ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:11:44 PM |
|
Using own compiled solver.. Getting these on a Win7 x64 Intel Core Duo e4300 2GB RAM and 2 RX480: Total 188.4 sol/s [dev0 97.2, dev1 93.0] 477 shares Total 189.1 sol/s [dev0 95.7, dev1 92.3] 477 shares Total 189.3 sol/s [dev0 94.4, dev1 91.9] 477 shares Total 190.4 sol/s [dev0 93.2, dev1 93.5] 477 shares Total 190.7 sol/s [dev0 95.0, dev1 94.0] 477 shares Total 190.4 sol/s [dev0 98.9, dev1 94.6] 477 shares Total 190.3 sol/s [dev0 97.9, dev1 89.8] 477 shares Total 190.0 sol/s [dev0 99.3, dev1 89.4] 477 shares Total 190.0 sol/s [dev0 99.9, dev1 90.1] 477 shares Total 190.7 sol/s [dev0 98.8, dev1 91.7] 477 shares Total 189.5 sol/s [dev0 95.2, dev1 92.1] 477 shares Total 189.0 sol/s [dev0 96.0, dev1 90.9] 478 shares Total 189.9 sol/s [dev0 97.3, dev1 93.1] 479 shares Total 189.6 sol/s [dev0 97.2, dev1 94.1] 479 shares Total 189.2 sol/s [dev0 95.8, dev1 93.8] 479 shares Total 190.4 sol/s [dev0 95.2, dev1 93.0] 479 shares Total 191.3 sol/s [dev0 95.9, dev1 99.5] 479 shares Total 190.2 sol/s [dev0 93.9, dev1 100.8] 480 shares Total 189.2 sol/s [dev0 88.6, dev1 101.6] 480 shares Total 189.4 sol/s [dev0 88.8, dev1 100.5] 480 shares Total 191.0 sol/s [dev0 92.9, dev1 102.7] 480 shares Total 190.3 sol/s [dev0 93.3, dev1 102.9] 480 shares Total 189.5 sol/s [dev0 92.1, dev1 99.6] 480 shares
Better than on my Nvidia GTX1080 and GTX1070 on Windows 10 x64 1607, 32GB Ram and Xeon 1650v3 @4.2GHz which are doing just: Total 387.7 sol/s [dev0 72.2, dev1 80.7, dev2 73.5, dev3 82.7, dev4 77.7] 71 shares Total 388.1 sol/s [dev0 71.3, dev1 81.5, dev2 72.2, dev3 81.2, dev4 77.6] 71 shares Total 390.0 sol/s [dev0 71.8, dev1 83.6, dev2 70.0, dev3 81.7, dev4 77.1] 71 shares Total 388.8 sol/s [dev0 71.2, dev1 83.4, dev2 71.4, dev3 79.8, dev4 78.0] 71 shares Total 388.3 sol/s [dev0 69.0, dev1 84.4, dev2 70.4, dev3 79.4, dev4 79.6] 71 shares Total 390.0 sol/s [dev0 74.5, dev1 82.0, dev2 70.8, dev3 79.4, dev4 76.7] 71 shares Total 389.5 sol/s [dev0 73.5, dev1 80.9, dev2 72.5, dev3 76.2, dev4 77.9] 71 shares Total 388.1 sol/s [dev0 73.1, dev1 81.0, dev2 71.0, dev3 81.8, dev4 77.0] 71 shares Total 385.6 sol/s [dev0 74.6, dev1 81.2, dev2 71.2, dev3 81.4, dev4 73.0] 71 shares Total 385.2 sol/s [dev0 74.8, dev1 86.2, dev2 68.9, dev3 82.5, dev4 72.3] 71 shares Total 386.0 sol/s [dev0 76.0, dev1 87.2, dev2 68.6, dev3 82.8, dev4 71.1] 71 shares Total 387.9 sol/s [dev0 76.7, dev1 87.3, dev2 69.3, dev3 84.4, dev4 72.8] 71 shares Total 386.2 sol/s [dev0 76.0, dev1 85.7, dev2 71.0, dev3 83.8, dev4 71.3] 71 shares Total 386.6 sol/s [dev0 76.4, dev1 84.8, dev2 69.5, dev3 85.6, dev4 73.2] 71 shares Total 386.7 sol/s [dev0 77.4, dev1 86.4, dev2 70.6, dev3 84.9, dev4 73.7] 71 shares Total 387.0 sol/s [dev0 74.0, dev1 87.8, dev2 68.8, dev3 84.0, dev4 74.3] 71 shares Total 386.5 sol/s [dev0 70.2, dev1 90.0, dev2 68.1, dev3 88.4, dev4 72.1] 71 shares Total 387.3 sol/s [dev0 69.7, dev1 90.7, dev2 70.1, dev3 88.0, dev4 74.4] 71 shares Total 388.5 sol/s [dev0 71.1, dev1 91.0, dev2 70.7, dev3 87.0, dev4 77.8] 71 shares Total 389.1 sol/s [dev0 71.3, dev1 92.1, dev2 71.9, dev3 87.2, dev4 77.1] 71 shares Total 388.9 sol/s [dev0 71.8, dev1 89.5, dev2 72.2, dev3 85.3, dev4 75.5] 71 shares Total 386.8 sol/s [dev0 70.6, dev1 88.0, dev2 71.2, dev3 83.0, dev4 73.3] 71 shares Total 388.0 sol/s [dev0 72.2, dev1 87.8, dev2 71.8, dev3 84.2, dev4 76.1] 71 shares Total 387.0 sol/s [dev0 72.8, dev1 85.2, dev2 71.3, dev3 84.1, dev4 74.3] 71 shares Total 387.4 sol/s [dev0 72.8, dev1 83.2, dev2 71.9, dev3 84.4, dev4 74.2] 71 shares Total 387.1 sol/s [dev0 74.5, dev1 82.2, dev2 72.7, dev3 85.5, dev4 74.2] 73 shares Total 386.5 sol/s [dev0 77.4, dev1 81.0, dev2 71.7, dev3 84.4, dev4 74.9] 74 shares
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
muchoman
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:11:57 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... Thank you for fixing cpu usage!
