Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 11:59:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 [1059] 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
PVmining
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330
Merit: 252



View Profile
September 26, 2014, 08:07:35 PM
 #21161

Have you installed your 980's yet?
no not yet, will do that a bit later (I have downloaded the drivers and installed the new version of cuda 6.5)
waiting patiently..... kind of

waiting - for - numbers - still  Wink
1715126370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715126370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715126370
Reply with quote  #2

1715126370
Report to moderator
1715126370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715126370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715126370
Reply with quote  #2

1715126370
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715126370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715126370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715126370
Reply with quote  #2

1715126370
Report to moderator
1715126370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715126370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715126370
Reply with quote  #2

1715126370
Report to moderator
1715126370
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715126370

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715126370
Reply with quote  #2

1715126370
Report to moderator
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 08:22:41 PM
 #21162

Have you installed your 980's yet?
no not yet, will do that a bit later (I have downloaded the drivers and installed the new version of cuda 6.5)
waiting patiently..... kind of

waiting - for - numbers - still  Wink
Can - not - wait - much - longer.....

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 26, 2014, 08:52:43 PM
 #21163

Have you installed your 980's yet?
no not yet, will do that a bit later (I have downloaded the drivers and installed the new version of cuda 6.5)
waiting patiently..... kind of

waiting - for - numbers - still  Wink
Can - not - wait - much - longer.....
Just recompiled with 5.2
For xcn, this isn't good 10MHash/s
I'll be optimistic (for the moment) and blame the tuning I used for the 750ti which might not be optimum for the 980.
I haven't tested yet other algorithm.

keccak: 365MHash/s which is rather wow, the 750ti 780ti is doing around 300MH

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 08:54:32 PM
 #21164

Have you installed your 980's yet?
no not yet, will do that a bit later (I have downloaded the drivers and installed the new version of cuda 6.5)
waiting patiently..... kind of

waiting - for - numbers - still  Wink
Can - not - wait - much - longer.....
Just recompiled with 5.2
For xcn, this isn't good 10MHash/s
I'll be optimistic (for the moment) and blame the tuning I used for the 750ti which might not be optimum for the 980.
I haven't tested yet other algorithm.
Fire strike- 3DMark......

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 26, 2014, 08:57:39 PM
 #21165

Have you installed your 980's yet?
no not yet, will do that a bit later (I have downloaded the drivers and installed the new version of cuda 6.5)
waiting patiently..... kind of

waiting - for - numbers - still  Wink
Can - not - wait - much - longer.....
Just recompiled with 5.2
For xcn, this isn't good 10MHash/s
I'll be optimistic (for the moment) and blame the tuning I used for the 750ti which might not be optimum for the 980.
I haven't tested yet other algorithm.
Fire strike- 3DMark......
driver upgrade and I do it

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 08:59:36 PM
 #21166

Thanks. I've got to make my mind up soon. From what I have seen already the ski should get an extra 25% on top of the 970 sli

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 26, 2014, 09:23:24 PM
 #21167

Thanks. I've got to make my mind up soon. From what I have seen already the ski should get an extra 25% on top of the 970 sli
Ok I ran firestrike, the score is of 17029 (not sure if it is real high... the 780ti was doing 10208 not at stock)
with "stock" superclocked (1360MHz (boost)/7000MH).
Temp doesn't exceed 65°C

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 26, 2014, 09:29:56 PM
 #21168

something odd, when mining the mem clock auto adjust to 6000MHz (3000MHz instead of 3500MHz) and refuse to take the overclock (at least with msi AB...) That might explain the rather poor performance on xcn...

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 09:32:41 PM
 #21169

something odd, when mining the mem clock auto adjust to 6000MHz (3000MHz instead of 3500MHz) and refuse to take the overclock (at least with msi AB...) That might explain the rather poor performance on xcn...

yeh my 780 does that, refuses overclocks atall.... no reason for it

Thanks. I've got to make my mind up soon. From what I have seen already the ski should get an extra 25% on top of the 970 sli
Ok I ran firestrike, the score is of 17029 (not sure if it is real high... the 780ti was doing 10208 not at stock)
with "stock" superclocked (1360MHz (boost)/7000MH).
Temp doesn't exceed 65°C
seems to match what i have seen.

14.6k for 970 sli, 17k for 980 sli
£520 vs £1100

hmmm

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 26, 2014, 09:59:55 PM
 #21170

something odd, when mining the mem clock auto adjust to 6000MHz (3000MHz instead of 3500MHz) and refuse to take the overclock (at least with msi AB...) That might explain the rather poor performance on xcn...

yeh my 780 does that, refuses overclocks atall.... no reason for it

may-be it is the same kind of problem as the chrome trick ?
When firestrike or else is run), it run at 3500MH, but when ccminer miner run the mem clock downclock to 3000M.
The core clock move has expected and I can overclock... but not the mem clock

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 10:09:18 PM
 #21171

Have you checked the memory usage? Perhaps it down clocks when not massively used.

