|
soundposition
|
 |
October 26, 2017, 05:16:23 PM |
|
I installed the AMD Overdrive utility, and disabled Turbo Core. I'll see if that helps.
Immediately I can see my temps dropped to 32C, and the speed is now 1.5kH/s
|
|
|
|
|
MAD945
|
|
October 26, 2017, 05:41:23 PM |
|
Verium Vault 1.1 has been released! |
|
|
|
|
eddex
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
October 26, 2017, 06:42:51 PM |
|
Verium Vault 1.1 has been released! Wohoo! Great job devs! |
|
|
|
|
alex3921
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2017, 04:59:07 AM |
|
has verium been in development for a year? From what I see development is only to new versions of roadmap?  Yes, huge mining overhaul, most of work done without commits because it was being pieced together (wouldn't compile, would crash etc), after initial code development push of changes was done on branch 1.1, now 1.1 is master and commits are being pushed there. https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium/commits/masterAll OSes and architecture wallet builds for 1.1 are now being prepared, including the addition of windows 64bit Any significant advancements using the 64bit build? Will mining hashrate improve? Also should we prefer wallet mining over veriumMiner CLI? |
|
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 27, 2017, 06:17:42 AM |
|
has verium been in development for a year? From what I see development is only to new versions of roadmap? Yes, huge mining overhaul, most of work done without commits because it was being pieced together (wouldn't compile, would crash etc), after initial code development push of changes was done on branch 1.1, now 1.1 is master and commits are being pushed there. https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium/commits/masterAll OSes and architecture wallet builds for 1.1 are now being prepared, including the addition of windows 64bit Any significant advancements using the 64bit build? Will mining hashrate improve? Also should we prefer wallet mining over veriumMiner CLI? I'm afraid that this algorithm is optimized to the maximum, the fundamental question in what version is the miner in the wallet, is it already a fast 64bit? The verium is still gpu resistant  |
|
|
|
|
raven1322
|
|
October 29, 2017, 10:50:29 AM |
|
has verium been in development for a year? From what I see development is only to new versions of roadmap? Yes, huge mining overhaul, most of work done without commits because it was being pieced together (wouldn't compile, would crash etc), after initial code development push of changes was done on branch 1.1, now 1.1 is master and commits are being pushed there. https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium/commits/masterAll OSes and architecture wallet builds for 1.1 are now being prepared, including the addition of windows 64bit Any significant advancements using the 64bit build? Will mining hashrate improve? Also should we prefer wallet mining over veriumMiner CLI? I'm afraid that this algorithm is optimized to the maximum, the fundamental question in what version is the miner in the wallet, is it already a fast 64bit? The verium is still gpu resistant It isn’t botnet resistant though.. you know those huge hashrates on various pools. Makes it a little discouraging for the small time miners out there |
|
|
|
|
jacko0088
|
|
October 29, 2017, 12:03:33 PM |
|
has verium been in development for a year? From what I see development is only to new versions of roadmap? Yes, huge mining overhaul, most of work done without commits because it was being pieced together (wouldn't compile, would crash etc), after initial code development push of changes was done on branch 1.1, now 1.1 is master and commits are being pushed there. https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium/commits/masterAll OSes and architecture wallet builds for 1.1 are now being prepared, including the addition of windows 64bit Any significant advancements using the 64bit build? Will mining hashrate improve? Also should we prefer wallet mining over veriumMiner CLI? I'm afraid that this algorithm is optimized to the maximum, the fundamental question in what version is the miner in the wallet, is it already a fast 64bit? The verium is still gpu resistant It isn’t botnet resistant though.. you know those huge hashrates on various pools. Makes it a little discouraging for the small time miners out there Solo is still more profitable in the long run |
|
|
|
mifanmuzny
Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 16
|
|
October 29, 2017, 12:06:40 PM |
|
VRC already in the big leagues  |
|
|
|
|
JMAlex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2017, 07:27:16 PM |
|
New wallet new problems fking amateurs ... new problems jchrist
|
|
|
|
|
JoyofCrypto
Member
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 10
|
|
October 30, 2017, 10:32:57 AM |
|
Sent out some Verium yesterday from the wallet and it's still at 0 confirmations...
|
|
|
|
|
|
jacko0088
|
|
October 30, 2017, 10:36:22 AM |
|
Sent out some Verium yesterday from the wallet and it's still at 0 confirmations...
