[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[Lukras]

is there any way I can add another miner to NEMOS?

You can always post a request with an explanation of why you want the miner.

I correctly understand that I myself can not insert any miner?

You can... but it's a bit complicated. Actually you can do anything since it's open source as long as you know how.

I don't have time right now to write a full guide but I'll give you an idea of how to do it,
1) Go to the folder \Miners
2) Copy paste one miner (preferably a similar one)
3) Read all the parameters of the file you opened and make any changes as required, depending on the miner you want to load
4) (Optional) Download the miner and put the files in the \Bin folder, but even if you don't, as long as you've inserted the correct download link in step 3 it will be auto-downloaded.

If you need more help, I'll check the forums tomorrow again so just ask.

I did it all, my added miner starts the benchmark, but after 300 seconds the data is not added and the miner continues to work in the benchmark mode, what do I do wrong?the only thing I do not specify the address for downloading the miner, because it does not exist, how can I be?

[Hin]

i just went thru several pools. so far i saw zergpool and blazepool may be the right one? maybe, but there payout is at least 0.005, i only have a small rig . any advise will be appreciate.

[jimmykl]

i just went thru several pools. so far i saw zergpool and blazepool may be the right one? maybe, but there payout is at least 0.005, i only have a small rig . any advise will be appreciate.

buy more cards? 

sorry i know that's not constructive but afaik that's a reasonably low payout level so you'll either have to hang in there or increase your shares

[paskevic]

NemosMiner-v3.1

https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner/releases
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner/releases/download/v3.1/NemosMiner-v3.1.zip

Miner updates:
updated ccminerx16r-x16s : https://github.com/nemosminer/ccminerx16r-x16s/releases
added ccminer-cryptonight support for cryptonightV7 (nicehash) : https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer-cryptonight/releases
updated ccminer-Tpruvot : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
disabled XMRig (not working with more than 3 GPU's)

Algo updates:
added x16s & hmq1725 support (zergpool)
added cryptonightv7 support (nicehash)
added x16r support (ahashpool,blazepool)
changed Tribus to Tpruvotx64

Pools updates
take zergpool fee into account

If you have Windows 7, 8, or 8.1, please update PowerShell:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=50395

CCMiner may need 'MSVCR120.dll' if you don't already have it:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/download/details.aspx?id=40784

CCMiner may need 'VCRUNTIME140.DLL' if you don't already have it:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48145

running multiple cards its recommended to increase Virtual Memory 64gb is optimal

Requires nvidia driver newer than 388 (390.65 recommended)

Made For & Tested with 8x10603gb 6x1070 6x1070ti 6x1080ti (users have reported up to 12cards working have not tested myself) Some miners do not support more that 9cards

Best Regards
Nemo

reported active miner times are broken for months and nobody cares (since version 2.3 i believe)?

[manc]

No. No error.
But no change in the clock.

Heres some syntax for a +10 core change, just to confirm it works.

Code:

SET CORE1=10
SET MEM1=0

cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:0,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,%MEM1%"

THX a lot. It is working but only 1 GPU. (GPU0)

But lots, lots of testing and this is works for 3gpu

SET CORE1=150
SET MEM1=500

cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:0,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,%MEM1%" "-setPowerTarget:0,87" "-setTempTarget:0,0,83"
cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:1,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,%MEM1%" "-setPowerTarget:1,87" "-setTempTarget:1,0,83"
cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:2,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,%MEM1%" "-setPowerTarget:2,87" "-setTempTarget:2,0,83"

Example of (3) different core speeds, and shorter over all. You don't need to set power & temp targets with every bat unless you WANT to change them from the previous algo.

Code:

SET CORE0=20
SET CORE1=50
SET CORE2=0
MEM1=500

cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:0,0,%CORE0%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,%MEM1%" "-setBaseClockOffset:1,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,%MEM1%" "-setBaseClockOffset:2,0,%CORE2%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,%MEM1%"

[DrHookMcracken]

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?

I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this

[JCS-CCT]

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?

I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

[DrHookMcracken]

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?

I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

[JCS-CCT]

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?

I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Try 20% and increase Interval to 300 or only use one pool in the config tab.  ActiveMinerGain% and Interval are the features already in the app to control switching.  Adjusting them should solve your problem.

[Bit2017User]

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?

I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Just asking, but why do you guys care how long does it take to get paid
even with 4 pools and not how much is your current profit?
How long makes sense only if you are changing to USD all the time
but if you save in BTC is not better to be more profitable ?
Thanks

[DrHookMcracken]

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?

I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Just asking, but why do you guys care how long does it take to get paid
even with 4 pools and not how much is your current profit?
How long makes sense only if you are changing to USD all the time
but if you save in BTC is not better to be more profitable ?
Thanks

I personally don't care.  I care more about the downtime and ramp-up time of my miners when switching.

[JCS-CCT]

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?

I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Just asking, but why do you guys care how long does it take to get paid
even with 4 pools and not how much is your current profit?
How long makes sense only if you are changing to USD all the time
but if you save in BTC is not better to be more profitable ?
Thanks

IMO. More payouts reduce risk.  There are risks of pools loosing your profits.  There are risks of BTC crashing before payout.  I exchange to USD or a stable coin asap.

[jebidia]

Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software

[manc]

Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software

averaged 0.0004 BTC

[jebidia]

Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software

averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?

[Hin]

Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software

averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?

any one with 4 1070ti? roughly how much will nemosminer made?

[LeeMcTired]

Tribus creep, thanks Nemo and JCS-CCT, algo was disabled. Now running v3.1 and Tribus is running fine.

Any idea as to why when selected hashrefinery balance and estimated pay date doesnt show up with the other pools that are selected?

[MaxiMan]

Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software

averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?

What settings and pool?=
My profits Average are 0.00049 BTC/Day with 2 1080TI 65%TDP On Zergpoolplus.

[JCS-CCT]

Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software

averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?

What settings and pool?=
My profits Average are 0.00049 BTC/Day with 2 1080TI 65%TDP On Zergpoolplus.

I'm wondering the same.

[Storx]

Feature Request:

Add a separate wallet address line for Nicehash ONLY, so we can use Nicehash internal wallets and check box to trigger which fee we expect to pay so it can be added into the calculations to determine if more profitable vs other pools.



Story Behind the change:
I have been using NemoMiner over AwesomeMiner for some time now and recently upgraded to the new GUI versions on my rigs, i mainly mine to Ahashpool Plus, but i mistakenly forgot to turn off nicehash which was checked from default during install and found large periods that my Ahashpool showed huge drops in profits checking on it periodically, this boggled me as the rigs were online the entire time, but lastnight i figured out what it was, the nicehash box was checked and i overlooked this and copied the setup folder to my cloud drive so it would be downloaded on all of my rigs to later run... while on my PC and looking at my Ahashpool page i noticed that all 120+ GPU's were displayed not active miners all sudden and remoted into the rigs to check on them to find that they were mining on Nicehash. I have no issues with mining to Nicehash if it truly is more profitable than any algo on Ahashpool, just didnt expect it. The issue now is when i look at nicehash to check the payout, its sending me payments via external route and charging me 3%, if i was able to populate my internal wallet than i would incur 0% fee as i use coinbase.