Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2017, 07:27:01 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ◣XBB◥ Boolberry - attempt at grassroots development movement [Bittrex]  (Read 408803 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 01, 2017, 12:58:14 AM
 #541

Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732516.0

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have the primary liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.

But yes, indeed, a lot of people have coins parked on Poloniex and can make quick reactions because of this.

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  Pre-Sale is now Live,
         w/ bonuses available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Febo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile
January 01, 2017, 01:00:44 AM
 #542

Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732516.0

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there. It is way easier to stay on Poloniex then to get listed on Poloniex. a huge difference.  2 years ago Poloniex listed many coins, since was growing. Now is fully grown and is picky who gets in. Dont take being on Poloniex as sure thing and dont think it dont matter if Booolberry gets delisted, since it matters a lot.

.BitDice.               ▄▄███▄▄
           ▄▄██▀▀ ▄ ▀▀██▄▄
      ▄▄█ ▀▀  ▄▄█████▄▄  ▀▀ █▄▄
  ▄▄██▀▀     ▀▀ █████ ▀▀     ▀▀██▄▄
██▀▀ ▄▄██▀      ▀███▀      ▀██▄▄ ▀▀██
██  ████▄▄       ███       ▄▄████  ██
██  █▀▀████▄▄  ▄█████▄  ▄▄████▀▀█  ██
██  ▀     ▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀     ▀  ██
             ███████████
██  ▄     ▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄     ▄  ██
██  █▄▄████▀▀  ▀█████▀  ▀▀████▄▄█  ██
██  ████▀▀       ███       ▀▀████  ██
██▄▄ ▀▀██▄      ▄███▄      ▄██▀▀ ▄▄██
  ▀▀██▄▄     ▄▄ █████ ▄▄     ▄▄██▀▀
      ▀▀█ ▄▄  ▀▀█████▀▀  ▄▄ █▀▀
           ▀▀██▄▄ ▀ ▄▄██▀▀
               ▀▀███▀▀
        ▄▄███████▄▄
     ▄███████████████▄
    ████▀▀       ▀▀████
   ████▀           ▀████
   ████             ████
   ████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ████
▄█████████████████████████▄
██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████▄                 ▄████
████████▄▄▄     ▄▄▄████████
  ▀▀▀█████████████████▀▀▀
        ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
▄▄████████████████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████                   ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
██████████████████▀▀███ ██          ██
 ████████████████▄  ▄██ ██          ██
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██          ██
             ██████████ ██          ██
           ▄███████████ ██████▀▀██████
          █████████████  ▀████▄▄████▀
[/]
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 01, 2017, 01:02:04 AM
 #543

Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732516.0

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there.

you're right, even AEON rises and falls on extremely low volume, I would say due to being on small exchanges.

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  Pre-Sale is now Live,
         w/ bonuses available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
Febo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile
January 01, 2017, 01:04:30 AM
 #544

Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732516.0

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there.

you're right, even AEON rises and falls on extremely low volume, I would say due to being on small exchanges.

AENON cant get on Poloneix and might take years to get there.

.BitDice.               ▄▄███▄▄
           ▄▄██▀▀ ▄ ▀▀██▄▄
      ▄▄█ ▀▀  ▄▄█████▄▄  ▀▀ █▄▄
  ▄▄██▀▀     ▀▀ █████ ▀▀     ▀▀██▄▄
██▀▀ ▄▄██▀      ▀███▀      ▀██▄▄ ▀▀██
██  ████▄▄       ███       ▄▄████  ██
██  █▀▀████▄▄  ▄█████▄  ▄▄████▀▀█  ██
██  ▀     ▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀     ▀  ██
             ███████████
██  ▄     ▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄     ▄  ██
██  █▄▄████▀▀  ▀█████▀  ▀▀████▄▄█  ██
██  ████▀▀       ███       ▀▀████  ██
██▄▄ ▀▀██▄      ▄███▄      ▄██▀▀ ▄▄██
  ▀▀██▄▄     ▄▄ █████ ▄▄     ▄▄██▀▀
      ▀▀█ ▄▄  ▀▀█████▀▀  ▄▄ █▀▀
           ▀▀██▄▄ ▀ ▄▄██▀▀
               ▀▀███▀▀
        ▄▄███████▄▄
     ▄███████████████▄
    ████▀▀       ▀▀████
   ████▀           ▀████
   ████             ████
   ████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ████
▄█████████████████████████▄
██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████▄                 ▄████
████████▄▄▄     ▄▄▄████████
  ▀▀▀█████████████████▀▀▀
        ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
▄▄████████████████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████                   ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
██████████████████▀▀███ ██          ██
 ████████████████▄  ▄██ ██          ██
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██          ██
             ██████████ ██          ██
           ▄███████████ ██████▀▀██████
          █████████████  ▀████▄▄████▀
[/]
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 01, 2017, 02:07:14 AM
 #545


Could someone tell me what command I used to add seed nodes please?

