Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[hoanghuy2912]

Do anyone here believe the whole puzzle use the same seed ?
Is there posibility that that same seed lead to some similar statistical behaviour among them ?
Just asking , mybe somone deeply observe it ? 😅🙏

https://ibb.co/DDQtZnwf
like this

Image not available 😅🤔

So they generated private keys using a simple k = k + 1 scheme.

You don't understand how key derivation in BIP32 works and your foolish assumptions that puzzle keys have any dependency from one to another is deeply flawed.

Even though key derivation in deterministic wallets is deterministic, it doesn't mean that you can calculate a sequential key solely from knowledge of its predecessor or successor (or any other key).

In a deterministic wallet all keys appear as if they're random. Period! There is no exploitable relation between individual keys. Masking them down to a certain bitlength doesn't introduce any new relation.

But you can happily continue to read tea leaves...

I dont say any direct connection or dependency between them.
I mean some kind of statistical prefix frequency similiarity among huge keyspace around them maybe 😅. I just persue to look it deeper. As i scan lots of statistical bias in several prefix count / frequency in dissected private key keyspace result

Click on the link to see the photo

Image not found. Can you re upload ?

https://i.ibb.co/Rpc9qWQT/Screenshot-2025-07-22-012321.png

[smracer]

found 1PWo3JeB9jrGLDTmsp45h1pDXXtb7zisQH

What is the key for this address?

[teguh54321]

do you have code simulating the checksum prefix

Im also looking for this

[mahmood1356]

do you have code simulating the checksum prefix

Im also looking for this

How is this?
1PWoer2JRPuTkoaeoPj4TpwFpvtRY6bzXU

[teguh54321]

do you have code simulating the checksum prefix

Im also looking for this

How is this?
1PWoer2JRPuTkoaeoPj4TpwFpvtRY6bzXU

In what hex is this ?

Im looking any tool avalable today to scan checksum prefix (ending part of address)... is there any  ?

Or checksum prefix never been scanned ? 😅

[E36cat]

with new vanity I'm getting this speed with 5090
VanitySearch v1.19 Linux with BitCrack integration
Difficulty: 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Search: 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU [Compressed]
Current task START time: Wed Jul 23 17:22:14 2025
Number of CPU thread: 0
GPU: GPU #0 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (170x0 cores) Grid(1792x256)
[14.09 Gkeys/s][Total 2^34.71][00:00:02 RUN || END 00:20:41][Found 0]

5090 users keep dreaming thats not the real speed nobody dare to tell you

[pbies]

with new vanity I'm getting this speed with 5090
VanitySearch v1.19 Linux with BitCrack integration
Difficulty: 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Search: 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU [Compressed]
Current task START time: Wed Jul 23 17:22:14 2025
Number of CPU thread: 0
GPU: GPU #0 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (170x0 cores) Grid(1792x256)
[14.09 Gkeys/s][Total 2^34.71][00:00:02 RUN || END 00:20:41][Found 0]

Can you share link to this "new vanity"?

[crytoestudo]

Well, you can smile, but the speed is real. I know very well the changes that were made. We tested from 1 to 70 and those ending in 5. The code is functional and robust.

with new vanity I'm getting this speed with 5090
VanitySearch v1.19 Linux with BitCrack integration
Difficulty: 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Search: 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU [Compressed]
Current task START time: Wed Jul 23 17:22:14 2025
Number of CPU thread: 0
GPU: GPU #0 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (170x0 cores) Grid(1792x256)
[14.09 Gkeys/s][Total 2^34.71][00:00:02 RUN || END 00:20:41][Found 0]

5090 users keep dreaming thats not the real speed nobody dare to tell you

[Tony8989]

HEY GUY JUST QUESTION DID ANYONE FINISH THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000

[crytoestudo]

I don't think anyone has reached 1% yet.

HEY GUY JUST QUESTION DID ANYONE FINISH THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000

[fixedpaul]

with new vanity I'm getting this speed with 5090
VanitySearch v1.19 Linux with BitCrack integration
Difficulty: 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Search: 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU [Compressed]
Current task START time: Wed Jul 23 17:22:14 2025
Number of CPU thread: 0
GPU: GPU #0 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (170x0 cores) Grid(1792x256)
[14.09 Gkeys/s][Total 2^34.71][00:00:02 RUN || END 00:20:41][Found 0]

Most likely, this version uses endos and -P, so 5 keys out of every 6 you’re checking are useless because they’re outside the range

[Tony8989]

  ???if anyone did did not reach THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000  i found out something funny lol maybe i'm going Crazy 

[crytoestudo]

Hey master, how's it going? No, I'm using sequential mode, but there are other people who have managed to improve the code and are even faster. But for studying, we're satisfied with the improvements.

