NutMasterTardd
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1015
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 08:05:00 AM
Last edit: January 08, 2017, 08:26:12 AM by NutMasterTardd |
|
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one. LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain. and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense. Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha  But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017. In due time I think more exchanges will list WAVES but I'm pretty sure nobody from Poloniex has any problems with any of the WAVES developers, there are probably other reasons for it not being listed and the project is still fairly new. I think you will probably be right, unfortunately most people seem to expect an instant 5x ROI after buying into any random ICO in crypto. |
GEO, RLC & QRL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
btc_zero_sum
|
|
January 08, 2017, 12:30:32 PM |
|
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one. LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain. and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense. Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017. Definitely, sasha cursed poloniex and they hate sasha. He should be a real CEO and ignores every negative thing cuz he is so rich. having an opinion is not "cursing" and is not reason for "hate", at least among professional adults |
|
|
|
|
|
Grahnite
|
|
January 08, 2017, 01:15:22 PM |
|
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one. LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain. and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense. Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017. Definitely, sasha cursed poloniex and they hate sasha. He should be a real CEO and ignores every negative thing cuz he is so rich. having an opinion is not "cursing" and is not reason for "hate", at least among professional adults I agree, but it is still bad that Sasha's attitude towards Polo has negatively affected all WAVES investors. But anyway, such is life... |
|
|
|
|
taipei
|
|
January 08, 2017, 03:21:17 PM |
|
Stratis hasn't needed Polo to make an X9 from the ICO. Since it was added to Polo, it has only lowered the price.
Just a note. That Poloniex adds Waves is good, but it's not that important.
|
|
|
|
|
MirkoIta
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1667
Merit: 1008
Stoned & Stranged
|
|
January 08, 2017, 03:30:36 PM |
|
Stratis hasn't needed Polo to make an X9 from the ICO. Since it was added to Polo, it has only lowered the price.
Just a note. That Poloniex adds Waves is good, but it's not that important.
I agree with you because Poloniex will surely add trading volume, but the token will also be easily manipulated there. |
|
|
|
|
ninjabiz
|
|
January 08, 2017, 03:37:49 PM
Last edit: January 22, 2017, 02:40:03 PM by ninjabiz |
|
Stratis hasn't needed Polo to make an X9 from the ICO. Since it was added to Polo, it has only lowered the price.
Just a note. That Poloniex adds Waves is good, but it's not that important.
Maybe waves without poloniex is better, or massive dump will happen. No polo plz. You look Stratis and NXC, Stratis was 15k for some moment, but it is hardly be there on poloniex, maybe big pump will come but who knows |
|
|
|
|
|
taipei
|
|
January 08, 2017, 03:43:40 PM |
|
The problem of waves is that the ICO was overbought. That problem is solved over time. When they've sold all weak hands.
Waves is a great project. I'm convinced of his success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yhlsqj
|
|
January 08, 2017, 04:04:04 PM |
|
The problem of waves is that the ICO was overbought. That problem is solved over time. When they've sold all weak hands.
Waves is a great project. I'm convinced of his success.
Yes, overbought a bit, if they only raised 10k btc or 5k btc, people would be never crying about the sub ico price, they could earn profit. |
|
|
|
|
sulfurtank
|
|
January 08, 2017, 04:05:36 PM |
|
Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
Very overvalued, almost no functions, delays follow delays. Dex will be not ready for sure at the end of january. Its not coming before summmer. The price will go for sure more down. Waves doesn't impress me. It looks more and more like crap with absolutely no backing. I have no idea why people view it as a blockchain parlor which produces unique business solutions for improving existing tools. Though if u compare it with LISK the latter will be in a higher position on the scale of shittiness than waves. |
|
|
|
|
dukeneptun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 08, 2017, 04:09:14 PM |
|
Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
Very overvalued, almost no functions, delays follow delays. Dex will be not ready for sure at the end of january. Its not coming before summmer. The price will go for sure more down. Waves doesn't impress me. It looks more and more like crap with absolutely no backing. I have no idea why people view it as a blockchain parlor which produces unique business solutions for improving existing tools. Though if u compare it with LISK the latter will be in a higher position on the scale of shittiness than waves. while the blockchain aspect of it doesn't provide anything unique, if the company itself can provide a proper fiat gateway allowing us to trade a properly pegged asset that can be swapped 1:1 for fiat currencies, this will be a good step forward. i'm not talking about those bullshit pegs like bitshares's bitusd or bitcny which recently got delisted from polo, lmao |
|
|
|
|
revelacaogr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1021
2009 Alea iacta est
|
|
January 08, 2017, 04:20:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arvydas77
|
|
January 08, 2017, 05:07:12 PM |
|
Waves is one of my favourite picks for 2017. But I do not want to give any investment advices. Otherwise. it looks very promising if you take into account all the functions of their Lite client.
