Mafioso246
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 05:48:21 AM |
|
1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
start with 79B
Hmm 1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDN pdGK54CRas7fsVzXU The p position also match Hmm mybe near then ? 😅 There are so many JeB9j and JeB9jr between 75 and 7F maybe it's close  Bjork - Possibly maybe Yeah i found some JeB9jr In 77 7e 7b Using random mode 😅 I know, sometimes you post here and delete it after a minute or two  Hahaha 🤪. Bcoz some time i change my mind on sharing 😅 So you're saying we're not worthy of the prefixes you’ve found?  Wow… shame. Just… shame.
|
|
|
|
|
teguh54321
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 142
Merit: 1
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 05:55:26 AM |
|
1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
start with 79B
Hmm 1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDN pdGK54CRas7fsVzXU The p position also match Hmm mybe near then ? 😅 There are so many JeB9j and JeB9jr between 75 and 7F maybe it's close  Bjork - Possibly maybe Yeah i found some JeB9jr In 77 7e 7b Using random mode 😅 I know, sometimes you post here and delete it after a minute or two  Hahaha 🤪. Bcoz some time i change my mind on sharing 😅 So you're saying we're not worthy of the prefixes you’ve found?  Wow… shame. Just… shame. 😕😕😕😕😕 not like that
|
|
|
|
|
Bram24732
Member

Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 18
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 06:00:16 AM |
|
1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
start with 79B
Why does everyone keep trying to solve it? I think this is a game that benefits others, not the solvers!! When more inventory was added to these puzzles, each Bitcoin was worth about $27,000. Have any of you thought about why the finder of puzzle 69 lost inventory? Let me remind you of a few principles: Bitcoin can only consider a transaction as completed after receiving 6 confirmations in the next blocks in the blockchain network chain, and before 6 confirmations, that asset is not in your possession, and the block containing the transaction confirmed by miners may be completely removed from the blockchain chain before reaching 6 confirmations, which are called orphan blocks. lost because he used the mempool instead of Mara. Big mistake when it's already been discussed here on how to avoid losing those funds.  Although using a private mining pool instead of a public one can prevent RBF, but who can guarantee that the private mining pool will not embezzle the money? This is not difficult at all technically. Normal transfers with high fees may still have a chance of success, but if they cheat through a private mining pool, you will never get your property back. I think the decentralization of Bitcoin does not allow you to hand over transactions to private mining pools. And I have not seen any evidence that No. 67 and 68 were successfully transferred through Mara. Here is your evidence : that’s how I transferred the funds for 67 and 68
|
|
|
|
|
MrGPBit
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 1
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 07:41:34 AM |
|
1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
start with 79B
Why can't you give the exact hex key!
|
|
|
|
|
|
kTimesG
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 08:08:16 AM |
|
I still recommend using the highest fee for normal transfers, which is in line with the decentralized principle of Bitcoin and can quickly get block confirmation. Usually, you can successfully transfer money in less than a minute. Those who suggest that we transfer money through private mining pools may be a conspiracy to steal our property.  I recommend you to not recommend idiotic ideas. There were numerous tests about replacing TX's of keys up to 80 bits and they all succeeded. I even paid 500$ for the 80-bit test right on this thread. RBF is useless. Bots will fight until the fee approaches the total amount. Bots are online as we speak. A single one is enough to totally compromise the TX, what about when there are 10 of them? Or 100? A 71 bits key can be broken in 2 seconds on a laptop CPU (attention: not GPU) with proper preparation. Yes, it takes 3 seconds when using an RTX 4090, but that is when starting the cracking process from a clean slate. That's the "noob approach". Puzzle 81 can also be cracked in a matter of seconds. Shall I continue? With proper preparation, puzzle 101 can also be cracked in less than the average time of a mined block. Shall I continue? Have you heard of GPU farms? They can be automated to wake up and solve even higher-bit puzzles as well, as long as the cost to do it is less than the expected reward.
|
Off the grid, training pigeons to broadcast signed messages.
|
|
|
bibilgin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 260
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 09:54:24 AM |
|
1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
start with 79B
I previously told you that 70% starts with 5xx. 30% starts with 7xx. Then you sent me a private message saying it didn't start with 6xx. So why didn't you respond? I also included my private Telegram username.
