Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[Tony8989]

how? please tell me more

[Denevron]

You're wasting your time using full brute force. The keys are not placed randomly across the entire space — they follow a certain pattern. Open your eyes. I've been working on this puzzle for over 3 months, and I'm looking for smarter solutions — not brute force.

If you find this message useful, consider supporting me with a small donation:37BEYjCrU3Vmv8ZmhnKyWtnfcG4pbxWy7n

If there was a template, then during the entire existence of the puzzle, it would have already been found.

[farou9]

anyone have a guide to use renting online gpus for computing using my own scripts ?
and what is the best gpus to rent , which companies to rent from

[Tony8989]

is plenty look windows base is easy set up

[Virtuose]

That’s not true. I’ve been working on Puzzle 73 for months and have scanned everything up to prefix 14 from 1000000000000000000 to 14fffffffffffffffff. Higher puzzles like 71+ are absolutely being searched, even if they haven’t been solved yet.

comme on )  how long and what power did you scan from 10 to 14.. for puzzle 73 )

You know how it goes, share too many details and in 2 minutes someone calls you a liar anyway 😉
Let’s just say it took time, decent firepower, and good software. If you know, you know.

Seems as everyone and their dog is a crypto genius these days, breaking boundaries this or that as easy as a weekend barbecue.

Needless to say, what you claim as having done has an identical problem size as P71, and requires at a bare minimum a few million $ to accomplish. If you know, you know this is why people like Bram won't bother with 71+ for quite some time. Going after 71 and up is simply throwing money out the window today.

Fair point but you're assuming everyone brute-forces blindly. I’m not claiming miracles, just targeted work over time with filtered subsets and decent resources. Not all efforts cost millions when strategy and persistence are involved. If you know, you know.

[kTimesG]

I’ve been working on Puzzle 73 for months and have scanned everything up to prefix 14 from 1000000000000000000 to 14fffffffffffffffff.

Needless to say, what you claim as having done has an identical problem size as P71, and requires at a bare minimum a few million $ to accomplish.

Fair point but you're assuming everyone brute-forces blindly. I’m not claiming miracles, just targeted work over time with filtered subsets and decent resources. Not all efforts cost millions when strategy and persistence are involved. If you know, you know.

It's fine, we might have different definitions for "everything".

[QG623]

There is a solution to solve this puzzle, you just have to give up.where the creator gives us clues

[Tony8989]

feel like the movie, Ready Player One searching for the Easter eggs 

[bibilgin]

P71..  1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU

found 1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH

Does anyone have any idea how far apart the two might be (64bit?)

63f651bb9c47645cd6  1PWo3JeB9jdv1SaFoJK7SynTq94JFdbagU +64bit
649a3dd0486c96e70b 1PWo3JeB9jdvp56gzG8navJjUMFQxxb997

Hello, I'd prefer to discuss this matter privately. You can open your inbox and write to me if you'd like.
I'm giving you a little hint.
It's either very close or very far away.
The probability of it being very close is between 5-7%.
Example
40 bit - 5-7%
44 bit - 8-10%
48 bit - 6-9%.... If you'd like to discuss it in detail, you can send me a message.

1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH
Hex code start: 60% 5xxx - 30% 7xxx

[nomachine]

If there was a template, then during the entire existence of the puzzle, it would have already been found.

It really depends on your game plan. Sometimes it’s kangaroo, sometimes it’s BSGS, and believe it or not, sometimes you just gotta brute force it. 

[QG623]

If everyone gives up, surely the creator will give us other clues and I know he is among us. Without clues for puzzle #160, we need to scan half of the key.

[Virtuose]

If everyone gives up, surely the creator will give us other clues and I know he is among us. Without clues for puzzle #160, we need to scan half of the key.

But that’s exactly the point, no clues. The challenge is to see if the key can be cracked without help. If hints were given every time people got stuck, it wouldn’t be a true test of possibility or limits. That’s what makes it worth chasing.