Paste your tx. How many blocks is your wallet showing? |
|
|
|
monsanto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1005
..like bright metal on a sullen ground.
|
|
October 30, 2017, 10:38:25 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
October 30, 2017, 12:13:37 PM |
|
It is recommended for all 64bit Windows user to get 64bit wallet from vericoin.info. Check for update in wallet will only offer upgrade to current architecture. 64bit wallet for windows is new this release so please download from site.
|
|
|
|
|
asket3man
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2017, 03:46:44 PM |
|
CPU Benchmark of VRM mining: Weekly Update: 04 September 2017. Data updated.
INTEL CPUs
| # | CPU model | Cores/threads | MINER | OS | Hashrate | TDP | | 01 | Core i5 7600 | 4 / 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 10 x64Pro | 26 H/s | 65W | | 02 | Pentium G 4400 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 8.1 x64Pro | 10 H/s | 54W | | 03 | Xeon E5 2650 | 8 / 16 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 40 H/s | 95W | | 04 | Pentium G 3260 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 10 H/s | 53W | | 05 | Atom N455 | 1 / 2 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | Win7x64 | 1.9 H/s | 15W | | 06 | 2 x Xeon 3200DP
(800/2mb) Socket 604 | 1 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | WinServer2008R2 | 4.8 H/s | 312W | | 07 | 2 x Xeon 3400DP
(800/1mb) Socket 604 | 1 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | WinServer2008R2 | 4.5 H/s | 315W | | 08 | Pentium 2020M | 2 / 2 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | Win10x64 | 8.8 H/s | 35W | | 09 | Xeon E5 2670 | 8 / 16 | pooler-cpuminer-2.5.0-win64 | Windows 10 Pro 1703 x64 | 44 H/s | 115W | | 10 | Core i3-2330M | 2 / 4 | cpuminer 3.6.6 | Windows 8.1 x64Pro | 9.7 H/s | 35W | | 11 | Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz | 4 / 8 | cpuminer 3.6.8 | Debian 9 | 31.7 H/s | 80W | | 12 | 2 x Xeon E5-2603 v2 @ 1.80GHz | 4 / 4 | pooler cpuminer | Windows server 2012 | 27.3 H/s | 80W x 2 | | 13 | 2 x Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | 6 / 12 | pooler cpuminer | Windows server 2012 | 56.7 H/s | 80W x 2 |
AMD CPUs| # | CPU model | Cores/threads | MINER | OS | Hashrate | TDP | | 01 | A10 5800K | 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.6 | Win8.1x64 | 11.8 H/s | 73W |
Пpивeт. Ha дняx тecтиpoвaл eщё тpи мaшины нa пpoизвoдитeльнocть пo VRM. Дoбaвь плз в тaблицy: 1. AMD Athlon 64 x2 5600+ Dual Core 2.8GHz [2C/2T] (Windows Server 2016 x64 STD) CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 TPD 65W - 4.5H/s2. AMD Phenom 9850 Qaud Core 2.5GHz [4C/4T] (Windows 10 x64Pro) CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 TPD 125W - 9H/s
3. Intel I7-3630QM 2.4GHz [4C/8T](нoyтбyк) (Windows 10 x64Pro) CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 TPD 45W - 26H/s |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
October 31, 2017, 05:33:27 AM |
|
CPU Benchmark of VRM mining: Update: 31 October 2017.
