Save the planet or not

[JofryTheKing]

The effect can be reversed but since humans don’t seem to want to scaled down on their expenditure of resources and governments seems to follow the same logic then the only way to solve it is to create more technology.

Rather than blaming the individuals, you must blame the government. Among the adults in any particular country, you will find some people supporting the measures to save the planet, and some others who are opposing it. The government should properly educate the citizens, and then implement strong measures meant to preserve our planet for the future generations.

There are ways to reverse the flow of nature and that is to detonate all volcanoes in the world and the world will cool down within a day. When the gases from the volcano will spread all over the atmosphere the green gases will be gone and the earth can no longer trap the heat coming from the sun. When this happens the earth will cool down and we will face ice age once again.

Do you think that this is the way that will save the planet? The main reason why a land dies is a person. Therefore, it is worth to destroy a person, and everything on the planet will come to life.

Not everything depends on the person. There is also solar activity and activity of other planets. A man does a lot of harm to the earth, but killing all people does not make sense.

[1714875305]

1714875305

[daarul50]

The effect can be reversed but since humans don’t seem to want to scaled down on their expenditure of resources and governments seems to follow the same logic then the only way to solve it is to create more technology.

Rather than blaming the individuals, you must blame the government. Among the adults in any particular country, you will find some people supporting the measures to save the planet, and some others who are opposing it. The government should properly educate the citizens, and then implement strong measures meant to preserve our planet for the future generations.

There are ways to reverse the flow of nature and that is to detonate all volcanoes in the world and the world will cool down within a day. When the gases from the volcano will spread all over the atmosphere the green gases will be gone and the earth can no longer trap the heat coming from the sun. When this happens the earth will cool down and we will face ice age once again.

Do you think that this is the way that will save the planet? The main reason why a land dies is a person. Therefore, it is worth to destroy a person, and everything on the planet will come to life.

Not everything depends on the person. There is also solar activity and activity of other planets. A man does a lot of harm to the earth, but killing all people does not make sense.

Earth damage was not caused by natural factors, but the destruction of the earth caused by humans because humans are destroying nature.

[voltesbit777]

This planet is only humankind stepping stone. We will not need this planet once our civilization reach level 2. In the future we will build planet size Biosphere Ships that can accommodate trillions. Unlike earth this Biospheres that is floating on Space has no earthquake, typhoon, tsunami, volcano eruption and other natural calamities. It can also travel to other places to escape incoming asteroid or roque planets.

Future Humans don't need this planet anymore. Because they can create more beautiful and safer than earth.

Future Humans don't need this planet anymore. Because they can create more beautiful and safer than earth.
- What kind of reason is this? that humans don't need this planet anymore don't make me laugh, No one knows what will happen tomorrow, or in the near future. and no one also can create more beautiful and safer than earth except God.

[kpcian]

We are passing very crucial time. Our Earth is not in a safe mood, day by day it's getting more complicated. After couple of decade we will face strong challenge to survive on the planet. Man made activities are one of the main responsible for this situation. If we should not be aware still now then our future generation will face strong difficulties. Whatever​ they'll make, we should offer a pleasant environment for them.
So we must take proper action to reduce the risk otherwise our beloved planet will be destroyed.

[killgald]

well i think we need to save the only planet we have now, who knows maybe in the future we´ll travel across the galaxy in searching for other planets to life, but now its better to save our planet!.

[djordjamayna]

All humans must unite and save the planet

[ZlaiaZaia]

All humans must unite and save the planet

You seem like an optimist. I have already lost hope that humanity can save the planet for future generations. What happens on earth leads directly to the collapse of the planet.

[varyspro]

I think that the government of each country should take care of saving the planet. Special international laws should be adopted that will reduce harmful emissions into the atmosphere

[kidoseagle0312]

We must have a 100% fully concern in the nature/environment, And we should take care of everything of what God entrusted it to us. I remembered God commanded Adam to eat any of the fruit in the tree, and gave Authority human to give any name of God's creatures whether plants, sea animals or land animals, which means in return we had a responsibility to take care of it, how? By simply sowing tree seed, or vegetables or whatever.

