Bitcoin Forum
February 09, 2025, 05:44:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 [218] 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 ... 369 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it  (Read 253112 times)
dextronomous
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 105


View Profile
January 12, 2024, 01:59:50 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2024, 08:09:46 AM by hilariousandco
 #4341

Added mod 013

https://github.com/alek76-2/VanitySearch/tree/main/mod/013

Added Path - m/0'/0'/66' For 32 BTC Puzzle

Use SSE2 instructions - default VanitySearch code / Disable SSE cmd: -nosse
Initial SEED extension to 64 bits
GPU Added rotation - #define NB_SPIN 16
Modification file GPUHash.h
The speed on the Tesla T4 GPU is 670.98 Mkeys/s
If Use GPU Rekey multiple by 1000

RUN CMD:
Code:
VanitySearch.exe -stop -nosse -verbose 1 -level 0 -t 1 -bits 66 -r 10 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so

VanitySearch.exe -stop -t 0 -nosse -o Result.txt -verbose 1 -level 0 -gpu -r 500000000 -bits 66 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so

Added play sound buzzer.wav in Windows version Wink

p.s. The binaries assemble everything themselves.

Bro thanks again, will test, but is it still present somewhere the bip39_english.h and Winm.lib
alek76
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 16


View Profile
January 12, 2024, 02:12:26 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2024, 10:53:46 AM by alek76
 #4342

Bro thanks again, will test, but is it still present somewhere the bip39_english.h and Winm.lib
Added in VanitySearch.vcxproj <AdditionalDependencies> Winmm.lib;
Wordlist_en.h in folder 013 commented - not use.
Just uploaded bip39_english.h. Thank you. Forgot to copy Smiley
They differ only in the sizes of the rows, the array is the same here and there.

If the countdown starts from zero, then you can change keyIndex = 65;
Replace:
Code:
keyIndex = (uint32_t)TARGET_KEY_BITS;// BITS 66
To:
Code:
keyIndex = (uint32_t)TARGET_KEY_BITS - 1;// BITS 66
Or any:
Code:
keyIndex = 65;
it will be a patch - m/0'/0'/65'
But we still don’t know the patch.

mabdlmonem
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 12, 2024, 10:19:05 AM
 #4343


The beginning of private key  for 130 is 0x3

You are already stuck with your guesses! Stop spreading spam!
Ok!
FlleOWA
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2024, 12:11:46 PM
 #4344

By the way, I didn’t find any discussion of the public key, the owner of this puzzle, in the topic.

Do you mean to say this by chance?

024b0faa9624763002e963816b2f6774df0dedd770896a9511cb5c9d90f674ecda

It is clear that a letter is missing, but even such a combination is too much for an accident.
PrivatePerson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 174
Merit: 12


View Profile
January 16, 2024, 05:09:07 PM
 #4345


I can't figure out how to calculate the ccap=20 parameter?
I have an RTX 4050 Laptop.
Help please.


Code:
./deviceQuery
./deviceQuery Starting...

 CUDA Device Query (Runtime API) version (CUDART static linking)

Detected 1 CUDA Capable device(s)

