becker
|
|
November 19, 2014, 05:28:01 PM |
|
My fork is now doing 9.3-9.4 MHASH with overclock on the 980.
10MHASH with +300 on the core, but not very stable.
thanks for keeping the (pipe?) dream alive. Hopefully there will be better times for mining soon. Christian Unfortunately that GPUs mining is as good as death, Christian. I try futile for a few months and last Monday I decided to shutdown my farm. It hurts and I'm feeling the pain in my heart but on another side, I'm feeling more relieved. No point shutting down now, if in most of the US, it's been cold!!!!!!. Still cheaper than running traditional heat overall.
|
|
|
|
RavenXBR
|
|
November 19, 2014, 09:21:07 PM |
|
My fork is now doing 9.3-9.4 MHASH with overclock on the 980.
10MHASH with +300 on the core, but not very stable.
thanks for keeping the (pipe?) dream alive. Hopefully there will be better times for mining soon. Christian Unfortunately that GPUs mining is as good as death, Christian. I try futile for a few months and last Monday I decided to shutdown my farm. It hurts and I'm feeling the pain in my heart but on another side, I'm feeling more relieved. 10 days since I turned off my rig... feeling sad. It was so nice to see it running everyday, check the power consumption and so on...
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
November 19, 2014, 09:43:31 PM |
|
My fork is now doing 9.3-9.4 MHASH with overclock on the 980.
10MHASH with +300 on the core, but not very stable.
thanks for keeping the (pipe?) dream alive. Hopefully there will be better times for mining soon. Christian Unfortunately that GPUs mining is as good as death, Christian. I try futile for a few months and last Monday I decided to shutdown my farm. It hurts and I'm feeling the pain in my heart but on another side, I'm feeling more relieved. 10 days since I turned off my rig... feeling sad. It was so nice to see it running everyday, check the power consumption and so on... yeah, it turned in to a very fun hobby indeed, more like a work sometime, but still a funny job
|
|
|
|
tsiv
|
|
November 21, 2014, 12:11:23 AM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
November 21, 2014, 03:20:09 AM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. just curious what did you change (compared to x11) to have it working (haven't understood a lot of what he was saying) ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
fran2k
|
|
November 21, 2014, 03:47:51 AM |
|
My fork is now doing 9.3-9.4 MHASH with overclock on the 980.
10MHASH with +300 on the core, but not very stable.
thanks for keeping the (pipe?) dream alive. Hopefully there will be better times for mining soon. Christian Unfortunately that GPUs mining is as good as death, Christian. I try futile for a few months and last Monday I decided to shutdown my farm. It hurts and I'm feeling the pain in my heart but on another side, I'm feeling more relieved. Same here. We are closing down one of our two farms. A very hard work we done, and some relief also.
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
November 21, 2014, 07:18:42 AM |
|
Was fun while it lasted indeed. Probably only people with "free" electricy now.
|
|
|
|
DemosMirak
|
|
November 21, 2014, 07:37:46 AM |
|
Was fun while it lasted indeed. Probably only people with "free" electricy now.
Did someone mention me?
|
BTC: 13enECLM3M3gjQDoBKouXuYFG4zXaDdDPx LTC: LRTbQNQcRjZV51PivQdhK7zpMtJYPouqR9
|
|
|
mmmaybe
|
|
November 21, 2014, 07:58:33 AM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. Thank you, it's been week a go the cards did something meaningful Coins from my first will be your!
|
|
|
|
mmmaybe
|
|
November 21, 2014, 08:04:39 AM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. Thank you, it's been week a go the cards did something meaningful Coins from my first will be your! No pools?
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
November 21, 2014, 08:13:03 AM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. Thank you, it's been week a go the cards did something meaningful Coins from my first will be your! No pools? ...just read their OP - its a solomining coin. "Truly Decentralized In Bitcoin mining power is concentrated in large pools. This puts the whole network at risk in case these pools will become malicious or if their security will be compromised. In SpreadCoin there are no pools, mining power is spread around many solo miners."
