[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[Chosscoin]

Hello:

I have a question, can you help me?

I would like to switch between Blazepool and NiceHash with the NemosMiner, but I would like to mine in my NiceHash address of the Internal Wallet.

This means that when NemosMiner selects NiceHash, I would like the BTC address to be different, is it possible to specify a different BTC address for NiceHash and for the rest of the Pools?

Thank you very much

[1715636366]

1715636366

[1715636366]

1715636366

[1715636366]

1715636366

[Raziel666]

Hi! I'm new to NemosMiner but I have used SniffDogMiner and of course MultiPoolMiner, so not totally newbie.

My question is this (and sorry if it's been asked):

MPM, as far as I remember, used 2-3 different miners for some algorithms to determine the best one. Isn't this the case in NM? Because I'm finishing a benchmark now and only see 1 miner tested per algorithm.

Also, I had to disable timetravel and x16r during benchmarks, I guess both of them were crashing. Is there anything I can do about it? Maybe another miner or something?

Btw, my rig is a 9x1070 one.

Thanks for any help!

timetravel and x16r are worthless so remove

NM is already setup to use only the most optimized miner for the particular algo so thats normal to only see one miner per algo

x17/phi are making all the money these days for us

Ah, thanks! Can I use 2 or 3 pools at the same time in NM and have it switch to the most profitable algorithm in the most profitable pool? I remember MPM can do that.

[minerx117]

NemosMiner-v2.5.2-windows

https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.5.2-windows/releases/download/v2.5.2/NemosMiner-v2.5.2-windows.zip

Add support for ZergPool EU server
Disable Quick edit in CMD window
update Claymores Ethash from v11.2 to v11.4
add support for keccakc Algo zpool/zergpool
add support for x16r Algo (RavenCoin) Zergpool
add ccminerAlexis78 for keccakc Algo thanks to "cornz"
add RavenMiner for x16r algo thanks to: "tpruvot,todd1251,MSFTserver"

tested with 6x1070ti & 6x1080ti

Best Regards
Nemo

[L0c0]

Looking for some advise.  I have a 6-gpu rig, since alexis78 takes forever to fully start hashing when using more than 4 cards, I'm now running 2 copies of nemo's side by side 3 gpu each (I changed the miner's API ports to prevent any crosstalk).  Now everything works great most of the time except that BrainPlus has a very high CPU utilization (I have a Celeron 3930), so running 2 copies bring up the CPU utilization to 100% and sometimes it makes HSR miner crash.  I've tried to launch each copy of nemo at different intervals but eventually both copies of BrainPlus end up catching up to each other and running at the same time.

Any suggestions on how to drop the CPU utilization of BrainPlus?

[Chosscoin]

Hello:

I have a question, can you help me?

I would like to switch between Blazepool and NiceHash with the NemosMiner, but I would like to mine in my NiceHash address of the Internal Wallet.

This means that when NemosMiner selects NiceHash, I would like the BTC address to be different, is it possible to specify a different BTC address for NiceHash and for the rest of the Pools?

Thank you very much

Please?

[cable_loco]

Looking for some advise.  I have a 6-gpu rig, since alexis78 takes forever to fully start hashing when using more than 4 cards, I'm now running 2 copies of nemo's side by side 3 gpu each (I changed the miner's API ports to prevent any crosstalk).  Now everything works great most of the time except that BrainPlus has a very high CPU utilization (I have a Celeron 3930), so running 2 copies bring up the CPU utilization to 100% and sometimes it makes HSR miner crash.  I've tried to launch each copy of nemo at different intervals but eventually both copies of BrainPlus end up catching up to each other and running at the same time.

Any suggestions on how to drop the CPU utilization of BrainPlus?

See my post for a fix:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1777336.msg31397702#msg31397702

[ravenj]

Hello,

I'm trying to use nemosminer to mine both zergpool and nicehash but the results are not great simply because the earnings announced by zergpool are overestimated and, therefore, cannot be compared to nicehash.

Is it possible to add correction factors to each pool’s earning calculations so they can be more real?

Thank you

[MrPlus]

Hello,

I'm trying to use nemosminer to mine both zergpool and nicehash but the results are not great simply because the earnings announced by zergpool are overestimated and, therefore, cannot be compared to nicehash.

Is it possible to add correction factors to each pool’s earning calculations so they can be more real?

Thank you

May be have a look here: https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases

[ravenj]

May be have a look here: https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases

Thank you

That's exactly what I was talking about.

Best regards

[butka]

Hi,

i got 3x 1070ti with ahashpool goin on.
I am using nemosminer since January i got a very stable system and i haven't touched it ever since!

THANK U FOR THIS!

I could use a quick advice - will it be more profitable to upgrade to the latest nemosminer version or is it just a marginal change??

Thanks in advance.