[Goliaf]

I think that the government of each country should take care of saving the planet. Special international laws should be adopted that will reduce harmful emissions into the atmosphere

Any environmental programs are very expensive. Each government hoped for him that others do. The US and China have not signed the Kyoto Protocol. Let other save.

[DaftAjax]

The effect can be reversed but since humans don’t seem to want to scaled down on their expenditure of resources and governments seems to follow the same logic then the only way to solve it is to create more technology.

Rather than blaming the individuals, you must blame the government. Among the adults in any particular country, you will find some people supporting the measures to save the planet, and some others who are opposing it. The government should properly educate the citizens, and then implement strong measures meant to preserve our planet for the future generations.

There are ways to reverse the flow of nature and that is to detonate all volcanoes in the world and the world will cool down within a day. When the gases from the volcano will spread all over the atmosphere the green gases will be gone and the earth can no longer trap the heat coming from the sun. When this happens the earth will cool down and we will face ice age once again.

Do you think that this is the way that will save the planet? The main reason why a land dies is a person. Therefore, it is worth to destroy a person, and everything on the planet will come to life.

Not everything depends on the person. There is also solar activity and activity of other planets. A man does a lot of harm to the earth, but killing all people does not make sense.

Earth damage was not caused by natural factors, but the destruction of the earth caused by humans because humans are destroying nature.

I just want to make this thing clear, earth damage, is a broad phrase, the planet is also damaged by natural phenomenon such as earthquakes, typhoons etc. not just us humans.

And haven't you had the thought that in 'Stone Age', all the things that surrounds us, we don't have even a spec of idea what are these? My point is if you are really pinpointing that the 'humans' are mainly the cause of destroying this planet, if the people back then are as smart as we are today, then we probably have prevented this to happen and eventually stick in the 'natural way of life'.

Yes we are destroying it, and for what? For the future, through science we have come to understand and realize the secrets of this planet though, there are still things we do not know. And by this, we have discovered various technologies and invent new creations. If we didn't do what we did, we probably wouldn't evolved and we probably wouldn't built civilizations.

This planet is not in the good shape anymore and at the moment we do not have the technology to help the earth.

[Russelmain]

The effect can be reversed but since humans don’t seem to want to scaled down on their expenditure of resources and governments seems to follow the same logic then the only way to solve it is to create more technology.

Rather than blaming the individuals, you must blame the government. Among the adults in any particular country, you will find some people supporting the measures to save the planet, and some others who are opposing it. The government should properly educate the citizens, and then implement strong measures meant to preserve our planet for the future generations.

There are ways to reverse the flow of nature and that is to detonate all volcanoes in the world and the world will cool down within a day. When the gases from the volcano will spread all over the atmosphere the green gases will be gone and the earth can no longer trap the heat coming from the sun. When this happens the earth will cool down and we will face ice age once again.

Do you think that this is the way that will save the planet? The main reason why a land dies is a person. Therefore, it is worth to destroy a person, and everything on the planet will come to life.

Not everything depends on the person. There is also solar activity and activity of other planets. A man does a lot of harm to the earth, but killing all people does not make sense.

Earth damage was not caused by natural factors, but the destruction of the earth caused by humans because humans are destroying nature.

I just want to make this thing clear, earth damage, is a broad phrase, the planet is also damaged by natural phenomenon such as earthquakes, typhoons etc. not just us humans.

And haven't you had the thought that in 'Stone Age', all the things that surrounds us, we don't have even a spec of idea what are these? My point is if you are really pinpointing that the 'humans' are mainly the cause of destroying this planet, if the people back then are as smart as we are today, then we probably have prevented this to happen and eventually stick in the 'natural way of life'.

Yes we are destroying it, and for what? For the future, through science we have come to understand and realize the secrets of this planet though, there are still things we do not know. And by this, we have discovered various technologies and invent new creations. If we didn't do what we did, we probably wouldn't evolved and we probably wouldn't built civilizations.

