Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[Jorge54PT]

Robots?  hahahahah

Using Mara and no robot can do nothing

[b0dre]

Hello, guys!
Ultra lightweight CUDACyclone is ready, speed is 1.3Gkeys/s on RTX4060.
Key feature - extremely low VRAM usage for rented gpu. Less than 500Mb VRAM on RTX4090.
It will work even if Vanity or Keyhunt doesn’t start.
And also this is a good studying sample for your education (why not)? Total 7 small files.
Link: https://github.com/Dookoo2/CUDACyclone

Great work, thanks for sharing!
Do you have any idea why there’s such a big performance difference between the old and new versions? For example, the old one hits ~1048.8 Mkeys/s in 9s using only 512MB VRAM, while the new one runs ~933.5 Mkeys/s in 71s using 3GB VRAM on the same RTX 3060.

Code:

./CUDACyclone_old --range 2000000000:3FFFFFFFFF --address 1HBtApAFA9B2YZw3G2YKSMCtb3dVnjuNe2 --grid 256,512
======== PrePhase: GPU Information ====================
Device               : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (compute 8.6)
SM                   : 28
ThreadsPerBlock      : 256
Blocks               : 8192
Points batch size    : 256
Batches/SM           : 512
Memory utilization   : 4.3% (512.2 MB / 11.6 GB)
------------------------------------------------------- 
Total threads        : 2097152

======== Phase-1: Brooteforce =========================
Time: 9.0 s | Speed: 1048.8 Mkeys/s | Count: 8897329760 | Progress: 6.47 %

======== FOUND MATCH! =================================
Private Key   : 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000022382FACD0
Public Key    : 03C060E1E3771CBECCB38E119C2414702F3F5181A89652538851D2E3886BDD70C6

Code:

./CUDACyclone --range 2000000000:3FFFFFFFFF --address 1HBtApAFA9B2YZw3G2YKSMCtb3dVnjuNe2 --grid 256,512
======== PrePhase: GPU Information ====================
Device               : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (compute 8.6)
SM                   : 28
ThreadsPerBlock      : 256
Blocks               : 8192
Points batch size    : 256
Batches/SM           : 512
Batches/launch       : 64 (per thread)
Memory utilization   : 26.5% (3.08 GB / 11.6 GB)
------------------------------------------------------- 
Total threads        : 2097152

======== Phase-1: BruteForce (sliced) =================
Time: 71.2 s | Speed: 933.5 Mkeys/s | Count: 70322919104 | Progress: 51.17 %%

================================= FOUND MATCH! =================================
Private Key   : 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000022382FACD0
Public Key    : 03C060E1E3771CBECCB38E119C2414702F3F5181A89652538851D2E3886BDD70C6

[optioncmdPR]

Please watch this video to see my theory.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/-rxN_y5K9vA?si=PsxWaGWLpe9HoQlO

This is interesting, suggesting that puzzle 1 is the first waveform and 256 the end waveform, with 254 interpolated transitional waveforms in between.
How can we convert decimal to binary to waveform ?

[bitstonps]

There’s activity on this puzzle, a clear sign that someone has solved it. Bots, get ready, Finally !!!! 

Miners on Mara are all set this time to grab this gift.

[Menowa*]

There’s activity on this puzzle, a clear sign that someone has solved it. Bots, get ready, Finally !!!! 

Miners on Mara are all set this time to grab this gift.

Bro thinks someone can crack a wallet just by a hex transaction lmao

[bitstonps]

There’s activity on this puzzle, a clear sign that someone has solved it. Bots, get ready, Finally !!!! 

Miners on Mara are all set this time to grab this gift.

Bro thinks someone can crack a wallet just by a hex transaction lmao

1% of your confidence would be enough

[jonematt]

https://i.postimg.cc/9QT3h749/220.jpg

Done or Not ? 

[MrGPBit]

https://i.postimg.cc/9QT3h749/220.jpg

Done or Not ?  

a very bad fake try again please

[Menowa*]

https://i.postimg.cc/9QT3h749/220.jpg

Done or Not ?  

a very bad fake try again please

Yeah, but next time try to at least pretending you’re making an effort

[FrozenThroneGuy]

Hello, guys!
Ultra lightweight CUDACyclone is ready, speed is 1.3Gkeys/s on RTX4060.
Key feature - extremely low VRAM usage for rented gpu. Less than 500Mb VRAM on RTX4090.
It will work even if Vanity or Keyhunt doesn’t start.
And also this is a good studying sample for your education (why not)? Total 7 small files.
Link: https://github.com/Dookoo2/CUDACyclone

Great work, thanks for sharing!
Do you have any idea why there’s such a big performance difference between the old and new versions? For example, the old one hits ~1048.8 Mkeys/s in 9s using only 512MB VRAM, while the new one runs ~933.5 Mkeys/s in 71s using 3GB VRAM on the same RTX 3060.

