[ANN][VRM] Verium PoWT | CPU mining | scrypt² | Scaling | New Roadmap Released

[zdeni82]

guys Iam new here and  trying to start the linux wallet. how to do it?

[1714314107]

1714314107

[1714314107]

1714314107

[1714314107]

1714314107

[mirny]

@testbug

Have you got any recommended hashrates for static ports?

[testbug]

@testbug

Have you got any recommended hashrates for static ports?

As far as i can say, miners with a hashrate below 3000 h/m are most likely always on lowerst vardiff settings.
If you have multiple machines mineing on a single worker or a very big miner the fixed difficulties are good. There is someone with a single worker, hashing on vardiff 0.6 and higher.
I think that miners below 3000 h/m should go on vardiff, because difficulty is a bit lower than on smallest fixed port with 0.02 diff.
About 75% of all miners are running on vardiff settings.
If anyone needs a bigger difficulty please PM me, ill open it for you then.

[eeX]

guys Iam new here and  trying to start the linux wallet. how to do it?

use Windoze, dude

[testbug]

guys Iam new here and  trying to start the linux wallet. how to do it?

use Windoze, dude

I suggest you compile it:

Get dependencies:
apt-get install git nano
sudo apt-get install build-essential libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev libboost-all-dev libqrencode-dev freeglut3-dev git

Clone git:
git clone https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium
cp verium/src
make -f makefile.unix
strip veriumd
cp veriumd /usr/bin

If you wish to compile it with UPNP support (please check the needed dependencies):
make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1

You can start the freshly compiled wallet with: veriumd
After initial start, you must setup your verium.conf here:

nano ~/.verium/verium.conf

Whenever you receive error message like "Permission denied" please add a

suode

in front of the lines in order to fix permission issues.

[zdeni82]

guys Iam new here and  trying to start the linux wallet. how to do it?

use Windoze, dude

I suggest you compile it:

Get dependencies:
apt-get install git nano
sudo apt-get install build-essential libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev libboost-all-dev libqrencode-dev freeglut3-dev git

Clone git:
git clone https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium
cp verium/src
make -f makefile.unix
strip veriumd
cp veriumd /usr/bin

If you wish to compile it with UPNP support (please check the needed dependencies):
make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1

You can start the freshly compiled wallet with: veriumd
After initial start, you must setup your verium.conf here:

nano ~/.verium/verium.conf

Whenever you receive error message like "Permission denied" please add a

suode

in front of the lines in order to fix permission issues.

thanks man it's working now

[mirny]

@testbug

Have you got any recommended hashrates for static ports?

As far as i can say, miners with a hashrate below 3000 h/m are most likely always on lowerst vardiff settings.
If you have multiple machines mineing on a single worker or a very big miner the fixed difficulties are good. There is someone with a single worker, hashing on vardiff 0.6 and higher.
I think that miners below 3000 h/m should go on vardiff, because difficulty is a bit lower than on smallest fixed port with 0.02 diff.
About 75% of all miners are running on vardiff settings.
If anyone needs a bigger difficulty please PM me, ill open it for you then.

Thank you very much for explanation.
I was asking because strange thing happened to me,
on vardiff (port 4444) with 3500h/m (ubuntu) and 1000h/m (W7) it stopped hashing after five minutes, or so.
Every miner has it's own worker.
But now with port 4447 it's hashing for 24hrs without any problems.

[alexa10]

Why can not I use all CPU cores?



miner : cpuminer-opt-3.4.8-windows       mining on vps


if -t 8



CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5620  @ 2.40GHz
CPU features: SSE2
SW built on Sep 22 2016 with GCC 4.8.3
SW features: SSE2
Algo features: SSE2
Start mining with SSE2

[2016-11-16 06:46:54] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://eu.poolinat0r.com:4443
[2016-11-16 06:46:54] Scrypt buffer allocation failed
[2016-11-16 06:46:54] Scrypt buffer allocation failed
[2016-11-16 06:46:54] Scrypt buffer allocation failed
[2016-11-16 06:46:54] 8 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2016-11-16 06:46:54] FAIL: thread 60750360 failed to initialize
[2016-11-16 06:46:54] FAIL: thread 56556056 failed to initialize
C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\cpuminer-opt-3.4.7-windows>pause
Press any key to continue . . .




if -t 4




CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5620  @ 2.40GHz
CPU features: SSE2
SW built on Sep 22 2016 with GCC 4.8.3
SW features: SSE2
Algo features: SSE2
Start mining with SSE2

[2016-11-16 06:48:59] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2016-11-16 06:48:59] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://eu.poolinat0r.com:4443
[2016-11-16 06:49:08] CPU #3: 12 H, 2.49 H/s
[2016-11-16 06:49:08] CPU #1: 12 H, 2.44 H/s
[2016-11-16 06:49:08] CPU #0: 12 H, 2.42 H/s
[2016-11-16 06:49:13] CPU #2: 12 H, 2.68 H/s
[2016-11-16 06:49:13] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 48 H, 10.03 H/s

cpu used 50%

why? please help me !

