beyinsi
|
|
January 18, 2017, 02:34:51 AM |
|
*Knock Knock*
Who's there? IC IC who? U
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
puremage111
|
|
January 18, 2017, 02:54:16 AM |
|
Initial ICO Price is $0.12?
In 2-3 month time
which is almost 300% Growth
Now we are at $0.37
In 2-3 month time
if we could make a consistent growth at 300%
0.37 * 3 = we would reach $1
Possible?
|
|
|
|
Enjorlas
|
|
January 18, 2017, 03:20:04 AM |
|
If the Open Fund Management platform gets released, and ICN gets listed on another exchange or two, then yes. $1 is very likely in 3 months.
|
|
|
|
PikachuYou
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Me is Cute
|
|
January 18, 2017, 06:23:05 AM |
|
Buckle up boyz We're going UP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that's what am talking about!! Now we just need her to have an ICONOMI t-shirt or something....
|
|
|
|
ecawyna
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
🌟 æternity🌟 blockchain🌟
|
|
January 18, 2017, 06:48:45 AM |
|
Anyone notice Melonport ICO? It looks very familiar with ICONOMI.
|
|
|
|
szafa
|
|
January 18, 2017, 06:52:12 AM |
|
Buckle up boyz We're going UPShe is so sexy.
|
|
|
|
MoveCrypto
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
move that crypto
|
|
January 18, 2017, 08:19:32 AM Last edit: January 18, 2017, 08:56:37 AM by MoveCrypto |
|
Anyone notice Melonport ICO? It looks very familiar with ICONOMI.
It may seem similar from far, but it's far from similar. They are both building digital asset management platforms. This is the main difference: Iconomi: assets are held in cold storage and Iconomi interfaces mostly with centralized exchanges Melonport: assets are held in smart-contracts and Melonport interfaces with decentralized ethereum smart-contract exchanges like EtherEx or Mkr.market Melonport is focused on fund management of ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum chain. If a fund manager on Melonport wanted to include something like ZEC or BTC in their fund, then someone who holds ZEC or BTC would have to issue a proxy-ERC20 token on Ethereum chain so it will be compatible with Melonport smart contracts. ICNX is an example of such a proxy-token.
|
|
|
|
szachta
|
|
January 18, 2017, 08:40:21 AM |
|
Nice Lambos .Yesterday i saw mustang in my city.
|
|
|
|
XbladeX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 18, 2017, 09:12:10 AM |
|
...
Melonport: assets are held in smart-contracts and Melonport interfaces with decentralized ethereum smart-contract exchanges like EtherEx or Mkr.market ...
Looks like DAO 2.0 is coming those attempts to keep cash on blockchain are scary. ETH can be exploited once again and Melon could get rekt. While codding you can fail in something and it can destroy whole project. I don't believe in those advanced programs build on ETH chain. In long run if ETH price rise maintenance cost will rise too. With ICN you just pay fee and go there will be a lot more gas needed.
|
Request / 26th September / 2022 APP-06-22-4587
|
|
|
gravitate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 18, 2017, 09:30:09 AM |
|
...
Melonport: assets are held in smart-contracts and Melonport interfaces with decentralized ethereum smart-contract exchanges like EtherEx or Mkr.market ...
Looks like DAO 2.0 is coming those attempts to keep cash on blockchain are scary. ETH can be exploited once again and Melon could get rekt. While codding you can fail in something and it can destroy whole project. I don't believe in those advanced programs build on ETH chain. In long run if ETH price rise maintenance cost will rise too. With ICN you just pay fee and go there will be a lot more gas needed. is that related to ICN?
|
To peel or not to peel.
|
|
|
Admiral_Bit
|
|
January 18, 2017, 09:42:13 AM |
|
...
Melonport: assets are held in smart-contracts and Melonport interfaces with decentralized ethereum smart-contract exchanges like EtherEx or Mkr.market ...
