Zanatos666
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Sometimes man, just sometimes.....
|
 |
August 05, 2013, 07:38:34 PM |
|
Anyone else all of a sudden start having their ESET or other virus program start flagging BFG? Was alwasy good, never had a problem before (but cgminer would get picked up). Now here within the last week or so ESET is flagging BFG.
|
Squiggly letters, written really fast, with a couple of dots for good measure.
|
|
|
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:21:12 PM |
|
Quick update: I just checked dmesg and it says the BE is registering as a GSM MODEM, WHAT THE HELL? Sounds like maybe a new model BE - although I'm not sure why it'd claim to be a modem. Can you paste the exact lines from dmesg? Anyone else all of a sudden start having their ESET or other virus program start flagging BFG? Was alwasy good, never had a problem before (but cgminer would get picked up). Now here within the last week or so ESET is flagging BFG.
Report a false positive. IMO, "antivirus" software that takes the easy way out by flagging commonly abused software as more than merely a warning, is itself malware. They should be looking for the virus/trojan itself, not the common software they use. |
|
|
|
Zanatos666
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Sometimes man, just sometimes.....
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:23:40 PM |
|
Anyone else all of a sudden start having their ESET or other virus program start flagging BFG? Was alwasy good, never had a problem before (but cgminer would get picked up). Now here within the last week or so ESET is flagging BFG.
Report a false positive. IMO, "antivirus" software that takes the easy way out by flagging commonly abused software as more than merely a warning, is itself malware. They should be looking for the virus/trojan itself, not the common software they use. [/quote] True, I couldnt agree with you more. I have a corporate ESET client and its password protected. Now that its being flagged, I cant use it anymore. |
Squiggly letters, written really fast, with a couple of dots for good measure.
|
|
|
|
OtaconEmmerich
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:25:43 PM |
|
Also here's a debug log I get when I try out my old args. [2013-08-04 08:12:23] setrlimit: Soft fd limit already identical to hard limit (1024)
[2013-08-04 08:12:23] ft232r_scan: Found 10c4:ea60 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-04 08:12:23] ft232r_scan: Found 13fe:3200 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-04 08:12:23] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0001 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-04 08:12:23] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r Seems like I'm missing something to detect the BE, Hmmm. Quick update: I just checked dmesg and it says the BE is registering as a GSM MODEM, WHAT THE HELL? Disable / remove modemmanager. Unless of course you use it for some reason. apt-get / aptitude purge modemmanager on debian/derived systems. I did this on my ubuntu machine before my Jalapeños arrived. This is a RT-N16 with ASUSWRT Merlin, I tried disabling the USB Modem feature in the web GUI but it still detects it as a Modem. Ugh. I'm pretty sure I can't remove it as it's part of the firmware package. |
|
|
|
|
|
OtaconEmmerich
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:28:41 PM |
|
Quick update: I just checked dmesg and it says the BE is registering as a GSM MODEM, WHAT THE HELL? Sounds like maybe a new model BE - although I'm not sure why it'd claim to be a modem. Can you paste the exact lines from dmesg? drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for generic
usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial_generic
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial Driver core
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for GSM modem (1-port)
option 2-1:1.0: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected
usb 2-1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB0
usbcore: registered new interface driver option
drivers/usb/serial/option.c: USB Driver for GSM modems: v0.7.2
usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2
option1 ttyUSB0: GSM modem (1-port) converter now disconnected from ttyUSB0
option 2-1:1.0: device disconnected
usbcore: deregistering interface driver option
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial deregistering driver GSM modem (1-port)
usbcore: deregistering interface driver usbserial_generic
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial deregistering driver generic
usbcore: deregistering interface driver usbserial
|
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:41:09 PM |
|
Quick update: I just checked dmesg and it says the BE is registering as a GSM MODEM, WHAT THE HELL? Sounds like maybe a new model BE - although I'm not sure why it'd claim to be a modem. Can you paste the exact lines from dmesg? drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for generic
usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial_generic
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial Driver core
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for GSM modem (1-port)
option 2-1:1.0: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected
usb 2-1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB0
usbcore: registered new interface driver option
drivers/usb/serial/option.c: USB Driver for GSM modems: v0.7.2
usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2
option1 ttyUSB0: GSM modem (1-port) converter now disconnected from ttyUSB0
option 2-1:1.0: device disconnected
usbcore: deregistering interface driver option
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial deregistering driver GSM modem (1-port)
usbcore: deregistering interface driver usbserial_generic
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial deregistering driver generic
usbcore: deregistering interface driver usbserial
Are you using any special modprobe commands here? What does lsusb -vv report? |
|
|
|
|
OtaconEmmerich
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:46:27 PM |
|
Are you using any special modprobe commands here?