I've just built boolbd on Ubuntu 16.04 from the Rune github repository, but it won't sync.

I have a list of working nodes from an old boolberry client that still syncs, but I don't know how to configure those seeds in the newly built boolbd.

Code:
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454445 [P2P0]Connecting to 1.24.247.119:10101(white=1, last_seen: d501.h14.m7.s36)...
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454663 [P2P1]Tx <95f59a7fb0395095ecc1ccd937d50281c9cc27211c605a48f17536a9540d032d> removed from tx pool due to outdated, age: 1188145
2016-Dec-28 12:17:55.455421 [P2P0]Connect failed to 1.24.247.119:10101
2016-Dec-28 12:29:36.791425
Peerlist white:
d8205b596235f1ba 1.24.247.119:10101 last_seen: d501.h14.m19.s22

Peerlist gray:

2016-Dec-28 12:29:53.601706
Connections:
Remote Host                  Peer id             Recv/Sent (idle,sec)     State                    Livetime(seconds)   


Thanks folks.
I had same problem


This is likely occurring because the daemon only has two seed nodes to connect to by default. If these nodes are not online then your node doesn't know who to connect to the first time you run the daemon. Therefore a long term solution to this will be to change the hard-coded seed nodes in the code repository.

A short term solution for you and others would be to specify a seed node manually. This can be done by doing the following:

boolbd --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101

This command tells your daemon to treat the bbr.mbkpool.info node as a seed node. As a result, your node will connect to it and download its list of active peers. I got this to overcome the error on my end so I hope it works for others as well.

This seems like something that could easily be coded into javajareds most recent daemon builds. How are they coming along?
[/quote]

We are implementing a more robust solution than hardcoded IP addresses

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  Pre-Sale is now Live,
         w/ bonuses available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142


View Profile
January 01, 2017, 04:07:07 PM
 #546

Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732516.0

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there.

you're right, even AEON rises and falls on extremely low volume, I would say due to being on small exchanges.

AENON cant get on Poloneix and might take years to get there.

Aeon was on Poloniex and has since been de-listed, I can't see it being brought back anytime soon. Boolberry will soon be the only other CN coin on Poloniex with Monero. I'm expecting big things for Boolberry in 2017 for numerous reasons, watch this space.... BUY LOW
mmo4me.2016
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


Solaris XEVAN with Masternode


View Profile
January 03, 2017, 02:17:23 AM
 #547

Many coin increases with Bitcoin, XMR also rose well, this Coin keeping prices!  Angry
Hope will be better the next time

raimch89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1133

PosToken


View Profile
January 04, 2017, 03:00:42 PM
 #548

bi-weekly update today?
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142


View Profile
January 04, 2017, 05:32:44 PM
 #549

bi-weekly update today?
Yes, it should be today.
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 12:17:05 AM
 #550

need more than one dev. xmr have tons of top flight devs working with them.
CZ (guy was hailed as a genius by many on this board)  sad he dumped us....should return by now to help.

████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
     ▄▄████████▄▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
██████▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀█
██████     █████     █
██████     █████     █             ▄▄▄
██████     ▀▀▀▀▀     █        ███  ███
 ▀████                  ▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄
   ▀██     ▄▄▄▄▄      ▄█████▄ ███  ███ ███  ███ ████████████▄
     ▀     █████      ███▄▄██ ███  ███ ███  ███ ███ ▀███ ▀███
           ▀▀███      ███▄▄▄  ███▄ ███ ███▄████ ███  ███  ███
               ▀       ▀████▀  ▀██ ███ ▀███▀███ ███  ███  ███
                   ▀█
████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
|
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2017, 07:02:54 AM
 #551

Boolberry Network Address January 4, 2017

This is more of a summary of events and what is happening, as there has not been much software development over the holidays.

Poloniex and Seed nodes
Poloniex's Boolberry daemon was down and I messaged them about how to start the daemon with seed nodes. There was information to suggest that Poloniex migrated some daemons to new computational environments last week, and as such their Boolberry daemon likely lacked the ability to connect to peers with its built in seed nodes being offline. The problem is fixed on Poloniex's end now, and this reiterates why the updates I am pursuing to the Boolberry client's seed node resolving is important.