[Nik4691]

Why can not I use all CPU cores?

Set your virtual memory (page file) to 32GB.

[wgd]

effectsToCause jokes myself doing with investors and project vrm?

[Hhampuz]

You guys still going strong?

I was here during launch but had to drop out as soon as exchanges went live, are there any news surrounding this project that might make it interesting again, or is it the same old stuff?

[wgd]

You guys still going strong?

I was here during launch but had to drop out as soon as exchanges went live, are there any news surrounding this project that might make it interesting again, or is it the same old stuff?

It was promised wallet modernization and a large promotion. Well, time is running out and the devs did not write here of a month ago?

[Hhampuz]

You guys still going strong?

I was here during launch but had to drop out as soon as exchanges went live, are there any news surrounding this project that might make it interesting again, or is it the same old stuff?

It was promised wallet modernization and a large promotion. Well, time is running out and the devs did not write here of a month ago?

Hmm.. That sounds a bit worrysome. Ohwell, seems like that's the usual course these coins go these days.. what about Vericoin? Did they not more or less back this project?

[effectsToCause]

Hey guys,

Working on wallet update, finishing it up. The Verium protocol is working great, the price seems to have found a floor near the margin of profitability, which is what one expects absent excess speculation. The hashrate also found a peak and bounced off a floor at a decent level for cpu mining. Also notice our launch was more decentralized than zcash mining due it being a gpu mineable coin mostly. New wallet will encourage more solomining, further improving security. Next release after upcoming one will be the pairing release and miners can optionally earn VeriCoin as well after that.  Thanks for mining and supporting Verium!

[motorhead89]

I am mining VRM with my i7 4790K water cooled with an H110i Corsair Water cooler and overclocked to 4.8ghz stable.

I am monitoring temps and seems to have things under control.

[wgd]

Hey guys,

Working on wallet update, finishing it up. The Verium protocol is working great, the price seems to have found a floor near the margin of profitability, which is what one expects absent excess speculation. The hashrate also found a peak and bounced off a floor at a decent level for cpu mining. Also notice our launch was more decentralized than zcash mining due it being a gpu mineable coin mostly. New wallet will encourage more solomining, further improving security. Next release after upcoming one will be the pairing release and miners can optionally earn VeriCoin as well after that.  Thanks for mining and supporting Verium!

What about the promotional campaign? It was ico, part of the funds would be spent on promotion, and understand the big development. The community is bitter, I also

[gufpmvgw3334]

ask effectsToCause, I am sad. We have new miners, the supply is high and nobody is buying. Dev has not published anything for a month, it's a bad joke; /

the VRM ICO was just hype to get people to buy VRC. now the devs control all the VRC and the network is centralized in their hands.

VRM is just scrypt with changed parameters. 2014 coins tried this before and called it silly names like scrypt-n, scrypt-og, scrypt-jane. it's the same shit, just uses more memory. and VRM devs just called their bull shit scrypt². good joke.

over time this coin will die just like all the other scrypt coins which use so much memory the wallets eventually stop working.

do you enjoy this scam?

yes, only cpu mine is not profit with now price.

[effectsToCause]

Hey guys,

Working on wallet update, finishing it up. The Verium protocol is working great, the price seems to have found a floor near the margin of profitability, which is what one expects absent excess speculation. The hashrate also found a peak and bounced off a floor at a decent level for cpu mining. Also notice our launch was more decentralized than zcash mining due it being a gpu mineable coin mostly. New wallet will encourage more solomining, further improving security. Next release after upcoming one will be the pairing release and miners can optionally earn VeriCoin as well after that.  Thanks for mining and supporting Verium!

What about the promotional campaign? It was ico, part of the funds would be spent on promotion, and understand the big development. The community is bitter, I also

Promotional campaign has started, will post results and more info as I get it.

[Hhampuz]

I think the big mistake for this coin was to make it CPU only. This invites several non-wanted entity's such as botnets etc. Oh well, will still try and catch updates on this but so far it is not looking too good.

[wgd]

effectsToCause wrong, each price for botnet is always  good

without such demand and this mine reward is a disaster. We do not to be a genius to read trex chart, the big richlist address still not touch...