vtrsp1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2018, 12:10:21 PM |
|
Hi guys, i Have a problem with bencmarking DTSM miner....when its starts up it see all 6 cards but when its benchmarking it sees only gpu 0,1?? when it benchmarking i see the command line and it says 2 gpu`s -d 0,1 ?? did is somthing wrong? or a bug in the program? other benschmarks run fine sorry for my bad englisch its a bit rusty
|
|
|
|
sunc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2018, 12:12:50 PM |
|
You need to write without space -d0,1
|
|
|
|
cable_loco
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 1
|
|
March 02, 2018, 12:37:57 PM |
|
Hi guys, i Have a problem with bencmarking DTSM miner....when its starts up it see all 6 cards but when its benchmarking it sees only gpu 0,1?? when it benchmarking i see the command line and it says 2 gpu`s -d 0,1 ?? did is somthing wrong? or a bug in the program? other benschmarks run fine sorry for my bad englisch its a bit rusty All explained here: https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.5.2/blob/master/README.mdinstructions: edit startpoolname.bat 1.change BTC address to yours 2.select how many gpu's you have eg: (1gpu dstm 0 cc 0) (2gpu dstm 0 1 cc 0,1) (6gpu dstm 0 1 2 3 4 5 cc 0,1,2,3,4,5) 3.remove any algos you do not want to mine 4.save & run startpoolname.bat So if you have 6 gpus, you need to edit your start file with the following. -SelGPUDSTM '0 1 2 3 4 5' -SelGPUCC '0,1,2,3,4,5'
|
|
|
|
verado
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2018, 12:48:35 PM |
|
I've seen those cpu usage spikes from powershell since switching to 2.5.1, regardless of which miner is running at the moment. No idea what's causing them.
The miner is using too much cpu since the change to minerplus, if you run 3 instances in parallel, the host and hashrate is almost crashing under the load. Calculating a moving average can't be that hard. What is the miner doing with the cpu ressources?
|
|
|
|
k2laci
Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2018, 01:56:44 PM |
|
I tested zergpool (nemosminer, zergpoolplus, 24h test. Result (6x1070 GPU) : https://imgur.com/e4t7ZKAIt's a disaster!
|
|
|
|
k2laci
Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2018, 03:06:57 PM |
|
FULL 12 RIG 72 GPU NICEHASH TESTOk guys, I've switched one entire farm (72 GPUs, 12 rigs) over to NiceHash (2.0.1.11) - 48 HOUR TEST!!!! https://imgur.com/a/vNodgLast 3 Payouts on AHashPool (Use to be 0.021 at its peak) 19h ago 0.01532754 330b3de0606d1257621e51301da726f8ca02... 43h ago 0.01419105 87ce1e684a440868ea347bcde8766b5ac7f8... 2d ago 0.01409336 67db48c92b113c2c98fc62461144ad8399bd... Lets see how it plays out compared to my AHashPoolPlus 62 GPU Farm First 24 hours (2/28/2018): Farm #1 (62 gpu) which is still using NemosMiner 2.5/NPlusMiner 1.3.3 on AhashPoolPlus produced .011531 BTC Farm #2 (72 gpu) which is on NiceHash Miner v2.0.1.11 produced .01424642 BTC Farm #2 Typically produces on the high side 14.8% better revenue, so if the 72 gpu farm was on AHashPool I would have expected .013237 best case .01424642 - .013237 = 7.6% better revenue on NiceHash! Lets see how the next 24 play out.... Got the end result?