Device 0: "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU"
  CUDA Driver Version / Runtime Version          12.3 / 12.3
  CUDA Capability Major/Minor version number:    8.9
  Total amount of global memory:                 6140 MBytes (6438780928 bytes)
  (020) Multiprocessors, (128) CUDA Cores/MP:    2560 CUDA Cores
  GPU Max Clock rate:                            2055 MHz (2.06 GHz)
  Memory Clock rate:                             8001 Mhz
  Memory Bus Width:                              96-bit
  L2 Cache Size:                                 25165824 bytes
  Maximum Texture Dimension Size (x,y,z)         1D=(131072), 2D=(131072, 65536), 3D=(16384, 16384, 16384)
  Maximum Layered 1D Texture Size, (num) layers  1D=(32768), 2048 layers
  Maximum Layered 2D Texture Size, (num) layers  2D=(32768, 32768), 2048 layers
  Total amount of constant memory:               65536 bytes
  Total amount of shared memory per block:       49152 bytes
  Total shared memory per multiprocessor:        102400 bytes
  Total number of registers available per block: 65536
  Warp size:                                     32
  Maximum number of threads per multiprocessor:  1536
  Maximum number of threads per block:           1024
  Max dimension size of a thread block (x,y,z): (1024, 1024, 64)
  Max dimension size of a grid size    (x,y,z): (2147483647, 65535, 65535)
  Maximum memory pitch:                          2147483647 bytes
  Texture alignment:                             512 bytes
  Concurrent copy and kernel execution:          Yes with 1 copy engine(s)
  Run time limit on kernels:                     Yes
  Integrated GPU sharing Host Memory:            No
  Support host page-locked memory mapping:       Yes
  Alignment requirement for Surfaces:            Yes
  Device has ECC support:                        Disabled
  Device supports Unified Addressing (UVA):      Yes
  Device supports Managed Memory:                Yes
  Device supports Compute Preemption:            Yes
  Supports Cooperative Kernel Launch:            Yes
  Supports MultiDevice Co-op Kernel Launch:      No
  Device PCI Domain ID / Bus ID / location ID:   0 / 1 / 0
  Compute Mode:
     < Default (multiple host threads can use ::cudaSetDevice() with device simultaneously) >

deviceQuery, CUDA Driver = CUDART, CUDA Driver Version = 12.3, CUDA Runtime Version = 12.3, NumDevs = 1
Result = PASS
citb0in
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 782


Bitcoin g33k


View Profile
January 16, 2024, 06:25:40 PM
Merited by PrivatePerson (1)
 #4346


I can't figure out how to calculate the ccap=20 parameter?
I have an RTX 4050 Laptop.
Help please.

This is architecture "Ada Lovelace", you need 8.9 so use ccap=89 in your compiling task. In case you have no success try downgrading and use max CUDA 11.8. However I wish you best of luck and success.

citb0in

  _      _   _       __  _          _  _   __
 |_) |  / \|/   (_  / \ | \  / |_ |_) (_ 
 |_) |_ \_/ \_ |\   __) \_/ |_ \/  |_ | \ __)
--> citb0in Solo-Mining Group <--- low stake of only 0.001 BTC. We regularly rent about 5 PH/s hash power and direct it to SoloCK pool. Wanna know more? Read through the link and JOIN NOW
alek76
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 16


View Profile
January 17, 2024, 03:05:04 AM
Last edit: January 17, 2024, 04:03:47 AM by alek76
Merited by PrivatePerson (1)
 #4347


I can't figure out how to calculate the ccap=20 parameter?
I have an RTX 4050 Laptop.
Help please.

This is architecture "Ada Lovelace", you need 8.9 so use ccap=89 in your compiling task. In case you have no success try downgrading and use max CUDA 11.8. However I wish you best of luck and success.

citb0in
and edit GPUEngine.cu; 4 lines are commented out; they are not in version 10.2.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.msg63128300#msg63128300
Stanislav01
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2024, 02:48:41 PM
 #4348

Can you tell me if I'm calculating the range scan time correctly for the 130 puzzle?

Time = (End Range - Start Range) / (Speed * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365)

Start Range = 200000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 680564733841876926926749214863536422912 (decimal)
End Range =   400000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 (decimal)
Speed = 100 Ekeys/s

Time = (1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 - 680564733841876926926749214863536422912) / (100000000000000000000*60*60*24*365) = 215 805 661 416 years
Woz2000
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 2


View Profile
January 17, 2024, 03:49:17 PM
 #4349

My math concurs.


Can you tell me if I'm calculating the range scan time correctly for the 130 puzzle?

Time = (End Range - Start Range) / (Speed * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365)

Start Range = 200000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 680564733841876926926749214863536422912 (decimal)
End Range =   400000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 (decimal)
Speed = 100 Ekeys/s

Time = (1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 - 680564733841876926926749214863536422912) / (100000000000000000000*60*60*24*365) = 215 805 661 416 years
nomachine
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 507
Merit: 38


View Profile
January 17, 2024, 10:14:55 PM
 #4350

215 805 661 416 years

Your calculation is correct. With 100 Ekeys/s would take an incredibly long time.