GUI
Monero officially released their GUI and it is written in the QT framework. A few contributors to the Boolberry project have offered designs for a Boolberry wallet that could possibly be reskinned over the Monero GUI, or separate QT GUI project.

Additional C++ Dev
I've been working on getting an additional C++ dev to contribute to the project. We will see soon if the project is right for them.

Market
The Boolberry market has had a low and steady amount of order depth and volume over the last month. Although not rising with the bitcoin rally, the last matched prices remain the same, ultimately increasing the value of BBR supply as it is priced in bitcoin. At some points in time the market seems to have an inverse relationship, but not at this point in time, likely coupled with the confidence that Monero's own rally inspires.

I routinely get messages from people that want to contribute in various capacities, the Boolberry project is getting more and more attention as people see the technology here.

The blockchain is going to soon be too prohibitive for 32-bit systems, and getting that into the database out of RAM is also an ongoing effort.

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  Pre-Sale is now Live,
         w/ bonuses available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
CryptoRambler
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 11:18:06 AM
 #552

Boolberry Network Address January 4, 2017

This is more of a summary of events and what is happening, as there has not been much software development over the holidays.

Poloniex and Seed nodes
Poloniex's Boolberry daemon was down and I messaged them about how to start the daemon with seed nodes. There was information to suggest that Poloniex migrated some daemons to new computational environments last week, and as such their Boolberry daemon likely lacked the ability to connect to peers with its built in seed nodes being offline. The problem is fixed on Poloniex's end now, and this reiterates why the updates I am pursuing to the Boolberry client's seed node resolving is important.

GUI
Monero officially released their GUI and it is written in the QT framework. A few contributors to the Boolberry project have offered designs for a Boolberry wallet that could possibly be reskinned over the Monero GUI, or separate QT GUI project.

Additional C++ Dev
I've been working on getting an additional C++ dev to contribute to the project. We will see soon if the project is right for them.

Market
The Boolberry market has had a low and steady amount of order depth and volume over the last month. Although not rising with the bitcoin rally, the last matched prices remain the same, ultimately increasing the value of BBR supply as it is priced in bitcoin. At some points in time the market seems to have an inverse relationship, but not at this point in time, likely coupled with the confidence that Monero's own rally inspires.

I routinely get messages from people that want to contribute in various capacities, the Boolberry project is getting more and more attention as people see the technology here.

The blockchain is going to soon be too prohibitive for 32-bit systems, and getting that into the database out of RAM is also an ongoing effort.

Thank you for the update and continued work on the project 1blockologist.

I have a few questions:

How is the RPC API coming along? Last we heard a couple mos ago was that it is 70-80% complete.

Is Javajared still working on BBR? What is the additional benefit of adopting the XMR GUI - any enhanced functionality, or just cosmetic improvements?

What other help do you need from the community? I think there are a bunch of folks here that can really help if included
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2017, 08:32:02 PM
 #553

Boolberry Network Address January 4, 2017

This is more of a summary of events and what is happening, as there has not been much software development over the holidays.

Poloniex and Seed nodes
Poloniex's Boolberry daemon was down and I messaged them about how to start the daemon with seed nodes. There was information to suggest that Poloniex migrated some daemons to new computational environments last week, and as such their Boolberry daemon likely lacked the ability to connect to peers with its built in seed nodes being offline. The problem is fixed on Poloniex's end now, and this reiterates why the updates I am pursuing to the Boolberry client's seed node resolving is important.

GUI
Monero officially released their GUI and it is written in the QT framework. A few contributors to the Boolberry project have offered designs for a Boolberry wallet that could possibly be reskinned over the Monero GUI, or separate QT GUI project.

Additional C++ Dev
I've been working on getting an additional C++ dev to contribute to the project. We will see soon if the project is right for them.

Market
The Boolberry market has had a low and steady amount of order depth and volume over the last month. Although not rising with the bitcoin rally, the last matched prices remain the same, ultimately increasing the value of BBR supply as it is priced in bitcoin. At some points in time the market seems to have an inverse relationship, but not at this point in time, likely coupled with the confidence that Monero's own rally inspires.

I routinely get messages from people that want to contribute in various capacities, the Boolberry project is getting more and more attention as people see the technology here.

The blockchain is going to soon be too prohibitive for 32-bit systems, and getting that into the database out of RAM is also an ongoing effort.

Thank you for the update and continued work on the project 1blockologist.

I have a few questions:

How is the RPC API coming along? Last we heard a couple mos ago was that it is 70-80% complete.

Is Javajared still working on BBR? What is the additional benefit of adopting the XMR GUI - any enhanced functionality, or just cosmetic improvements?

