Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[kuramuqnko]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

[fecell]

to full 160 bit range still 10% to complete (with all other ranges with CircleTraversal.cuh). Hurry to get all rewards.


ps: but in these 10% all the awards.   everyone's hope.

[brainless]

Suggest me free ftp
Where I upload addresses list about 400 million addresses, for puzzle 135
Where gpu holder act open pool for bitcrack run to find 1 address and win 1 btc

[BTCzeroo]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

[kuramuqnko]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

[SimonNeedsBitcoin]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

[Mafioso246]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

You keep repeating the same thing, either you're the bot owner waiting in ambush, or SimonNeedsBrain
Nice try Diddy LOL, can you share your bot with us?

[Psychedelic Susa]

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

Buddy, I sincerely hope you solve this puzzle faster than the others and then see your angry posts on this forum. 
Now, back to reality—take a couple of steps to understand the small range problem: 
1. Grab the open public key for #70 (hint: it’s 0290e6900a58d33393bc1097b5aed31f2e4e7cbd3e5466af958665bc0121248483). 
2. Open any public key solver (let’s say RCKangaroo or Kangaroo by JLP). 
3. Check how many seconds it takes to crack it (on your hardware). 
(Next, it’s best to work with wallets that have funds.) 
4. Use the nomachine script from page 569 of this thread. If needed, you can rewrite it for hex instead of WIF or whatever suits your soul. 
5. Open slipstream.mara.com and input the values for broadcasting. 
6. You’ve done everything correctly. 

Now imagine all these steps could be pre-prepared into a single script, written properly in C++, paired with some solid hardware, and then just run and wait. 
In this scenario, if your bot is faster than the others and makes the first valid outgoing transaction, you could steal bitcoins. 
P.S. There are plenty of such bots out there, and the odds aren’t always in your favor. 

The small range problem is that you can find the private key in a few seconds before miners confirm the transaction, knowing the public key that goes into the public mempool.

[SimonNeedsBitcoin]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

You keep repeating the same thing, either you're the bot owner waiting in ambush, or SimonNeedsBrain
Nice try Diddy LOL, can you share your bot with us?

This is hilarious! If I knew how to use a bot like this, I'd have already cracked dozens of Bitcoin addresses. I'd probably be on vacation in Hawaii.

Don't you think that asking you to give them your transaction data is essentially like saying, "Hey, give me your private key."?

You guys are so technically proficient, do you think private mining pools are any worse than you?

[Mafioso246]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

You keep repeating the same thing, either you're the bot owner waiting in ambush, or SimonNeedsBrain
Nice try Diddy LOL, can you share your bot with us?

This is hilarious! If I knew how to use a bot like this, I'd have already cracked dozens of Bitcoin addresses. I'd probably be on vacation in Hawaii.

Don't you think that asking you to give them your transaction data is essentially like saying, "Hey, give me your private key."?

You guys are so technically proficient, do you think private mining pools are any worse than you?

Okay, it's clear you’re not reading the replies sent to you, and based on the sentence you wrote above, you clearly don’t have any understanding of how bots work, so I’ll assume the bot doesn’t either, fair enough

You seem to think bots can crack all addresses or something. Let me ease your mind: Bitcoin is secure (for now). What you said is valid, but the puzzle topic is a different matter and should be evaluated as such.

67–68 were taken via Marapool. The person who solved 69 did exactly what you described, and the result is clear bots stole it. That was the only option and that’s all I have to say. GL

[brainless]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

You keep repeating the same thing, either you're the bot owner waiting in ambush, or SimonNeedsBrain
Nice try Diddy LOL, can you share your bot with us?

This is hilarious! If I knew how to use a bot like this, I'd have already cracked dozens of Bitcoin addresses. I'd probably be on vacation in Hawaii.

Don't you think that asking you to give them your transaction data is essentially like saying, "Hey, give me your private key."?

You guys are so technically proficient, do you think private mining pools are any worse than you?

Wooow
You claim you crack Bitcoin wallets and have lot of money, and enjoying time n money
Here is simple example and test
You should create 71 bit range address
Put their 1 btc
Post address here, and announce your destination address where you will transfer your 1 btc full or partial btc after 3 hours, using ur secure mempool tx, remember no one have ur pvkey,
After play this test you will learn lot of things, when bots will pickup before go to your destination address
If you successfully transfer your fund to your des address , whole forum will learn from you
Come and play And proof your simple tx by mempool
After 12 hours

[kuramuqnko]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

You keep repeating the same thing, either you're the bot owner waiting in ambush, or SimonNeedsBrain
Nice try Diddy LOL, can you share your bot with us?