|
|
|
|
|
Andrey2225
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 10:33:02 AM |
|
Key start 4003......
|
|
|
|
|
teguh54321
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 142
Merit: 1
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 10:52:19 AM |
|
I still recommend using the highest fee for normal transfers, which is in line with the decentralized principle of Bitcoin and can quickly get block confirmation. Usually, you can successfully transfer money in less than a minute. Those who suggest that we transfer money through private mining pools may be a conspiracy to steal our property.  I recommend you to not recommend idiotic ideas. There were numerous tests about replacing TX's of keys up to 80 bits and they all succeeded. I even paid 500$ for the 80-bit test right on this thread. RBF is useless. Bots will fight until the fee approaches the total amount. Bots are online as we speak. A single one is enough to totally compromise the TX, what about when there are 10 of them? Or 100? A 71 bits key can be broken in 2 seconds on a laptop CPU (attention: not GPU) with proper preparation. Yes, it takes 3 seconds when using an RTX 4090, but that is when starting the cracking process from a clean slate. That's the "noob approach". Puzzle 81 can also be cracked in a matter of seconds. Shall I continue? With proper preparation, puzzle 101 can also be cracked in less than the average time of a mined block. Shall I continue? Have you heard of GPU farms? They can be automated to wake up and solve even higher-bit puzzles as well, as long as the cost to do it is less than the expected reward. Idiotic ? 🤪😅. No it is fun 😀
|
|
|
|
|
brainless
Member

Offline
Activity: 432
Merit: 35
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 11:19:37 AM |
|
Season is guess the pvk 71  My guess is 4c to 51. 70% 6e to 73. 30%
|
13sXkWqtivcMtNGQpskD78iqsgVy9hcHLF
|
|
|
Rohit. Bittalk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 11:50:30 AM |
|
Don't Say Guess There Is No Guess only bigger prefixes and solve this and give you the exact location
|
|
|
|
|
teguh54321
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 142
Merit: 1
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 12:55:08 PM |
|
Key start 4003......
If 4003 it already solved 😅
|
|
|
|
|
mahmood1356
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 03:01:13 PM |
|
1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
start with 79B
Why does everyone keep trying to solve it? I think this is a game that benefits others, not the solvers!! When more inventory was added to these puzzles, each Bitcoin was worth about $27,000. Have any of you thought about why the finder of puzzle 69 lost inventory? Let me remind you of a few principles: Bitcoin can only consider a transaction as completed after receiving 6 confirmations in the next blocks in the blockchain network chain, and before 6 confirmations, that asset is not in your possession, and the block containing the transaction confirmed by miners may be completely removed from the blockchain chain before reaching 6 confirmations, which are called orphan blocks. lost because he used the mempool instead of Mara. Big mistake when it's already been discussed here on how to avoid losing those funds.  Although using a private mining pool instead of a public one can prevent RBF, but who can guarantee that the private mining pool will not embezzle the money? This is not difficult at all technically. Normal transfers with high fees may still have a chance of success, but if they cheat through a private mining pool, you will never get your property back. I think the decentralization of Bitcoin does not allow you to hand over transactions to private mining pools. And I have not seen any evidence that No. 67 and 68 were successfully transferred through Mara. If you have any questions, why dont you try Mara by yourself? Ill make myself clear: im not specialist in bitcoin not even in coding. But I already have tested Mara and it`ll worked out in the end. At no time in this process the private key is revealed, you only need a hex of a signed transaction which contains just numbers, and past it in Mara. I dont see how they could get the private key and trick you leaving you with nothing. I could be talking bullshit since im not an expert about all of this, Im just talking about what I did and tested with 5 dolars. If I'm not thinking incorrectly, the assumption or theory behind not trusting MARA is entirely based on the hex of a signed transaction, the idea that someone there, whether it's the miner or someone else, could access the public key information before anyone else and, thinking "well, this is a Bitcoin puzzle anyway," could take the entire amount for themselves. There only 2 way. Collusion inside 😅. Or setup huge mount of miner at mara pool and hope lucky the public key pass to your miner .. But why .. .. better to find way to solve it 🙃😅 If it fail trough mara , then mara reputation will fall i think. Cause the solver will surely go bonker 🙃 