Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 01:24:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Ethereum mining still profitable?  (Read 131197 times)
Listent
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 26, 2016, 05:17:46 PM
 #821

So for 3x970, the profit is $6.99, 2X390, profit is 6.76. Not much difference. But 3X970 is 50% more expensive.
1715304271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715304271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715304271
Reply with quote  #2

1715304271
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715304271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715304271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715304271
Reply with quote  #2

1715304271
Report to moderator
1715304271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715304271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715304271
Reply with quote  #2

1715304271
Report to moderator
1715304271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715304271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715304271
Reply with quote  #2

1715304271
Report to moderator
antantti
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
May 26, 2016, 06:15:58 PM
 #822


you are not understading what you are posting

it's obvious that more hash equal to more profit, but this does not mean that the 390 is better than a 970

you need to do thing in the right way, by calculating with the same hash, so put in the calculator this

3x970 at 120w each, 60MH total, vs 2x390 at 230w each, 60MH total, this with your example...

I do understand very well what I am posting.

What I didn't understand was your way of calculating ethereum mining profitability but now I get it. You completely forgot that street price for 970=390 so you need 50% more funding to start. In this case that is 20-25 ETH.

Only a fool would buy 970 instead of 390 for ethereum mining.
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
May 26, 2016, 06:27:43 PM
Last edit: May 27, 2016, 12:46:20 PM by Amph
 #823


you are not understading what you are posting

it's obvious that more hash equal to more profit, but this does not mean that the 390 is better than a 970

you need to do thing in the right way, by calculating with the same hash, so put in the calculator this

3x970 at 120w each, 60MH total, vs 2x390 at 230w each, 60MH total, this with your example...

I do understand very well what I am posting.

What I didn't understand was your way of calculating ethereum mining profitability but now I get it. You completely forgot that street price for 970=390 so you need 50% more funding to start. In this case that is 20-25 ETH.

Only a fool would buy 970 instead of 390 for ethereum mining.


well i was talking about efficiency not investment, because after you reach roi, you are not making more with 390

yes they cost equal but initial investment is not so important gpu can be sold later at a good price

and in efficiency they are equal if a 970 can do 20 mega with 125w

So for 3x970, the profit is $6.99, 2X390, profit is 6.76. Not much difference. But 3X970 is 50% more expensive.

sure but my entire point is that they have the same efficiency, people were saying that the 390 can consume less and hash more

but in the end they have the same ratio between hashing and consumption

btw i payed my 970 g1 gaming 240 euro only and i can't find the 390 for the same price even used so...
Stein
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 26, 2016, 06:37:00 PM
 #824

So I was thinking of building a few 380 x 6 rigs with a EVGA Gold 1300
Would I be better building a 5 x 390 rig ? What power supply would that take ?
Which is more bang for the buck ?
bitcoin730
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 26, 2016, 09:40:10 PM
 #825

Only if you do cloud mining its could work yes.
Zeelotin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 27, 2016, 05:52:26 AM
 #826

So I was thinking of building a few 380 x 6 rigs with a EVGA Gold 1300
Would I be better building a 5 x 390 rig ? What power supply would that take ?
Which is more bang for the buck ?

I will build 6x390 with the undervoltage is under clock. That is more efficient that the 6x380, but more expensive.
BitMaxz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3248
Merit: 2969


Block halving is coming.


View Profile WWW
May 27, 2016, 06:35:15 AM
 #827

Only if you do cloud mining its could work yes.
Cloud mining is not worth it.. better to rent vps to start mining ethereum.. and i think this is profitable cloud mining..
Also you can find free vps in google but it needs credit card to verified that you are real person not a bot..

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
Stein
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 27, 2016, 06:39:42 AM
 #828

I will build 6x390 with the undervoltage is under clock. That is more efficient that the 6x380, but more expensive.
Yes definitively more efficient but I was looking for info about of 6 x 380 VS 5 X 390.
Was wondering Hash Rate/ Power Supply Sizes etc..

Is it  380 x 6 = 20 x 6= 120 MH/s and 1300 Watt PS
and  390 x 5 = 30 x 5= 150 MH/s  and Huh   Watt PS

Just trying to stay away from building with two power supplies.
Jating
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 808


View Profile
May 27, 2016, 07:08:01 AM
 #829

I will build 6x390 with the undervoltage is under clock. That is more efficient that the 6x380, but more expensive.
Yes definitively more efficient but I was looking for info about of 6 x 380 VS 5 X 390.
Was wondering Hash Rate/ Power Supply Sizes etc..

