lolailo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2017, 05:34:37 AM |
|
Has anyone's payment been verified yet? I ordered and paid immediately after they went on sale - the transaction has over 60 confirmation now, but my order hasn't updated. It's still 'Unpaid, Unshipped, Expired'.
Same thing here, bought, paid immediately, still shows unpaid.... wft bitmain?
|
|
|
|
ethereumhunter
|
|
January 18, 2017, 06:05:15 AM |
|
when i see on the site, t9 its more high hashrate than s9 batch 22 and its lower than s9 batch 23 and its more power consumption than s9 and it more power efficiency than s9. i think if i have more money, i will buy t9 because the hashrate is more big than s9 and its lower price than s9. but how long we need to be wait until the payment become verified like many members complain?
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
GWhisper
|
|
January 18, 2017, 07:36:15 AM |
|
They've confirmed my order/payment via a support ticket however my order status still hasn't been updated.
|
|
|
|
GMPoison
|
|
January 18, 2017, 07:40:00 AM |
|
So, this is a less efficient version of the S9? They are taking a step back with this.
Less efficient but cheaper MSRP. Doesn't make up for the fact that it's less efficient though. Like you said, a step back for sure but it's better than them not releasing anything tbh.
|
|
|
|
Scrappy Do
|
|
January 18, 2017, 01:28:08 PM Last edit: January 18, 2017, 11:13:55 PM by -ck |
|
Limited amount left in stock. Just paid for another 3.
MOD EDIT: Scam link removed
Thanks Swimmer63, Just grabbed one to give it a try out. Scam post, delete this shit please.
|
|
|
|
Longsnowsm
|
|
January 18, 2017, 01:45:44 PM |
|
Looks like the last 2 batches offered on the Bitmain Chinese store were T9's and no S9's. Maybe they are cutting over production of these miners to just T9's now? Just thought it was worth noting... Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Landy1264
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
Tip: 1JBSwRgm7iMzc7uyhnJdxH7hSECdJkdMoj
|
|
January 18, 2017, 02:07:09 PM |
|
Limited amount left in stock. Just paid for another 3.
SCAM Link removed!
Thanks Swimmer63, Just grabbed one to give it a try out. Scam post, delete this shit please. You better report it to moderator than to quote it.
|
|
|
|
Eyedol-X
|
|
January 18, 2017, 03:28:35 PM |
|
Any differences between T9 and S9?
Power Consumption: T9 1450W 11.5TH/s S9 1078W 11TH/s (Batch 22) The big difference for me. It's 1450W +7% it's not +/- That's 1550W! with the 7% factored in. I'm sorry but this looks like bitmain trying to create a new product that increases profit margins to capitalize on the recent increases in BTC value. The sad truth here is, people will probably buy this crap. My guess here is they finally fixed the S9 problems and instead of continuing to post fake specs about the power usage and capability, they are going with actual specs this time. I don't own an S9 so this is just speculation based upon what I've read about people complaining about the S9. Also if they did fix a design issue with the S9, owners would be clamoring for replacements. Bitmain Solution: Create the T9 and move away from the bad like Microsoft did with Windows 8.
|
|
|
|
sarakuka
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
January 18, 2017, 03:38:56 PM |
|
When will next stock be available ? approximately 3-7 days. @Bitmain
|
Selling BTC with PAYPAL via Localbitcoins.com.
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8587
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 18, 2017, 03:46:33 PM Last edit: January 18, 2017, 04:10:29 PM by philipma1957 |
|
all things being equal the r4 at 7.5th and 916 could be a better deal then the t9 at 1104 11.5th.
the r4 will use .1 watts the t9 will use .126 watts
so 3 r4's = 22.5th and 2748
and 2 t9's = 23th and 2204 this is 544 usd difference and shipping makes is about 600 more for the r4's
So I will pretend they are both 23 th for math ease
23th at .1 watts = 2300 watts
23th at .126 watts = 2900 watts
so 1 ibm 2980 psu runs all 3 r4's
and 1 ibm 2980 will be short for 2 t9's so the r4's save back some of the 600 price difference in psu say 50
so 550 price difference
and you save 432 kwatts per month
600 watts per hour x 24 = 14.4 kwatts a day
at 10 cents that is 43.20 usd per month
So in about 1 year 43.20 x 12 = 518.40
which means 3x R4 7.5th vs 2x T9 11.5 are close to a tie in value.