My discussion is not about attacking or removing confirmed blocks for profit; it is about why some puzzles - whose existence is recorded at the time of their creation - become very valuable and popular, but when these puzzles are solved, the rewards are not distributed to the solvers and are stolen? The answer is quite clear: we all know that it is completely ridiculous and illogical to believe that bots can obtain the private key in a very short time, given the public key. The only logical and 100% probable case is that those bots already have that key before you yourself have access to your private key. "Yes, of course the number of these bots is the same as the number of puzzles left. These bots all have the keys to the puzzles and are designed to monitor and investigate unsolved Bitcoin puzzles and monitor Bitcoin transactions across the blockchain. If you have access to a full node on the Bitcoin network, you can examine the transactions associated with orphaned blocks at the time and date of previous puzzle solutions and see how many of these thefts occurred there." Summoning KtimesG and nomachine. Let see their comment 😅🙏 And by the way, everyone knows that our company has a lot of computing power and cannot solve the puzzles in a very short time. So, have you ever wondered why it didn't do this? In the news and reports about our company's monthly income, it is stated that last month the company's net income was 900 bitcoins. In your opinion, why doesn't our company solve these puzzles so that it can earn more income than the previous month?  I am Iranian and I translate texts using Google Translate, and if there is a mistake in the writing, I am not to blame. Cause for puzzle 71 it is gamble. Cost of bruting the entire puzzle is more than the prize in current technology. thats my opinion. What if we send the transaction with Wasabi Wallet? Can bots still hack it? Does anyone have experience with it?
|
|
|
|
|
Jorge54PT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 03:57:35 PM |
|
1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
start with 79B
Why does everyone keep trying to solve it? I think this is a game that benefits others, not the solvers!! When more inventory was added to these puzzles, each Bitcoin was worth about $27,000. Have any of you thought about why the finder of puzzle 69 lost inventory? Let me remind you of a few principles: Bitcoin can only consider a transaction as completed after receiving 6 confirmations in the next blocks in the blockchain network chain, and before 6 confirmations, that asset is not in your possession, and the block containing the transaction confirmed by miners may be completely removed from the blockchain chain before reaching 6 confirmations, which are called orphan blocks. lost because he used the mempool instead of Mara. Big mistake when it's already been discussed here on how to avoid losing those funds.  Although using a private mining pool instead of a public one can prevent RBF, but who can guarantee that the private mining pool will not embezzle the money? This is not difficult at all technically. Normal transfers with high fees may still have a chance of success, but if they cheat through a private mining pool, you will never get your property back. I think the decentralization of Bitcoin does not allow you to hand over transactions to private mining pools. And I have not seen any evidence that No. 67 and 68 were successfully transferred through Mara. If you have any questions, why dont you try Mara by yourself? Ill make myself clear: im not specialist in bitcoin not even in coding. But I already have tested Mara and it`ll worked out in the end. At no time in this process the private key is revealed, you only need a hex of a signed transaction which contains just numbers, and past it in Mara. I dont see how they could get the private key and trick you leaving you with nothing. I could be talking bullshit since im not an expert about all of this, Im just talking about what I did and tested with 5 dolars. If I'm not thinking incorrectly, the assumption or theory behind not trusting MARA is entirely based on the hex of a signed transaction, the idea that someone there, whether it's the miner or someone else, could access the public key information before anyone else and, thinking "well, this is a Bitcoin puzzle anyway," could take the entire amount for themselves. There only 2 way. Collusion inside 😅. Or setup huge mount of miner at mara pool and hope lucky the public key pass to your miner .. But why .. .. better to find way to solve it 🙃😅 If it fail trough mara , then mara reputation will fall i think. Cause the solver will surely go bonker 🙃 My discussion is not about attacking or removing confirmed blocks for profit; it is about why some puzzles - whose existence is recorded at the time of their creation - become very valuable and popular, but when these puzzles are solved, the rewards are not distributed to the solvers and are stolen? The answer is quite clear: we all know that it is