That is unbreakable even at that speed.

Speed needed for a 130 range scan time of 5 minutes is approximately
 

719,000,000 Ekeys/s. Grin

bc1qdwnxr7s08xwelpjy3cc52rrxg63xsmagv50fa8
NAKAMOT0
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 04:31:37 AM
Last edit: January 18, 2024, 04:49:38 AM by NAKAMOT0
 #4351

I can give you some clues for this problem and you can reflect on it...
       *Addresses are in order.
       *Addresses are not random.
       * Addresses always have PVK values ​​that differ by one PVK value.
       * There is a pattern.

    The key is to use the common factor within each address pair and its PVK value.

     A common factor between addresses 1 and 2 is that their PVK value is equal to 3.

     A common factor between addresses 3 and 4 is that their PVK value is equal to 7.

     A common factor between addresses 5 and 6 is that their PVK value is equal to 21.

     Etc...



      PVK values ​​are always in a mathematical progression (in this case, I don't like to use the word "sequence") that appears to be in a progression of prime numbers.


       * What is important is not the PVK values ​​but the mathematical relationship between the PVK values.
       *Addresses are in a progression of prime numbers.
       *The addresses are always in order.
       * There is always a relationship between the PVK value of the following addresses.


       *PVK values ​​do not always have to be prime numbers.
       * PVK addresses are always generated mathematically and never randomly.
       * Don't look for the answer in the Bitcoin blockchain.

      * Think of the relationship between the directions as the common factor between two very large prime numbers.
       * The equation to be solved for the PVK values ​​is a unique mathematical solution.
       *Also remember that PVK addresses are always in order.

       *The key is the PVK value pattern.
       * The pattern goes beyond PVK values.


       * Use a mathematical relationship between the PVK values ​​to calculate the PVK values ​​of the directions in the depressed progressions.

    Some clues are a little more ambiguous, but if you think about it it can give you a little idea of ​​how to decipher the directions in this case.  I can't give you more information about the exact formula behind all this for security reasons, but I hope you have fun and someone very special sends you greetings.  ✌️
mcdouglasx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 148



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2024, 05:46:02 AM
Last edit: January 18, 2024, 06:37:55 AM by mcdouglasx
 #4352

I can give you some clues for this problem and you can reflect on it...
       *Addresses are in order.
       *Addresses are not random.
       * Addresses always have PVK values ​​that differ by one PVK value.
       * There is a pattern.

    The key is to use the common factor within each address pair and its PVK value.

     A common factor between addresses 1 and 2 is that their PVK value is equal to 3.

     A common factor between addresses 3 and 4 is that their PVK value is equal to 7.

     A common factor between addresses 5 and 6 is that their PVK value is equal to 21.

     Etc...



      PVK values ​​are always in a mathematical progression (in this case, I don't like to use the word "sequence") that appears to be in a progression of prime numbers.


       * What is important is not the PVK values ​​but the mathematical relationship between the PVK values.
       *Addresses are in a progression of prime numbers.
       *The addresses are always in order.
       * There is always a relationship between the PVK value of the following addresses.


       *PVK values ​​do not always have to be prime numbers.
       * PVK addresses are always generated mathematically and never randomly.
       * Don't look for the answer in the Bitcoin blockchain.

      * Think of the relationship between the directions as the common factor between two very large prime numbers.
       * The equation to be solved for the PVK values ​​is a unique mathematical solution.
       *Also remember that PVK addresses are always in order.

       *The key is the PVK value pattern.
       * The pattern goes beyond PVK values.


       * Use a mathematical relationship between the PVK values ​​to calculate the PVK values ​​of the directions in the depressed progressions.