This is hilarious! If I knew how to use a bot like this, I'd have already cracked dozens of Bitcoin addresses. I'd probably be on vacation in Hawaii.

Don't you think that asking you to give them your transaction data is essentially like saying, "Hey, give me your private key."?

You guys are so technically proficient, do you think private mining pools are any worse than you?

Wooow
You claim you crack Bitcoin wallets and have lot of money, and enjoying time n money
Here is simple example and test
You should create 71 bit range address
Put their 1 btc
Post address here, and announce your destination address where you will transfer your 1 btc full or partial btc after 3 hours, using ur secure mempool tx, remember no one have ur pvkey,
After play this test you will learn lot of things, when bots will pickup before go to your destination address
If you successfully transfer your fund to your des address , whole forum will learn from you
Come and play And proof your simple tx by mempool
After 12 hours

Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

[mcdouglasx]

Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

The public keys of multiple 5 puzzles were intentionally revealed, which opens the way to the possibility of using kangaroo, which allows for a faster solution of the problem, something that is not possible with puzzles 71, 72... that do not end in 5 or 0, which makes them difficult to solve because only conventional (slow) brute force can be applied. However, if for example you solve puzzle 71 and do not use the Mara service, when sending the transaction, you are exposing its public key to the world, which will cause bots to use kangaroo and replace your transaction, taking away your prize, since the difficulty of puzzle 71 lies in the fact that the public key is hidden, but once an attempt is made to spend it and it is included in the mempool, the public key is leaked.

For this reason you should use mara Slipstream for these puzzles, because mara does not broadcast the transaction publicly, which means it does not reveal the public key until the transaction is confirmed (included in a block) and at this point, this is not reversible, so you will have collected the reward without problems.

[Mafioso246]

For the remaining unsolved lower bitlength puzzles the solver has to use non-public mempool with so far the only easy public service at slipstream.mara.com OR the solver is a complete idiot as was the case with puzzle #69.

Any solver of puzzles #71, #72, ... which are not multiples of 5 have to be mined from non-public mempools. Period!

Solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5, i.e. #135, #140, ... #160, don't necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast their puzzle withdrawal transaction publicly. Though it doesn't really hurt to do it via slipstream.mara.com, too. I'd consider it safer that way.

It's funny how some dudes here don't seem to understand how RBF works and that basically all mining pools have an economic incentive to have FullRBF enabled by default. Therefore you can't prevent that your transaction gets replaced as long as the replacer follows RBF rules. You can't opt-out RBF successfully anymore. Period!

Anybody who doesn't understand this, shouldn't play with solving #71+, just don't come later and cry you've been robbed by bots. DYOR!

I don't understand. What is the difference between any puzzle and these that are multiples of 5?

 In case you solve any of the puzzles from 71 to 134, you must consider several precautions to avoid being robbed by automated bots.

I understand well how the public mempool works and how transactions function. I've read through the entire thread and I understand the risk of being front-run by bots when transfering funds.
This is the first time I’m seeing someone mention that “solvers of remaining puzzles which are multiples of 5 don’t necessarily need non-public mempools and should be fine to broadcast publicly.” I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it's #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes special the puzzles that are multiples of 5 - like #85, #100, #105?

Don't trust online claims, especially in the digital currency space, where scammers are everywhere.

Puzzle 71 has been the subject of three or four months of global effort since the solution of Puzzle 69, but the private key hasn't been cracked. Can you believe your funds could be stolen by a so-called bot within a minute of your transfer? Bitcoin's most important principle is decentralization. Even if you're transferring funds publicly, as long as you use the highest transaction fee, miners around the world will rush to confirm your transaction. This is the essence of Bitcoin's decentralization and security. What's there to worry about? You can claim your winnings in under a minute. If Bitcoin were so easily hackable, it would have collapsed long ago.

Remember, anyone who asks you to submit your transactions to a private mining pool is likely a scammer. Even if the private mining pool is a large company, what about their employees? Anyone who handles your transaction information could try to steal your winnings. Think for yourself.

You keep repeating the same thing, either you're the bot owner waiting in ambush, or SimonNeedsBrain
Nice try Diddy LOL, can you share your bot with us?

This is hilarious! If I knew how to use a bot like this, I'd have already cracked dozens of Bitcoin addresses. I'd probably be on vacation in Hawaii.

Don't you think that asking you to give them your transaction data is essentially like saying, "Hey, give me your private key."?

You guys are so technically proficient, do you think private mining pools are any worse than you?