Code:

./CUDACyclone_old --range 2000000000:3FFFFFFFFF --address 1HBtApAFA9B2YZw3G2YKSMCtb3dVnjuNe2 --grid 256,512
======== PrePhase: GPU Information ====================
Device               : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (compute 8.6)
SM                   : 28
ThreadsPerBlock      : 256
Blocks               : 8192
Points batch size    : 256
Batches/SM           : 512
Memory utilization   : 4.3% (512.2 MB / 11.6 GB)
------------------------------------------------------- 
Total threads        : 2097152

======== Phase-1: Brooteforce =========================
Time: 9.0 s | Speed: 1048.8 Mkeys/s | Count: 8897329760 | Progress: 6.47 %

======== FOUND MATCH! =================================
Private Key   : 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000022382FACD0
Public Key    : 03C060E1E3771CBECCB38E119C2414702F3F5181A89652538851D2E3886BDD70C6

Code:

./CUDACyclone --range 2000000000:3FFFFFFFFF --address 1HBtApAFA9B2YZw3G2YKSMCtb3dVnjuNe2 --grid 256,512
======== PrePhase: GPU Information ====================
Device               : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (compute 8.6)
SM                   : 28
ThreadsPerBlock      : 256
Blocks               : 8192
Points batch size    : 256
Batches/SM           : 512
Batches/launch       : 64 (per thread)
Memory utilization   : 26.5% (3.08 GB / 11.6 GB)
------------------------------------------------------- 
Total threads        : 2097152

======== Phase-1: BruteForce (sliced) =================
Time: 71.2 s | Speed: 933.5 Mkeys/s | Count: 70322919104 | Progress: 51.17 %%

================================= FOUND MATCH! =================================
Private Key   : 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000022382FACD0
Public Key    : 03C060E1E3771CBECCB38E119C2414702F3F5181A89652538851D2E3886BDD70C6

Interesting, that a new version is FASTER on a top-tier GPU like 5090. I have seen 9Gkeys/s On 5090 with —grid 1024,512. But another version of 5090 is slower, speed around 8.2-8.3 Gkeys/s. It depends on power consuption limit.
But I will check speed differences between versions. 4060 speed is the same both version.

[blackd111]

Did anybody saw that almost on each search you get addresses that contain 9h, 9W, 9t?

Regarding the ones with comments that finally they discovered and be prepared, please don't give such comments because you are like little children discovered a candy for first time.

Many thanks for technical people who is sharing. On next post i will share a new solution ideea just with python script.

And to give a hint: is a formula based on the number of puzzle, the amount of BTC from each wallet and the TX number from each puzzle. This formula can be applied to all puzzles based on the information we know, including the 135+.

[Frequence]

Done or Not ? 

The creator of this puzzle is watching  they have no idea .. @saatoshi

[b0dre]

Hello, guys!
Ultra lightweight CUDACyclone is ready, speed is 1.3Gkeys/s on RTX4060.
Key feature - extremely low VRAM usage for rented gpu. Less than 500Mb VRAM on RTX4090.
It will work even if Vanity or Keyhunt doesn’t start.
And also this is a good studying sample for your education (why not)? Total 7 small files.
Link: https://github.com/Dookoo2/CUDACyclone

Great work, thanks for sharing!
Do you have any idea why there’s such a big performance difference between the old and new versions? For example, the old one hits ~1048.8 Mkeys/s in 9s using only 512MB VRAM, while the new one runs ~933.5 Mkeys/s in 71s using 3GB VRAM on the same RTX 3060.

