Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[brainless]

1000 gpu 5090
Could find 71 or 135 within 7 days
Hardware not only enough, need to use mind +strategy
Too

What is your search method that allows you to scan the vast key space of Puzzle 71 within one week?

There is numerous strategies in my mind and practical
Just giving u tip,
If using bitcrack, there is some other function too example
Share 1/2 etc,
Don't stop here, there is forks too pinkachunka ver, bitcrack2 ver etc, something could be use in them too
Not first step
71 have 18 char
4 char from 4000 to 7fff contain 16000
1000 gpu will use share function in between here
2nd part 14 char, now think n calculate starting point generated by bitcrack, 14 char need to adjust in between starting points*1000 gpu
Hope here 80% solution help you think and design for find 71

[nochkin]

We should make a list of scanned prefixes and upload them to the web daily, for example to google doc.

Support it. Everyone has their own GPU power, the pools have very long ranges, and can they be trusted.

You scan locally without sharing your final answer to the pool. Does not matter if you trust the pool or not, you keep the answer to yourself.
How do you think the pool can steal it?

[ik316m]

If we all share each scanned section together, there will be more than prefix theory or the number φ.

I'm scanning with a GPU using BitCrack at a speed of 550 million keys per second. I searched the key range from 78D110000000000000 to 78D12BDB2A82C14000 over a period of six months.

What makes you to scan this range and stick to it for 6 months? Do you think it starts with 78D1?
I highly recommended you to stop BitCrack and use KeyHunt-Cuda or VanitySearch-BitCrack, it will double your speed.

A rough aggregate of all puzzles keys from 1-70
'D' appears only 2 times at position 3 and '1' appears only 2 times at position 4

https://i.postimg.cc/TPXMYLfz/Capture.png

[mcdouglasx]

The problem with puzzles is that no one gives their opinion, proposes, or experiments with anything new. I recommend you at least try it. As Carl Sagan said: “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known”

Don't believe the pathetic people who say things are impossible. Humans have always found ways to improve everything. Many things that seemed unbreakable 30 years ago are now obsolete.

[hoanghuy2912]

The problem with puzzles is that no one gives their opinion, proposes, or experiments with anything new. I recommend you at least try it. As Carl Sagan said: “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known”

Don't believe the pathetic people who say things are impossible. Humans have always found ways to improve everything. Many things that seemed unbreakable 30 years ago are now obsolete.

there is no other way but to invest in hardware, so give up

[nochkin]

there is no other way but to invest in hardware, so give up

You forgot the plain simple luck. The majority here relies purely on that alone and nothing else.

[Tony8989]

is 50gpu each  1 target 2886.49 MKey/s  enough i try RTX 5090
Initializing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
[2025-07-26.19:45:56] [Info] Generating 262,144 starting points (10.0MB)
[2025-07-26.19:45:56] [Info] Error: invalid device symbol anyone any idea what is the issue guys  Error: invalid device symbol

[Jorge54PT]

Hi...this came from JLP vanitysearch source code and this dont have source code?   https://github.com/WanderingPhilosopher/VanBitCrackenRandom2   VBCr.exe ?  not possible get the source code  WanderingPhilosopher ?

thank you

[mcdouglasx]

The problem with puzzles is that no one gives their opinion, proposes, or experiments with anything new. I recommend you at least try it. As Carl Sagan said: “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known”

Don't believe the pathetic people who say things are impossible. Humans have always found ways to improve everything. Many things that seemed unbreakable 30 years ago are now obsolete.

there is no other way but to invest in hardware, so give up

I'm working on other things at the moment, but if I were working on this, the last thing I'd care about is your opinion on it being a bit of a noob. It all comes down to using proper techniques. Or haven't you realized that with the same hardware, you get different speeds depending on the code you use?
So, no, it doesn't all come down to hardware alone, but rather a combination of ideas in your code.

[nochkin]

is 50gpu each  1 target 2886.49 MKey/s  enough i try RTX 5090
Initializing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
[2025-07-26.19:45:56] [Info] Generating 262,144 starting points (10.0MB)
[2025-07-26.19:45:56] [Info] Error: invalid device symbol anyone any idea what is the issue guys  Error: invalid device symbol

Make sure you compile it with 5090 support.