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 10:58:45 PM
 #21172

something odd, when mining the mem clock auto adjust to 6000MHz (3000MHz instead of 3500MHz) and refuse to take the overclock (at least with msi AB...) That might explain the rather poor performance on xcn...

I have the same issue with the GTX 970 from EVGA.

I can overclock the core fine but not the memory.

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 26, 2014, 11:00:46 PM
 #21173

something odd, when mining the mem clock auto adjust to 6000MHz (3000MHz instead of 3500MHz) and refuse to take the overclock (at least with msi AB...) That might explain the rather poor performance on xcn...

I have the same issue with the GTX 970 from EVGA.

I can overclock the core fine but not the memory.
so that's a problem with evga bios...

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 11:10:24 PM
 #21174

Just a note. My 780 that I can't overclock from what it chooses itself is also evga. I can set a +500 core and it will never change

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
Namsbreh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 318
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 26, 2014, 11:21:37 PM
 #21175

I appear to be able to overclock both mem & core on my Palit 970's
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2014, 12:40:01 AM
 #21176

I appear to be able to overclock both mem & core on my Palit 970's

may-be I should ask evga to fix the issue... (the problem everything works okay (oc too) except for ccminer...

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
BrewCrewFan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 501



View Profile
September 27, 2014, 12:46:04 AM
 #21177

Alright with all this info here I can not decide of I should go with 2x 750s or 1 970. Space is not a problem for I want to start rolling out the old outdated 270xs

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.
SqMe5ceYfdcGsRyVpgvpYb6bRLS9j8omvB

XChat : Addy : XYuZESQpeMtZ2wit8nVVnXKGytfiaTBCo6 PubKey : eteshLzeq8Bh54BRjGSunMTc6Ytxtk7HYaSmDYMQn61z
Ignition75
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


www.dashpay.io


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 01:29:55 AM
 #21178

Alright with all this info here I can not decide of I should go with 2x 750s or 1 970. Space is not a problem for I want to start rolling out the old outdated 270xs

I'm doing exactly the same thing at the moment, I have acquired both 750ti's and 970s.

My favourite is still the 750ti's, but I'm mining only x11 so it may be different for other algo's.

The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2014, 02:12:54 AM
 #21179

Alright with all this info here I can not decide of I should go with 2x 750s or 1 970. Space is not a problem for I want to start rolling out the old outdated 270xs

I'm doing exactly the same thing at the moment, I have acquired both 750ti's and 970s.

My favourite is still the 750ti's, but I'm mining only x11 so it may be different for other algo's.
the algos needs to be tuned for these cards. It seems obvious that the capacity of the 750ti hasn't disapeared, they are just hiding. That's one of the inconvenient of ccminer is that there isn't anything to configure for the user,  that doesn't mean there is nothing to do...

I already reclaimed 0.6M on xcn + 1MH by adjusting the mem clock to 3500MHz using nvidia inspector (really strange, it applies for the mem clock the P2 state parameters and for the core clock P3 state... I think there is a major srew up here

they are running so cool, I will have problem in winter

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Ignition75
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


www.dashpay.io


View Profile
September 27, 2014, 03:08:16 AM
 #21180

Alright with all this info here I can not decide of I should go with 2x 750s or 1 970. Space is not a problem for I want to start rolling out the old outdated 270xs

I'm doing exactly the same thing at the moment, I have acquired both 750ti's and 970s.

My favourite is still the 750ti's, but I'm mining only x11 so it may be different for other algo's.
the algos needs to be tuned for these cards. It seems obvious that the capacity of the 750ti hasn't disapeared, they are just hiding. That's one of the inconvenient of ccminer is that there isn't anything to configure for the user,  that doesn't mean there is nothing to do...

I already reclaimed 0.6M on xcn + 1MH by adjusting the mem clock to 3500MHz using nvidia inspector (really strange, it applies for the mem clock the P2 state parameters and for the core clock P3 state... I think there is a major srew up here

they are running so cool, I will have problem in winter

Ya it's interesting you say that.  TDP is never more than 55-60% when mining x11 on the 750ti's.  So there's plenty to come I'm sure.

I think with the 970/980s it was an expectation thing, people get excited and sometimes a little unrealistic, including myself.  I was dreaming of 6 x 980 rigs making mining profitable again...

The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
Pages: « 1 ... 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 [1059] 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!