Bitcoin Forum
December 12, 2017, 06:56:16 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitmain Launches the New Antminer T9 Bitcoin Miner  (Read 35644 times)
BITMAIN
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742


https://www.bitmain.com


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2017, 06:25:43 AM
 #1



Dear Bitcoiners,

We are pleased to announce the launch of the new Antminer T9 bitcoin miner.

The T9 employs the same 16nm ASIC chip as the Antminer S9 and this T9 batch can deliver a hashrate of 11.5TH/s with an efficiency of 0.126J/GH (+7%).

It will be available at this link after 2300 hours (GMT+8) today (17 January 2017).

We advise all to place your order while stock lasts.

For any queries or tech support, please reach out to us via support.bitmain.com

Happy mining,

The Bitmain team

Cloud Mining? Just Go to Hashnest.com          Best Liquidity   Lowest Price   100% Real Mining Back Up
1513104976
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513104976

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513104976
Reply with quote  #2

1513104976
Report to moderator
1513104976
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513104976

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513104976
Reply with quote  #2

1513104976
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513104976
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513104976

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513104976
Reply with quote  #2

1513104976
Report to moderator
lolailo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 06:40:48 AM
 #2

Any differences between T9 and S9?
HagssFIN
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742


Electrician. Mining since 2014.


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 06:48:58 AM
 #3

It's like the late-S7 batches.
The same miner with less chips, little less effiency.

The S9 had 2 fans too..

semender35
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 06:58:42 AM
 #4

When will the sale come out?
GWhisper
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 07:36:31 AM
 #5

I would have preferred these over the R4's I just purchased - I guess them's the brakes.
kodokbuduk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 07:38:22 AM
 #6

Is this the end of S9? new miner will come? may be S10 or S11???
usenet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 133


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 08:05:16 AM
 #7

Any differences between T9 and S9?

Power Consumption:

T9 1450W 11.5TH/s
S9 1078W 11TH/s (Batch 22)

The big difference for me.
GWhisper
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 08:13:47 AM
 #8

Any differences between T9 and S9?

Power Consumption:

T9 1450W 11.5TH/s
S9 1078W 11TH/s (Batch 22)

The big difference for me.

That's a good point - I just realised the additional 29% power the T9 requires, @ 0.05 kWh that's an extra $160 per year.
usenet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 133


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 08:17:48 AM
 #9

Any differences between T9 and S9?

Power Consumption:

T9 1450W 11.5TH/s
S9 1078W 11TH/s (Batch 22)

The big difference for me.

That's a good point - I just realised the additional 29% power the T9 requires, @ 0.05 kWh that's an extra $160 per year.
Yeah, huge difference. If you have a free energy is not a problem. if you pay hosting this could be a problem.
Big plus is the warranty. Improved reliability? A 180-day warranty is provided starting from the shipping date.
IconFirm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Always ask questions.


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 08:54:52 AM
 #10

Same cruddy firmware?

Same cruddy bmminer?

Same cruddy warranty?

Same cruddy pricing?

Same crud........

Do not trust Yobit scam exchange or shady ICO's run by known scam companies like HashCoins - they WILL steal from you:
https://translate.google.com/translate?u=https://bitnovosti.com/2017/06/28/stop-this-for-bitcoins-sake/
Always research & use due diligence before investing. If your questions aren't answered - don't touch it.
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442



View Profile
January 17, 2017, 09:56:55 AM
 #11

Wonder why they didn't call it the Q9 instead of T9 since Q is before R and S.

Its like BMW releasing a new cheaper, slower, less luxurious car and calling it the 9 Series.


FORTUNEJACK.COM[
                            
5 BTC WELCOME PACK FOR 1ST 5 DEPOSITS
FREE 1,000 mBTC daily for LuckyJack winners
[
          
]
GWhisper
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 10:25:13 AM
 #12

So who's buying one?
mamiakimo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 202


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 11:33:06 AM
 #13

i think they figure the reason of high S9 hashboard failure
it's the power needed for the chips!
so they produced T9 with 180 days warranty
each T9 board have 57 chips instead of 63 and need 480W to power instead of 400W
less chips more power!
leowonderful
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 11:41:27 AM
 #14

Less efficient? Dunno why they're even trying now. Don't see many people buying one, at least the S7LN had a few buyers. If they did something like the LN with the S9 I'd buy it but just looks like the one fan variant of the S7 they did a while back.














