeah LTC-Global is down too.  Seems like the problem is accessing his backend server to check balances - you can view and navigate the site fine if you aren't logged in (try it in a different browser and you'll see) but soon as you login it fails.
maunderingcabal
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


Don't dwell in the past, don't dream of the future


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2013, 05:20:58 AM
 #403

This is messed up. Now I have nothing to do.

You like my post? Buy me a beer for ฿0.01
13KKQYQLmDFaTtcoPDtnt3My1PPUdcc8AL
My website/blog/bitcoin store
Deprived
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 02, 2013, 06:31:47 AM
 #404

It's back up now.
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043

👻


View Profile
March 02, 2013, 06:33:43 AM
 #405

It's back up now.
cron script might have run every on every :30 ?
burnside
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2013, 06:36:55 AM
 #406

This is messed up. Now I have nothing to do.

doh, it's Friday night man!

Wink

The HDD filled up on the backend server.  I had to purge some backups to make some room.  If you sent a deposit, it should come in shortly as the daemon catches up with the chain.

Cheers.
burnside
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2013, 08:33:28 AM
 #407

The OAuth API now supports internal coin transfers.  Smiley

Cheers.
burnside
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2013, 10:47:19 AM
 #408

I've setup an ASICMINER passthru.

https://btct.co/security/ASICMINER-PT

Please vote if you are able.  Wink
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4354
Merit: 3261



View Profile
March 02, 2013, 10:19:34 PM
 #409

Also have you ever thought of dropping all fees for listing orders and have the people who buy into orders pay all the fee instead.  I think this would encourage traders to put up more listings and improve fluidity.  It's also what the GLBSE did IIRC.

That's a good question.  I have thought about it.  GLBSE when I first started using it did it this way, then it seems like later on it was silently changed to both sides paying.  I remember being pretty pissed when I realized this because I'd stupidly been placing orders that I could have executed right away for just a few satoshi's difference.

It doesn't necessarily have to be all or nothing.  It could be 0.1% to place an order on the book and 0.3% to execute for instance.  That might be a more balanced approach and still encourage more use of the order book.

What does everyone else think?  Would it really have the intended effect of better liquidity?



I am for it.

1. It will bring bid and ask prices closer and improve liquidity.
2. When you make a bid or ask, you are incurring an extra hidden cost because you are giving anyone the option to fill your order at any time, and that option is worth something. Removing the fee for making a bid or ask mitigates that loss.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
Zedster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2013, 09:01:54 AM
 #410

Any chance you will ever offer Cognitive as a pass thru on LTC-Global burnie?
burnside
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2013, 09:19:12 AM
 #411

Any chance you will ever offer Cognitive as a pass thru on LTC-Global burnie?

burnie. lol.  Wink

There's no point to me doing one.  Garr has an official one up already at https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/COGNITIVE-PT Wink

Cheers.
Zedster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2013, 09:30:57 AM
 #412

Any chance you will ever offer Cognitive as a pass thru on LTC-Global burnie?

burnie. lol.  Wink

There's no point to me doing one.  Garr has an official one up already at https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/COGNITIVE-PT Wink

Cheers.


so i am blind...sorry sir..  ahh i remember now....it was still outta my price that's why I forgot Smiley


But how about a ASICMiner then you gonna set that up I guess?
burnside
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2013, 09:35:27 AM
 #413

Any chance you will ever offer Cognitive as a pass thru on LTC-Global burnie?

burnie. lol.  Wink

There's no point to me doing one.  Garr has an official one up already at https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/COGNITIVE-PT Wink

Cheers.


so i am blind...sorry sir..  ahh i remember now....it was still outta my price that's why I forgot Smiley

But how about a ASICMiner then you gonna set that up I guess?

No problem.

On the ASICMINER, it's definitely a possibility.  We'll see how the BTCTC one does.

Cheers.
Zedster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2013, 09:41:26 AM
 #414

Any chance you will ever offer Cognitive as a pass thru on LTC-Global burnie?

burnie. lol.  Wink

There's no point to me doing one.  Garr has an official one up already at https://www.litecoinglobal.com/security/COGNITIVE-PT Wink

Cheers.


so i am blind...sorry sir..  ahh i remember now....it was still outta my price that's why I forgot Smiley

But how about a ASICMiner then you gonna set that up I guess?

No problem.

On the ASICMINER, it's definitely a possibility.  We'll see how the BTCTC one does.

Cheers.


Waiting in line for BTCTC.
zx9r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2013, 05:45:25 PM
 #415

Sorry for this may be being an offtopic. I was wondering what are the possibilities of BTC-TC following the same way as GLBSE did. Is it a real possibility ?
creativex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 03, 2013, 06:00:43 PM
 #416

BTCT.CO automatically issues a shareholder report to asset issuers every 12hrs so even if the exchange disappeared overnight the GLBSE fiasco would not be repeated. Asset issuers would have only to check their inbox for a list of email addresses to contact with share information.

burnside
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2013, 06:21:28 PM
 #417

Sorry for this may be being an offtopic. I was wondering what are the possibilities of BTC-TC following the same way as GLBSE did. Is it a real possibility ?


The site could definitely go away if government entities come after me.  I've guarded against this every way I can legally with the creation of the company offshore and technically with the open access of the lists to the asset issuers.

A GLBSE meltdown where no one knows who owns what will definitely not be repeated.

Cheers.
Monster Tent
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 04, 2013, 12:17:31 AM
 #418

Sorry for this may be being an offtopic. I was wondering what are the possibilities of BTC-TC following the same way as GLBSE did. Is it a real possibility ?


burnside isnt Nefario  Smiley. You can tell from the way the site is coded and the fact you get ownership details emailed to you every 12 hours.



burnside
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006


Lead Blockchain Developer


View Profile WWW
March 04, 2013, 06:47:39 AM
 #419

Brief PSA...

A cross-post-quote from the G.ASICMINER-PT thread:

We discussed a potential payment from Jon, in the case where the PT trades larger volumes

This will not be done on BTC-TC.  It has been considered in the past, and rejected.

https://btct.co/ (the dev log tab):

Quote
?possible? Kick-backs for asset issuers with large volume, eg, 0.5% of transaction fees for assets with over 10k/mo in volume. (thx EMIF) -- (probably not going to do this. it would encourage asset issuers to generate transactions by intentionally inducing volatility --burnside)

Something to chew on a bit.  We were considering making it transparent like cryptostocks does and just have an extra percentage displayed on the trades.  Apparently this kind of thing goes on behind closed doors elsewhere.

Unless the asset is the exchange itself, think twice before buying into an asset where the issuer makes coins on the trades.

btcash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 968
Merit: 515



View Profile
March 04, 2013, 08:31:53 AM
 #420

Great improvements in the last weeks. You should post them here too and not only on Litcointalk.

What happened to the deposit status (0/3 confirmations...)?
Bids/Asks like 0.1000001 should be changed to 0.100001 and not to 0.1.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 139 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!