What other help do you need from the community? I think there are a bunch of folks here that can really help if included


As I mentioned in the last bi-weekly, talking with an additional dev that likes crypto, if that falls through I'll let you know what help the effort needs

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  Pre-Sale is now Live,
         w/ bonuses available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


View Profile
January 19, 2017, 08:45:28 PM
 #554

https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/


Interesting link

I wonder if this is true. I mean if CZ returns and masternodes are coming into play then BBR could be in for a very wild ride indeed.

I am obviously hoping this is true but it would seem others are taking this article rather seriously looking at the rise today.

Would be great to see BBR break out of this sub 1M MC that it has been stuck in for an age.

████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
     ▄▄████████▄▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
██████▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀█
██████     █████     █
██████     █████     █             ▄▄▄
██████     ▀▀▀▀▀     █        ███  ███
 ▀████                  ▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄
   ▀██     ▄▄▄▄▄      ▄█████▄ ███  ███ ███  ███ ████████████▄
     ▀     █████      ███▄▄██ ███  ███ ███  ███ ███ ▀███ ▀███
           ▀▀███      ███▄▄▄  ███▄ ███ ███▄████ ███  ███  ███
               ▀       ▀████▀  ▀██ ███ ▀███▀███ ███  ███  ███
                   ▀█
████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
|
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
Ergenekon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476



View Profile
January 19, 2017, 08:49:37 PM
 #555

Where is "Creator of Boolberry"? Did he come back the boolberry developing?




▄▄▄                                          ███                ▄▄▄     ███
███                                          ███               ▐███▌    ███
███                                          ███                ▀▀▀     ███
███        ▄███████▄   ▐███▄█████▄     ▄▄███████ ▄▄███████▄▄    ███   ███████▄
███       ████▀  ████  ▐████▀▀████▌   ████▀▀██▀▄████▀▀▀▀▀███▌   ███   ▀▀███▀▀▀
███      ▐████▄▄▄████  ▐███    ███▌  ████    ▄████▀▄█▌   ▐███   ███     ███
███      ▐███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▐███    ███▌  ███▌   ████▀▄███▀   ▐███   ███     ███
███       ████▄    ▄▄  ▐███    ███▌  ████▄   ▄█████▀▄█   ████   ███     ███▄ ▄▄
▀████████  ▀████████▀  ▐███    ███▌   █████████▀▀  ████████▀    ███     ▀█████▀

ALL YOU NEED IS LOAN





















           ▄▄██████▄▄
       ▄▄██████████████▄▄
    ▄▄████████████████████▄▄
 ▄████████████████████████████▄
████████████▌  █████████████████
████████████▌  █████████████████
███████▀▀      ███▀      ▀██████
██████   ▄██▄▄▀▀  ▄▄▄██▄   █████
█████▌  ████    ▄▀  ████   █████
█████▌  ▐███▄▄▀▀  ▄▄████   █████
██████   ▀▀▀   ▄▄█▀  ▀▀   ▄█████
████████▄▄▄▄███████▄▄▄▄▄████████
▀██████████████████████████████▀
   ▀▀███████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀████████████████▀▀
          ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀
raimch89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1133

PosToken


View Profile
January 19, 2017, 08:52:41 PM
 #556

https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/


Interesting link

I wonder if this is true. I mean if CZ returns and masternodes are coming into play then BBR could be in for a very wild ride indeed.

I am obviously hoping this is true but it would seem others are taking this article rather seriously looking at the rise today.

Would be great to see BBR break out of this sub 1M MC that it has been stuck in for an age.

3 months old and no news since that
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


View Profile
January 19, 2017, 08:56:27 PM
 #557

https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/


Interesting link

I wonder if this is true. I mean if CZ returns and masternodes are coming into play then BBR could be in for a very wild ride indeed.

I am obviously hoping this is true but it would seem others are taking this article rather seriously looking at the rise today.

Would be great to see BBR break out of this sub 1M MC that it has been stuck in for an age.

3 months old and no news since that

Opps yep. Just noticed the date. I asked someone the reason for the pump and he sent that. I did not examine the date.

Must be either

1. other news we are not privy too
2. just a pump

hopefully 1.

████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
     ▄▄████████▄▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
██████▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀█
██████     █████     █
██████     █████     █             ▄▄▄
██████     ▀▀▀▀▀     █        ███  ███
 ▀████                  ▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄
   ▀██     ▄▄▄▄▄      ▄█████▄ ███  ███ ███  ███ ████████████▄
     ▀     █████      ███▄▄██ ███  ███ ███  ███ ███ ▀███ ▀███
           ▀▀███      ███▄▄▄  ███▄ ███ ███▄████ ███  ███  ███
               ▀       ▀████▀  ▀██ ███ ▀███▀███ ███  ███  ███
                   ▀█
████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
|
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 20, 2017, 04:30:04 AM
 #558

Boolberry Network Address January 19, 2017

We are ramping up development and need to clarify a couple of things.

