🌟🎲🌟 MoneyPot.com

[JackpotRacer]

you are saying >>>No - as in we don't allow it. <<<

and next sentence you are saying >>>Multiple user accounts but same person are 'ok' <<<

please correct me if I am wrong. I will open 6 accounts like this user as seen in screenshot did
and I am the same person and go to the same app he wagered or can I even go to all mp apps? so this would be allowed? 

Why did you snip the context out of my post?  I said that it was 'ok' for server loading purposes, but it is not allowed if the purpose of doing it is to get faster bets.

No -- as in we don't allow multiple tabs of the same account or multiple tabs of different accounts for the purposes of betting faster.

Multiple user accounts but same person are 'ok' in the sense that they do not put as much stress on the server as multiple tabs under the same account would, but we don't wish for users to do this.  Users should be using the site as it was intended and not using workarounds to get more requests in to the server.

So basically a user can have more than one moneypot account but they should only gamble with one account at a time?

Or can they gamble on 2 sites with two different accounts (say use one account on betterbets and a different account on dustdice).

My roommate has showed interest in playing that's why I ask. I assume that like other sites you count an "IP" address as a belonging to one person no matter how many people actually use it.

Having more than one account is fine.  Just don't have them running at the same time on the same site.

did you see my screenshot with  same user with 5 accounts wagering on the same app the same time? my simple question was if this is allowed and a simple yes or no is enough for me

[yahoo62278]

@JPR the answer is NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO to all. Is that clear enough jeez

[JackpotRacer]

@JPR the answer is NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO to all. Is that clear enough jeez

calm down yahoo you have no reason to shout and I am talking and asking to MP owner or did I miss something that you are one of the MP owners?

not everyone is that smart as you guys I just need some more explanation because my english is not that good as yours. that would mean that I need people with patience and respect towards an app owner.

let me ask my question again. what does this explanation mean in simple engish and without shouting

>>>Multiple user accounts but same person are 'ok' in the sense that they do not put as much stress on the server as multiple tabs under the same account would, but we don't wish for users to do this.  Users should be using the site as it was intended and not using workarounds to get more requests in to the server.<<<

my next question addressed to MP owner and not to yahoo is that we are ready to go out with our new game and it was coded for Satoshi wager. when will the minimum 1 bit wager be implemented?

[JackpotRacer]

2nd try from an app owner

my next question addressed to MP owner and not to yahoo is that we are ready to go out with our new game and it was coded for Satoshi wager. when will the minimum 1 bit wager be implemented?

[JackpotRacer]

I think MP owners should remove and not allow idiot owners to make sites with them, because such owners bring more trouble then profit. please MP dont allow such idiots

62 postings in the last 2 hours tells all  you can easily hit 500 postings today 

[Pif]

I think MP owners should remove and not allow idiot owners to make sites with them, because such owners bring more trouble then profit. please MP dont allow such idiots

62 postings in the last 2 hours tells all   you can easily hit 500 postings today  

I think bitcointalk owners should remove and not allow idiot accountfarmes to make account here with the only purpose of growing their postcounts as fast as they can with the aim to sell their accounts later on. Please bitcointalk don't allow such idiots.


102 posts in around 3 hours after months the account was inactive....and the first post it to stake a bitcoin address 


permaban + IP ban  if you ask me

[elm]

I think MP owners should remove and not allow idiot owners to make sites with them, because such owners bring more trouble then profit. please MP dont allow such idiots

62 postings in the last 2 hours tells all   you can easily hit 500 postings today  

I think bitcointalk owners should remove and not allow idiot accountfarmes to make account here with the only purpose of growing their postcounts as fast as they can with the aim to sell their accounts later on. Please bitcointalk don't allow such idiots.