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:14:29 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... Giving me still: Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
ROFLED
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:17:13 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... Giving me still: Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Have same, unless install Cygwin, and run not "py silentarmy ..." but "c:\cygwin64\bin\python3.4m silentarmy" idk why, but works for me
|
|
|
|
TheRider
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:17:28 PM Last edit: November 12, 2016, 03:29:58 PM by TheRider |
|
For some reason, my 295x2 hashes best with 2 instances (90sol per GPU), while my 470 8G hashes best with a single instance (75-80sol). I am currently running two copies of the miner to achieve this. Is there a way to specify the number of instances per GPU in the command line? EDIT: One more thing, my 470 (75-80sol) is finding shares faster than my 295x2 (185-190sol). Any possible explanation for why this is happening? Started the two miners at roughly the same time. Here you can see that by the time both miners got job a1a, the 470 has found 10 more shares than the 295x2. 295x2, stock BIOS, core 1100 mem 1500.Received job "a1a" Total 183.2 sol/s [dev2 94.0, dev3 98.0] 55 shares Total 184.0 sol/s [dev2 93.5, dev3 96.8] 55 shares Total 182.4 sol/s [dev2 92.2, dev3 96.3] 55 shares
Nitro+ 470 8G, stock BIOS, core 1350 mem 2100.Received job "a1a" Total 75.8 sol/s [dev4 77.0] 65 shares Total 75.4 sol/s [dev4 75.8] 65 shares Total 76.1 sol/s [dev4 76.7] 65 shares
|
|
|
|
Ale91
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 10
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:23:34 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... Thx a lot, runs perfectly! And speedup 2% i see Total 513.0 sol/s [dev1 80.4, dev2 88.0, dev3 84.2, dev4 81.0, dev5 86.8, dev6 88.9] 243 shares Total 515.8 sol/s [dev1 81.4, dev2 87.5, dev3 84.2, dev4 79.7, dev5 86.6, dev6 90.6] 243 shares Total 516.3 sol/s [dev1 81.5, dev2 87.0, dev3 82.5, dev4 79.7, dev5 91.3, dev6 89.0] 243 shares Total 520.9 sol/s [dev1 82.4, dev2 89.0, dev3 84.0, dev4 82.5, dev5 91.8, dev6 89.4] 243 shares Total 517.2 sol/s [dev1 81.4, dev2 86.3, dev3 82.0, dev4 81.4, dev5 88.9, dev6 87.3] 243 shares Total 518.4 sol/s [dev1 80.9, dev2 89.1, dev3 87.5, dev4 84.0, dev5 88.2, dev6 87.6] 243 shares Total 519.0 sol/s [dev1 81.2, dev2 89.1, dev3 87.1, dev4 85.9, dev5 89.9, dev6 92.8] 244 shares Total 516.3 sol/s [dev1 83.9, dev2 88.0, dev3 87.2, dev4 87.4, dev5 87.4, dev6 92.0] 244 shares 6x1070 Can you share the bat file?Thx
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:24:18 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... Giving me still: Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Total 0.0 sol/s [dev0 0.0, dev1 0.0, dev2 0.0, dev3 0.0, dev4 0.0] 0 shares Have same, unless install Cygwin, and run not "py silentarmy ..." but "c:\cygwin64\bin\python3.4m silentarmy" idk why, but works for me So you run it out of the cygwin CMD?
