deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2016, 09:47:23 AM Last edit: June 23, 2016, 09:58:47 AM by deisik |
|
Combustion engine may be an "ancient" technology, but it is so pervasive because for the amount of energy you get for the cost, combustion engines are cheap and easy. I also believe electric cars are the future. I currently own a hybrid car. Comparatively, a hybrid car costs a few thousand dollars more than the exact same non-hybrid version, about $2-3k. I've more than made up that cost in the years of driving it, so it's been a sound investment.
For short drives (10-20 kms), these can work. The Lithium battery which you get for $2,000 runs out of charge after 20 km max. Then you have to spend 3-4 hours to recharge it. The batteries which last 400 km or more usually costs around $30,000. The invertor costs another $25,000 to $30,000. So if you are using the car mostly for long drives, then 98% of the time, you will be running it using gasoline For short term (lol) drives you could also use flywheel energy storage. Given the recent breakthroughs in nanomaterials (such as carbon fibers), which have outstanding qualities in respect to their mechanical strength (critical for flywheels), this technology may gain traction again (pun intended)... The flywheels had been used, for example, in gyrobuses ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs31.postimg.org%2F4ssnesl3v%2FGyrobus_aan_het_opladen.jpg&t=665&c=zxVMcev1Mw22CQ)
|
|
|
|
Barnabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2016, 09:56:32 AM |
|
Combustion engine may be an "ancient" technology, but it is so pervasive because for the amount of energy you get for the cost, combustion engines are cheap and easy. I also believe electric cars are the future. I currently own a hybrid car. Comparatively, a hybrid car costs a few thousand dollars more than the exact same non-hybrid version, about $2-3k. I've more than made up that cost in the years of driving it, so it's been a sound investment.
For short drives (10-20 kms), these can work. The Lithium battery which you get for $2,000 runs out of charge after 20 km max. Then you have to spend 3-4 hours to recharge it. The batteries which last 400 km or more usually costs around $30,000. The invertor costs another $25,000 to $30,000. So if you are using the car mostly for long drives, then 98% of the time, you will be running it using gasoline For short term (lol) drives you could also use flywheel energy storage. Given the recent breakthroughs in the nanomaterials, which have outstanding qualities in respect to their mechanical strength, this technology may gain traction again (pun intended)... They had been used, for example, in gyrobuses ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs32.postimg.org%2Fl26mfu1cl%2FGyrobus_aan_het_opladen.jpg&t=665&c=JFqoENSg1p5lPw) Meh... IMO everything that requires highly calibrated mechanical parts is not very efficient. Not because of the yield of the technique, but rather because of the manutention needed. An electrical drive requires much less daily work and offers similar (or even better) benefits.
|
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2016, 10:02:18 AM Last edit: June 23, 2016, 10:40:34 AM by deisik |
|
Meh... IMO everything that requires highly calibrated mechanical parts is not very efficient. Not because of the yield of the technique, but rather because of the manutention needed. An electrical drive requires much less daily work and offers similar (or even better) benefits.
It is not actually so. Flywheels with magnetic bearings enclosed in a high vacuum casing can maintain about 97% mechanical efficiency (as per Wikipedia). In fact, they can potentially replace conventional chemical batteries, since it takes only a few minutes to "charge" a flywheel, i.e. to spin it up to its full rotational speed. And the rotational speed limits depend on the strength of the flywheel material... Just in case, an electrical motor is also made up of high-precision mechanical parts (rotational speeds are not much different)
|
|
|
|
Barnabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2016, 10:10:23 AM |
|
Meh... IMO everything that requires highly calibrated mechanical parts is not very efficient. Not because of the yield of the technique, but rather because of the manutention needed. An electrical drive requires much less daily work and offers similar (or even better) benefits.
It is not actually so. Flywheels with magnetic bearings enclosed in a high vacuum casing can maintain about 97% mechanical efficiency (as per Wikipedia). In fact, they can potentially replace conventional chemical batteries, since it takes only a few minutes to "charge" a flywheel, i.e. to spin it up to its full rotational speed... And the rotational speed limits depend on the strength of the flywheel material I know that, that's why I said not because of the yield. The energetic yield is probably better than chemical batteries. The technique is very interesting and can easily work. But you still have to do regular verifications on this system (probably more than with batteries, because if something goes wrong you would see a 2'000kg disk rolling at more than 100km/h in the middle of town crushing everything in its way).
|
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2016, 10:16:54 AM Last edit: June 23, 2016, 01:45:49 PM by deisik |
|
But you still have to do regular verifications on this system (probably more than with batteries, because if something goes wrong you would see a 2'000kg disk rolling at more than 100km/h in the middle of town crushing everything in its way).