 

 

█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
BitBlender 

 













 















 












 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
elrippo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966



View Profile WWW
January 17, 2017, 11:58:07 AM
 #15

In this state of technology 50% more power consumption as the S9???

.BitDice.               ▄▄███▄▄
           ▄▄██▀▀ ▄ ▀▀██▄▄
      ▄▄█ ▀▀  ▄▄█████▄▄  ▀▀ █▄▄
  ▄▄██▀▀     ▀▀ █████ ▀▀     ▀▀██▄▄
██▀▀ ▄▄██▀      ▀███▀      ▀██▄▄ ▀▀██
██  ████▄▄       ███       ▄▄████  ██
██  █▀▀████▄▄  ▄█████▄  ▄▄████▀▀█  ██
██  ▀     ▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀     ▀  ██
             ███████████
██  ▄     ▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄     ▄  ██
██  █▄▄████▀▀  ▀█████▀  ▀▀████▄▄█  ██
██  ████▀▀       ███       ▀▀████  ██
██▄▄ ▀▀██▄      ▄███▄      ▄██▀▀ ▄▄██
  ▀▀██▄▄     ▄▄ █████ ▄▄     ▄▄██▀▀
      ▀▀█ ▄▄  ▀▀█████▀▀  ▄▄ █▀▀
           ▀▀██▄▄ ▀ ▄▄██▀▀
               ▀▀███▀▀
        ▄▄███████▄▄
     ▄███████████████▄
    ████▀▀       ▀▀████
   ████▀           ▀████
   ████             ████
   ████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ████
▄█████████████████████████▄
██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████                   ████
████▄                 ▄████
████████▄▄▄     ▄▄▄████████
  ▀▀▀█████████████████▀▀▀
        ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
▄▄████████████████████████████████▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                            █████
█████                     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████                   ▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
█████                   ██          ██
██████████████████▀▀███ ██          ██
 ████████████████▄  ▄██ ██          ██
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██          ██
             ██████████ ██          ██
           ▄███████████ ██████▀▀██████
          █████████████  ▀████▄▄████▀
[/]
CryptoCrane
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 295



View Profile WWW
January 17, 2017, 02:34:48 PM
 #16

I'm definitely going to try these out. I'm hopeful the decreased efficiency is offset by increased reliability.

Update:
Reliability has been great! Not a single failure from the first batch. Reminds me of the S7s.

Update #2:
We've got another 50 T9s arriving the first week of March. Check my signature if you're interested.

Longsnowsm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 02:40:58 PM
 #17

This seems like an acknowledgement of what everyone knows.  The S9 has design issues.  While we have looked at the A7 and could not figure out the huge efficiency differences between the Antminer and the Avalon in efficiency it appears that now we may know why.  This seems like an acknowledgement that the design has problems with the S9 and most likely the R4 as well. 

This would appear to put the T9 back on turf with the A7 for efficiency or getting pretty close.  If this is what it takes to make the miners stable and less prone to failure then so be it.  But now the T9 has to live in the shadow of the S9 which appears to be a more efficient miner that has hardware issues. 

So will miners gamble and keep ordering S9's if they become available?  Or will they choose stability and possibly reliability instead?  Maybe Bitmain will make that choice for us and just not offer the S9 going forward?
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 03:12:49 PM
 #18

I'm definitely going to try these out. I'm hopeful the decreased efficiency is offset by increased reliability.

Since when has that ever been the case?

My guess is it's a cost thing. Bitmain just wants more money and nobody has a competitive product so they know they can get away with it. Kinda like they did with S5 and S7.

jackcantrell
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 03:15:23 PM
 #19

Is the purchasing link working for anyone yet?
QBblock
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
January 17, 2017, 03:27:50 PM
 #20

Is the purchasing link working for anyone yet?

Not yet for me
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!