🎥 PureVidz.net: Decentralized Streaming WebTorrents 🎥 VIDZ - Trading Now 🎥

[tamer3]

Kids Spam Stay away
This project is great
But the developer did not give him a priority
We hope to see a serious project
Anyway we hope that this project progresses

[1714148615]

1714148615

[1714148615]

1714148615

[coins101]

It's kind of funny to me... I warn people that this is a bad investment *BEFORE THE ICO* and get bashed for it. Now the same people are crying because they feel like they got ripped off. Seriously? I told you. I even explained WHY it was a bad investment. I can't even feel bad for anyone who threw money into it at this point because the signs were so clear and obvious.

+1

...So where is the long-term investment opportunity? Seems like the risk is mostly in the hands of investors. With a 20% premine, the devs would obviously want to cash out ASAP.

Perhaps I missed something.  

[scaryvirus]

Vidz is a better project. Vidz works NOW. novus does not and won't for unknown amount of time. vidz has wallet with video player NOW, community uploads NOW, phone app NOW. vidz is guaranteed to moon just from the people following the fud to the copycat and lowering supply. You can profit after a millenia when the other project MAYBE delivers something, or you can follow concrete NOW project. When people invented the internet, vidz was the project they couldn't dream of because it would cause an aneurysm from excitement. The future is not sometime, the future is now, and its name is vidz. even if op doesn't appear, you know another project where op didn't appear for some time - just a little project called BITCOIN. vidz is bitcoin 8.0

believe in yourself, believe in the technology, believe in VIDZ

VIDZ will make anime real

[tamer3]

Is it normal? !!
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/vidz/#!wallets

[jelin1984]

where is the idiot which tell me about his dog and the bet

i still wait him
where  are you  little pussy

also i bet now if you want 0.5 btc
that dev is not arrived at these forum

neverrrrrrrrr
come on pussy bet it


still wait
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=840733

[digitalgrow]

why dev ran away?

[johncassa]

I have some BTC ready to spend on this project but I prefer to wait for the official announcement before start to buying.

[tamer3]

I have some BTC ready to spend on this project but I prefer to wait for the official announcement before start to buying.

me too

[tamer3]

I have some BTC ready to spend on this project but I prefer to wait for the official announcement before start to buying.

me too

Maybe I begin to buy something because the price is very low but the big buy it after the official announcement.
You have to be ready because after the announcement the sale price goes up a quickly.... 5X, 10X or 20X easy.

Do you think so ?

[drays]

It's kind of funny to me... I warn people that this is a bad investment *BEFORE THE ICO* and get bashed for it. Now the same people are crying because they feel like they got ripped off. Seriously? I told you. I even explained WHY it was a bad investment. I can't even feel bad for anyone who threw money into it at this point because the signs were so clear and obvious.

To me your post looks really funny. You advised people not to invest in this ICO, and you think that was a good advise?  
You better check things out before posting: this ICO was one of the most successful ICO investments ever published on this forum. ICO investors have made from 5x to 20x on their investment, and even now, after all the craziness and dumps, the coin trades at 3x-4x the ICO price!

Do you still think your advice was good?

[ranlo]

It's kind of funny to me... I warn people that this is a bad investment *BEFORE THE ICO* and get bashed for it. Now the same people are crying because they feel like they got ripped off. Seriously? I told you. I even explained WHY it was a bad investment. I can't even feel bad for anyone who threw money into it at this point because the signs were so clear and obvious.

To me your post looks really funny. You advised people not to invest in this ICO, and you think that was a good advise?  
You better check things out before posting: this ICO was one of the most successful investments of last year. ICO investors have made from 5x to 20x on their investment, and even now, after all the craziness and dumps, the coin trades at 3x-4x the ICO price!

Do you still think was advice was good?

"My friend put $100 into a known Ponzi and got back $200 before the owner ran and everyone lost. But that was a good investment. I mean, I made 100% ROI so that's good, right?"

That's how I read your post.

Just because you profit off of people stupider than you doesn't make something a good investment. It's like saying going all-in with 2/8 OS in poker is a good move because "one time I won!" No. Statistically you're screwing yourself.

[drays]

It's kind of funny to me... I warn people that this is a bad investment *BEFORE THE ICO* and get bashed for it. Now the same people are crying because they feel like they got ripped off. Seriously? I told you. I even explained WHY it was a bad investment. I can't even feel bad for anyone who threw money into it at this point because the signs were so clear and obvious.

To me your post looks really funny. You advised people not to invest in this ICO, and you think that was a good advise?  
You better check things out before posting: this ICO was one of the most successful investments of last year. ICO investors have made from 5x to 20x on their investment, and even now, after all the craziness and dumps, the coin trades at 3x-4x the ICO price!

Do you still think was advice was good?

"My friend put $100 into a known Ponzi and got back $200 before the owner ran and everyone lost. But that was a good investment. I mean, I made 100% ROI so that's good, right?"

That's how I read your post.

Just because you profit off of people stupider than you doesn't make something a good investment. It's like saying going all-in with 2/8 OS in poker is a good move because "one time I won!" No. Statistically you're screwing yourself.