Have you been using the normal, plus, or 24h settings?

[minerx117]

Hi,

i got 3x 1070ti with ahashpool goin on.
I am using nemosminer since January i got a very stable system and i haven't touched it ever since!

THANK U FOR THIS!

I could use a quick advice - will it be more profitable to upgrade to the latest nemosminer version or is it just a marginal change??

Thanks in advance.

Have you been using the normal, plus, or 24h settings?

hi newest version has more updated miners so will be faster in some algos also a few new algos have been added since January so your also missing out on them eg. x16r on zergpool is doing very well atm
Best Regards
Nemo

[JCS-CCT]

Looking for some advise.  I have a 6-gpu rig, since alexis78 takes forever to fully start hashing when using more than 4 cards, I'm now running 2 copies of nemo's side by side 3 gpu each (I changed the miner's API ports to prevent any crosstalk).  Now everything works great most of the time except that BrainPlus has a very high CPU utilization (I have a Celeron 3930), so running 2 copies bring up the CPU utilization to 100% and sometimes it makes HSR miner crash.  I've tried to launch each copy of nemo at different intervals but eventually both copies of BrainPlus end up catching up to each other and running at the same time.

Any suggestions on how to drop the CPU utilization of BrainPlus?

See my post for a fix:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1777336.msg31397702#msg31397702

#Set process priority to BelowNormal to avoid hash rate drops on systems with weak CPUs
(Get-Process -Id $PID).PriorityClass = "BelowNormal"

Edit: Looks like fixed in v3.0!

[JCS-CCT]

Even though I set half the gpus in parameters dstm 0 1 2 cc 0,1,2.. when running the ethash algo all gpus are used.  Any ideas of what is going on?

Thanks!

[sirbrokealot]

Hi,

i got 3x 1070ti with ahashpool goin on.
I am using nemosminer since January i got a very stable system and i haven't touched it ever since!

THANK U FOR THIS!

I could use a quick advice - will it be more profitable to upgrade to the latest nemosminer version or is it just a marginal change??

Thanks in advance.

Have you been using the normal, plus, or 24h settings?

hi newest version has more updated miners so will be faster in some algos also a few new algos have been added since January so your also missing out on them eg. x16r on zergpool is doing very well atm
Best Regards
Nemo

Thank u!
will update now

[MaxiMan]

Testing That New Ravenminer, hashrate is fluctuating between 17~12MH/S (1080Ti 65%TDP) some jumps up to 20Mh/s

After almost 10 mins of running, hashrates media for 2x 1080ti = 30Mh/s
Compared to Ccminer 2.2.5 = 25.12 Mh/s from many days

Will keep running

[Raziel666]

hi newest version has more updated miners so will be faster in some algos also a few new algos have been added since January so your also missing out on them eg. x16r on zergpool is doing very well atm
Best Regards
Nemo

If we update manually (overwrite), should we keep the miners and they will be updated automatically or should we delete them?

[JCS-CCT]

hi newest version has more updated miners so will be faster in some algos also a few new algos have been added since January so your also missing out on them eg. x16r on zergpool is doing very well atm
Best Regards
Nemo

If we update manually (overwrite), should we keep the miners and they will be updated automatically or should we delete them?

I would delete and let Nemo download the latest.

[MaxiMan]

Testing That New Ravenminer, hashrate is fluctuating between 17~12MH/S (1080Ti 65%TDP) some jumps up to 20Mh/s

After almost 10 mins of running, hashrates media for 2x 1080ti = 30Mh/s
Compared to Ccminer 2.2.5 = 25.12 Mh/s from many days

Will keep running

After 2h of running: the average Hashrate dropped a bit
Lot of fluctuation on hashrate
Found a drops on hashrate per single GPU low as 8Mh/s
 Final Avg I got from both GPU is 28.5Mh/s

[moro89]

I'm using NemosMiner 2.5.2 with 4 GTX 1050ti cards. All mining software work well, except for the sick, buggy-as-hell hsrminer... It just brought me persistent headache while crashing all the time and needs infinite attempts for configuring it at a stable manner... Feels like the lousy kid in the family!

Please, get rid of it and use a well-configured edition of ccminer for Neoscrypt along with PhoenixMiner for ethereum mining...

Keep up the good work!

[JCS-CCT]

I'm using NemosMiner 2.5.2 with 4 GTX 1050ti cards. All mining software work well, except for the sick, buggy-as-hell hsrminer... It just brought me persistent headache while crashing all the time and needs infinite attempts for configuring it at a stable manner... Feels like the lousy kid in the family!

Please, get rid of it and use a well-configured edition of ccminer for Neoscrypt along with PhoenixMiner for ethereum mining...

Keep up the good work!

This would be a nice feature request.. able to select or change which miner is tied to an algo.  I would rather have stable miners.  Sometimes the fastest aren't stable.