Bitcoin Forum
April 22, 2018, 02:11:40 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: .
.
.

Pages: « 1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 ... 501 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][PIVX] - PRIVATE INSTANT VERIFIED TRANSACTION - PROOF OF STAKE - ZEROCOIN  (Read 703311 times)
pjcltd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001

MP-Hosting (owner)


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2016, 12:31:17 PM
 #3081

i think you misquoted that one. I agree with the risk part. There is also the risk that people switch off masternodes and thats pretty high imho.

EDIT:
Quote
Spot on
we all know the risks in the coin
this issue will get sorted out.

I am not talking about a couple of days but compensation in case it takes longer.

You should know how people handle this otherwise since you switched off 100+ masternodes at least because people were not paying.


dont think thats the same really
if you dont pay for a service then you will get turned off
this is differant thay have a isse in the code lets let them sort it out.


thanks
Paul

░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄
░░░░▄██████████▄
░░░███▀░░░░░░▀███
░░███░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░██░░░░░███
███░░░░░░██░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░██░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░█████░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░███
░░███░░░░░░░░░░███
░░░███▄░░░░░░▄███
░░░░▀██████████▀
░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀
   ░░░████░░░░░░░████
░░███░██░░░░░██░███
░░██░░░███░███░░░██
░░██░░░░░███░░░░░██
█████████████████████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████


░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
   

░░░░░░
░░░░░██░░░░░░
░░░░████░░░░░▐█
░░░░█████░░░░███
░░░░░█████░░████
░░█░░░█████░████
░██░░░██████████
████░████░█████
█████████░░███
███████░░░██
░░▀████░░░█▀
░░░░░
   ░██████████████████▀██████░
█████████░░██████▀████████
█████████░░███▀▄████████
███████░░██░░▄██░░███████
██████▌░░░██▄▄██░░░▐██████
██████░░░░░█████░░░░░██████
██████░░░░░░███░░░░░░██████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████
█████░░░██░░░░░░░██░░░█████
████░░░████▌░░░▐████░░░████
████░░░█████▌▐█████░░░████
███░░░███████████████░░░███
███░░░███████████████░░░███
░█████████████████████████░
MONETARYUNIT
.......for Me, U & Everyone.......
[/
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1524363100
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524363100

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524363100
Reply with quote  #2

1524363100
Report to moderator
1524363100
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524363100

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524363100
Reply with quote  #2

1524363100
Report to moderator
1524363100
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524363100

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524363100
Reply with quote  #2

1524363100
Report to moderator
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000


jakiman is back!


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 01:37:58 PM
 #3082

Last time something like this happen was during March where MN payments were higher than normal.
It was fixed but nothing was invalidated. It's all part of the fun. Code is open for all to see on github. Smiley

You can follow me on Twitter for the latest PIVX news & updates: https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Pivx Core Developer - HyperStake Founder


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 03:50:25 PM
 #3083

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

presstab's Block Explorer Service | Only $10/mo for most coins! | Richlist w/ Address Claim | Market Cap Charts | Stake Weight Tracking | PoS % Rate Tracking
PIVX - Private Instant Verified Tx | HyperStake - Fun & Easy High Reward Staking
pjcltd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001

MP-Hosting (owner)


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2016, 03:52:38 PM
 #3084

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

Hay
no problem these things happen
if you need any help from any of us just let sus know on here 

and thanks for taking the time to keep us informed 

thanks
Paul

░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄
░░░░▄██████████▄
░░░███▀░░░░░░▀███
░░███░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░██░░░░░███
███░░░░░░██░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░██░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░█████░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░███
░░███░░░░░░░░░░███
░░░███▄░░░░░░▄███
░░░░▀██████████▀
░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀
   ░░░████░░░░░░░████
░░███░██░░░░░██░███
░░██░░░███░███░░░██
░░██░░░░░███░░░░░██
█████████████████████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████


░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
░░███████░░░███████
   

░░░░░░
░░░░░██░░░░░░
░░░░████░░░░░▐█
░░░░█████░░░░███
░░░░░█████░░████
░░█░░░█████░████
░██░░░██████████
████░████░█████
█████████░░███
███████░░░██
░░▀████░░░█▀
░░░░░
   ░██████████████████▀██████░
█████████░░██████▀████████
█████████░░███▀▄████████
███████░░██░░▄██░░███████
██████▌░░░██▄▄██░░░▐██████
██████░░░░░█████░░░░░██████
██████░░░░░░███░░░░░░██████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████
█████░░░██░░░░░░░██░░░█████
████░░░████▌░░░▐████░░░████
████░░░█████▌▐█████░░░████
███░░░███████████████░░░███
███░░░███████████████░░░███
░█████████████████████████░
MONETARYUNIT
.......for Me, U & Everyone.......
[/
tylerderden
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1008



View Profile
August 08, 2016, 03:53:14 PM
 #3085

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

Allgood brother, I doubt anyone here is upset in the slightest. Masternodes with PoS shit this is a first, going OK under the circumstances. Except Nobody is panic selling goddamnit!!