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:26:30 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... CPU is fine now - Thanks! But there is still issues with speed C:\Users\Demo\Desktop\SILENTARMY>c:\cygwin64\bin\python3.4m silentarmy --instances=1 -c stratum+tcp://zec.coinmine.pl:7007 -u user.1 -p 1 --use 2(GTX 760 4GB) Connecting to zec.coinmine.pl:7007 Stratum server sent us the first job Mining on 1 device Total 0.0 sol/s [dev2 0.0] 0 shares Total 10.0 sol/s [dev2 5.0] 0 shares Total 8.5 sol/s [dev2 3.5] 0 shares Total 6.9 sol/s [dev2 3.6] 0 shares Total 8.9 sol/s [dev2 5.5] 0 shares Total 9.5 sol/s [dev2 6.2] 0 shares Total 8.6 sol/s [dev2 5.3] 0 shares
|
|
|
|
zawawa
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:28:29 PM |
|
PLEASE READ WINDOWS.txt FIRST! I thought that was obvious...
|
Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4VBTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
|
|
|
eXtremal
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:37:17 PM |
|
Latest version gives me 92-93 sol/s from modded RX480: Total 361.5 sol/s [dev0 92.4, dev1 89.5, dev2 81.7, dev3 87.1] 307 shares Total 361.8 sol/s [dev0 91.7, dev1 89.2, dev2 81.0, dev3 92.5] 308 shares Total 358.8 sol/s [dev0 92.2, dev1 85.9, dev2 79.4, dev3 91.2] 310 shares
Have anyone try this miner https://github.com/Optiminer/OptiminerZcash ?
|
|
|
|
zawawa
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:38:02 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... CPU is fine now - Thanks! But there is still issues with speed C:\Users\Demo\Desktop\SILENTARMY>c:\cygwin64\bin\python3.4m silentarmy --instances=1 -c stratum+tcp://zec.coinmine.pl:7007 -u user.1 -p 1 --use 2(GTX 760 4GB) Connecting to zec.coinmine.pl:7007 Stratum server sent us the first job Mining on 1 device Total 0.0 sol/s [dev2 0.0] 0 shares Total 10.0 sol/s [dev2 5.0] 0 shares Total 8.5 sol/s [dev2 3.5] 0 shares Total 6.9 sol/s [dev2 3.6] 0 shares Total 8.9 sol/s [dev2 5.5] 0 shares Total 9.5 sol/s [dev2 6.2] 0 shares Total 8.6 sol/s [dev2 5.3] 0 shares I don't think SILENTARMY is optimized for the Kepler architecture.
|
Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4VBTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
|
|
|
eXtremal
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:39:22 PM |
|
I don't think SILENTARMY is optimized for the Kepler architecture.
Yes, it not uses atomic operations on local memory which supported only on GCN GPUs, Maxwell and Pascal.
|
|
|
|
lexele
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:44:22 PM |
|
yup...faster than SAv5. But I'm sure SA will catch up soon Edit: maybe not as stable, just had a crash.
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:51:16 PM |
|
Latest version gives me 92-93 sol/s from modded RX480: Total 361.5 sol/s [dev0 92.4, dev1 89.5, dev2 81.7, dev3 87.1] 307 shares Total 361.8 sol/s [dev0 91.7, dev1 89.2, dev2 81.0, dev3 92.5] 308 shares Total 358.8 sol/s [dev0 92.2, dev1 85.9, dev2 79.4, dev3 91.2] 310 shares
Can you share your changes ?
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
November 12, 2016, 03:52:01 PM |
|
yup...faster than SAv5. But I'm sure SA will catch up soon Edit: maybe not as stable, just had a crash. It's binary only, I don't have time to trace for any malicious stuff...
|
|
|
|
changesl
Member
Offline
Activity: 160
Merit: 10
|
|
November 12, 2016, 04:05:25 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... Very nice ! R5 works fine with me, thanks, 1080 + 1070*4 Total 389.3 sol/s [dev0 63.9, dev1 81.0, dev2 82.4, dev3 84.0, dev4 75.5] 54 shares Total 390.4 sol/s [dev0 63.6, dev1 82.7, dev2 85.4, dev3 82.8, dev4 76.9] 54 shares Total 391.6 sol/s [dev0 63.8, dev1 83.4, dev2 86.4, dev3 84.7, dev4 77.8] 54 shares Total 391.1 sol/s [dev0 63.5, dev1 81.3, dev2 85.2, dev3 84.8, dev4 77.8] 54 shares Total 391.7 sol/s [dev0 63.2, dev1 79.2, dev2 86.2, dev3 86.5, dev4 78.5] 54 shares Total 390.5 sol/s [dev0 59.8, dev1 84.4, dev2 87.5, dev3 82.8, dev4 79.8] 54 shares Total 391.4 sol/s [dev0 59.9, dev1 84.3, dev2 87.2, dev3 83.4, dev4 81.6] 55 shares Total 391.6 sol/s [dev0 60.0, dev1 83.9, dev2 86.5, dev3 81.8, dev4 86.0] 55 shares Total 392.2 sol/s [dev0 60.5, dev1 83.3, dev2 86.6, dev3 82.8, dev4 85.2] 55 shares Total 397.3 sol/s [dev0 64.6, dev1 86.0, dev2 88.0, dev3 86.2, dev4 80.0] 57 shares
|
|
|
|
hannusolo
|
|
November 12, 2016, 04:10:56 PM |
|
yup...faster than SAv5. But I'm sure SA will catch up soon Edit: maybe not as stable, just had a crash. Yes it's faster, with 3 Rx 480 I've got from ~265 sol/s with silentarmy to 310 - 365 sol/s with this. But it crashed on GPU #0 after ~10 minutes and only a reset helped with it, so my vote is on silentarmy! You are doing great guys!