Does someone remembers the early days of PayPal? For long term Waves looks very similar and even much better.
|
|
|
|
bigpattywhack
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
4.3.2.1.
|
|
January 08, 2017, 05:25:25 PM |
|
I think the reason why the centralized crypto exchanges do not hurry to list Waves because there is a conflict of interest between the two. They don't want to support a technology which makes them obsolete.
I'm so glad someone else said it. I've felt that way about poloniex since day one. LOL no, poloniex couldn't care less about dex. it's all about volume and fees to gain. and btw nxt and bts are listed since long time and they do offer dex as feature: the conflict of interest make no sense. Probably Polo wont list WAVES because Sasha pissed them off too many times. Was a very bad move from Sasha But besides that, I think WAVES has a bright future and will see stellar growth in 2017. Anyone who thinks an alt needs poloniex to grow big shows the centralization of the altcoin scene. It'll be poloniex who needs Waves, not the other way around. |
|
|
|
|
|
KoinMaster
|
|
January 08, 2017, 05:27:55 PM |
|
"....doesn't provide anything unique..." Hmmmmm * Decentralized Asset Exchange * Easy one-click asset creation * Fiat Gateways * Decentralized Voting * Decentralized Secure Messenger * First Crypto implemented solely in Scala * Mass payments API, asset creation API etc. Waves is looking prime for re-entry. Not a bad start for 2017 and a bright future ahead.
Very overvalued, almost no functions, delays follow delays. Dex will be not ready for sure at the end of january. Its not coming before summmer. The price will go for sure more down. Waves doesn't impress me. It looks more and more like crap with absolutely no backing. I have no idea why people view it as a blockchain parlor which produces unique business solutions for improving existing tools. Though if u compare it with LISK the latter will be in a higher position on the scale of shittiness than waves. while the blockchain aspect of it doesn't provide anything unique, if the company itself can provide a proper fiat gateway allowing us to trade a properly pegged asset that can be swapped 1:1 for fiat currencies, this will be a good step forward. i'm not talking about those bullshit pegs like bitshares's bitusd or bitcny which recently got delisted from polo, lmao |
▄████▄
▄████████▄
▄████████████▄
▄████████████████▄
████████████████████ ▄█▄ ▄███▄ ▄███▄ ▄████████████████▀ ▄██████████
▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██
▄█████▄▀▀▀▄██████▄▀▀▀▄█████▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██████████████▄
████████████████████████████ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ██
▀████████████████████████▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██
▀████████████████████▀ ▀███▀ ▀███▀ ▀█▀ ▀███▀ ▄███████████████████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀████████████▀
▀████████▀
▀████▀
| ║║
║█
║█
║║ | .
| .
║║
██
║║
| .
| .
║║
██
║║
| .
| ║║
█║
█║
║║ | |
|
|
|
|
|
revelacaogr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1021
2009 Alea iacta est
|
|
January 08, 2017, 07:34:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grahnite
|
|
January 08, 2017, 08:36:37 PM |
|
Waves is one of my favourite picks for 2017. But I do not want to give any investment advices. Otherwise. it looks very promising if you take into account all the functions of their Lite client.
Does someone remembers the early days of PayPal? For long term Waves looks very similar and even much better.
I agree, WAVES looks like a VERY promising investment for 2017. |
|
|
|
yassprod
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
January 08, 2017, 10:58:31 PM |
|
Waves is one of my favourite picks for 2017. But I do not want to give any investment advices. Otherwise. it looks very promising if you take into account all the functions of their Lite client.
Does someone remembers the early days of PayPal? For long term Waves looks very similar and even much better.
I agree, WAVES looks like a VERY promising investment for 2017. Yes for only people who believed in this project  |
|
|
|
|
The-Accountant
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Legendary.
|
|
January 08, 2017, 11:08:43 PM |
|
Waves is one of my favourite picks for 2017. But I do not want to give any investment advices. Otherwise. it looks very promising if you take into account all the functions of their Lite client.
Does someone remembers the early days of PayPal? For long term Waves looks very similar and even much better.
I agree, WAVES looks like a VERY promising investment for 2017. Yes for only people who believed in this project What about if I don't believe in the project but still hold many waves? |
|
|
|
|
yassprod
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
January 08, 2017, 11:14:12 PM |
|
Waves is one of my favourite picks for 2017. But I do not want to give any investment advices. Otherwise. it looks very promising if you take into account all the functions of their Lite client.
Does someone remembers the early days of PayPal? For long term Waves looks very similar and even much better.
I agree, WAVES looks like a VERY promising investment for 2017. Yes for only people who believed in this project What about if I don't believe in the project but still hold many waves? You already believe in the project by holding many waves for a long period |
|
|
|
|
|
