ARK - DPoS 🔹 ARK Protokol 🔹 MarketSquare 🔹 IPFS 🔹 Staking on Binance 🔹

[t2yax]

There are many bitcoiners from turkey,so i mean there must be a turkish translation also

if you decide to change your mind please let me know im a translator.

keep up the good work !

edit my translations:

boolberry rune edition: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1624271.0

vdice crowdsale: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1659034.0

[1714780761]

1714780761

[1714780761]

1714780761

[bitseedmike]

The OP states the following: To be successful, the TEC must reach at least 2000 BTC total valuation.

I expect you can reach all the things in your white paper with that amount.

Why wouldn't you cap it on a certain amount? So that there is also room for investors money to grow.

For example what if you guys get 10.000 BTC valuation from the TEC, but you only will use 2.000 BTC. What will happen with the other 8.000 BTC?

For investors it would be better to start with a lower marketcap.

Having extra funds allows us to accelerate the schedule by having more resources available, increasing the actual value sooner, it allows us to add more use cases, which increases the value of the token, and it enables us to extend our reach with sales and marketing. Crypti agreed to a cap at the request of the community, and it turned out to be a big mistake.

[ShooterXD]

Portuguese translation request thread https://forum.ark.io/topic/12/portuguese-translation-service

Waiting a answer!

Regards, Shooter

[O_Omaha]

I was reading more into the whitepaper and see that you will support anon transactions. Can you tell me by what method this will be accomplished? e.g. Ring Signatures, CoinJoin Mixer,  zk-SNARK??

[mirador17]

Will read the whitepaper over the weekend and maybe invest an amount of my Lisk. 

[moroseneng]

Will read the whitepaper over the weekend and maybe invest an amount of my Lisk. 

And this is why lisk is moved. Great

[manasd]

Someone, pls, do russian translation

[ihanaihana]

Someone, pls, do russian translation

I see it is done, you can read it on the blog, link is there.

[Skyrik]

Someone, pls, do russian translation

i think you missed it, man - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1661696.msg16681592#msg16681592

[electronicash]

seem to have attract attention to people here in the forum must be worth investing. delegates proof of stake disadvantage though is that coins isn't limited.
we'll see how things goes then. 

[vlom]

i need a summary:
ico? if yes: when und where?
connection with lisk?

[redsn0w]

i need a summary:
ico? if yes: when und where?
connection with lisk?

I think you can find a good summary in the OP, this is the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1649695.msg16574194#msg16574194  .

[vlom]

i need a summary:
ico? if yes: when und where?
connection with lisk?

I think you can find a good summary in the OP, this is the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1649695.msg16574194#msg16574194  .

but it is really hard to read the text in this pictures. why don't they publish the infos a text? does it not look fancy enough? i really don't want  to read this small text. do they have to hide something?

[/URL]

[tuvok007]

Just joined the signature campaign,this will be big 

[electronicash]

i need a summary:
ico? if yes: when und where?
connection with lisk?

I think you can find a good summary in the OP, this is the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1649695.msg16574194#msg16574194  .

but it is really hard to read the text in this pictures. why don't they publish the infos a text? does it not look fancy enough? i really don't want  to read this small text. do they have to hide something?

[/URL]

i do think so.
i even think these text are all copied from some other ICO and that if you copy paste these text to google, you'll see its plagiarized. didn't really tried to google it though.   but i do hope they could have insert the real text.

[bitseedmike]

i need a summary:
ico? if yes: when und where?
connection with lisk?

I think you can find a good summary in the OP, this is the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1649695.msg16574194#msg16574194  .

but it is really hard to read the text in this pictures. why don't they publish the infos a text? does it not look fancy enough? i really don't want  to read this small text. do they have to hide something?

[/URL]

i do think so.
i even think these text are all copied from some other ICO and that if you copy paste these text to google, you'll see its plagiarized. didn't really tried to google it though.   but i do hope they could have insert the real text.

The website has larger text. The OP was custom written by the team and designed by a well known designer. If you go to "Control Panel/Adjust Screen Resolution" in Windows or "Preferences/Displays" on Mac, you can change the screen resolution to a smaller number of pixels to increase the text size. There is also a handy zoom option under "View" in your browser.

Please feel free to check the text on Google to check for any duplication. We would like to know as well if there are duplicates. The TOS and Legal kind of stuff is likely to have duplication since it includes the kind of boilerplate typical of these things, but any other content is purely original to this project.

[bitseedmike]

We are working on providing a text version with the OP information, make it more mobile friendly as well. Thanks for the suggestions.

[Luke2939]

Is there any minimum number of post required to be qualified for signature bounty? I haven't found anything regarding the number of posts to be made in the rules for signature campaign

[Maicol792]

interesting... italian traslation already assigned? thanks

[Samuray]

Is there any minimum number of post required to be qualified for signature bounty? I haven't found anything regarding the number of posts to be made in the rules for signature campaign

from Ark Bounties Blog :
"You need to make one post per week in order for your bounties to count at the official ARK signature bounty thread at Bitcointalk." here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1660352.0