4 assumptions made are :
1) nothing breaks 2) .126 watts per gh = T9 3) .100 watts per gh = R4 4) 10 cents a kwatt
Many will say 10 cents a kwatt is too high use 8 cents a kwatt so after 16 months they are pretty much equal
The real key is the true power used.
If the T9 does .135 cents at the meter and the R4 does .100 cents at the meter
the r4 is cheaper after:
9 months at 10 cents a kwatt 12 months at 8 cents a kwatt
|
|
|
|
Meech
|
|
January 18, 2017, 04:08:19 PM |
|
Are they trying to get rid of their B stock chips by creating another product?
|
|
|
|
HagssFIN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1710
Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.
|
|
January 18, 2017, 04:09:30 PM |
|
Are they trying to get rid of their B stock chips by creating another product?
This could very well be one of the reasons.
|
|
|
|
mindtrip
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1167
Merit: 1009
|
|
January 18, 2017, 05:12:54 PM |
|
Are they trying to get rid of their B stock chips by creating another product?
This could very well be one of the reasons. exactly what i suspect they are doing and keeping the final good quality design S9's for there own in house use
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 18, 2017, 05:38:35 PM |
|
all things being equal the r4 at 7.5th and 916 could be a better deal then the t9 at 1104 11.5th.
the r4 will use .1 watts the t9 will use .126 watts
so 3 r4's = 22.5th and 2748
and 2 t9's = 23th and 2204 this is 544 usd difference and shipping makes is about 600 more for the r4's
So I will pretend they are both 23 th for math ease
23th at .1 watts = 2300 watts
23th at .126 watts = 2900 watts
so 1 ibm 2980 psu runs all 3 r4's
and 1 ibm 2980 will be short for 2 t9's so the r4's save back some of the 600 price difference in psu say 50
so 550 price difference
and you save 432 kwatts per month
600 watts per hour x 24 = 14.4 kwatts a day
at 10 cents that is 43.20 usd per month
So in about 1 year 43.20 x 12 = 518.40
which means 3x R4 7.5th vs 2x T9 11.5 are close to a tie in value.
4 assumptions made are :
1) nothing breaks 2) .126 watts per gh = T9 3) .100 watts per gh = R4 4) 10 cents a kwatt
Many will say 10 cents a kwatt is too high use 8 cents a kwatt so after 16 months they are pretty much equal
The real key is the true power used.
If the T9 does .135 cents at the meter and the R4 does .100 cents at the meter
the r4 is cheaper after:
9 months at 10 cents a kwatt 12 months at 8 cents a kwatt
I came to the same basic conclusion Phil, but your math sealed it for me. I missed the T9 flash sale and don't believe any more S9s will coming for a while. I placed an order for an R4. It will be my first. Was temped to have it shipped to me. But my electric is too high. So it's heading to hosting with my other ones. Thanks for the proof.
|
|
|
|
Llord-of-the-Sword
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
January 18, 2017, 06:55:06 PM |
|
I have never brought a large quantity of miners from Bitmain. I'm a little apprehensive with a big order all purchased with my BitCoin.
|
|
|
|
cybermods
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
Jack of all trades, master of none.
|
|
January 18, 2017, 07:36:36 PM |
|
I wouldn't worry. I purchased mine almost the second they became available. My status is now Paid Shipped Valid Tracking numbers received and there on there way
|
Keep calm and carry on mining.
|
|
|
fanatic26
|
|
January 18, 2017, 08:06:01 PM |
|
The point of the T9 is to trade a bit of efficiency for a more reliable machine.
As 16/14nm is pretty much the standard for the next few years it makes sense to buy a miner that is slightly less efficient but will run twice as long without problems. We all know the S9 has issues, and the release of this miner seems to support the fact that the s9 hardware is being run on the very edge of reliability to get the .10 spec, which in turn is causing a number of premature failures. It only takes one bad chip to take out an entire hashing board with the way the boards are designed.
|
Stop buying industrial miners, running them at home, and then complaining about the noise.
|
|
|
Finksy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 18, 2017, 08:15:34 PM |
|
Limited amount left in stock. Just paid for another 3.
DELETED
Thanks Swimmer63, Just grabbed one to give it a try out. Scam post, delete this shit please. Delete your quote of said shit please.
|
|
|
|
VentMine
|
|
January 18, 2017, 09:43:21 PM |
|
The point of the T9 is to trade a bit of efficiency for a more reliable machine.
Can you back up this claim?
|
1ESSdoVYKm8sNtYMfdkFBajhAe2e6G8keH
|
|
|
|
|