Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 12:19:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 123 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT  (Read 157066 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
btcusury
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 260


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 03:55:55 PM
 #881

Bitcoin is difficult enough for what it is, if it's turned into an experiment in anarchism as well it's destined to fail.

Bitcoin absolutely is an experiment in anarchism. That's the whole fucking point. You have no idea what anarchism even is. Check out Larken Rose on Youtube if you want some quick learning (and to become a voluntaryist instead of an involuntaryist/statist).



Are hellobitcoinworld & co. *really* so stupid, stubborn, and pushy, or are they secretly on our side and trying to make Classic look bad?

I also find it amusing that Gavin, of all people, recommended the "how to survive poisonous people" video. Could Gavin be dropping subtle hints on us? There are some other WTF things like that "but the average webpage is 2MB" argument.

FACT: There were hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths by December 2020 due to the censorship of all effective treatments (most notably ivermectin) in order to obtain EUA for experimental GT spike protein injections despite spike bioweaponization patents going back about a decade, and the manufacturers have 100% legal immunity despite long criminal histories.
1715041142
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715041142

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715041142
Reply with quote  #2

1715041142
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
March 10, 2016, 04:03:41 PM
 #882

lol they all agree that there doesn't need to be a block size increase but they all agree to increase to HF 2MB in a year...
A HF in 2016 and a HF in 2017 (with a 2 MB block size limit) are quite different. You might think that time is the only involved factor, but it isn't. However, "they all agree" is a false statement. I don't see "all" of them agreeing to such a thing.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
watashi-kokoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 268



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 04:35:44 PM
 #883

It's over. They have 5% hashrate, if this continues the hard fork will be deployed off anytime now.

I hope they would at least inform us so we can update to Classic too.
RealBitcoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1007


JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 04:47:39 PM
 #884


That's an artificial limit that is constraining growth, remove it now or suffer the consequences!

The unconfirmed ones average between 1000 -4000 all day, and on top activity it sometimes goes up to 10,000.

However if you analyze it closely https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ , you can see that the majority of unconfirmed ones are mostly faucet payments with 2000-3000 satoshi fees.

So apart from the recent network attack, there wasnt any issue of sending transactions if you put an extra 1000 satoshi to it for priority.



But the shills are overwhelming it that we need immediate solutions, it seems to me like a very intense hegelian dialectic: problem-reaction-solution crap that they have planned.

The leftists are master manipulators so we need to be vigilant.

chek2fire
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3416
Merit: 1142


Intergalactic Conciliator


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 04:49:28 PM
 #885

Bitcoin is difficult enough for what it is, if it's turned into an experiment in anarchism as well it's destined to fail.

Bitcoin absolutely is an experiment in anarchism. That's the whole fucking point. You have no idea what anarchism even is. Check out Larken Rose on Youtube if you want some quick learning (and to become a voluntaryist instead of an involuntaryist/statist).



Are hellobitcoinworld & co. *really* so stupid, stubborn, and pushy, or are they secretly on our side and trying to make Classic look bad?

I also find it amusing that Gavin, of all people, recommended the "how to survive poisonous people" video. Could Gavin be dropping subtle hints on us? There are some other WTF things like that "but the average webpage is 2MB" argument.


Definitely Coinbase and Armstrong is not a term of Anarchism even of Ancap

http://www.bitcoin-gr.org
4411 804B 0181 F444 ADBD 01D4 0664 00E4 37E7 228E
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
March 10, 2016, 04:53:49 PM
 #886

That's an artificial limit that is constraining growth, remove it now or suffer the consequences!
-snip-
The leftists are master manipulators so we need to be vigilant.
You didn't detect the sarcasm, did you?

The unconfirmed ones average between 1000 -4000 all day, and on top activity it sometimes goes up to 10,000.