|
|
|
|
miner14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2018, 03:28:10 PM |
|
Right after the params, like so Thanks CLoco, That took my CeleronG2930 in one rig down to 40% from 80% If you have a ZenCash addy I'll send you £1's worth for that useful post. (and yes technically I'm trying to get rid of my old lame coins sorry Zen)
|
|
|
|
millsys
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2018, 06:19:36 PM Last edit: March 02, 2018, 07:16:54 PM by millsys |
|
FULL 12 RIG 72 GPU NICEHASH TESTOk guys, I've switched one entire farm (72 GPUs, 12 rigs) over to NiceHash (2.0.1.11) - 48 HOUR TEST!!!! https://imgur.com/a/vNodgLast 3 Payouts on AHashPool (Use to be 0.021 at its peak) 19h ago 0.01532754 330b3de0606d1257621e51301da726f8ca02... 43h ago 0.01419105 87ce1e684a440868ea347bcde8766b5ac7f8... 2d ago 0.01409336 67db48c92b113c2c98fc62461144ad8399bd... Lets see how it plays out compared to my AHashPoolPlus 62 GPU Farm First 24 hours (2/28/2018): Farm #1 (62 gpu) which is still using NemosMiner 2.5/NPlusMiner 1.3.3 on AhashPoolPlus produced .011531 BTC Farm #2 (72 gpu) which is on NiceHash Miner v2.0.1.11 produced .01424642 BTC Farm #2 Typically produces on the high side 14.8% better revenue, so if the 72 gpu farm was on AHashPool I would have expected .013237 best case .01424642 - .013237 = 7.6% better revenue on NiceHash! Lets see how the next 24 play out.... Well the second 24 hour wasn't as nice.... 2/29/2018 Nicehash 0.01319923 while my 62 GPU on X17/AHashPool did 0.013345! Since the 72 gpu should have 14.8% better I would have expected 0.015320 if I was on AHashPool. So after 48 hours, if left on X17/AHashPool we would be around 0.028557, but currently we are 0.02744565... Not the end of the world, .001 LESS on NiceHash so far after 48 hour test. Definitely not enough to make me cancel the testing so we'll continue the tests, keeping the 62 gpu on X17/AHashPool and 72 gpu on NiceHash to see if we just had a bad day on NiceHash.....
|
FARM #1 : 60 GPUs spread across 6 rigs (1080ti/1080/1070ti/1070) FARM #2 : 72 GPUs spread across 12 rigs (1070ti x 6) FARM #3 : 16 GPUs spread across 4 rigs (1080ti x 4) AntMiner S9 13.5TH / AntMiner L3+ x 2
|
|
|
puch0021
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2018, 08:17:25 PM |
|
I'm stopping my test I've ran for 36 hours as the results are similar to what I had ran in January.
identical 1060 x 7 rigs AHASHplus 0.12553203 -> 0.12687823 (difference of 0.0013462 in 36 hours). AM with NH - 0 -> 0.00198541
I think only Ahash makes sense if you have graphics cards that excel at core dependent algorithms not offered on NH and also compared to ethash. For a 1060, ethereum mining is way ahead of pretty much any alt coin at this point in time.[/]
|
|
|
|
Gelik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2018, 10:35:55 PM |
|
Still testing, post later with screens
|
|
|
|
Justbecause
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2018, 11:18:24 PM |
|
I'm stopping my test I've ran for 36 hours as the results are similar to what I had ran in January.
identical 1060 x 7 rigs AHASHplus 0.12553203 -> 0.12687823 (difference of 0.0013462 in 36 hours). AM with NH - 0 -> 0.00198541
I think only Ahash makes sense if you have graphics cards that excel at core dependent algorithms not offered on NH and also compared to ethash. For a 1060, ethereum mining is way ahead of pretty much any alt coin at this point in time.[/]
Your Ahash rates are in line with my 1060 on Ahashpool these last two days (0.00026547 in 50 hours, so 0.127 mBTC/Day against your 0.128mBTC/Day) And very good NH rates: 0.189 mBTC/Day. That's 47% increase.
|
|
|
|
Storx
|
|
March 02, 2018, 11:43:54 PM |
|
If you want to run a test on Nicehash, run identical cards with same settings on both platforms at the same time.
My personal computer is a AMD 1950x w/32gb ram rig with 4 x evga 1080ti's watercooled, so all GPU's see the same temps
When i did testing on different pools before switching my rigs over to nemo's from AM i ran 3 miners on my rig to see which pool to go to...