What does lsusb -vv report?
I ran nothing at all, I replugged in the BE before I ran this command. Bus 002 Device 003: ID 10c4:ea60
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 13fe:3200
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
|
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:58:21 PM |
|
Are you using any special modprobe commands here?
What does lsusb -vv report?
I ran nothing at all, I replugged in the BE before I ran this command. Bus 002 Device 003: ID 10c4:ea60
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 13fe:3200
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
Did you install kmod-usb-serial-cp210x from opkg? |
|
|
|
|
OtaconEmmerich
|
|
August 05, 2013, 09:02:46 PM |
|
Are you using any special modprobe commands here?
What does lsusb -vv report?
I ran nothing at all, I replugged in the BE before I ran this command. Bus 002 Device 003: ID 10c4:ea60
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 13fe:3200
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
Did you install kmod-usb-serial-cp210x from opkg? AH HA! as I thought, the repo doesn't have that. I made a request for it, I guess I just gotta wait till someone compiles it and adds it. Thanks for clearing this up Luke-Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
smscotten
|
|
August 05, 2013, 09:03:32 PM |
|
I'm having trouble building BFGminer on Angstrom (BeagleBone Black).
I started trying to build 2.10.11 because that was what was listed as "stable." When building I was told that I needed jansson. I build jansson fine and the whole ./configure, make, make install process appeared to go through with no trouble (Success!). Except that when I tried to run the executable:
bfgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libjansson.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libjansson.so.4 is right in the same place (/usr/local/lib) it was when I ran make and make install. So, not sure what that's about.
At that point I figured that I ought to just try the 3.1.4 version. There configure reported:
checking whether HASH_ITER is declared... no
configure: error: Could not find HASH_ITER - please install uthash-dev 1.9.2+
Ok, so I went looking for uthash and here is where I'm probably handicapped by not being a C guy. (My first language was Fortran, then TCL, Rexx, and Perl, and now I write PHP because that's what they pay me to do). Anyway, the only uthash distribution out there says only this:
USAGE
============
The only file you need to use uthash in your own application is
src/uthash.h
These bonus headers are also included:
src/utlist.h
src/utarray.h
src/utstring.h
OK, header files. There are a number of them in the directory where I untarred the 3.1.4 distribution, and where I was trying to build bfgminer. So I tried copying uthash.h into the bfgminer distribution folder, but configure reported the same "Could not find HASH_ITER - please install uthash-dev 1.9.2+" message. I tried the same after copying the other three "bonus" header files in as well.
At this point it appears that I don't just need the uthash header files; I need the debian package uthash-dev. Which I don't have because I'm not running Debian.
Searching didn't yield any answers to these, so I'm a bit stuck and back to mining with cgminer. Might anyone have suggestions about what my next steps should be?
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
August 05, 2013, 09:08:38 PM |
|
I'm having trouble building BFGminer on Angstrom (BeagleBone Black).