I see your point. But things are not that simple.

Practically 100% of crypto projects are going to be abandoned at some [random] points in not so far future. Thats because technology is evolving, new things arise, and old ones are forgotten. Some projects deliver more before being abandoned, some deliver less. Vidz has delivered something, and that *something* is even going to be used now by another project(even two).

Calling Vidz "ponzi", while backing other crypto projects with tradeable assets, sounds hypocritical to me. They all are ponzi, to some extent. But those are "ponzi" with some good output, not only gambling. So Vidz were - it helped to develop some tech, inspired new projects, and helped to identify new possibilities for development. Thats all any good project could dream to achieve.

The only point which makes Vidz stand out, is everything happened much faster than with most other crypto projects, both good things, and bad ones. Still, the story is not over.

[dranster]

Where are you PureVIDZ dev , we are waiting for you for so long

Pls come back 

[BitPotus]

Where are you PureVIDZ dev , we are waiting for you for so long

Pls come back 

wanna bet that "PV" will mysteriously appear after Asphyxia finishes his ICO?

 

[ranlo]

It's kind of funny to me... I warn people that this is a bad investment *BEFORE THE ICO* and get bashed for it. Now the same people are crying because they feel like they got ripped off. Seriously? I told you. I even explained WHY it was a bad investment. I can't even feel bad for anyone who threw money into it at this point because the signs were so clear and obvious.

To me your post looks really funny. You advised people not to invest in this ICO, and you think that was a good advise?  
You better check things out before posting: this ICO was one of the most successful investments of last year. ICO investors have made from 5x to 20x on their investment, and even now, after all the craziness and dumps, the coin trades at 3x-4x the ICO price!

Do you still think was advice was good?

"My friend put $100 into a known Ponzi and got back $200 before the owner ran and everyone lost. But that was a good investment. I mean, I made 100% ROI so that's good, right?"

That's how I read your post.

Just because you profit off of people stupider than you doesn't make something a good investment. It's like saying going all-in with 2/8 OS in poker is a good move because "one time I won!" No. Statistically you're screwing yourself.

I see your point. But things are not that simple.

Practically 100% of crypto projects are going to be abandoned at some [random] points in not so far future. Thats because technology is evolving, new things arise, and old ones are forgotten. Some projects deliver more before being abandoned, some deliver less. Vidz has delivered something, and that *something* is even going to be used now by another project(even two).

Calling Vidz "ponzi", while backing other crypto projects with tradeable assets, sounds hypocritical to me. They all are ponzi, to some extent. But those are "ponzi" with some good output, not only gambling. So Vidz were - it helped to develop some tech, inspired new projects, and helped to identify new possibilities for development. Thats all any good project could dream to achieve.

The only point which makes Vidz stand out, is everything happened much faster than with most other crypto projects, both good things, and bad ones. Still, the story is not over.

FWIW, I never said that PV, as a project, is bad. In fact, even when I said it was a horrible investment, I noted that the idea and concept behind the technology was awesome (and is why I still follow it to this day). The issue is their business model was going to be an absolute failure. Whether the creator ran or not, you were not going to ROI. It wasn't just improbable, it was nearly impossible. A good investment requires a greater chance of successfully returning ROI than not. This wasn't going to match that.

People bidding up the price on the coins was exactly what a Ponzi would do. There was nothing backing it. The business wasn't profitable, it had no way of really returning enough capital to MAKE it profitable, and therefore the only thing propping up prices was hoping someone was stupid enough to buy it for more than you did. Protip: that's exactly what a Ponzi does and how it works. You're paid by people putting money in after you, in a system that can't possibly exist in a profitable manner.

It's the same concept in the fiat world. You don't invest your money because something looks cool, you do it because their business model makes sense, you have faith that they will earn a profit, and you're banking on their success. If you just throw your money at everyone who says "I have a cool idea" but no business sense, you're going to go broke quickly.

[ComponY]

Where are you PureVIDZ dev , we are waiting for you for so long

Pls come back 

I am wondering, are they not active only here? Or they abandoned the project? I think they are still developing the project because the price is not under ico.

[chronek]

Which year? It would be nice if dev could show up, but i afraid he working on other project now, trying rise crowd funds...

[SirTING]

It's kind of funny to me... I warn people that this is a bad investment *BEFORE THE ICO* and get bashed for it. Now the same people are crying because they feel like they got ripped off. Seriously? I told you. I even explained WHY it was a bad investment. I can't even feel bad for anyone who threw money into it at this point because the signs were so clear and obvious.

To me your post looks really funny. You advised people not to invest in this ICO, and you think that was a good advise?  
You better check things out before posting: this ICO was one of the most successful ICO investments ever published on this forum. ICO investors have made from 5x to 20x on their investment, and even now, after all the craziness and dumps, the coin trades at 3x-4x the ICO price!

Do you still think your advice was good?

+1
It's called worthless warning

[bitcoinbilly]

Was there ever mention of a new website drop for today 2/25/2017?  Anyone  ... remember this?

Thanks

[kenscho]

is this project dead?