GPU 0 was left unused so i can still use the computer
GPU1 was used on Ahashpoolplus.bat
GPU2 was used on Nicehash.bat
GPU3 was used on zpoolplus.bat
I ran this setup for 7 days and compared the results to see which one i wanted to move my farm over to....
Ahashpoolplus 7 days total was $22.96 worth of BTC at time of testing ending, but i would receive $22.96 to my btc wallet on payout
Nicehash 7 days total was $23.41 worth of BTC at time of testing ending, but i would receive $22.23 to my btc wallet on payout due to payment fee
zpoolplus 7 days total was $21.03 worth of BTC at time of testing ending, but i would receive $21.03 to my btc wallet on payout
|
- GPUs Mining : 128 (Updated 3/7/18) // CPUs Mining : 19 (Updated 2/23/18)
|
|
|
P00P135
|
|
March 03, 2018, 02:16:12 AM |
|
Its not nemo its zergpool that is a disaster. Sometimes its good and sometimes you get hit by pump and dump groups on some of these coins that zergpool mines.
|
|
|
|
georat72
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 08:22:20 AM Last edit: March 03, 2018, 08:32:52 AM by georat72 |
|
Hi Guys, How can i change neoscrypt algo miner? I want to change hsr miner with ccminer KlausT . Best regards ----------------------------------- I`m ready - changed it.
|
|
|
|
Bit2017User
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 1
|
|
March 03, 2018, 02:05:16 PM |
|
Hi all regarding location in Nemos 2.5.1 and ZergPool Is there support for changing location? Location US is to be change to europe or EU? Thanks
Update: Both of them are not working ( europe and EU ) Also the earnings display is useless when mining in LTC Any way to adjust it? Thanks
|
|
|
|
iamaeey
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 03:06:55 PM |
|
Its not nemo its zergpool that is a disaster. Sometimes its good and sometimes you get hit by pump and dump groups on some of these coins that zergpool mines. What's the recommended pool for multialgo mining right now?
|
|
|
|
ubergod
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 03:35:41 PM |
|
I'm running 2.5.1 and I'm finding that the program is restarting the mining instances alot on refreshes even if it's not switching algos..dropping my hash rate, making it have to ramp up again and again. I'm seeing an error on refreshes trying to find devlist.json but it is clearly in the location it is looking for it. I have a feeling this is the cause of the problem. Just not sure how to fix it.
|
|
|
|
Enkrypt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 05:31:38 PM Last edit: March 03, 2018, 08:29:58 PM by Enkrypt |
|
For strictly NiceHash pool, do you recommend NemosMiner/NPlusMiner over the official NiceHash Miner Legacy?
@millsys, Which algos should I enable for NiceHash in NPlusMiner (1080Ti)?
|
|
|
|
Storx
|
|
March 03, 2018, 06:10:01 PM |
|
Hi Guys, How can i change neoscrypt algo miner? I want to change hsr miner with ccminer KlausT . Best regards ----------------------------------- I`m ready - changed it.
Go in the miner folder you want to change and add # to turn it off and remove the # in the miner you want to run, then restart the software and it will benchmark that new software change.
|
- GPUs Mining : 128 (Updated 3/7/18) // CPUs Mining : 19 (Updated 2/23/18)
|
|
|
Enkrypt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 08:29:00 PM |
|
Well the second 24 hour wasn't as nice.... 2/29/2018 Nicehash 0.01319923 while my 62 GPU on X17/AHashPool did 0.013345! Since the 72 gpu should have 14.8% better I would have expected 0.015320 if I was on AHashPool.
So after 48 hours, if left on X17/AHashPool we would be around 0.028557, but currently we are 0.02744565... Not the end of the world, .001 LESS on NiceHash so far after 48 hour test. Definitely not enough to make me cancel the testing so we'll continue the tests, keeping the 62 gpu on X17/AHashPool and 72 gpu on NiceHash to see if we just had a bad day on NiceHash..... Do you still recommend -ActiveMinerGainPct 5 for AhashPoolPlus?
|
|
|
|
|