█▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC

[crackfoo]

Sorry I wasn't clear, I meant 10gh/s from just me; not from the pool. The pool has a large amount of hashing power and should easily give a miner a share of the Dash if mining at 10gh/s. It regularly goes higher than 60gh/s on zpool. It's either not distributing the Dash correctly or the pool isn't mining enough of it over other coins.

and? we can't know when a block will be found. sometimes its a couple hours, sometimes several in the same hour. the pool does easily give you a share of DASH.... when a block is found. there is just over 200mh on other coins right now.and 72000mh on dash... I don't see a problem with that. you're saying... that other 200mh will make the difference in finding a DASH block?

[crackfoo]

Hashrate is more stabile but reduced to 230 MH/s. On other Pools I get a rate about 360 MH/s. Seems for Titans zpool is not working

Are there any other titan user who can present their settings?

Can you tell or guesstimate how often you see your shares being submitted?

[aaronsace]

I appreciate the response; hopefully we get this working correctly. If most of the pools hashing power is going onto dash then the issue must be the way it's distributing the shares. Are you able to see if there is any miners in the pool that are running at about 10gh/s then with miners with small amounts of hashing power? It should be averaging about 0.02 to 0.08 btc/gh/day but maybe it's highly sporadic due to the rate dash is found. The pool should be distributing the shares according to miners hash rate but maybe it's not working correctly. 0.004 btc/gh/day is extremely low for 1 hour.

[joblo]

x11 is not working correctly. zpool keeps reporting high btc per gh but all it mines is unprofitable coins.

Where the heck is dash or startcoin???

 

Post your address. I suspect you mine for an hour and expect it to rain gold.

I suspect a possible misunderstanding of the differences between high and low diff coins, or an issue I mentioned a
while back, that the most profitable coin does not always get the most hash even when it is high diff and can handle it.

[aaronsace]

x11 is not working correctly. zpool keeps reporting high btc per gh but all it mines is unprofitable coins.

Where the heck is dash or startcoin???

 

Post your address. I suspect you mine for an hour and expect it to rain gold.

I suspect a possible misunderstanding of the differences between high and low diff coins, or an issue I mentioned a
while back, that the most profitable coin does not always get the most hash even when it is high diff and can handle it.

Is this a known issue then? LTCRabbit is definitely distributing the shares correctly but zpool isn't. Thanks.

[joblo]

x11 is not working correctly. zpool keeps reporting high btc per gh but all it mines is unprofitable coins.

Where the heck is dash or startcoin???

 

Post your address. I suspect you mine for an hour and expect it to rain gold.

I suspect a possible misunderstanding of the differences between high and low diff coins, or an issue I mentioned a
while back, that the most profitable coin does not always get the most hash even when it is high diff and can handle it.

Is this a known issue then? LTCRabbit is definitely distributing the shares correctly but zpool isn't. Thanks.

It is an issue I've observed and reported but hasn't been acknowledged.

[crackfoo]

It is an issue I've observed and reported but hasn't been acknowledged.

I've mentioned before, I'm not a developer and don't have the first clue how to revamp that part of the pools code nor is it even very easy to understand what it's doing to begin with.

It's here though, if you've got some ideas:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp

[joblo]

It is an issue I've observed and reported but hasn't been acknowledged.

I've mentioned before, I'm not a developer and don't have the first clue how to revamp that part of the pools code nor is it even very easy to understand what it's doing to begin with.

It's here though, if you've got some ideas:

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp

Fair enough, I can't make sense of it either. If you previously responded to me on this issue I apologize.

[JaredKaragen]

Wow... looks like it was a bad time to let my internet lapse at home for the last week.... and its still not paid yet.


So;  For people going crazy about shares and "expected credit":  If you are mining for just a min and a block is found;  there's still X amount of shares accumulated before you even started mining for that block.  This in itself should dissuade you from switching pools unless its for long periods.
The forked coins... yeah... it happens.   Fact of life.  Happens to every pool.  Fact of life.   Not the pools fault at all.

Crackfoo:
I am finalizing a copy of my batch that implements the new web addressing....   But I made that modification at the same time as the mod for selecting individual devices per-instance of the batch; and things broke a little.   I may just have to do a quick sub-revision of my last released version just for the new URL settings....

I will also release a "fool-proof" batch for people having issues with mine (the typical loop of individual algos one at a time).

I hope to get this done within the next two days or so....  so keep your eyes peeled people.

[induktor]

Hello
I am mining LBRY and I don't see any profits, does this coin takes too long to confirm? because in "Last 50 Earnings"  I don't even see it as inmmature, it shows nothing, i am mining at 1GH

does this coin still works? it shows 0 on profitability but i know that this is sometimes because the algo that calculates it does not work so better ask here hehe

my address is: 176cb7Pwp8V4x9bXt6fpCRqXm9S9oUVEHB

thank you!
indkt.

[tbearhere]

Hello
I am mining LBRY and I don't see any profits, does this coin takes too long to confirm? because in "Last 50 Earnings"  I don't even see it as inmmature, it shows nothing, i am mining at 1GH

does this coin still works? it shows 0 on profitability but i know that this is sometimes because the algo that calculates it does not work so better ask here hehe

my address is: 176cb7Pwp8V4x9bXt6fpCRqXm9S9oUVEHB

thank you!
indkt.

induktor
Read your PM

[crackfoo]

Wow... looks like it was a bad time to let my internet lapse at home for the last week.... and its still not paid yet.