Donation Process
This update is primarily around formalizing the donations process.

Sporadically, people have donated to @blockology and that has been very helpful. Although the 1% miner tax has not been a priority incentive, this is still enabled and goes to CZ, voluntary donations would spur development better.

There are several objectives and key results which can be funded directly and this will allow the people that worked on those things to be paid directly without ambiguity.

This too is modeled after Monero’s approach to donations and development funding.

For example, there are several approaches to the seed node solution, and they require owning multiple domain names and setting the A names to stable peers.

The domain names themselves would have a cost and having at least one highly connected node under our control would a cost. And paying for it years into the future would be prudent.

Similarly, binaries, and the LMDB are very high priorities.

I’ll be organizing this more in the coming days, showing what the primary objectives are.

Cryptonote

Monero forked to include RingCT and I’ve been monitoring developments in that front, with Boolberry in mind. RingCT has been on the development roadmap since the first research paper was released, and it would require a hard fork in Boolberry.

For now, if a flaw is found in RingCT then boolberry is a good fallback network. If all goes well we would be looking to have the Boolberry community update via hard fork. There would be no contentious hard forks and there are a lot of improvements to bring over without a hard fork.


                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  Pre-Sale is now Live,
         w/ bonuses available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
CryptoRambler
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
January 20, 2017, 02:43:34 PM
 #559

Boolberry Network Address January 19, 2017

We are ramping up development and need to clarify a couple of things.

Donation Process
This update is primarily around formalizing the donations process.

Sporadically, people have donated to @blockology and that has been very helpful. Although the 1% miner tax has not been a priority incentive, this is still enabled and goes to CZ, voluntary donations would spur development better.

There are several objectives and key results which can be funded directly and this will allow the people that worked on those things to be paid directly without ambiguity.

This too is modeled after Monero’s approach to donations and development funding.

For example, there are several approaches to the seed node solution, and they require owning multiple domain names and setting the A names to stable peers.

The domain names themselves would have a cost and having at least one highly connected node under our control would a cost. And paying for it years into the future would be prudent.

Similarly, binaries, and the LMDB are very high priorities.

I’ll be organizing this more in the coming days, showing what the primary objectives are.

Cryptonote

Monero forked to include RingCT and I’ve been monitoring developments in that front, with Boolberry in mind. RingCT has been on the development roadmap since the first research paper was released, and it would require a hard fork in Boolberry.

For now, if a flaw is found in RingCT then boolberry is a good fallback network. If all goes well we would be looking to have the Boolberry community update via hard fork. There would be no contentious hard forks and there are a lot of improvements to bring over without a hard fork.



@1blockologist,

Is the new developer going to remain anonymous, or will we recognize them from other projects?
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 20, 2017, 05:54:42 PM
 #560

Boolberry Network Address January 19, 2017

We are ramping up development and need to clarify a couple of things.

Donation Process
This update is primarily around formalizing the donations process.

Sporadically, people have donated to @blockology and that has been very helpful. Although the 1% miner tax has not been a priority incentive, this is still enabled and goes to CZ, voluntary donations would spur development better.

There are several objectives and key results which can be funded directly and this will allow the people that worked on those things to be paid directly without ambiguity.

This too is modeled after Monero’s approach to donations and development funding.

For example, there are several approaches to the seed node solution, and they require owning multiple domain names and setting the A names to stable peers.

The domain names themselves would have a cost and having at least one highly connected node under our control would a cost. And paying for it years into the future would be prudent.

Similarly, binaries, and the LMDB are very high priorities.

I’ll be organizing this more in the coming days, showing what the primary objectives are.

Cryptonote

Monero forked to include RingCT and I’ve been monitoring developments in that front, with Boolberry in mind. RingCT has been on the development roadmap since the first research paper was released, and it would require a hard fork in Boolberry.

For now, if a flaw is found in RingCT then boolberry is a good fallback network. If all goes well we would be looking to have the Boolberry community update via hard fork. There would be no contentious hard forks and there are a lot of improvements to bring over without a hard fork.



@1blockologist,

Is the new developer going to remain anonymous, or will we recognize them from other projects?


The one in mind probably won't be anonymous, not related to cryptocurrency

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  Pre-Sale is now Live,
         w/ bonuses available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!