with new vanity I'm getting this speed with 5090
VanitySearch v1.19 Linux with BitCrack integration
Difficulty: 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976
Search: 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU [Compressed]
Current task START time: Wed Jul 23 17:22:14 2025
Number of CPU thread: 0
GPU: GPU #0 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (170x0 cores) Grid(1792x256)
[14.09 Gkeys/s][Total 2^34.71][00:00:02 RUN || END 00:20:41][Found 0]

Most likely, this version uses endos and -P, so 5 keys out of every 6 you’re checking are useless because they’re outside the range

[ik316m]

HEY GUY JUST QUESTION DID ANYONE FINISH THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000

Not possible for a solo user until next few years.
I prefer random search. I am using RTX3060 and Keyhunt-Cuda in a random mode with an helper app. I am using 36 bit search with 9 random prefix. Link contains the ranges I have already scanned, it may not be useful if someone searching with less prefix.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zig8usXOQmqRZD5xlSHndNf5RRir-eg2/view?usp=sharing

[teguh54321]

HEY GUY JUST QUESTION DID ANYONE FINISH THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000

Not possible for a solo user until next few years.
I prefer random search. I am using RTX3060 and Keyhunt-Cuda in a random mode with an helper app. I am using 36 bit search with 9 random prefix. Link contains the ranges I have already scanned, it may not be useful if someone searching with less prefix.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zig8usXOQmqRZD5xlSHndNf5RRir-eg2/view?usp=sharing

What helper app ? It is automatic or you input manually each keyspace ?

[E36cat]

HEY GUY JUST QUESTION DID ANYONE FINISH THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000

Not possible for a solo user until next few years.
I prefer random search. I am using RTX3060 and Keyhunt-Cuda in a random mode with an helper app. I am using 36 bit search with 9 random prefix. Link contains the ranges I have already scanned, it may not be useful if someone searching with less prefix.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zig8usXOQmqRZD5xlSHndNf5RRir-eg2/view?usp=sharing

what is your speed with rtx 3060 keyhunt-cuda ?

[ik316m]

HEY GUY JUST QUESTION DID ANYONE FINISH THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000

Not possible for a solo user until next few years.
I prefer random search. I am using RTX3060 and Keyhunt-Cuda in a random mode with an helper app. I am using 36 bit search with 9 random prefix. Link contains the ranges I have already scanned, it may not be useful if someone searching with less prefix.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zig8usXOQmqRZD5xlSHndNf5RRir-eg2/view?usp=sharing

what is your speed with rtx 3060 keyhunt-cuda ?

I have tested 3 apps, BitCrack 625MKeys/s, VanitySearch-BitCrack 1024MKeys/s but the problem is it gets hang multiple times in a day and forced to restart my PC, and KeyHunt-Cuda 945MKeys/s with these settings (KeyHunt-Cuda.exe -t 0 -g --gpui 0 --gpux 950,256 -m address --coin BTC...)

[nochkin]

I have tested 3 apps, BitCrack 625MKeys/s, VanitySearch-BitCrack 1024MKeys/s but the problem is it gets hang multiple times in a day and forced to restart my PC, and KeyHunt-Cuda 945MKeys/s with these settings (KeyHunt-Cuda.exe -t 0 -g --gpui 0 --gpux 950,256 -m address --coin BTC...)

Does not hang for me running days. Something is wrong with your system.
Could be the high load, maybe the power supply can't handle it or just the general overheating. I would try to run it with opened case maybe or add some extra air flow.

[ik316m]

HEY GUY JUST QUESTION DID ANYONE FINISH THIS SPACE 400000000000000000 TO 500000000000000000

Not possible for a solo user until next few years.
I prefer random search. I am using RTX3060 and Keyhunt-Cuda in a random mode with an helper app. I am using 36 bit search with 9 random prefix. Link contains the ranges I have already scanned, it may not be useful if someone searching with less prefix.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zig8usXOQmqRZD5xlSHndNf5RRir-eg2/view?usp=sharing

What helper app ? It is automatic or you input manually each keyspace ?

I created this helper app, it has both the modes, auto or manual/personalized mode. In auto mode it first pick a random number and check if its it is already scanned or not and apply filters, if everything is ok it creates a command and pass it to new cmd and wait for the search to complete. It also has an option to divide the full rane in to multiple parts and search N number of ranges in each parts.

https://postimg.cc/6810xJJL
https://postimg.cc/w79Mg19g

[MrGPBit]

@ik316m

I created this helper app, it has both the modes, auto or manual/personalized mode. In auto mode it first pick a random number and check if its it is already scanned or not and apply filters, if everything is ok it creates a command and pass it to new cmd and wait for the search to complete. It also has an option to divide the full rane in to multiple parts and search N number of ranges in each parts.

https://postimg.cc/6810xJJL
https://postimg.cc/w79Mg19g

Can you publish your app on github?