This planet is not in the good shape anymore and at the moment we do not have the technology to help the earth.

Judging by how humanity treats the planet and nature a, then I do not think that we will be able to save it All for future generations the point is another fact that has occurred on this topic, this is America's exit from the climate treaty that entails a huge impact on the environment Environment. So what is the conservation of the planet?

[iram3130]

All humans must unite and save the planet

You seem like an optimist. I have already lost hope that humanity can save the planet for future generations. What happens on earth leads directly to the collapse of the planet.

Being optimistic is what kept humans alive from so many centuries. There is still time if everyone starts understanding what we are doing wrong and what should be done.

[ppc.pt]

First of all there is evidence in both sides by specialists. Some say there is global warning, some say there isn't.

So that being said, you cannot really say with 100% accuracy that it is a problem.

Second global warming is used as an excuse to redistribute wealth. It's just one more tax you have to pay.

Third it is proven (and this really is) that the more technology and evolution the better for the environment. We are far from the Industrial Revolution by now, probably the time we destroyed our planet more

In free market countries (with less government) the water is cleaner and the air is less polluted. Check it for yourself

[DaftAjax]

First of all there is evidence in both sides by specialists. Some say there is global warning, some say there isn't.

So that being said, you cannot really say with 100% accuracy that it is a problem.

Second global warming is used as an excuse to redistribute wealth. It's just one more tax you have to pay.

Third it is proven (and this really is) that the more technology and evolution the better for the environment. We are far from the Industrial Revolution by now, probably the time we destroyed our planet more

In free market countries (with less government) the water is cleaner and the air is less polluted. Check it for yourself

I totally agree with you, but before we proceed on saving the planet we might want to reconsider the fact that we don't have the word 'UNITY'(for the whole world) right now. I mean war all over the place, we are killing our selves. Before we save someone or something else we have to save ourselves, then we make actions. Currently we don't have the technology that we needed but I think we are getting there.

[seinzein]

who will save this  planet ?
the answer is human who still wanna stay on it, if anybody says " i don't care about global wrming bla bla bla "
just kick them to the mars they absolutely has their own planet.

[ckorbba]

who will save this  planet ?
the answer is human who still wanna stay on it, if anybody says " i don't care about global wrming bla bla bla "
just kick them to the mars they absolutely has their own planet.

And Really why then do people Planet, If you're not going to fly to Mars and colonize it. Even if we are lucky, then the Moon will be populated and then it will no longer be necessary. There will be no Earth for us. Let people already clog up and completely and destroy the atom as it will be so.

[daarul50]

who will save this  planet ?
the answer is human who still wanna stay on it, if anybody says " i don't care about global wrming bla bla bla "
just kick them to the mars they absolutely has their own planet.

And Really why then do people Planet, If you're not going to fly to Mars and colonize it. Even if we are lucky, then the Moon will be populated and then it will no longer be necessary. There will be no Earth for us. Let people already clog up and completely and destroy the atom as it will be so.

People live on Mars and the moon. It will not happen because if this world is no occupant then the only place that will be inhabited by man is hereafter

[mobilezz]

who will save this  planet ?
the answer is human who still wanna stay on it, if anybody says " i don't care about global wrming bla bla bla "
just kick them to the mars they absolutely has their own planet.

And Really why then do people Planet, If you're not going to fly to Mars and colonize it. Even if we are lucky, then the Moon will be populated and then it will no longer be necessary. There will be no Earth for us. Let people already clog up and completely and destroy the atom as it will be so.

People live on Mars and the moon. It will not happen because if this world is no occupant then the only place that will be inhabited by man is hereafter

If people are clogged and destroyed one planet, they will do the same to any other planet. Solving the problem of pollution will only help change people's thinking. We need to understand that the planet is the place of our life and it needs to be saved

[babo]

my advice is see this video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p86BPM1GV8M

the pale blue dot, .. talk carl sagan

is a beautiful video and talk about our home, the only home we have