110110101
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1002
|
 |
April 25, 2016, 07:10:53 AM |
|
Rather a later launch than a total disaster if the network had collapsed. Glad the devs caught the network limitation and are addressing the problems. I guess we will have to be patient and hold out another month, more time for testing and verification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Axente
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:12:35 AM |
|
Rather a later launch than a total disaster if the network had collapsed. Glad the devs caught the network limitation and are addressing the problems. I guess we will have to be patient and hold out another month, more time for testing and verification.
I totally agree, the delegates can even test their servers more and stresstest. We only had one which went wrong so it's better we have more time. |
|
|
|
edmundduke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1007
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:14:52 AM |
|
Rather a later launch than a total disaster if the network had collapsed. Glad the devs caught the network limitation and are addressing the problems. I guess we will have to be patient and hold out another month, more time for testing and verification.
Yeah i have to agree. It is dissapointing that it is delayed but at the same time i understand that they cant and should not release a system that is not operating as intended and could end up a total disaster. |
|
|
|
|
MorAltsPlease
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 282
Merit: 250
Fear only from the fear itself
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:16:24 AM |
|
Rather a later launch than a total disaster if the network had collapsed. Glad the devs caught the network limitation and are addressing the problems. I guess we will have to be patient and hold out another month, more time for testing and verification.
Yeah i have to agree. It is dissapointing that it is delayed but at the same time i understand that they cant and should not release a system that is not operating as intended and could end up a total disaster. Same here, just don't wait till last second to state that |
|
|
|
|
|
Simple858
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:18:53 AM |
|
So official LISK release will be on May the 24th, 2016... that is 7 days before WAVES ICO ends... interesting  |
|
|
|
|
souljah1h
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
Hyperspace snail
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:20:20 AM |
|
So official LISK release will be on May the 24th, 2016... that is 7 days before WAVES ICO ends... interesting Nothing interesting about that. You just wanna promote waves. Why is this even interesting? |
_@/'
|
|
|
Wolf Rainer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1022
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:21:40 AM |
|
So official LISK release will be on May the 24th, 2016... that is 7 days before WAVES ICO ends... interesting Nothing interesting about that. You just wanna promote that shit. Why is this even interesting? Massive dump incoming. |
|
|
|
|
raetsch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:28:00 AM |
|
you spelled dump wrong, there is a b u l l s h i t missing.
|
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:28:12 AM |
|
So official LISK release will be on May the 24th, 2016... that is 7 days before WAVES ICO ends... interesting Waves may have delays too, too make their ICO a success, they claim to have it ready at launch. But after the ICO, well, the money is in. Not saying that Waves is a scam in any way, I'm sure that the team is honest. |
|
|
|
|
addicto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:40:52 AM |
|
This is good decision taking by team, we can wait for it to get access there to our coin and i am quite it will be worth to it when network will be more stable at that time of release.
|
|
|
|
|
andrealandia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:44:49 AM |
|
Another month for users!
VERY BAD DEV
You should refund all users that want the refund because you can't say the wallet will be relased 14 april and after you decide to relase the 25 may!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinuserz
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:56:12 AM |
|
Nuuu I want to spend my Lisk
|
Korean Chinese Translator
Professional Korean translator.
|
|
|
Patriarch
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 347
Merit: 258
Founder of PROCOMMERCE.IO
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:56:48 AM |
|
i was a bit bummed when i saw may 24th... but guess what? its for the better! all of you guys complaining about it clearly do not have any idea how difficult this project is.
|
|
|
|
|
raetsch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:58:58 AM
Last edit: April 25, 2016, 09:12:21 AM by raetsch |
|
Another month for users!
VERY BAD DEV
You should refund all users that want the refund because you can't say the wallet will be relased 14 april and after you decide to relase the 25 may!!!!!!