Wooow
You claim you crack Bitcoin wallets and have lot of money, and enjoying time n money
Here is simple example and test
You should create 71 bit range address
Put their 1 btc
Post address here, and announce your destination address where you will transfer your 1 btc full or partial btc after 3 hours, using ur secure mempool tx, remember no one have ur pvkey,
After play this test you will learn lot of things, when bots will pickup before go to your destination address
If you successfully transfer your fund to your des address , whole forum will learn from you
Come and play And proof your simple tx by mempool
After 12 hours

Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

So puzzle numbers actually represent the size of the key range.

For puzzles like #85, #100, or #105, the public keys were intentionally exposed by the creator. This was done to make it possible to test cryptographic algorithms like Kangaroo or BSGS or maybe for other reasons.

[kuramuqnko]

Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

The public keys of multiple 5 puzzles were intentionally revealed, which opens the way to the possibility of using kangaroo, which allows for a faster solution of the problem, something that is not possible with puzzles 71, 72... that do not end in 5 or 0, which makes them difficult to solve because only conventional (slow) brute force can be applied. However, if for example you solve puzzle 71 and do not use the Mara service, when sending the transaction, you are exposing its public key to the world, which will cause bots to use kangaroo and replace your transaction, taking away your prize, since the difficulty of puzzle 71 lies in the fact that the public key is hidden, but once an attempt is made to spend it and it is included in the mempool, the public key is leaked.

For this reason you should use mara Slipstream for these puzzles, because mara does not broadcast the transaction publicly, which means it does not reveal the public key until the transaction is confirmed (included in a block) and at this point, this is not reversible, so you will have collected the reward without problems.

Thank you for the answer! The explanation was simple, but I just didn't pay attention. I thought there were several puzzles with known public keys, but I hadn’t noticed that it's specifically the ones that are multiples of 5.

[mahmood1356]

Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

The public keys of multiple 5 puzzles were intentionally revealed, which opens the way to the possibility of using kangaroo, which allows for a faster solution of the problem, something that is not possible with puzzles 71, 72... that do not end in 5 or 0, which makes them difficult to solve because only conventional (slow) brute force can be applied. However, if for example you solve puzzle 71 and do not use the Mara service, when sending the transaction, you are exposing its public key to the world, which will cause bots to use kangaroo and replace your transaction, taking away your prize, since the difficulty of puzzle 71 lies in the fact that the public key is hidden, but once an attempt is made to spend it and it is included in the mempool, the public key is leaked.

For this reason you should use mara Slipstream for these puzzles, because mara does not broadcast the transaction publicly, which means it does not reveal the public key until the transaction is confirmed (included in a block) and at this point, this is not reversible, so you will have collected the reward without problems.

Thank you for the answer! The explanation was simple, but I just didn't pay attention. I thought there were several puzzles with known public keys, but I hadn’t noticed that it's specifically the ones that are multiples of 5.

I personally have no trust in intermediary sites like Slipstream Mara. These are all delusional thoughts that are expressed. Anyone who can solve Puzzle 71 can create a transaction with a gift of 1 million Satoshi and broadcast it on the network. Rest assured, with this reward, miners will not hesitate for a moment to accept it. Your transaction will be confirmed and there is no need to worry until the robots try to reach the public key from the private key.

[onepuzzle]

Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

The public keys of multiple 5 puzzles were intentionally revealed, which opens the way to the possibility of using kangaroo, which allows for a faster solution of the problem, something that is not possible with puzzles 71, 72... that do not end in 5 or 0, which makes them difficult to solve because only conventional (slow) brute force can be applied. However, if for example you solve puzzle 71 and do not use the Mara service, when sending the transaction, you are exposing its public key to the world, which will cause bots to use kangaroo and replace your transaction, taking away your prize, since the difficulty of puzzle 71 lies in the fact that the public key is hidden, but once an attempt is made to spend it and it is included in the mempool, the public key is leaked.

For this reason you should use mara Slipstream for these puzzles, because mara does not broadcast the transaction publicly, which means it does not reveal the public key until the transaction is confirmed (included in a block) and at this point, this is not reversible, so you will have collected the reward without problems.

Thank you for the answer! The explanation was simple, but I just didn't pay attention. I thought there were several puzzles with known public keys, but I hadn’t noticed that it's specifically the ones that are multiples of 5.

I personally have no trust in intermediary sites like Slipstream Mara. These are all delusional thoughts that are expressed. Anyone who can solve Puzzle 71 can create a transaction with a gift of 1 million Satoshi and broadcast it on the network. Rest assured, with this reward, miners will not hesitate for a moment to accept it. Your transaction will be confirmed and there is no need to worry until the robots try to reach the public key from the private key.