I started trying to build 2.10.11 because that was what was listed as "stable." When building I was told that I needed jansson. I build jansson fine and the whole ./configure, make, make install process appeared to go through with no trouble (Success!). Except that when I tried to run the executable:
bfgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libjansson.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libjansson.so.4 is right in the same place (/usr/local/lib) it was when I ran make and make install. So, not sure what that's about. Check that /usr/local/lib is listed in /etc/ld.so.conf and that you ran ldconfig after installing it (this is standard procedure for library installs) At that point I figured that I ought to just try the 3.1.4 version. There configure reported:
checking whether HASH_ITER is declared... no
configure: error: Could not find HASH_ITER - please install uthash-dev 1.9.2+
Ok, so I went looking for uthash and here is where I'm probably handicapped by not being a C guy. (My first language was Fortran, then TCL, Rexx, and Perl, and now I write PHP because that's what they pay me to do). Anyway, the only uthash distribution out there says only this:
USAGE
============
The only file you need to use uthash in your own application is
src/uthash.h
These bonus headers are also included:
src/utlist.h
src/utarray.h
src/utstring.h
OK, header files. There are a number of them in the directory where I untarred the 3.1.4 distribution, and where I was trying to build bfgminer. So I tried copying uthash.h into the bfgminer distribution folder, but configure reported the same "Could not find HASH_ITER - please install uthash-dev 1.9.2+" message. I tried the same after copying the other three "bonus" header files in as well.
At this point it appears that I don't just need the uthash header files; I need the debian package uthash-dev. Which I don't have because I'm not running Debian.
Searching didn't yield any answers to these, so I'm a bit stuck and back to mining with cgminer. Might anyone have suggestions about what my next steps should be?
It won't look in the bfgminer directory for the uthash headers by default. Try using: ./configure CFLAGS="-I$PWD" |
|
|
|
|
smscotten
|
|
August 05, 2013, 09:45:03 PM |
|
Check that /usr/local/lib is listed in /etc/ld.so.conf and that you ran ldconfig after installing it (this is standard procedure for library installs)
Arrgh. Yes, I did run ldconfig, but /etc/ld.so.conf is a zero-length file. That's troubling. And now fixed. It won't look in the bfgminer directory for the uthash headers by default.
Try using: ./configure CFLAGS="-I$PWD"
Beauty. Thank you! luckydog:~$ bfgminer -V
bfgminer 3.1.4
luckydog:~$  |
|
|
|
|
smscotten
|
|
August 05, 2013, 10:44:36 PM |
|
Sorry to be a pest. One more thing. # bfgminer -D -T -d? -S all
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] setrlimit: Increased soft fd limit from 1024 to hard limit of 4096
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Timers: Using clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW)
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Started bfgminer 3.1.4
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found "FT232R USB UART" serial "A90ZF159"
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 0403:6001
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Devices detected:
0 devices listed
A90ZF159 is a Lancelot FPGA. I've done 'modprobe ftdi_sio vendor=0x0403 product=0x6001' but I don't have any /dev/ttyusb*. bfgminer appears to be detecting the device but determining that it isn't something it can use. I'm already chagrinned for finding one of my earlier questions in the README after you answered it (thank you for being so gracious) but I'm stumped again. Any ideas? |
|
|
|
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
August 06, 2013, 12:16:03 AM |
|
Sorry to be a pest. One more thing. # bfgminer -D -T -d? -S all
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] setrlimit: Increased soft fd limit from 1024 to hard limit of 4096
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Timers: Using clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW)
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Started bfgminer 3.1.4
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found "FT232R USB UART" serial "A90ZF159"
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 0403:6001
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Devices detected:
0 devices listed
A90ZF159 is a Lancelot FPGA. I've done 'modprobe ftdi_sio vendor=0x0403 product=0x6001' but I don't have any /dev/ttyusb*. bfgminer appears to be detecting the device but determining that it isn't something it can use. I'm already chagrinned for finding one of my earlier questions in the README after you answered it (thank you for being so gracious) but I'm stumped again. Any ideas? Please paste output from Also, be sure you haven't run cgminer, as that corrupts the drivers (re-plugging the device should fix it though). |