[QG623]

if we arrive, it means that BTC is no longer secure . surely it's Satoshi Nakamoto

[hoanghuy2912]

just ask the creator directly about the seed he used, otherwise you will have to use force until you die, this is the truth

[sxiclub]

I have been experimenting for months with popular algorithms like Kangaroo, Baybestep,.. but all have no results, need more efficient algorithms. As the last comment of author Satoshi_Rising he said all addresses belong to the same wallet, this means they have the same master key. Hope some genius will have more ideas.
 

These algorithms are useless in those puzzles in which the public key has not been revealed, the first on the list with that condition is 135 and yes, without another type of approximation it is practically impossible to solve.

Then explain why 1-70 were solved without the pub key.

Puzzles 1 to 64 and 66 to 69 were solved with pure brute force algorithms, which is the only way to achieve it without the public key exposed (keyhunt for example) and it was possible because the search range was sufficiently limited for the current computational capacity, or its proximity to the beginning of the range in the case of 69. ericb148 said "I have been experimenting for months with popular algorithms like Kangaroo, Baybestep,.. but all have no results", of course, if he did it in puzzles like 69 or 71 he could keep trying until the end of days on planet Earth, since THOSE algorithms (BSGS, Kangaroo) require the public key. That's what I wanted to clarify.

[teguh54321]

Anyone try find checksum 3 digit prefix instead of adress prefix ?

Any tool that can do that ? 😅

[atom13]

Its easyer to find a Bitcoin Block  than finding the key here.

[Virtuose]

Its easyer to find a Bitcoin Block  than finding the key here.

Yes you can try with your 50Mkeys/s 

[atom13]

Its easyer to find a Bitcoin Block  than finding the key here.

Yes you can try with your 50Mkeys/s 

 60516 MKeys/s 

[mahmood1356]

Anyone try find checksum 3 digit prefix instead of adress prefix ?

Any tool that can do that ? 😅

1PWo3JeB9j5asAZX7457hXNUypugyosSfw
f6f5431d25bbe51d5f7633c702ba2608f3163704
Checksum (Hex): 89c9a9c6
Checksum (Decimal): 2311694790
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9j5nh1sKHaudeo82T4GLTXWdyf
f6f5431d25bbe533119c98ad7904b81121ad9631
Checksum (Hex): e135cdce
Checksum (Decimal): 3778399694
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9j6YptaZDx6UaNsmgZRuakjrum
f6f5431d25bbe5840bfb07f2aad41820879502ce
Checksum (Hex): b0793cb8
Checksum (Decimal): 2960735416
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9j6ffmBQZ4tTuWxaByxBvPKVbB
f6f5431d25bbe59099ee9b35fb4a89ac2576371a
Checksum (Hex): 3ef22ffe
Checksum (Decimal): 1056059390
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9jA5WGsbKBo1fsbvZawV81YKgG
f6f5431d25bbe6fb94ccecf0e58b2c8c632e952b
Checksum (Hex): 9d3e02a5
Checksum (Decimal): 2638086821
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9jCVcGHZ8A8RtvvRAuzRYjJ8XM
f6f5431d25bbe7fca2acb33a3eebe9d58992d4c3
Checksum (Hex): bb4fc504
Checksum (Decimal): 3142567172
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9jEJ4Z6LC6f9cKooNViuukaCyG
f6f5431d25bbe8bc47e76e1558ebb52a99986d3d
Checksum (Hex): cd162c23
Checksum (Decimal): 3440782371
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9jEzsR5sR3HcUvfDNP7eQ1cZqv
f6f5431d25bbe9072738674df75ad60e8e6c1e99
Checksum (Hex): eb11a2ad
Checksum (Decimal): 3943801517
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9jFYt1sLaz7QVUpZVHSt1nhP7r
f6f5431d25bbe941e25510cae40bc9c531d13a76
Checksum (Hex): 4fcf19f5
Checksum (Decimal): 1338972661
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9jGBe6DNEAoAmEm12s5qmwhaCj
f6f5431d25bbe985544c01b3b23258960ba70315
Checksum (Hex): bbc8b56c
Checksum (Decimal): 3150493036
----------------------------------------
1PWo3JeB9jH8F1Mor4PbvcqoVwL6DZMp9v
f6f5431d25bbe9e9829ca059af52a2e3d73951b4
Checksum (Hex): 972d9901
Checksum (Decimal): 2536347905
----------------------------------------