DRPD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


Safekeet


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 04:38:18 PM
 #3086

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

thanks for your honest information and no problem man, we are all humans, and humans make mistakes ....
just take the time you need to fix the error and test the new version.

  █ 


  █ 
A new cryptocurrency for a Simple, Smart & Secure digital safe deposit box
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ■ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Whitepaper Bitcointalk ANN Telegram Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
  █ 


  █ 
ICO SALE
FEB. 1
2018
[/center]
berron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 650
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 08, 2016, 05:06:20 PM
 #3087

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.
The only way to not fail it's not try it. I think that everyone involved in this coin from its early stage know that you were trying to get a new high to the Dashcoin scheme, and it would have its risk (first in something is always a risk, being this to land a rocket or to make the first POS wallet in the last bitcoin protocol). Big wallets in Bitrex are (unfortunately) not dumping so it's clear that almost everyone knows your honestity, professionality and work. Let's hope we can have that wallet working as soon as possible, if any testnet windows version can be run to help, don't hesitate to ask.

I'm not ENT dev neither affiliated with EternityGroup in any way. Simply, the coin gives good returns.
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000


jakiman is back!


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 05:43:26 PM
 #3088

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

You can follow me on Twitter for the latest PIVX news & updates: https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
kbhutto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 573
Merit: 250


⚡ Property-secured P2P lending ⚡


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 07:09:34 PM
 #3089

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

That would be an issue.......I also did a couple of small transfers.

Tokenlend

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
PROPERTY SECURED P2P LENDING
WHITEPAPERTWITTERTELEGRAMFACEBOOK

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Pivx Core Developer - HyperStake Founder


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 07:21:20 PM
 #3090

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

That would be an issue.......I also did a couple of small transfers.

I am not sure how you could have something go through after 259200. My guess is that you minted it into a transaction yourself and that it will be in the mempool waiting to get into a block once the update is ready.

Initial testing has gone well, I have a few nodes synced up to a PoS chain. Should have more details to you folks soon. I am more than happy to give up any staking rewards I have received in the process.

presstab's Block Explorer Service | Only $10/mo for most coins! | Richlist w/ Address Claim | Market Cap Charts | Stake Weight Tracking | PoS % Rate Tracking
PIVX - Private Instant Verified Tx | HyperStake - Fun & Easy High Reward Staking
kbhutto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 573
Merit: 250


⚡ Property-secured P2P lending ⚡


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 07:24:32 PM
 #3091

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

That would be an issue.......I also did a couple of small transfers.

I am not sure how you could have something go through after 259200. My guess is that you minted it into a transaction yourself and that it will be in the mempool waiting to get into a block once the update is ready.


Initial testing has gone well, I have a few nodes synced up to a PoS chain. Should have more details to you folks soon. I am more than happy to give up any staking rewards I have received in the process.

No.......I did two very small transfers from trex (both were successful). I am not worried about my coins as transactions are small........but what about transactions done by other users?

Don't make it another ETH please!

Tokenlend

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
PROPERTY SECURED P2P LENDING
WHITEPAPERTWITTERTELEGRAMFACEBOOK

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Pivx Core Developer - HyperStake Founder


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 07:28:15 PM
 #3092

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

That would be an issue.......I also did a couple of small transfers.

I am not sure how you could have something go through after 259200. My guess is that you minted it into a transaction yourself and that it will be in the mempool waiting to get into a block once the update is ready.


Initial testing has gone well, I have a few nodes synced up to a PoS chain. Should have more details to you folks soon. I am more than happy to give up any staking rewards I have received in the process.

No.......I did two very small transfers from trex (both were successful). I am not worried about my coins as transactions are small........but what about transactions done by other users?

Don't make it another ETH please!

And the transactions were confirmed into a block?

There is no need for a reversal of transactions. Transactions are not dependent on the block. Bittrex, if they need to, can just prompt their wallet to rebroadcast the transactions.

presstab's Block Explorer Service | Only $10/mo for most coins! | Richlist w/ Address Claim | Market Cap Charts | Stake Weight Tracking | PoS % Rate Tracking
PIVX - Private Instant Verified Tx | HyperStake - Fun & Easy High Reward Staking
kbhutto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 573
Merit: 250


⚡ Property-secured P2P lending ⚡


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 07:35:04 PM
 #3093

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

That would be an issue.......I also did a couple of small transfers.

I am not sure how you could have something go through after 259200. My guess is that you minted it into a transaction yourself and that it will be in the mempool waiting to get into a block once the update is ready.


Initial testing has gone well, I have a few nodes synced up to a PoS chain. Should have more details to you folks soon. I am more than happy to give up any staking rewards I have received in the process.

No.......I did two very small transfers from trex (both were successful). I am not worried about my coins as transactions are small........but what about transactions done by other users?

Don't make it another ETH please!

And the transactions were confirmed into a block?

There is no need for a reversal of transactions. Transactions are not dependent on the block. Bittrex, if they need to, can just prompt their wallet to rebroadcast the transactions.

presstab explorer is not showing records for both transactions. However, I received both in my wallet and balance on trex was deducted accordingly. Could it be that presstab was on a different chain........but how come trex and my wallet were on same chain?