completely ridiculous and illogical to believe that bots can obtain the private key in a very short time, given the public key. The only logical and 100% probable case is that those bots already have that key before you yourself have access to your private key. "Yes, of course the number of these bots is the same as the number of puzzles left. These bots all have the keys to the puzzles and are designed to monitor and investigate unsolved Bitcoin puzzles and monitor Bitcoin transactions across the blockchain. If you have access to a full node on the Bitcoin network, you can examine the transactions associated with orphaned blocks at the time and date of previous puzzle solutions and see how many of these thefts occurred there." Summoning KtimesG and nomachine. Let see their comment 😅🙏 And by the way, everyone knows that our company has a lot of computing power and cannot solve the puzzles in a very short time. So, have you ever wondered why it didn't do this? In the news and reports about our company's monthly income, it is stated that last month the company's net income was 900 bitcoins. In your opinion, why doesn't our company solve these puzzles so that it can earn more income than the previous month?  I am Iranian and I translate texts using Google Translate, and if there is a mistake in the writing, I am not to blame. Cause for puzzle 71 it is gamble. Cost of bruting the entire puzzle is more than the prize in current technology. thats my opinion. What if we send the transaction with Wasabi Wallet? Can bots still hack it? Does anyone have experience with it? The secret to all this is that the wallets are low bits, and the important thing is that the public key doesn't become public before you receive the funds in your new wallet. That's all. Don't make the public key public 
|
|
|
|
|
Menowa*
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 04:34:37 PM |
|
Since GPU farm is worthless, 71 has almost no chances of being solved this year. Maybe in next years, unless someone is very lucky or the price goes to 200k.
And about withdrawing the funds. Mara is the only option right now, either you trust it or not.
|
|
|
|
|
E36cat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 08:41:53 PM |
|
Since GPU farm is worthless, 71 has almost no chances of being solved this year. Maybe in next years, unless someone is very lucky or the price goes to 200k.
And about withdrawing the funds. Mara is the only option right now, either you trust it or not.
also if it goes to 200k will not be profitable to solve it by renting gpu`s
|
|
|
|
|
jonematt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 09:22:13 PM |
|
649aa0a809fe13a924 1PWo3JeB9jgLYkm8cEj6yywPn3kk41BFaY 7c26f7d7a330e3cf99 1PWo3JeB9jgfLmhDhuZofG3Gzfzd5FzBvU 7C26FAAF73713321D5 1PWo3JeB9B7LuZPHX2LXs88wFpQ1dJk9BW 
|
|
|
|
|
Cricktor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 3131
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 10:26:00 PM |
|
For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.
Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!
Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.
It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!
Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!
|
|
|
|
_ili_
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 29, 2025, 10:29:38 PM |
|
if Come-from-Beyond wasn't attacking monero, it will be helping find a wallet with insane computing power
|
|
|
|
|
mahmood1356
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 30, 2025, 12:17:07 AM |
|
Since GPU farm is worthless, 71 has almost no chances of being solved this year. Maybe in next years, unless someone is very lucky or the price goes to 200k.
And about withdrawing the funds. Mara is the only option right now, either you trust it or not.
Once a transaction is confirmed by a miner, there should be no more funds in the source address that a bot or anyone else can resend at a higher fee, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Menowa*
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 30, 2025, 12:55:51 AM |
|
Since GPU farm is worthless, 71 has almost no chances of being solved this year. Maybe in next years, unless someone is very lucky or the price goes to 200k.
And about withdrawing the funds. Mara is the only option right now, either you trust it or not.
Once a transaction is confirmed by a miner, there should be no more funds in the source address that a bot or anyone else can resend at a higher fee, right? Yeah, once Mara got one block mined the coins is safely moved at the same time. I've made a tutorial of how to withdraw the funds safely throught Mara. But in a nutshell: the coins remains in 71 till mara mines a block, until that the public key remains not exposed. When you use public mempool, the transaction is shown all the time on the wallet's history, including mempool. When you do it through Mara, there will be any evidence that you started a transaction until Mara confirms it in a mined block. Thtat's the main difference...
|
|
|
|
|
|