So;  For people going crazy about shares and "expected credit":  If you are mining for just a min and a block is found;  there's still X amount of shares accumulated before you even started mining for that block.  This in itself should dissuade you from switching pools unless its for long periods.
The forked coins... yeah... it happens.   Fact of life.  Happens to every pool.  Fact of life.   Not the pools fault at all.

Crackfoo:
I am finalizing a copy of my batch that implements the new web addressing....   But I made that modification at the same time as the mod for selecting individual devices per-instance of the batch; and things broke a little.   I may just have to do a quick sub-revision of my last released version just for the new URL settings....

I will also release a "fool-proof" batch for people having issues with mine (the typical loop of individual algos one at a time).

I hope to get this done within the next two days or so....  so keep your eyes peeled people.

That's awesome. thanks. I hope the miners find it super simple to get up and running.

Thanks

[aarons6]

wow what a day on the sha256 pool.. dont know what coin is being so profitable but i love it.

sha256   3333   45   161   612.1 Th/s   2%   0.00338


so far ive made almost 10$ today.. thats 6$ more then 100% bitcoin..

   

[redukt]

wow what a day on the sha256 pool.. dont know what coin is being so profitable but i love it.

sha256   3333   45   161   612.1 Th/s   2%   0.00338


so far ive made almost 10$ today.. thats 6$ more then 100% bitcoin..

   
https://c4.staticflickr.com/9/8040/28614443483_74652bb7d5_b.jpg

So SHA256 has finally become stable enough to mine on?

[aarons6]

wow what a day on the sha256 pool.. dont know what coin is being so profitable but i love it.

sha256   3333   45   161   612.1 Th/s   2%   0.00338


so far ive made almost 10$ today.. thats 6$ more then 100% bitcoin..

   

So SHA256 has finally become stable enough to mine on?

ive never really had much problems with it..

i currently have 2 s7s that are clocked down to 500 and undervolted to 660mv

they do jam up if you dont set a difficulty.. i have mine set to 2000.

[crackfoo]

wow what a day on the sha256 pool.. dont know what coin is being so profitable but i love it.

sha256   3333   45   161   612.1 Th/s   2%   0.00338


so far ive made almost 10$ today.. thats 6$ more then 100% bitcoin..

   

UNB being added to Bittrex jumped started the SHA profitability. Of course a lot of miners jumped on that coin and the diff went from 32M to 102M so it will bring down the returns but I think will still be doing ok and of course the markets have been wild so it makes the pending balances jump around.

Happy to have the SHA port stable now to bring in the most profits for everyone.

Cheers!

[Mudbankkeith]

I have some s5 miners on this pool
I find they slowly drop hash through the day and need rebooting.
On CK pool they were stable.
Is there any way of stabilising the hash rate? I have tried a few settings for the difficulty but they all slowly drop.

[crackfoo]

I have some s5 miners on this pool
I find they slowly drop hash through the day and need rebooting.
On CK pool they were stable.
Is there any way of stabilising the hash rate? I have tried a few settings for the difficulty but they all slowly drop.

have you tried using the stratum-proxie thing-a-majig that someone mentioned a little while ago?

[edonkey]

I jumped back on the pool yesterday lured by the increased profitability.

It was great until one of my S9 blades fell over again sometime over night. I woke up to the middle blade displaying all x's.

I think it happened around 11 PM Pacific time. At least the graph shows a drop off sometime around then. I'll check the logs to see if I can find an event.

This never happened on Kano.is, where I've mined since June. This is the second time that I've mined on zpool, and the second time that a blade fell over. I've restarted and pointed back at Kano and the middle blade is back and working fine.

I am using the Stratehm stratum-proxy. Doesn't seem to matter.

I have not specified a minimum difficulty. Last time this happened I think I noticed the difficulty being very low (64).

Maybe there's a Bitmain firmware problem that causes a blade to look disconnected if it runs at too low a difficulty and floods the controller with shares. Just a guess. Since Bitmain hasn't released their S9 source, no one can look at it.

Any suggestions for getting my S9s to be stable on zpool would be appreciated.

[edonkey]

Looks like my problem started happening at 23:03:15 Pacific time last night.

Near as I can tell from the logs, zpool disconnected, then the proxy failed over to Kano. There's some errors after that saying "Change extranonce not supported". Then there's a ton of rejects on kano, with a bunch of "JsonRpcError" errors that I haven't seen before.

The proxy switches back to zpool at 23:04:01 and gets a bunch of rejects with an "Invalid job id". Maybe that's old work from Kano, and expected during a pool switch.

I think that the blade fell over sometime around here because the hash rate chart for the problematic S9 seems to drop around this time.

I suspect that this problem is due to a massive shift in difficulty. The difficulty was at 93312 on zpool before the disconnect. It then gets set to 211 on kano. Then it's set to 64 on zpool. This is all in the space of a minute. It took about 8 minutes to settle out at 82944 on zpool. The fact that this is lower than before the disconnect reinforces the theory that this is when the blade fell over.

Operating under the theory that this is a Bitmain problem with difficulty swings, what minimum difficulty should I set for about 24 THs?