[Tony8989]

Thank you bro i will try
DID ANYONE FINISH 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000  I UNDERSTAND THIS IS I COMPETITION BUT WE ARE ALL IN

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000052674A80FE35EEBF15 TO

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000052674CA3107FFE5E53 = 

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000639DDDD954B03AF084 TO

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000639DDFFB66FA4A8FC2 =  

I WILL SHARE MORE ONCE THEY FINISH THE SEARCH





 

[Jorge54PT]

Thank you bro i will try
DID ANYONE FINISH 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000  I UNDERSTAND THIS IS I COMPETITION BUT WE ARE ALL IN

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000052674A80FE35EEBF15 TO

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000052674CA3107FFE5E53 =  

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000639DDDD954B03AF084 TO

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000639DDFFB66FA4A8FC2 =  

I WILL SHARE MORE ONCE THEY FINISH THE SEARCH





 

at 1 bilion keys/s   all range 4000000000000000000 to 500000000000000000 takes 12 years to scan  it takes 24 years to scan if it is up to 5ffffffffffffffffff

[kTimesG]

at 1 bilion keys/s   all range 4000000000000000000 to 500000000000000000 takes 12 years to scan  it takes 24 years to scan if it is up to 5ffffffffffffffffff

I think you mean 9359 years. Unless of course the non-n00bz manage to break the hardware limitations via a combination of ideas and proper techniques (the 27th time's the charm) and crack open the lame mathematical limitations of the last 30 years..Or is it maybe of the last 5000 years? Or maybe since forever, and forever?

[Jorge54PT]

at 1 bilion keys/s   all range 4000000000000000000 to 500000000000000000 takes 12 years to scan  it takes 24 years to scan if it is up to 5ffffffffffffffffff

I think you mean 9359 years. Unless of course the non-n00bz manage to break the hardware limitations via a combination of ideas and proper techniques (the 27th time's the charm) and crack open the lame mathematical limitations of the last 30 years..Or is it maybe of the last 5000 years? Or maybe since forever, and forever?

I know that in sequential mode we need almost 100k (maybe 92k enough hahahaah ) GPU 5090 at 10GKeys/s to scan all 400000000000000000:7fffffffffffffffff   in 30 days

[teguh54321]

🎯 REVISED P71 POSITIONING:
✅ Position:  77.3%  ( Success Probability 88.0% )
📍 Target Range: 0x7174 area
🔬 Improved Calibration: Enhanced mathematical modeling
📊 Confidence: Higher precision positioning
🎯 Search Strategy: COVERAGE deployment recommended
Reason for sharing this update:

"The mathematical positioning keeps evolving as I refine the φ-based calculations. This has higher success probability."

So anyone want too hash this ? 😅🤔

🚀 ADAPTIVE AI RANGE DEPLOYMENT:
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
📦 PRECISION: 717BF1E8E60C65E698 → 717D955714BE2A1968
              Width:  0.01% (118,059,162,071,741,136 keys)
              Surgical precision + AI

📦  BALANCED: 717B2D02DED7C1B1E0 → 717E5A3D1BF2CE4E20
              Width:  0.02% (228,903,190,186,990,656 keys)
              Optimal balance + AI

📦    SAFETY: 7178CB173103783CC0 → 7180BC28C9C717C340
              Width:  0.05% (572,257,975,467,476,608 keys)
              Enhanced safety + AI

📦  COVERAGE: 7174D28E64A1A87980 → 7184B4B19628E78680
              Width:  0.10% (1,144,515,950,934,953,216 keys)
              Maximum coverage + AI

Seems pi theory not so bad hmmmm. I predict also near here.. let see 😅

[Andrey2225]

KEY Start 43........

[AndrewWeb]

Exactly how many keys are there between 400000000000000000 and 7fffffffffffffffff ?

[teguh54321]

KEY Start 43........

Seems not.
I believe its about 5c-73
Based on some prefix found.... Just guessing✌️

[SimonNeedsBitcoin]

Exactly how many keys are there between 400000000000000000 and 7fffffffffffffffff ?

There are 2^70  ≈ 1.18 × 10²¹ private keys in total.

[uyrova818]

I think I have found a method that simplifies the scanning process. I am trying the range 2^70 - 2^71. If I am successful and solve the puzzle, I will be able to solve higher ranges with significant savings in power.