102 posts in around 3 hours after months the account was inactive....and the first post it to stake a bitcoin address 


permaban + IP ban  if you ask me

very well said @Pif and as you said permaban & IP and even more

[JackpotRacer]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429154.msg14454403#msg14454403

[DarkStar_]

2nd try from an app owner

my next question addressed to MP owner and not to yahoo is that we are ready to go out with our new game and it was coded for Satoshi wager. when will the minimum 1 bit wager be implemented?

2 days ago, there was a notification where this
was stating the 1 bit minimum wagers will be effective May 1st, 2016. A bit after I saw that though, they put up a new banner stating to disregard the notification, but I'm guessing it's still may 1st and they didn't want to worry people or something. The 1 bit thing shouldn't really effect most apps, probably only dice. Other apps like your dust lottery could be changed from single 10 satoshi bets to 10 linked 10 satoshi bets (1 bit total) obviously with the same chance as betting 10 times. Only difference with that is that you can't hit 6/6, 5/6 or 4/6 in a row for those 10 bets, since in reality it is only 1.

[JackpotRacer]

2nd try from an app owner

my next question addressed to MP owner and not to yahoo is that we are ready to go out with our new game and it was coded for Satoshi wager. when will the minimum 1 bit wager be implemented?

2 days ago, there was a notification where this
was stating the 1 bit minimum wagers will be effective May 1st, 2016. A bit after I saw that though, they put up a new banner stating to disregard the notification, but I'm guessing it's still may 1st and they didn't want to worry people or something. The 1 bit thing shouldn't really effect most apps, probably only dice. Other apps like your dust lottery could be changed from single 10 satoshi bets to 10 linked 10 satoshi bets (1 bit total) obviously with the same chance as betting 10 times. Only difference with that is that you can't hit 6/6, 5/6 or 4/6 in a row for those 10 bets, since in reality it is only 1.

@darkstar thank you very much for the info very much appreciated. we did not see it and no one of our customers told us that they saw it.
to be frank MP behavior is very confusing because app owners as well as players should be informed when and if the 1 bit min will be implemented. we have many players who are asking us if and when because they don't like it. and we as app owner would like to know the ETA because we are ready to go out with a new game app and need to tell our coders to change to bits instead of satoshi.

your proposal regarding our Dust Lottery to circumvent the 1 bit implementation would be not fair for our customers (if I understood you right). because it would be like they buy a ticket for 10 bets and pay 10 x 10 = 1b bit but cant hit 4/6 5/6 6/6 in a row (

thx again for the info and suggestion

[panjul07]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429154.msg14454403#msg14454403

Nice bounty, but it would be better if Moneypot also do the same thing to celebrate this achievement. Less than 130k bets to go, so it will be hit in a few minutes.
Congrats to MP for this achievement.

[JackpotRacer]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429154.msg14454403#msg14454403

Congratulations and sadly you did not yet hit 6/6

[DarkStar_]

2nd try from an app owner

my next question addressed to MP owner and not to yahoo is that we are ready to go out with our new game and it was coded for Satoshi wager. when will the minimum 1 bit wager be implemented?

2 days ago, there was a notification where this
was stating the 1 bit minimum wagers will be effective May 1st, 2016. A bit after I saw that though, they put up a new banner stating to disregard the notification, but I'm guessing it's still may 1st and they didn't want to worry people or something. The 1 bit thing shouldn't really effect most apps, probably only dice. Other apps like your dust lottery could be changed from single 10 satoshi bets to 10 linked 10 satoshi bets (1 bit total) obviously with the same chance as betting 10 times. Only difference with that is that you can't hit 6/6, 5/6 or 4/6 in a row for those 10 bets, since in reality it is only 1.