However if you analyze it closely https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ , you can see that the majority of unconfirmed ones are mostly faucet payments with 2000-3000 satoshi fees.
I've been trying to explain this during the attack that recently caused delays. However, you should talk in satoshis/byte when explaining the situation. In this case, those users are including a TX fee that is at least 3 times lower than it should be.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
RealBitcoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1007


JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 04:57:35 PM
 #887


I've been trying to explain this during the attack that recently caused delays. However, you should talk in satoshis/byte when explaining the situation. In this case, those users are including a TX fee that is at least 3 times lower than it should be.

Indeed, but i dont think it's an issue when you send bitcoins, but when you receive bitcoins.

I`m annoyed more when somebody sends me bitcoins, and they put too low fees and i had to wait 3 hours to get it because they forgot to put adequate fees.

So we need to tell bitcoin services to peg their fees to the market, instead of always using 10,000 satoshi.

watashi-kokoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 268



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 05:04:28 PM
 #888

I`m annoyed more when somebody sends me bitcoins, and they put too low fees and i had to wait 3 hours to get it because they forgot to put adequate fees.

Child pays for parent could solve this. At the expense of making yet another transaction.
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3071



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 07:38:55 PM
 #889

lol they all agree that there doesn't need to be a block size increase but they all agree to increase to HF 2MB in a year...

The subtlety appears lost on you adam. You do understand that "2MB yesterday" and "2MB in one year" are different to each other, don't you?

Vires in numeris
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
March 10, 2016, 07:54:29 PM
 #890

lol they all agree that there doesn't need to be a block size increase but they all agree to increase to HF 2MB in a year...

The subtlety appears lost on you adam. You do understand that "2MB yesterday" and "2MB in one year" are different to each other, don't you?

Trace Mayer tries to make bitcoin classic team look like a joke and Core like gods.
and suggest that there shouldn't be any debate because the gods are for sure more right than the jokers.
I'm pointing out that the difference in opinion from both sides is only time frame.
26/28 core devs agree, phhhh, what is this a sensodyne commercial??


chek2fire
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3416
Merit: 1142


Intergalactic Conciliator


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 07:55:54 PM
 #891

lol they all agree that there doesn't need to be a block size increase but they all agree to increase to HF 2MB in a year...

The subtlety appears lost on you adam. You do understand that "2MB yesterday" and "2MB in one year" are different to each other, don't you?

Trace Mayer tries to make bitcoin classic team look like a joke and Core like gods.
and suggest that there shouldn't be any debate because the gods are for sure more right than the jokers.
I'm pointing out that the difference in opinion from both sides is only time frame.
26/28 core devs agree, phhhh, what is this a sensodyne commercial??



This is not too much hard to do it. Because this classic team si ridiculous.

https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic/pull/138#issuecomment-194025577

http://www.bitcoin-gr.org
4411 804B 0181 F444 ADBD 01D4 0664 00E4 37E7 228E
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
March 10, 2016, 07:58:58 PM
 #892

lol they all agree that there doesn't need to be a block size increase but they all agree to increase to HF 2MB in a year...

The subtlety appears lost on you adam. You do understand that "2MB yesterday" and "2MB in one year" are different to each other, don't you?

Trace Mayer tries to make bitcoin classic team look like a joke and Core like gods.
and suggest that there shouldn't be any debate because the gods are for sure more right than the jokers.
I'm pointing out that the difference in opinion from both sides is only time frame.
26/28 core devs agree, phhhh, what is this a sensodyne commercial??



he misses the point... and why hes confused about why there is still much debate

this isn't about technical merit of each side.

one side wants favors second layer solutions, the other favors main chain scaling.

the technical details of each are almost completely irrlevent... and thats why it doesn't matter if 9/10 dev agree on one or the other.

Core devs are right for all the wrong reasons.

RealBitcoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1007


JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 08:32:21 PM
 #893


Trace Mayer tries to make bitcoin classic team look like a joke and Core like gods.
and suggest that there shouldn't be any debate because the gods are for sure more right than the jokers.
I'm pointing out that the difference in opinion from both sides is only time frame.
26/28 core devs agree, phhhh, what is this a sensodyne commercial??