Is it  380 x 6 = 20 x 6= 120 MH/s and 1300 Watt PS
and  390 x 5 = 30 x 5= 150 MH/s  and Huh   Watt PS

Just trying to stay away from building with two power supplies.

If you undervolt the R9 390 to -200 mV, it will consume about 160W at 27 MH/s. So for 6, it is 960W, plus system, it is about 1060W. But you can undervolt less, to say -100 mV, it is 230W at 30.5 MH/s.
Raswild
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 27, 2016, 07:42:48 AM
 #830

I have 1X7990 + 5x 390, consumes 1080W and 169 MH/S. But the 7990 runs at 900 mV and the 390 runs at 977mV.
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
May 27, 2016, 01:06:21 PM
 #831

I will build 6x390 with the undervoltage is under clock. That is more efficient that the 6x380, but more expensive.
Yes definitively more efficient but I was looking for info about of 6 x 380 VS 5 X 390.
Was wondering Hash Rate/ Power Supply Sizes etc..

Is it  380 x 6 = 20 x 6= 120 MH/s and 1300 Watt PS
and  390 x 5 = 30 x 5= 150 MH/s  and Huh   Watt PS

Just trying to stay away from building with two power supplies.

If you undervolt the R9 390 to -200 mV, it will consume about 160W at 27 MH/s. So for 6, it is 960W, plus system, it is about 1060W. But you can undervolt less, to say -100 mV, it is 230W at 30.5 MH/s.

last time it was 187 for 27mh not 160w, still waiting for pics for this, i provided pic of my little rig doing 20mh with only 124

still no pic for a single 390 doing 27mh with only 160w, i smell bullshit here, it's probably 180-190w
mwgame1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 04:07:01 PM
 #832



misinformation you say?



before you say that smi it's not accurate, i have tested with wattmeter and it report the same

how i can use the smi reporter to check the watt usage bcuz i want to sli mg nvidia gpu and want to make sure if my psu can handle it
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 04:56:48 PM
 #833



misinformation you say?



before you say that smi it's not accurate, i have tested with wattmeter and it report the same

how i can use the smi reporter to check the watt usage bcuz i want to sli mg nvidia gpu and want to make sure if my psu can handle it

nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw
mwgame1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 07:33:07 PM
 #834




nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw


i tried to type it in cmd, but nothing happened, where i should type it ?
thx vm 4 reply
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 08:02:30 PM
 #835




nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw


i tried to type it in cmd, but nothing happened, where i should type it ?
thx vm 4 reply

cmd as admin --->cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\ ---> nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw
mwgame1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 08:04:17 PM
 #836




nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw


i tried to type it in cmd, but nothing happened, where i should type it ?
thx vm 4 reply

cmd as admin --->cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\ ---> nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw



thx very much

GTX 970 4gb SSC EVGA @18MH @148-150Watt
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
May 29, 2016, 08:49:52 PM
 #837




nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw


i tried to type it in cmd, but nothing happened, where i should type it ?
thx vm 4 reply

cmd as admin --->cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\ ---> nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw



thx very much

GTX 970 4gb SSC EVGA @18MH @148-150Watt


seems too much, try to reduce power limit to 50-55%
mwgame1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 09:59:35 PM
 #838




nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw


i tried to type it in cmd, but nothing happened, where i should type it ?
thx vm 4 reply

cmd as admin --->cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\ ---> nvidia-smi -i 0 --loop-ms=1000 --format=csv,noheader --query-gpu=power.draw



thx very much

GTX 970 4gb SSC EVGA @18MH @148-150Watt


seems too much, try to reduce power limit to 50-55%

sorry for asking alot but can you tell me how i can do it ? and does it reduce my hashrate, because in a couple weeks i will buy another gtx 970 and make it SLI and i only have 620watt coolermaster psu, so less watt's will be helpfull
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 11:23:29 PM
 #839

SLI = bad for mining, offers ZERO benefit and sometimes causes issues that reduce your hashrate per card.
 For a machine that's primarily for gaming, SLI is usefull.

 You probably want a better power supply, given your stated plans - that second card is going to be pushing your existing supply VERY hard if you game with the machine or if you ever start mining something on it that can use an NVidia card efficiently.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
mwgame1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 29, 2016, 11:27:14 PM
 #840

r u sure ? i see alot of ppl mining with more than 1 gpu on 1 rig ? why would alot of ppl do that if its bad ? and my system will be using ~500watts, not really good but decent to make 120$ first month then i upgrade my psu
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!