Why would it? The fact that it rotates ~50,000 times per minute doesn't in the least mean that it will move at all from where it is installed. I've never seen nor heard about SCSI hard disk drives (15,000 RPM) erupting like a chestburster from computer cases and flying around, lol. Rotating whirligig is an obvious example which proves that... And I think that an internal combustion engine actually requires greater amount of maintenance (given its complexity)
|
|
|
|
jaysabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 27, 2016, 09:01:33 PM |
|
Well oil seems to be a good long term investment. There is less risk in trading oil because it is highly demanded. It is like gold that is also a good investment.
Sure, maybe if you're going to buy physical oil and store it somewhere. Except of course for the costs associated with that. When trading oil contracts, isn't there a relatively short period of time the contract is good for? The contract underlies a physical asset that someone is holding until expiration, so someone is incurring the cost of storing that oil. No one is going to allow you to buy a contract and just hold it indefinitely like you might with equities until you reach a point where you can sell it for a profit.
|
|
|
|
Barnabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 27, 2016, 09:27:30 PM |
|
The other possibility is simply to buy stocks from oil companies. Most of their assets are their oil reserves, so their stock should be quite correlated with the oil price. (A better option would be to buy an index of oil companies to reduce variance due to possible regional problems)
|
|
|
|
jaysabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2016, 02:40:38 AM |
|
The other possibility is simply to buy stocks from oil companies. Most of their assets are their oil reserves, so their stock should be quite correlated with the oil price. (A better option would be to buy an index of oil companies to reduce variance due to possible regional problems)
Oil index would definitely be the way to reduce variance, and absent that, you are correct, the best way to play the long term game is buy stock in oil companies. That's what Berkshire has done, taking a very large stake in Phillips 66 last year.
|
|
|
|
Barnabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2016, 08:30:25 AM |
|
With the recent developments of electric drives and batteries I don't know if oil investments are going to be as profitable as they were ... We are getting to a turning point, where solar energy is cheaper than fossil energies and where electricity storage is becoming really cheap (when compared with the previous decade).
|
|
|
|
jaysabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2016, 04:03:54 PM |
|
With the recent developments of electric drives and batteries I don't know if oil investments are going to be as profitable as they were ... We are getting to a turning point, where solar energy is cheaper than fossil energies and where electricity storage is becoming really cheap (when compared with the previous decade).
Solar is still highly dependent on government subsidies to be competitive. The high up-front costs are prohibitive to many folks, as it will take many years for the system to pay itself off, and without tax credits, many folks wouldn't bother as it just increases the pay-off period. We know oil eventually has to go away, but that doesn't make it a bad investment for the next 20-30 years or longer. Oil just simply will not be disrupted quickly. Berkshire has investments in all sorts of energy sectors, including refining and electric utilities. I'm sure the stake in Phillips is the result of a very long examination and sound thesis, as is the investment in everything that company does.
|
|
|
|
criptix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2016, 04:36:36 PM |
|
With the recent developments of electric drives and batteries I don't know if oil investments are going to be as profitable as they were ... We are getting to a turning point, where solar energy is cheaper than fossil energies and where electricity storage is becoming really cheap (when compared with the previous decade).
Solar is still highly dependent on government subsidies to be competitive. The high up-front costs are prohibitive to many folks, as it will take many years for the system to pay itself off, and without tax credits, many folks wouldn't bother as it just increases the pay-off period. We know oil eventually has to go away, but that doesn't make it a bad investment for the next 20-30 years or longer. Oil just simply will not be disrupted quickly. Berkshire has investments in all sorts of energy sectors, including refining and electric utilities. I'm sure the stake in Phillips is the result of a very long examination and sound thesis, as is the investment in everything that company does. Imho im not sure if this is true anymore atleast if you dont look at enviromental expenses. I.e. in germany exist punitive tariffs for solar panels from china and i read if they wouldnt exist prices could be at half of what they are now: -50% is ridic. (~5000-8000€ for a house full of solar panels and everything) Edit Punitive tariff is actually EU wide.
|
|
|
|
MingLee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2016, 04:43:40 PM |
|
Well oil seems to be a good long term investment. There is less risk in trading oil because it is highly demanded. It is like gold that is also a good investment.