[sarcasm]that is a fucking great idea.[/sarcasm] and in 6 weeks, the thread explodes of crying refunders. but please you lisk-devs, consider this as an option. would be a very superb message for all investors, especially those, who do not refund  edit: made post obvious, as it is not easy to recognize |
|
|
|
|
orendel
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
April 25, 2016, 08:10:25 AM |
|
Another month for users!
VERY BAD DEV
You should refund all users that want the refund because you can't say the wallet will be relased 14 april and after you decide to relase the 25 may!!!!!!
I know some people that will buy the Lisk that you have in the ICO price  |
|
|
|
|
|
bitbitch
|
|
April 25, 2016, 08:23:26 AM |
|
so i have one month to get my node shit together? every cloud has a silver lining  |
|
|
|
|
|
iambitcoin5
|
|
April 25, 2016, 08:38:25 AM |
|
Rather a later launch than a total disaster if the network had collapsed. Glad the devs caught the network limitation and are addressing the problems. I guess we will have to be patient and hold out another month, more time for testing and verification.
Yeah I totally agree with that. |
|
|
|
^yawn^
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2016, 08:46:48 AM |
|
Catch-22.
You need to hire today right now professional developers to get this done. One man working 12 h/day will not be able to do this. The funds may be locked up in escrow and inaccessible at this time. You need to borrow real money against it and pay for real developers immediately in order to get this done. Every blunder is a black mark ever step of the way. We are at 3 now unless some real initiative to solving these problems is displayed nearly everyone will be so quick to dump this once it goes live, and never return, you can kiss this dream goodbye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TravelsAsia
|
|
April 25, 2016, 09:01:30 AM |
|
The fact is that this delay is hurting US, the investors. There are a few points about the delay that were not handled professionally.
First, making an announcement 5-6 days ago that the release date would be announced today is childish. I am sure the devs knew at that point they needed to delay and should have made the announcement at that time.
Secondly, 1 delay for unforeseen problems is expected but needing 2 separate 1 month delays shows that the team wasn't ready when the ICO was started and the ICO should have been delayed. What is happening because of the multiple delays is that people will both lose interest and lose patience, which directly affects the investors but not the team. Remember that the ICO value has increased 10+% with the bitcoin value increase while our LISK certainly has not increased in value with 2 lengthy delays and I would bet it has devalued considerably.
LOL. Another delay!
5 days ago dev announced that april 24 he announced lisk date release for april end.
Yesterday he wrote that the announcement was made in the middle of the night.
At the end, the announcement was "another delay"
SO UNPROFESSIONAL!
He already knew yesterday or 5 days ago that another delay shoud happen, why just not tell us before?
Lot of investors have lose interest.
Good luck.
It's quite unreasonable to expect perfect results in every step of the way. Max has done an excellent job in staying honest and providing as much clarity as possible. Also, stating that we knew 5-6 days ago that it was going to get delayed is a BIG assumption. The internal testing was going great, until.... it didn't. The final tests proved to be the threshold; final tests were yesterday. Oliver gave it his all, pouring 12+ hours daily in trying to get it ready for today's announcement, but there wasn't enough hours in a day to provide the fix. As the community manager, by all means, feel free to spin this the best way you see fit. It's your right. Augur did it right, not only allowing early token trading but even helping to initiate the trades. Protect the people that actually paid for your jobs. As for the excuses about the money being locked up, I call BS. Are you telling me you can't hire an army of coders that understand that there's almost 6 million in the escrow. All you would need to do is offer above market rate when the escrow is released. It is what it is, I just wanted to share my frustration. |
|
|
|
|
|
TravelsAsia
|
|
April 25, 2016, 09:03:52 AM |
|
Another month for users!
VERY BAD DEV
You should refund all users that want the refund because you can't say the wallet will be relased 14 april and after you decide to relase the 25 may!!!!!!
that is a fucking great idea. and in 6 weeks, the thread explodes of crying refunders. but please you lisk-devs, consider this as an option. would be a very superb message for all investors, especially those, who do not refund I don't know if 'crying' is the proper characterization. |
|
|
|
|
|