PS: I was on v2 wallet.....

Tokenlend

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
PROPERTY SECURED P2P LENDING
WHITEPAPERTWITTERTELEGRAMFACEBOOK

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000


jakiman is back!


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 08:10:52 PM
 #3094

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

That would be an issue.......I also did a couple of small transfers.

I am not sure how you could have something go through after 259200. My guess is that you minted it into a transaction yourself and that it will be in the mempool waiting to get into a block once the update is ready.

Initial testing has gone well, I have a few nodes synced up to a PoS chain. Should have more details to you folks soon. I am more than happy to give up any staking rewards I have received in the process.

I did 1 small and 1 large withdraw from bittrex after block 259200 using v2 wallet.
It was done during the time when i was getting stake rewards. (minted) (still am)
It has over 1000 confirms so yeah, it would be an issue if i just lose it...  Sad

Surely there must have been others who also withdrew after block 259200. (but maybe not on this forum)
That would mean they will also lose their coins. Hmm.

You can follow me on Twitter for the latest PIVX news & updates: https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
kbhutto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 573
Merit: 250


⚡ Property-secured P2P lending ⚡


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 08:18:15 PM
 #3095

I am working with the DNET team to implement a fix to the node communication issue. We worked late into the night and got quite a bit done. Now we are in the testing phase. Hope to have some better information for you all soon. As of now, I would expect to consider anything after 259200 as not valid. I think best route going forward will be for us to make sure this fix works, then mint 10-20 PoS blocks and then hard checkpoint it into the wallet, then distribute the new version.

I feel bad, this is my error in the code. Sorry to let you all down.

What happens to the coins that i withdrew from bittrex after block 259200?
It came through without issue .will i lose that?

That would be an issue.......I also did a couple of small transfers.

I am not sure how you could have something go through after 259200. My guess is that you minted it into a transaction yourself and that it will be in the mempool waiting to get into a block once the update is ready.

Initial testing has gone well, I have a few nodes synced up to a PoS chain. Should have more details to you folks soon. I am more than happy to give up any staking rewards I have received in the process.

I did 1 small and 1 large withdraw from bittrex after block 259200 using v2 wallet.
It was done during the time when i was getting stake rewards. (minted) (still am)
It has over 1000 confirms so yeah, it would be an issue if i just lose it...  Sad

Surely there must have been others who also withdrew after block 259200. (but maybe not on this forum)
That would mean they will also lose their coins. Hmm.

Yeah. We cannot just discard blocks after 259200 height. It may not be good for the coin. Don't repeat ETH mistakes.

Tokenlend

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
PROPERTY SECURED P2P LENDING
WHITEPAPERTWITTERTELEGRAMFACEBOOK

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 260


PIVX D8cgXrCEkqTepGPfECnBjYDUuDMZ9wCZbn


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2016, 08:24:51 PM
 #3096

I am in favor to restart the chain at 259200, if you ask. I understand the frustration of some users to have made tx after the switch. however they are on a fake chain... so it's too easy to claim mint rewards that they were alone to get it. btw it's just my opinion.

Do the devs have an expected release date for the patch? Again, may the code be with you Wink.

mikegi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 09:05:23 PM
 #3097

My wallet node was up to block 259390... on whatever chain...

My masternodes seem to be happily waiting at 259200 with
 "status" : "Masternode successfully started".

Any suggestions from the devs about what to do with currently running masternodes or what will be likely necessary steps one should take when the fix is ready?

Anyway, it is nice to see some action in github indicating a solution is in the works.


jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000


jakiman is back!


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 09:24:07 PM
 #3098

At the end, I rather a fixed up single chain than the situation that we are in right now.
So whatever works 100% and is quickest to fix is fine I guess even if I'll lose coins.

You can follow me on Twitter for the latest PIVX news & updates: https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Pivx Core Developer - HyperStake Founder


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 09:38:52 PM
 #3099

Yeah. We cannot just discard blocks after 259200 height. It may not be good for the coin. Don't repeat ETH mistakes.

There is no valid chain after 259200. I would be thrilled if you could show me a chain that has more than 2 people connected to it. I don't think it exists.

presstab's Block Explorer Service | Only $10/mo for most coins! | Richlist w/ Address Claim | Market Cap Charts | Stake Weight Tracking | PoS % Rate Tracking
PIVX - Private Instant Verified Tx | HyperStake - Fun & Easy High Reward Staking
presstab
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Pivx Core Developer - HyperStake Founder


View Profile
August 08, 2016, 09:40:57 PM
 #3100

At the end, I rather a fixed up single chain than the situation that we are in right now.
So whatever works 100% and is quickest to fix is fine I guess even if I'll lose coins.

There will not be any loss of coins. That isn't how this will work. Just wait a few more hours and we should all be up and running.

presstab's Block Explorer Service | Only $10/mo for most coins! | Richlist w/ Address Claim | Market Cap Charts | Stake Weight Tracking | PoS % Rate Tracking
PIVX - Private Instant Verified Tx | HyperStake - Fun & Easy High Reward Staking
Pages: « 1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 [155] 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 ... 501 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!