|
|
|
|
mmmaybe
|
|
November 21, 2014, 08:21:24 AM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. Thank you, it's been week a go the cards did something meaningful Coins from my first will be your! No pools? ...just read their OP - its a solomining coin. "Truly Decentralized In Bitcoin mining power is concentrated in large pools. This puts the whole network at risk in case these pools will become malicious or if their security will be compromised. In SpreadCoin there are no pools, mining power is spread around many solo miners." Sorry, I was too fast Is it recommended to have a different u/p in the bat? How are they connected to a conf.file? can't find it anyhow
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
November 21, 2014, 08:29:41 AM |
|
Sorry, I was too fast Is it recommended to have a different u/p in the bat? How are tied to a conf.file? can't find it anyhow the usual suspects works rpcuser=user rpcpassword=pass rpcallowip=192.168.8.* (your lan or local ip!) listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 logtimestamps=1
|
|
|
|
mmmaybe
|
|
November 21, 2014, 08:55:21 AM |
|
Sorry, I was too fast Is it recommended to have a different u/p in the bat? How are tied to a conf.file? can't find it anyhow the usual suspects works rpcuser=user rpcpassword=pass rpcallowip=192.168.8.* (your lan or local ip!) listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 logtimestamps=1
Thanks again Now it asks for cudart32_65.dll? nvidia wont start without it Thanks
|
|
|
|
tsiv
|
|
November 21, 2014, 09:37:15 AM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. just curious what did you change (compared to x11) to have it working (haven't understood a lot of what he was saying) ? Not so much change than add. Changes would be in the RPC code and Blake. You need more data than just the header that also has more stuff in it than the common 88 bytes and you'll be feeding Blake 185 bytes, and those 185 have stuff that changes every 64 nonces instead of just replacing the nonce for every hash. From there on it's just X11. Calculating the new fields (that change every 64 nonces) in the header is done using sha256 (88 bytes from the block header), some modular arithmetic (add sha256 hash from previous step to a 256-bit value, multiply by another 256-bit value and reduce to mod ... some 256-bit value), and to finish it off with sha256 of the entire block including the transactions in it, padded to 200000 bytes and you actually process the 200000 byte block twice which makes for a total of 6251 sha256 block transformations, making it the slowest thing in the hash.
|
|
|
|
tsiv
|
|
November 21, 2014, 09:39:20 AM |
|
Sorry, I was too fast Is it recommended to have a different u/p in the bat? How are tied to a conf.file? can't find it anyhow the usual suspects works rpcuser=user rpcpassword=pass rpcallowip=192.168.8.* (your lan or local ip!) listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 logtimestamps=1
Thanks again Now it asks for cudart32_65.dll? nvidia wont start without it Thanks In case you didn't have a chance to check the Spreadcoin thread yet, I replaced the latest zip with one that has cudart32_65.dll included.
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
November 21, 2014, 10:24:52 AM |
|
tsiv - big thanks again!
i'll spread some coins with you... just write your address somewere (github is always a good place). nice to see you here still around, while a lot of people shut down their rigs.
@djm and I owe you a bunch of CSD... thank you too for your skminer.
|
|
|
|
tsiv
|
|
November 21, 2014, 11:14:28 AM |
|
tsiv - big thanks again!
i'll spread some coins with you... just write your address somewere (github is always a good place). nice to see you here still around, while a lot of people shut down their rigs.
@djm and I owe you a bunch of CSD... thank you too for your skminer.
Added a couple of addresses on the github readme. BTC: 1QD25HSCF8EAxUTYj2XsXZNGBi7RvQ21p8 SPR: SfSEcVQGhbXvPQ2hkTj3vxSd9PEZA12efa
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 21, 2014, 12:17:55 PM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. tsiv, Are you having issues with your 970? Every block my 970 finds is orphaned.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
tsiv
|
|
November 21, 2014, 12:21:37 PM |
|
If anybody feels like mining Spreadcoin.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.msg9607661#msg9607661Apparently the official OpenCL miner does something like 0.55 MH/s on a 280X while a factory OC GTX 750 Ti does something like 1.65 MH/s and a Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 hits 3.8 MH/s on my CUDA version. There's a definite NVIDIA advantage there for now, the AMD number seems very low and will probably improve drastically in the future. Whether or not the coin is worth mining is a whole different question. tsiv, Are you having issues with your 970? Every block my 970 finds is orphaned. I'm gonna have to go with a "nope" [2014-11-21 14:11:45] DEBUG: hash <= target Hash: 00000000bc7be9dce1d8702da12390920749bc3254f68db97b3d57d787ecd9ba Target: 00000000d3b90000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 [2014-11-21 14:11:45] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 3821 khash/s [2014-11-21 14:11:46] accepted: 54/58 (93.10%), 3821 khash/s (yay!!!)
I'll check that I'm actually running the latest binary instead of some earlier version, I'll get back to you on that.
|
|
|
|
|