|
|
|
|
smscotten
|
|
August 06, 2013, 12:37:17 AM |
|
Sorry to be a pest. One more thing. # bfgminer -D -T -d? -S all
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] setrlimit: Increased soft fd limit from 1024 to hard limit of 4096
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Timers: Using clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW)
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Started bfgminer 3.1.4
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found "FT232R USB UART" serial "A90ZF159"
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 0403:6001
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 15:27:43] Devices detected:
0 devices listed
A90ZF159 is a Lancelot FPGA. I've done 'modprobe ftdi_sio vendor=0x0403 product=0x6001' but I don't have any /dev/ttyusb*. bfgminer appears to be detecting the device but determining that it isn't something it can use. I'm already chagrinned for finding one of my earlier questions in the README after you answered it (thank you for being so gracious) but I'm stumped again. Any ideas? Please paste output from Also, be sure you haven't run cgminer, as that corrupts the drivers (re-plugging the device should fix it though). Oh! i didn't know that I'd have to re-plug the device between running cgminer and running bfgminer. I've got cgminer running—of course I've stopped it before trying to run bfgminer (I'm not quite *that* thick!) but lets see. I restarted the BBB and power-cycled the Lancelot. Here is the output: luckydog:~$ lsusb -vv
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0403:6001 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd FT232 USB-Seria
l (UART) IC
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 2.00
bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level)
bDeviceSubClass 0
bDeviceProtocol 0
bMaxPacketSize0 8
idVendor 0x0403 Future Technology Devices International, Ltd
idProduct 0x6001 FT232 USB-Serial (UART) IC
bcdDevice 6.00
iManufacturer 1 FTDI
iProduct 2 FT232R USB UART
iSerial 3 A90ZF159
bNumConfigurations 1
Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength 32
bNumInterfaces 1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration 0
bmAttributes 0xa0
(Bus Powered)
Remote Wakeup
MaxPower 90mA
Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 4
bInterfaceNumber 0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 2
bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bInterfaceSubClass 255 Vendor Specific Subclass
bInterfaceProtocol 255 Vendor Specific Protocol
iInterface 2 FT232R USB UART
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x02 EP 2 OUT
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Device Status: 0x0000
(Bus Powered)
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 2.00
bDeviceClass 9 Hub
bDeviceSubClass 0 Unused
bDeviceProtocol 1 Single TT
bMaxPacketSize0 64
idVendor 0x1d6b Linux Foundation
idProduct 0x0002 2.0 root hub
bcdDevice 3.08
iManufacturer 3
iProduct 2
iSerial 1
bNumConfigurations 1
Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength 25
bNumInterfaces 1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration 0
bmAttributes 0xe0
Self Powered
Remote Wakeup
MaxPower 0mA
Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 4
bInterfaceNumber 0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 1
bInterfaceClass 9 Hub
bInterfaceSubClass 0 Unused
bInterfaceProtocol 0 Full speed (or root) hub
iInterface 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0004 1x 4 bytes
bInterval 12
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 2.00
bDeviceClass 9 Hub
bDeviceSubClass 0 Unused
bDeviceProtocol 1 Single TT
bMaxPacketSize0 64
idVendor 0x1d6b Linux Foundation
idProduct 0x0002 2.0 root hub
bcdDevice 3.08
iManufacturer 3
iProduct 2
iSerial 1
bNumConfigurations 1
Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength 25
bNumInterfaces 1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration 0
bmAttributes 0xe0
Self Powered
Remote Wakeup
MaxPower 0mA
Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 4
bInterfaceNumber 0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 1
bInterfaceClass 9 Hub
bInterfaceSubClass 0 Unused
bInterfaceProtocol 0 Full speed (or root) hub
iInterface 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0004 1x 4 bytes
bInterval 12
luckydog:~$ ls /dev/ttyUSB*
/dev/ttyUSB0
luckydog:~$ bfgminer -D -T -d? -S all
[2013-08-05 17:34:34] scan-serial: /dev glob all-adding /dev/ttyUSB0
[2013-08-05 17:34:34] setrlimit: Increased soft fd limit from 1024 to hard limit of 4096
[2013-08-05 17:34:34] Timers: Using clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW)
[2013-08-05 17:34:34] Started bfgminer 3.1.4
[2013-08-05 17:34:35] ft232r_scan: Found "FT232R USB UART" serial "A90ZF159"