    Some clues are a little more ambiguous, but if you think about it it can give you a little idea of ​​how to decipher the directions in this case.  I can't give you more information about the exact formula behind all this for security reasons, but I hope you have fun and someone very special sends you greetings.  ✌️



If you are satoshi try it by sending me 1 btc, just kidding.
Your analysis is very interesting, friend.

edit:
My doubt is that I believe that there is no common factor for 5 and 6 to have a result of 21.

NAKAMOT0
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 08:07:09 AM
 #4353

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?
dextronomous
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 105


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 08:45:32 AM
 #4354

again but probably another digaran version?
really clear presentation, of it's own toughts on how to calculate this puzzle,
get it..
nomachine
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 507
Merit: 38


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 09:40:41 AM
Last edit: January 18, 2024, 10:33:30 AM by nomachine
 #4355

Now you understand?

I've enlisted the help of my imaginary friends, Fibonacci and Euclid, for an epic escapade through the primeval forest of PVK values and the enigmatic realm of depressed progressions. Armed with nothing but a slide rule and a cat's evil eye, we've sacrificed Netflix binging to decode cryptographic riddles, as the crypto-gods eagerly await our impending mathematical breakthrough.

Let's ride the prime number rollercoaster together and unveil the grand secret hidden within the pattern that goes beyond PVK values. I'm convinced we're on the verge of a breakthrough that will shake the foundations of mathematical academia.
The pulse of the prime force guides our quest, and we stand on the cusp of a revelation that promises to echo through the corridors of intellectual history. Get ready for the revelation of the century!

Cheers to the thrilling adventure of PVK values and their clandestine connections. May the prime force be with us!  Grin

bc1qdwnxr7s08xwelpjy3cc52rrxg63xsmagv50fa8
GR Sasa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 200
Merit: 14


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 10:08:36 AM
Last edit: January 18, 2024, 10:54:52 AM by GR Sasa
 #4356

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

If you are the creator could you please sign a something to prove us? Alternative you can increase the puzzle by 10x again.

The Creator said once in 2017, that there is not an pattern. Now you are saying the opposite, so how would we believe you if you didn't prove yourself and you aren't digaran?

EDIT: We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

Wrong? The next prime number after 49 is 53.
nomachine
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 507
Merit: 38


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 10:52:40 AM
Last edit: January 18, 2024, 11:14:29 AM by nomachine
 #4357

probably another digaran version?
It's amazing how persistent he is in his imagination. It turns out that the real Satoshi Nakamoto has been living a double life. The digaran mysterious genius behind it all.  Grin

If you are the creator could you please sign a something to prove us? Alternative you can increase the puzzle by 10x again.

Why would anyone prove anything when we already have a verified creator:

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).

bc1qdwnxr7s08xwelpjy3cc52rrxg63xsmagv50fa8
kalos15btc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 11:31:59 AM
 #4358

im asking the admin to ban digran and his multiple accounts, this thread become useless with his useless ideas
@modeator, verify those replies you will find the same ip address
AlanJohnson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 11


View Profile
January 18, 2024, 01:03:18 PM
Last edit: January 18, 2024, 03:31:38 PM by AlanJohnson
 #4359

Gee... it's getting worse with him ... He is not only mad but also thinks he is Satoshi Nakamoto now...
mcdouglasx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 148



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2024, 01:58:21 PM
 #4360

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

Satoshi is too busy doing things about gods to be commenting here on the theories of mere mortals.

What you're telling me is that as if I were saying the following.

Address 2, pvk decimal value: 3
Address 3, pvk decimal value: 7
Address 4, pvk decimal value: 8
Address 5, pvk decimal value: 21
Address 6, pvk decimal value: 49
Address 7, pvk decimal value: 76
Address 8, pvk decimal value: 224
Address 9, pvk decimal value: 467
Address 10, pvk decimal value: 514

9 and 10 =467

because 9*10 = (90 + (224 + 76 + 49 + 21 + 8 )) - 1= 467

What I did was create a mathematical pattern, conveniently to get the value I want, but this is just an illusion.
Therefore, I don't see much sense in your explanation.

I'm not one to judge, but in science we speak with evidence.


Pages: « 1 ... 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 [218] 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 ... 369 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!