Looks like DAO 2.0 is coming those attempts to keep cash on blockchain are scary. ETH can be exploited once again and Melon could get rekt. While codding you can fail in something and it can destroy whole project. I don't believe in those advanced programs build on ETH chain. In long run if ETH price rise maintenance cost will rise too. With ICN you just pay fee and go there will be a lot more gas needed. is that related to ICN? Check out this guy: https://www.reddit.com/r/melonproject/comments/5ok42j/melonport_contribution_vs_inflation/He nailed it; Melonport is a ponzi, right from the start: Hi there, i am quite interested in your project but i am having trouble understanding the underlying business model for participants of the contribution sale. As far as i understand you will: 1.Create 750,000 Melon token during the initial contribution period 2.Of these 750,000 token, 500,000 will be reserved for the public pool A. Owners will be able to trade these tokens on currency exchanges 3.150,000 token (which will be unlocked for trading after 2 years) will be assigned to the Melonport team 4.100,000 tradable token will be created at descretion of Melonport. This basically means you can do whatever you want with them... If i want to participate in the initial token sale i will have to buy Melonport token from you at a fixed rate of approx, 5 CHF. In 2018 there is going to be another contribution round where you will sell the other half of the 1 million public token at a completely different rate. However, after deployment of the MELON PROTOCOL, you will create an additional amount of up to 625,000 token per year (until the end of all eternity...) I hope i got the basic facts right since i got a few questions on this: 1.According to you roadmap; when do you plan to deploy the Melon protocol (and start with the creation of up to 625,000 additional token per year)? 2.What is your motivation behind the idea to sell melon token at a fixed rate of approx 5 CHF during contribution round 1 and approx CHF during contribution round 2? Where does this price come from? 3.What would keep you (the Melon team) from selling your 100,000 token at market price directly after the end of contribution period 1? 4.From your point of view, how can the initial melon token price be sustained considering the projected inflation model? Thank you and kind regards
|
|
|
|
kingcrimson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 18, 2017, 09:56:21 AM |
|
Initial ICO Price is $0.12?
In 2-3 month time
which is almost 300% Growth
Now we are at $0.37
In 2-3 month time
if we could make a consistent growth at 300%
0.37 * 3 = we would reach $1
Possible?
I am not getting rid of mine before 0.01/btc. I expect it will happen around Nov-Dec 2017.
|
|
|
|
gravitate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 18, 2017, 10:00:22 AM |
|
Initial ICO Price is $0.12?
In 2-3 month time
which is almost 300% Growth
Now we are at $0.37
In 2-3 month time
if we could make a consistent growth at 300%
0.37 * 3 = we would reach $1
Possible?
I am not getting rid of mine before 0.01/btc. I expect it will happen around Nov-Dec 2017. REally? I bet even then you wont sell lol. It would be like selling eth at the same price
|
To peel or not to peel.
|
|
|
Ris88
|
|
January 18, 2017, 10:07:37 AM |
|
Are all already know a lot about the ICN trading on the exchange Mercatox ?? You can direct review about of trade Mercatox for Adding ICN, on the trading site https://mercatox.com/exchange ..
|
|
|
|
bitcoinsforall
|
|
January 18, 2017, 11:41:05 AM |
|
mercatox has less volume and adding ICN over there is like an insult
|
|
|
|
btvGainer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 18, 2017, 12:02:47 PM |
|
mercatox has less volume and adding ICN over there is like an insult
Yes adding on many small exchanges would not serve any purpose instead we should all try for Poloniex and bittrex if we want better exchange. mercatox wouldn't be different than Liqui.
|
|
|
|
gravitate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 18, 2017, 12:05:38 PM |
|
mercatox has less volume and adding ICN over there is like an insult
Yes adding on many small exchanges would not serve any purpose instead we should all try for Poloniex and bittrex if we want better exchange. mercatox wouldn't be different than Liqui. Right now I dont want any exchanges while I am buying happily every week at a decent price lol
|
To peel or not to peel.
|
|
|
Ris88
|
|
January 18, 2017, 12:38:31 PM |
|
mercatox has less volume and adding ICN over there is like an insult
I think if mercatox many developers and investors who play there, will be great as polo and bittrex, so chances volume will not shrink with what you are saying ..
|
|
|
|
PikachuYou
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Me is Cute
|
|
January 18, 2017, 12:52:16 PM |
|
mercatox has less volume and adding ICN over there is like an insult
I think if mercatox many developers and investors who play there, will be great as polo and bittrex, so chances volume will not shrink with what you are saying .. stop fucking shilling for that shitty exchange on here....
|
|
|
|
GregH37
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1037
|
|
January 18, 2017, 01:07:46 PM |
|
mercatox has less volume and adding ICN over there is like an insult
Yes adding on many small exchanges would not serve any purpose instead we should all try for Poloniex and bittrex if we want better exchange. mercatox wouldn't be different than Liqui. Right now I dont want any exchanges while I am buying happily every week at a decent price lol I would agree with this point. lol. one because I can buy ICN cheap rates. if it go to Polo than ICN price can touch 100K satoshi. 2nd because I am an ICN holder. so I don't care much about the exchanges at this point. maybe in future some bad need bother me to sell.
|
|
|
|
|