[2013-08-05 17:34:35] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 17:34:35] ft232r_scan: Found 1d6b:0002 - not a ft232r
[2013-08-05 17:34:35] Icarus Detect: Attempting to open /dev/ttyUSB0
[2013-08-05 17:34:35] Icarus Read: No data in 0.10 seconds
[2013-08-05 17:34:35] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB0: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
[2013-08-05 17:34:35] BFL: Attempting to open /dev/ttyUSB0
[2013-08-05 17:34:36] BFL: Error reading/timeout (ZGX)
[2013-08-05 17:34:38] ModMiner detect: no response to version request from /dev/ttyUSB0
[2013-08-05 17:34:38] Not a ZTEX device 0403:6001
[2013-08-05 17:34:38] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 17:34:38] Not a ZTEX device 1d6b:0002
[2013-08-05 17:34:38] Devices detected:
0 devices listed
luckydog:~$
Well, this is at least different output to bfgminer -D -T -d? -S all than I was getting before. Maybe I'm almost all the way there. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
August 06, 2013, 12:01:29 PM |
|
Just posting to say I'm loving the new layout. Seems a bit more stable with my Block Erupters, too (no manic hash rates). Nice one. Little donation sent to Luke-Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
jml
|
|
August 06, 2013, 01:22:40 PM |
|
I can confirm that having the cm1 miners and BE within the same host (raspberry pi) causes the pi to hang requiring power cycling to reset the unit with bfgminer 3.14. I cannot ssh back to the pi after it has crashed requiring a power cycle to reboot.
Would this problem be addressed on the next software version?
|
"Everything is a matter of degree"
|
|
|
mrrad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2013, 04:54:09 PM
Last edit: August 06, 2013, 06:36:07 PM by mrrad |
|
I got my jalapeno hashing on bfgminer 3.1.4 with the host pc gpu disabled but the gpu temp. does not return to the normal idle temp. How can I take it completely out of the equation so it doesn't leech for want of a better word.. Obliviously I want to still have the gpu enabled on the pc to play games etc.. Thanks..................... I tried the bitminter client and the gpu is completely idle , before with the BFGminer I was using an extra 50 watts from the leeching gpu.........I'm sure there is a way around this.........
|
|
|
|
|
|
bronan
|
|
August 06, 2013, 09:39:06 PM |
|
Anyone else all of a sudden start having their ESET or other virus program start flagging BFG? Was alwasy good, never had a problem before (but cgminer would get picked up). Now here within the last week or so ESET is flagging BFG.
IMO, "antivirus" software that takes the easy way out by flagging commonly abused software as more than merely a warning, is itself malware.
They should be looking for the virus/trojan itself, not the common software they use.
Sadly i found many other private clients from being infected by a bfgminer/cgminer/minerd instance Hidden in a self starting proces called adobe, so it looks some botnet builders are using the miner to run them illegal These unknowing customers have no clue that its not normal that their gpu is blazing like mad so they complain and ofcourse some specialist find that its caused by the secretly installed miners. If this is done by people they know or by botnet owners or usage of illegal software i do not know. Ofcourse some of them report their findings to the av companies, and to be honest even though its annoying they are right But fact is that this causes all anti virus makers to flag the miners as nasty software. |
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
August 06, 2013, 11:26:30 PM |
|
Anyone else all of a sudden start having their ESET or other virus program start flagging BFG? Was alwasy good, never had a problem before (but cgminer would get picked up). Now here within the last week or so ESET is flagging BFG.
IMO, "antivirus" software that takes the easy way out by flagging commonly abused software as more than merely a warning, is itself malware.
They should be looking for the virus/trojan itself, not the common software they use.
Sadly i found many other private clients from being infected by a bfgminer/cgminer/minerd instance Hidden in a self starting proces called adobe, so it looks some botnet builders are using the miner to run them illegal These unknowing customers have no clue that its not normal that their gpu is blazing like mad so they complain and ofcourse some specialist find that its caused by the secretly installed miners. If this is done by people they know or by botnet owners or usage of illegal software i do not know. Ofcourse some of them report their findings to the av companies, and to be honest even though its annoying they are right But fact is that this causes all anti virus makers to flag the miners as nasty software. They aren't right. BFGMiner is not malware. The botnet is. Flag that, not the legit software it's abusing. |
|
|
|
|