Bitcoin classic is like a penis enlargement pill commercial.

adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
March 10, 2016, 08:36:07 PM
 #894


Trace Mayer tries to make bitcoin classic team look like a joke and Core like gods.
and suggest that there shouldn't be any debate because the gods are for sure more right than the jokers.
I'm pointing out that the difference in opinion from both sides is only time frame.
26/28 core devs agree, phhhh, what is this a sensodyne commercial??



Bitcoin classic is like a penis enlargement pill commercial.

and core is like a strap on?

hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 09:24:17 PM
 #895


Trace Mayer tries to make bitcoin classic team look like a joke and Core like gods.
and suggest that there shouldn't be any debate because the gods are for sure more right than the jokers.
I'm pointing out that the difference in opinion from both sides is only time frame.
26/28 core devs agree, phhhh, what is this a sensodyne commercial??



Bitcoin classic is like a penis enlargement pill commercial.

and core is like a strap on?

nah, core is just not impotent.
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3071



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 09:43:59 PM
 #896

lol they all agree that there doesn't need to be a block size increase but they all agree to increase to HF 2MB in a year...

The subtlety appears lost on you adam. You do understand that "2MB yesterday" and "2MB in one year" are different to each other, don't you?

I'm pointing out that the difference in opinion from both sides is only time frame.

No you weren't, you were trying to suggest that the Core devs were contradicting themselves ("they disagree with blocksize increases, but they also agree to an increase in 2 years")


Kind of ironic, that it's actually you that was representing the contradiction, don't you think?

Vires in numeris
watashi-kokoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 268



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 09:46:39 PM
 #897

Classic followers are either poet shills, or startup entepers bank hire bailout-having wannabees, retiring them selves and 6 more generations .

jealous of Satoshi Nakamoto mad startups skills .

nah, core is just not impotent.

yes prune fell from sky.
Thatstinks
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 09:58:09 PM
 #898

Toomincoin


On sale soon!  Cool
watashi-kokoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 268



View Profile
March 13, 2016, 09:20:24 AM
 #899

Mod crying about toxic shills making highly polarized and very, very, angry - Board went full buttcoin

/r/btc seems to have lost it's way

˵ that this sub-reddit is now like an angry mob and echo chamber. There isn't much productive discussion happening here any more.˶

But, is that all we are going to talk about on this sub-reddit for time eternal? If some developer from core comes up with a good ideal, are we going to attack the ideal, just because of who came up with it?

I don't know, all I can say is that this sub-reddit is certainly not hosting a very productive discussion about news, technology, and events in the bitcoin ecosystem these days. It's a 24/7 hate-fest at all things blockstream and core.

I mean, hey, it's not like we have censorship. So, keep at it. Let your inner rage out. I'm just not finding any of it particularly fun or enlightening at this point.
Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1014


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 09:29:08 AM
 #900

Mod crying about toxic shills making highly polarized and very, very, angry - Board went full buttcoin

/r/btc seems to have lost it's way

˵ that this sub-reddit is now like an angry mob and echo chamber. There isn't much productive discussion happening here any more.˶

But, is that all we are going to talk about on this sub-reddit for time eternal? If some developer from core comes up with a good ideal, are we going to attack the ideal, just because of who came up with it?

I don't know, all I can say is that this sub-reddit is certainly not hosting a very productive discussion about news, technology, and events in the bitcoin ecosystem these days. It's a 24/7 hate-fest at all things blockstream and core.

I mean, hey, it's not like we have censorship. So, keep at it. Let your inner rage out. I'm just not finding any of it particularly fun or enlightening at this point.

r/btc is the melting pot of all conspiracy theories about core, blockstream and everything related to it.
Reading there is a waste of time.
r/bitcoin by the way is having big issues as well.

Don't read to much over there, just gives you headache. Cheesy
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 123 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!