@darkstar thank you very much for the info very much appreciated. we did not see it and no one of our customers told us that they saw it.
to be frank MP behavior is very confusing because app owners as well as players should be informed when and if the 1 bit min will be implemented. we have many players who are asking us if and when because they don't like it. and we as app owner would like to know the ETA because we are ready to go out with a new game app and need to tell our coders to change to bits instead of satoshi.

your proposal regarding our Dust Lottery to circumvent the 1 bit implementation would be not fair for our customers (if I understood you right). because it would be like they buy a ticket for 10 bets and pay 10 x 10 = 1b bit but cant hit 4/6 5/6 6/6 in a row (

thx again for the info and suggestion

I do agree, MP needs to have better communication, at least with app owners as they make moneypot good. If the only apps were dice, not as many people would play. Regarding my proposal, it wouldn't be fair, but the chance of hitting 4/6, 5/6 or 6/6 in a row is extremely unlikely. You should at least consider adding it as an option. Some players are more casual and would rather spend lower amounts to win a decent amount rather then 2 bits to win 16 BTC. Just my 2 bits 

[cazkooo]

I do agree, MP needs to have better communication, at least with app owners as they make moneypot good.

As far as I know, they do have a slack channel for the app owner so the app owner could contact them directly. Moreover someone could always send email or PM to discuss things privately instead of jumping in the thread though. So far the new team has been great however as the old saying goes, you can never pleased everyone

[JackpotRacer]

2nd try from an app owner

my next question addressed to MP owner and not to yahoo is that we are ready to go out with our new game and it was coded for Satoshi wager. when will the minimum 1 bit wager be implemented?

2 days ago, there was a notification where this
was stating the 1 bit minimum wagers will be effective May 1st, 2016. A bit after I saw that though, they put up a new banner stating to disregard the notification, but I'm guessing it's still may 1st and they didn't want to worry people or something. The 1 bit thing shouldn't really effect most apps, probably only dice. Other apps like your dust lottery could be changed from single 10 satoshi bets to 10 linked 10 satoshi bets (1 bit total) obviously with the same chance as betting 10 times. Only difference with that is that you can't hit 6/6, 5/6 or 4/6 in a row for those 10 bets, since in reality it is only 1.

@darkstar thank you very much for the info very much appreciated. we did not see it and no one of our customers told us that they saw it.
to be frank MP behavior is very confusing because app owners as well as players should be informed when and if the 1 bit min will be implemented. we have many players who are asking us if and when because they don't like it. and we as app owner would like to know the ETA because we are ready to go out with a new game app and need to tell our coders to change to bits instead of satoshi.

your proposal regarding our Dust Lottery to circumvent the 1 bit implementation would be not fair for our customers (if I understood you right). because it would be like they buy a ticket for 10 bets and pay 10 x 10 = 1b bit but cant hit 4/6 5/6 6/6 in a row (

thx again for the info and suggestion

I do agree, MP needs to have better communication, at least with app owners as they make moneypot good. If the only apps were dice, not as many people would play. Regarding my proposal, it wouldn't be fair, but the chance of hitting 4/6, 5/6 or 6/6 in a row is extremely unlikely. You should at least consider adding it as an option. Some players are more casual and would rather spend lower amounts to win a decent amount rather then 2 bits to win 16 BTC. Just my 2 bits 

thank you very much again for your straight forward opinion. sadly MP owners are very quick to post in different threads on BCT but the same time not answering our ETA question regarding the min 1 bit implementation. we asked already 2 times and will not be shy to ask a 3rd time

we have 4 MP apps and started almost from the start of the RHavar's MP idea and are ready to add our 5th game app and we dont want to go out with this game as it is coded for Satoshi wager and shortly after going online MP will announce that we have to change to min 1 bit. we need to know the ETA so coders can change it.

back to your suggestion
now as you are proposing to add it as an option it makes sense to us. we forwarded your suggestion to the coders to check out this possibility so we can add it. but again an ETA of min 1 bit implementation would be very helpful for us because we are non coder and need to pay our coders for every minute and in case min 1 bit will not be implemented we don't want to change from Satoshi to bits. we believe in Dust players because bitcoin gambling without Dust players will not exist. the masses of players are Dust players (as in fiat).

thanks again for trying to help

best of luck wherever you put your coins


please let me add our 3rd try to get an answer for the ETA of the min 1 bit implementation?