Oil is a good long-term investment if you are able to physically buy it, which in and of itself is a massive challenge for the average person, and then proceed to be able to store it while complying with the laws and regulations surrounding the transport and storage of the substance. It will more than likely go up in value again in the future, but it all depends on whether or not you can get your investments intelligently protected.
|
|
|
|
STT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4018
Merit: 1436
Exchange 250+ Coins With 0% Fees
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2016, 04:50:45 PM |
|
The flywheels had been used, for example, in gyrobuses ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs31.postimg.org%2F4ssnesl3v%2FGyrobus_aan_het_opladen.jpg&t=665&c=zxVMcev1Mw22CQ) How about this, just implemented I think. Anything goes, isnt the Japanese bullet train with no actual physical contact friction in its movement the most energy efficient form of transport. At least for people, I dont know about heavy haulage maybe boats win on that one with diesel engines the size of buildings and their ability now to use the waste parts of oil cracking so Ive read is new tech available ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Ft07sTvf.jpg&t=665&c=ECUsWyaLSKTm0A)
|
| | TheChange | | | | |
░░░░░░░░░░██▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▀ ░░░░░░░░░░██▀ ░░░▄▄ ▄██▀ ███████████████ ▀██▄ ░░░▀▀ | | | | +250 COINS | | ..Crypto Exchange.. | │ | ▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄███▀▀███▄▄▄ ▄█████▀▀░▄▄▄▄░▀▀█████▄ ██▀░▄▄▄████████▄▄▄░▀██ ██░████████████████░██ ██░████████████████░██ ██░▀██████████████▀░██ ██░▀████████████▀░██ ▀██░▀██████████▀░██▀ ▀██▄░▀██████▀░▄██▀ ▀██▄▄░▀▀░▄▄██▀ ▀▀██▄▄██▀▀ ▀▀▀▀ | | | │ | |
|
|
|
Barnabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 28, 2016, 09:31:24 PM |
|
The electric grid on trucks ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I would never think of this. But I think it's a silly idea. The advantage of trucks is that they can go everywhere. If you need infrastructure, it's better to simply use railroad.
|
|
|
|
tyz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1533
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 05, 2016, 03:12:14 PM |
|
Totally agree! With electric grids, trucks could only drive on streets with such a facility. To rig only the main streets and highways with electric grid will cost billions. Remember, even the infrastructure of electric grids for common use cases like households is in a bad shape in most parts of the world. The electric grid on trucks ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I would never think of this. But I think it's a silly idea. The advantage of trucks is that they can go everywhere. If you need infrastructure, it's better to simply use railroad.
|
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 05, 2016, 06:59:12 PM |
|
The electric grid on trucks ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I would never think of this. But I think it's a silly idea. The advantage of trucks is that they can go everywhere. If you need infrastructure, it's better to simply use railroad. Is it a fuel tank under the driver's cab or are my eyes betraying me? Is this photo real at all?
|
|
|
|
jaysabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 05, 2016, 09:56:32 PM |
|
Rystad estimates US oil reserves (recoverable) to be higher than Russia and Saudi Arabia thanks to advancements in fracking and recovery technologies. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-now-more-oil-reserves-180800487.htmlEstimated global reserves at 2.1 trillion barrels, current annual production of 30 billion barrels.
|
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 05, 2016, 10:06:50 PM Last edit: July 06, 2016, 07:46:31 AM by deisik |
|
Totally agree! With electric grids, trucks could only drive on streets with such a facility. To rig only the main streets and highways with electric grid will cost billions. Remember, even the infrastructure of electric grids for common use cases like households is in a bad shape in most parts of the world Well, it is a hybrid truck running on biofuel The truck can freely connect to and disconnect from the overhead wires while in motion, operating as electric vehicles when on the electrified road and as regular hybrid vehicles at other times. All the Scania trucks that will be on the road are hybrid and Euro 6-certified, running on biofuel
|
|
|
|
MingLee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 05, 2016, 10:21:39 PM |
|
The electric grid on trucks ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I would never think of this. But I think it's a silly idea. The advantage of trucks is that they can go everywhere. If you need infrastructure, it's better to simply use railroad. Yeah, I have no idea why anyone would bother setting up an electric grid for semi trucks; it's completely useless (to an extent) and it is easily replaced by other existing infrastructure such as trains or even cargo ships, depending on the destination of the cargo. It would honestly be more than likely cheaper to have the trucks use fuel as opposed to try and use electricity anyways.
|
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 06, 2016, 08:01:44 AM Last edit: July 06, 2016, 03:29:44 PM by deisik |
|
The electric grid on trucks ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I would never think of this. But I think it's a silly idea. The advantage of trucks is that they can go everywhere. If you need infrastructure, it's better to simply use railroad. Yeah, I have no idea why anyone would bother setting up an electric grid for semi trucks; it's completely useless (to an extent) and it is easily replaced by other existing infrastructure such as trains or even cargo ships, depending on the destination of the cargo That's the whole point. We don't know the reasons why they are doing that. They could be testing powerful electric engines suitable for heavy and fast trucks. Almost 100% (with just one exception that I know about) of ultra-class haul trucks are electrically driven (equipped with diesel generators)... Each wheel is essentially an electric motor in such trucks
|
|
|
|
|