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
November 12, 2016, 04:17:20 PM |
|
I just uploaded a new version (r5) of my Windows build of SILENTARMY v5: https://mega.nz/#F!iwYQhI6S!2vl0D3jz3fH3-bZxHUurBg This should *finally* take care oft he high CPU usage with NVIDIA cards... Very nice ! R5 works fine with me, thanks, 1080 + 1070*4 Total 389.3 sol/s [dev0 63.9, dev1 81.0, dev2 82.4, dev3 84.0, dev4 75.5] 54 shares Total 390.4 sol/s [dev0 63.6, dev1 82.7, dev2 85.4, dev3 82.8, dev4 76.9] 54 shares Total 391.6 sol/s [dev0 63.8, dev1 83.4, dev2 86.4, dev3 84.7, dev4 77.8] 54 shares Total 391.1 sol/s [dev0 63.5, dev1 81.3, dev2 85.2, dev3 84.8, dev4 77.8] 54 shares Total 391.7 sol/s [dev0 63.2, dev1 79.2, dev2 86.2, dev3 86.5, dev4 78.5] 54 shares Total 390.5 sol/s [dev0 59.8, dev1 84.4, dev2 87.5, dev3 82.8, dev4 79.8] 54 shares Total 391.4 sol/s [dev0 59.9, dev1 84.3, dev2 87.2, dev3 83.4, dev4 81.6] 55 shares Total 391.6 sol/s [dev0 60.0, dev1 83.9, dev2 86.5, dev3 81.8, dev4 86.0] 55 shares Total 392.2 sol/s [dev0 60.5, dev1 83.3, dev2 86.6, dev3 82.8, dev4 85.2] 55 shares Total 397.3 sol/s [dev0 64.6, dev1 86.0, dev2 88.0, dev3 86.2, dev4 80.0] 57 sharesWhich clocks you are reaching such speed, and which driver
|
|
|
|
hagie
|
|
November 12, 2016, 04:22:27 PM |
|
Sorry no same with the changed main.c : :~/silentarmy$ ./sa-solver --nonces=5 Solving default all-zero 140-byte header Building program Hash tables will use 805.3 MB Running... Nonce 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 0 sols Nonce 0200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 3 sols Nonce 0400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Total 9 solutions in 1505.8 ms (6.0 Sol/s)
~/silentarmy.v4$ ./sa-solver --nonces=5 Solving default all-zero 140-byte header Building program Hash tables will use 805.3 MB Running... Nonce 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 0 sols Nonce 0200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 3 sols Nonce 0400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Total 9 solutions in 654.1 ms (13.8 Sol/s)
The difference is in the solver .. regards Anyone got an idea what's the cause of the speed decrease with V5 ? ./silentarmy --list Devices on platform "NVIDIA CUDA": ID 0: GRID K520 regards
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
November 12, 2016, 04:27:31 PM |
|
Sorry no same with the changed main.c : :~/silentarmy$ ./sa-solver --nonces=5 Solving default all-zero 140-byte header Building program Hash tables will use 805.3 MB Running... Nonce 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 0 sols Nonce 0200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 3 sols Nonce 0400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Total 9 solutions in 1505.8 ms (6.0 Sol/s)
~/silentarmy.v4$ ./sa-solver --nonces=5 Solving default all-zero 140-byte header Building program Hash tables will use 805.3 MB Running... Nonce 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 0 sols Nonce 0200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Nonce 0300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 3 sols Nonce 0400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000: 2 sols Total 9 solutions in 654.1 ms (13.8 Sol/s)
The difference is in the solver .. regards Anyone got an idea what's the cause of the speed decrease with V5 ? ./silentarmy --list Devices on platform "NVIDIA CUDA": ID 0: GRID K520 regards 2 GK104 GPUs it's Kepler also...wont get much with it...
|
|
|
|
|