[JackpotRacer]

here we have a very nice example for MP owner taking the time to jump in other threads but not answering our ETA question


MP owner ranlo posting:

Awesome promo and very unique idea, Yahoo!

Posting to say I deal with Yahoo on a semi-regular basis and will personally vouch for him in this promo,


link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1430128.msg14463744#msg14463744

we did a spontaneous 100 000 000 bet promo
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429154.msg14454403#msg14454403
and we did not get an "Awesome Promo" comment from MP. why? because it was not an "Awesome Promo"? ok no problem so tell us that it was not a nice Promo and we will try to learn what an "Awesome Promo is.

all I can say we had 24 users online during the promo and nice and fun action.

[BTCforJoe]

please let me add our 3rd try to get an answer for the ETA of the min 1 bit implementation?

I find this very sad, and quite unprofessional, for the record: that a MP app owner has to ask 3 times and still hasn't received an answer.

Yes, I do play on Jackpot Racer, and I also play on Bit-Exo, and honestly, if it wasn't for the Dust Lottery, I never would have found Bit-Exo and other MP apps. I also have another account that I have created for the sole purpose of investing with MP, and have a considerable amount invested into MP (which I'm taking a beating on the past 4 hours, btw lol).

I love MoneyPot and the idea behind it, but honestly, the way that I have witnessed JackpotRacer being treated (by dogedigital specifically) is quite frankly BULLSHIT.

I am not related to JPR in any way, shape, or form, other than the fact that I play on his site. He hasn't coerced me to write this; I'm speaking freely here, but I've seen many of the responses from dogedigital in other threads, and the lack of responses here, and... yeah. It would piss me off to no ends if I spent my time and resources in hiring developers to build a gambling platform that supports YOUR VERY PRODUCT, only to get treated like the bastard redheaded stepchild like you're treating him.

How insulting; you should be ashamed, in all seriousness. Give the man a god damn answer so he can tell his developers how to code for the changes. Or just man up and tell him that he's no longer welcome to be a part of the MP app family, which is the impression that you're giving off by the way you're acting like a child. Yeah, it's THAT transparent, where an average joe like me can clearly see it...

How fucking sad....

[prtty2gal2]

here we have a very nice example for MP owner taking the time to jump in other threads but not answering our ETA question


MP owner ranlo posting:

Awesome promo and very unique idea, Yahoo!

Posting to say I deal with Yahoo on a semi-regular basis and will personally vouch for him in this promo,


link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1430128.msg14463744#msg14463744

we did a spontaneous 100 000 000 bet promo
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429154.msg14454403#msg14454403
and we did not get an "Awesome Promo" comment from MP. why? because it was not an "Awesome Promo"? ok no problem so tell us that it was not a nice Promo and we will try to learn what an "Awesome Promo is.

all I can say we had 24 users online during the promo and nice and fun action.

Please moneypot remove such members who spread FUD . JackpotRacer why you cannot wait at least 48 hrs for a reply. Sometimes it looks to me as if you are not professional and still not good enough to run a  site.

[BlueStackz]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429154.msg14454403#msg14454403

Man are you serious ? Is this the place to advertise your site and its promotion ? I think this is a childish activity and seriously are you a owner of site ? well, I know now days its easy to open gambling sites with moneypot, you need nothing

[erwin45hacked]

Give the man a god damn answer so he can tell his developers how to code for the changes.

He doesnt really need the ETA for that, he got his answer clearly that it will be in implemented soon so he could just order his dev to make the changes because either way it will implemented in the future. His cocky response and acting like a boss wont do him any good at all

If JPR is unsatisfied with MP, he is more than welcome to remove his apps from MP and find the other service IMO, oh wait there is no other service like MP so he really needs MP

We are a service provider for the App Owners.  We are not your employees.

Right, JPR needs MP more than MP needs JPR so no reason to keep on forcing MP