Bullshit.

Even if you accept a 6 BTC fee, a pool still has to find a block in the end. And as we’ve seen before, many vultures are active and would use the replace-by-fee method to overwrite the transaction. Just admit it—you want to steal the money and nothing else. So far, slipstream has always worked; why wouldn’t it work now? Especially with Marapool behind it. For Marapool, 7 BTC is like $1,000. No one there would try to steal—it’s at least extremely unlikely.

[AbadomRSZ]

Sorry, guys, but unfortunately I have to ask my question for the third time, as Im still curious. SimonNeedsBitcoin steered the conversation in a completely different direction that’s already been discussed multiple times here and whether that path is right or wrong doesn’t concern me. What SimonNeedsBitcoin decided to explain was an answer to a question I never asked. So… once again, I had like to ask my question, and if anyone can answer, I will really appreciate it. I don’t understand what difference the puzzle number makes - whether it’s #61, #71, #82, etc. And specifically, what makes the puzzles that are multiples of 5 special — like #85, #100, #105? Or in the end, since no one is giving an answer, does that just mean this thing has no significance at all?

The public keys of multiple 5 puzzles were intentionally revealed, which opens the way to the possibility of using kangaroo, which allows for a faster solution of the problem, something that is not possible with puzzles 71, 72... that do not end in 5 or 0, which makes them difficult to solve because only conventional (slow) brute force can be applied. However, if for example you solve puzzle 71 and do not use the Mara service, when sending the transaction, you are exposing its public key to the world, which will cause bots to use kangaroo and replace your transaction, taking away your prize, since the difficulty of puzzle 71 lies in the fact that the public key is hidden, but once an attempt is made to spend it and it is included in the mempool, the public key is leaked.

For this reason you should use mara Slipstream for these puzzles, because mara does not broadcast the transaction publicly, which means it does not reveal the public key until the transaction is confirmed (included in a block) and at this point, this is not reversible, so you will have collected the reward without problems.

Thank you for the answer! The explanation was simple, but I just didn't pay attention. I thought there were several puzzles with known public keys, but I hadn’t noticed that it's specifically the ones that are multiples of 5.

I personally have no trust in intermediary sites like Slipstream Mara. These are all delusional thoughts that are expressed. Anyone who can solve Puzzle 71 can create a transaction with a gift of 1 million Satoshi and broadcast it on the network. Rest assured, with this reward, miners will not hesitate for a moment to accept it. Your transaction will be confirmed and there is no need to worry until the robots try to reach the public key from the private key.

You just know how to bark like stray dogs falling on the side of the road! And you don't solve anything, what a pain.

[Menowa*]

I personally have no trust in intermediary sites like Slipstream Mara. These are all delusional thoughts that are expressed. Anyone who can solve Puzzle 71 can create a transaction with a gift of 1 million Satoshi and broadcast it on the network. Rest assured, with this reward, miners will not hesitate for a moment to accept it. Your transaction will be confirmed and there is no need to worry until the robots try to reach the public key from the private key.

I’ve seen a lot of bullshit here about how this whole thing works lately. These people looks the same of those who believes Karl Marx’s theories would work without understanding nothing about how our reality works. Every block is supossed to be mined in 10 minutes by default, except some cases that it is mined in one minute or in one hour. Setting a higher fee doesn’t change anything since RBF let you set a higher fee than what you set before. So why do you think setting a million of satoshis would get your transaction mined safely? Just because it’s a high fee? You’re right when you said miners will not hesitate to accept your transaction with one million in fee, but how about a bot double it with a 2 million satoshis as fee? Will the miners accept it or your transaction is so special that it cannot be RBF? What will you do between the time you broadcast your transaction and the time it is confirme? Oh let me guess: loose your funds to a bot cause you were ignorant about how this whole thing works. The problem with low entropy like 71 is it can be cracked easily once you broadcast a transaction and the public key is exposed. Since it’s security is low, bots will crack and replace your transaction with a higher fee and you lose your funds. The problem people here seems to not understand is: it’s not the security of bitcoin, it’s the entropy. By default the wallets today has 256 bits os security which is impossible with modern hardware to crack it, but with 71 bits of entropy its security is nothing. But remember: only brute forcing is still almost impossible without public key, but once you have the public key you can get the private key in seconds.

[teguh54321]

Anyone here can explain the ripmed160 section ?
And the most logical way to observe it based on this image
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS9x4vLYDQENhxzOd05eUO0Yb7q8zYtkO9H0w&s

So it dissected into 5 part ?
8 digit each ? 🤔
Or not ?