Code:

./CUDACyclone_old --range 2000000000:3FFFFFFFFF --address 1HBtApAFA9B2YZw3G2YKSMCtb3dVnjuNe2 --grid 256,512
======== PrePhase: GPU Information ====================
Device               : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (compute 8.6)
SM                   : 28
ThreadsPerBlock      : 256
Blocks               : 8192
Points batch size    : 256
Batches/SM           : 512
Memory utilization   : 4.3% (512.2 MB / 11.6 GB)
------------------------------------------------------- 
Total threads        : 2097152

======== Phase-1: Brooteforce =========================
Time: 9.0 s | Speed: 1048.8 Mkeys/s | Count: 8897329760 | Progress: 6.47 %

======== FOUND MATCH! =================================
Private Key   : 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000022382FACD0
Public Key    : 03C060E1E3771CBECCB38E119C2414702F3F5181A89652538851D2E3886BDD70C6

Code:

./CUDACyclone --range 2000000000:3FFFFFFFFF --address 1HBtApAFA9B2YZw3G2YKSMCtb3dVnjuNe2 --grid 256,512
======== PrePhase: GPU Information ====================
Device               : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (compute 8.6)
SM                   : 28
ThreadsPerBlock      : 256
Blocks               : 8192
Points batch size    : 256
Batches/SM           : 512
Batches/launch       : 64 (per thread)
Memory utilization   : 26.5% (3.08 GB / 11.6 GB)
------------------------------------------------------- 
Total threads        : 2097152

======== Phase-1: BruteForce (sliced) =================
Time: 71.2 s | Speed: 933.5 Mkeys/s | Count: 70322919104 | Progress: 51.17 %%

================================= FOUND MATCH! =================================
Private Key   : 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000022382FACD0
Public Key    : 03C060E1E3771CBECCB38E119C2414702F3F5181A89652538851D2E3886BDD70C6

Interesting, that a new version is FASTER on a top-tier GPU like 5090. I have seen 9Gkeys/s On 5090 with —grid 1024,512. But another version of 5090 is slower, speed around 8.2-8.3 Gkeys/s. It depends on power consuption limit.
But I will check speed differences between versions. 4060 speed is the same both version.

Thanks for sharing your observations! On my side, I’ve noticed that memory utilization has increased significantly while speed has dropped on a 3060 GPU. It seems performance really varies a lot depending on the version and hardware.

[zahid888]

Interesting, that a new version is FASTER on a top-tier GPU like 5090. I have seen 9Gkeys/s On 5090 with —grid 1024,512. But another version of 5090 is slower, speed around 8.2-8.3 Gkeys/s. It depends on power consuption limit.
But I will check speed differences between versions. 4060 speed is the same both version.

I just wanted to share my experience after testing both optimized tools.

In my comparison, [VanitySearch/fixedpaul] runs noticeably faster than the [CudaCyclone/Your Tool].

The difference in speed really stands out, and it makes a big impact on performance.

[POD5]

The difference in speed really stands out, and it makes a big impact on performance.

I am getting 2,5 billion keys /s with FixedPaul

[blackd111]

For 10 GPU 4090 i get 92000MK/s.
For 8 GPU 4090 i get 74000MK/s

[zahid888]

The difference in speed really stands out, and it makes a big impact on performance.

I am getting 2,5 billion keys /s with FixedPaul

Good.. but the advantage.. when we searching for a prefix, suffix, or both simultaneously!
The speed remains constant compared to other VanitySearch tools, likely because it scans only the starting or ending bytes of the HASH160 rather than working with Base58 like the others.

[POD5]

Yes, that's an interesting approach.
Perhaps you could add a feature to search a file with ranges, like NOMACHINE had done in the normal CYCLONE.

[zahid888]

Yes, that's an interesting approach.
Perhaps you could add a feature to search a file with ranges, like NOMACHINE had done in the normal CYCLONE.

No, its a simple batch file you can use it with any tool to avoide duplication of ranges..

Code:

@echo off
setlocal enabledelayedexpansion

:: File where scanned ranges are stored
set logfile=C:\Users\Desktop\scanned_range_71.txt

:loop
:: Pick pas from {4,5,6,7} randomly
set /a pas=(%random% %% 4) + 4

:: Generate 9-digit random hex string
set s=abcdef0123456789
set pass=
for /l %%i in (1,1,8) do (
    set /a n=!random! %% 16
    call set pass=!pass!%%s:~!n!,1%%
)

:: Final range string
set range=%pas%%pass%000000000:%pas%%pass%fffffffff

:: Check if already scanned
findstr /c:"%range%" "%logfile%" >nul
if %errorlevel%==0 (
    echo [SKIP] Duplicate range: %range%
) else (
    echo [NEW] %range%  [Prefix + Suffix]
    echo %range%>>"%logfile%"
    prefixsuffix.exe --address 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU --prefix 4 --suffix 2 --range %range% --grid 512,512
)
timeout /t 10 >nul
goto loop

[POD5]

Very creative! 

This is your programm tough?

prefixsuffix.exe --address 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU --prefix 4 --suffix 2 --range %range% --grid 512,512