INTEL CPUs
| # | CPU model | Cores/threads | MINER | OS | Hashrate | TDP | | 01 | Core i5 7600 | 4 / 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 10 x64Pro | 26 H/s | 65W | | 02 | Pentium G 4400 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 8.1 x64Pro | 10 H/s | 54W | | 03 | Xeon E5 2650 | 8 / 16 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 40 H/s | 95W | | 04 | Pentium G 3260 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 10 H/s | 53W | | 05 | Atom N455 | 1 / 2 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | Win7x64 | 1.9 H/s | 15W | | 06 | 2 x Xeon 3200DP
(800/2mb) Socket 604 | 1 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | WinServer2008R2 | 4.8 H/s | 312W | | 07 | 2 x Xeon 3400DP
(800/1mb) Socket 604 | 1 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | WinServer2008R2 | 4.5 H/s | 315W | | 08 | Pentium 2020M | 2 / 2 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | Win10x64 | 8.8 H/s | 35W | | 09 | Xeon E5 2670 | 8 / 16 | pooler-cpuminer-2.5.0-win64 | Windows 10 Pro 1703 x64 | 44 H/s | 115W | | 10 | Core i3-2330M | 2 / 4 | cpuminer 3.6.6 | Windows 8.1 x64Pro | 9.7 H/s | 35W | | 11 | Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz | 4 / 8 | cpuminer 3.6.8 | Debian 9 | 31.7 H/s | 80W | | 12 | 2 x Xeon E5-2603 v2 @ 1.80GHz | 4 / 4 | pooler cpuminer | Windows server 2012 | 27.3 H/s | 80W x 2 | | 13 | 2 x Xeon E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz | 6 / 12 | pooler cpuminer | Windows server 2012 | 56.7 H/s | 80W x 2 | | 14 | I7-3630QM 2.4GHz | 4 / 8 | CPUminer-opt-3.6.6 | Windows 10 x64Pro | 26.0 H/s | 45W |
AMD CPUs| # | CPU model | Cores/threads | MINER | OS | Hashrate | TDP | | 01 | A10 5800K | 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.6 | Win8.1x64 | 11.8 H/s | 73W | | 02 | Athlon 64 x2 5600+ Dual Core 2.8GHz | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.6 | Windows Server 2016 x64 STD | 4.5 H/s | 65W | | 03 | Phenom 9850 Qaud Core 2.5GHz | 4 / 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.6 | Windows 10 x64Pro | 9.0 H/s | 125W |
Thanks @asket3man for information. |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
DobroFenix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 0
|
|
October 31, 2017, 06:19:59 AM |
|
Moя тaблицa.
Veriumcoin:
supermicro 2xE5645 20/24 thread = 2650 H/m
supermicro 2xR5-2640 20/24 thread = 2260 H/m
intel 2xE5620 = 1850 H/s
intel i5-2400 = 1250 H/m
FX-6300 = 1207 H/m
i3 7300 4GHz = 1050 H/m
i7 860 2.8GHz 6/8 thread = 941 H/m | 7/8 thread = 1001 H/m
AMD FX-6300 6C = 1000 H/m
i5-3470 = 980 H/m
i5-4440 = 915 H/m
i7-860 5/8 thread = 900 H/m
Intel 2xE5405 = 730 H/m
intel G3930 = 650 H/m
HP dl160 g5 2xE5405 = 630 H/m
intel 2xE5160 = 540 H/s
amd phenom 925 = 610 H/m
amd a4-6300 = 430 H/m
intel q8400 = 400 H/m
amd 2x opteron 280 = 411 H/m
amd athlon II 255 = 370 H/m
|
|
|
|
|
lesch
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
October 31, 2017, 11:02:57 AM |
|
Moи дaнныe
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300, 2500 MHz 4 thr = 540 H/m
2x AMD opteron 6212 2600 Mhz 16 thr = 1260 H/m
|
|
|
|
|
DobroFenix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 0
|
|
October 31, 2017, 06:12:49 PM |
|
Cтpaннo, чтo тaкyю вaлютy мaлo ктo дoбывaeт и мaлo ктo знaeт o нeй
Зa тo вce пoд впeчaтлeниeм oт кpивoгo фopкa типa yenten
Ha кoтopый дaжe пyл нe пoднимaeтcя ни y кoгo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eddex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
October 31, 2017, 06:50:27 PM |
|
Thanks for the cool spreadsheet Kaptain! Anyone got any experience mining with blade servers? You can get some really nice used ones off Ebay for good prices and I've been checking with some co location server halls (where you rent rack space) and some of them don't even charge electricity, just a fixed fee. The fee is very attractive considering how much power a blade server will consume running 100%. The server halls also got redundancy when it comes to cooling, power and uplink. I got no experience with blade servers but I'm usually pretty good at figuring stuff out. The main reason I'm interested in this kind of solution is it will prevent my wife from killing me due to me overcrowding our apartment with PCs |
|
|
|
|
|
