[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[Lubrifiant]

Which coin are you solo mining currently ?

[1715395628]

1715395628

[1715395628]

1715395628

[1715395628]

1715395628

[crackfoo]

hi,

We've added another new algo, allium for garlic coin/GRLC

Cheers

[rob3123]

Hello, are you planning to make this miner compatible with 10+ gpus ?

[sundownz]

Last week, I did a long term test of only "plus" logic of blazepool/zergpool/zpool - all evelauated only by cheking reward in wallet (not nemos estimate, which is very inacurate)

Blazepool - was usually just mining 1 algo with terrible reward.
Zergpool - was swaping algos well, but reward was small
Zpool - swaping algos, best reward for my setup

you guys with good result on blazepool, i suppose you are using "normal" pool settings, right?

Yes, the admin of Blazepool also endorses using "normal" mode on their pool.

I haven't had anything else do as well as Blaze on normal setting.

[j0sh710]

Last week, I did a long term test of only "plus" logic of blazepool/zergpool/zpool - all evelauated only by cheking reward in wallet (not nemos estimate, which is very inacurate)

Blazepool - was usually just mining 1 algo with terrible reward.
Zergpool - was swaping algos well, but reward was small
Zpool - swaping algos, best reward for my setup

you guys with good result on blazepool, i suppose you are using "normal" pool settings, right?

Yes, the admin of Blazepool also endorses using "normal" mode on their pool.

I haven't had anything else do as well as Blaze on normal setting.

I can vogue for this as well. In fact I have noticed such great results that I am exclusively using Blazepool right now with the Blazepool miner which is just a fork of nemosminer found on the Blazepool website. I previously was using Zergpool and miningpoolhub and the payouts never seemed to be on par to what I would expect. Even just mining RVN seemed better then algo switching with Zergpool at least for me. You certainly want to use normal mode with Blazepool.

[jcabello7]

@minerx117

When you test miner vs miner, are you checking hashrate at poolside or just client side?

Thanks and great job!

[cryptodunno]

Last week, I did a long term test of only "plus" logic of blazepool/zergpool/zpool - all evelauated only by cheking reward in wallet (not nemos estimate, which is very inacurate)

Blazepool - was usually just mining 1 algo with terrible reward.
Zergpool - was swaping algos well, but reward was small
Zpool - swaping algos, best reward for my setup

you guys with good result on blazepool, i suppose you are using "normal" pool settings, right?

Yes, the admin of Blazepool also endorses using "normal" mode on their pool.

I haven't had anything else do as well as Blaze on normal setting.

I can vogue for this as well. In fact I have noticed such great results that I am exclusively using Blazepool right now with the Blazepool miner which is just a fork of nemosminer found on the Blazepool website. I previously was using Zergpool and miningpoolhub and the payouts never seemed to be on par to what I would expect. Even just mining RVN seemed better then algo switching with Zergpool at least for me. You certainly want to use normal mode with Blazepool.

thanks for your suggestion guys, will give it a try and post results in few days after some tests

[sundownz]

I've had a few systems that simply will NOT run with the included X16R/X16S miner for whatever reason... on those systems I simply replaced the miner with SUPRMINER and it has been rock solid without reducing intensity. It's only been on about 4 systems out of ~90 systems I've rolled NEMO 3.1 onto.

Also a small handful won't run "Tpruvotx64" -- for those I copied the regular "TpruvotCuda9" into that folder and they ran fine after that.

Just putting it out there in case anyone else may have the same thing going on.

[minerx117]

@minerx117

When you test miner vs miner, are you checking hashrate at poolside or just client side?

Thanks and great job!

both

[toyo87]

I am still lost on how to configure this miner.

Please how do i set the miner to mine digibyte with '' theblocksfactory.com '' and other mining pool.

Any help here will be highly appreciated.
Thanks

[MaxiMan]

Little question..
When updating miners, it is enough if I extract the ps1 files for miners that got an update?
What happens if the bin folder contains already same name files for that outdated miner? It will download?
I dont know how the "Auto update" works, I have to check manually on github whats new.

[minerx117]

Little question..
When updating miners, it is enough if I extract the ps1 files for miners that got an update?
What happens if the bin folder contains already same name files for that outdated miner? It will download?
I dont know how the "Auto update" works, I have to check manually on github whats new.

1.delete "bin" folder
2.replace miner.ps1 files with updated files from : https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner/archive/master.zip

Best Regards
Nemo

[RivAngE]

Little question..
When updating miners, it is enough if I extract the ps1 files for miners that got an update?
What happens if the bin folder contains already same name files for that outdated miner? It will download?
I dont know how the "Auto update" works, I have to check manually on github whats new.

1.delete "bin" folder
2.replace miner.ps1 files with updated files from : https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner/archive/master.zip

Best Regards
Nemo

Or just delete the folder of the miner that has been updated, inside the "Bin" folder, instead of the whole folder. Depending on your internet speed, it could take a considerate amount of time to redownload every miner.
Also, check the date of the update for the .ps1 files in GitHub. That way you can see which have been updated. Personally I'm also checking WHAT has been updated, there were times I wasn't agreeing with a change and I didn't update.

[cryptodunno]

here are my average figures after 15 days of using nemosminer for 5x1063:
i had a few blackouts, but on the other side i used another rig to mine through nemosminer for a while to cover that gap
ttl earned - 0,005982063 BTC ~ 0,0003988042 per day
not considering last BTC drop and based on 9K per BTC it gives me only 3.5 bucks per day, which is too low.
So decided to turn it off

[LDPinch]

Is there an option to specify algos for selected pools?

I.e. I want to mine x16r at zergpool but I don't want to mine x16r at ahashpool. And vice versa, I want to enable x17 for ahaspool only. Tried to edit Config\PoolsAlgos.json but no luck - still have x16r for ahashpool at "benchmarks" section.

[RivAngE]

Is there an option to specify algos for selected pools?

I.e. I want to mine x16r at zergpool but I don't want to mine x16r at ahashpool. And vice versa, I want to enable x17 for ahaspool only. Tried to edit Config\PoolsAlgos.json but no luck - still have x16r for ahashpool at "benchmarks" section.

Go to Nemos Miner's directory, then \Config\PoolsAlgos.json
There you can delete what algos you don't want to use under the name of the pool.

[MaxiMan]

Last week, I did a long term test of only "plus" logic of blazepool/zergpool/zpool - all evelauated only by cheking reward in wallet (not nemos estimate, which is very inacurate)

Blazepool - was usually just mining 1 algo with terrible reward.
Zergpool - was swaping algos well, but reward was small
Zpool - swaping algos, best reward for my setup

you guys with good result on blazepool, i suppose you are using "normal" pool settings, right?

Show something data from your tests, looks like Zergpool rewards are lowering.. always using plus mode from nemos.

This is an average i got after processing my balances each 12 hours:
First half of march i got 0.00057 BTC/day*
On last half of march i got 0.00052 BTC/day
On april my average earnings per day were 0.00046/day

*Even disabling one GPU 2~3 hours at day for gaming/videos (2 1080ti 65%PL)

After that, Nemos states this on status from Zergpool:

Code:

   Type: NVIDIA

Miner                  Algorithm       Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Da
                                                                              y
-----                  ---------       ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------
ccminerAlexis78        C11        51.93 MH/s    0.899 0.00090   8.629   0.01731
ccminerPoolparty       X16r       33.40 MH/s    0.885 0.00089   8.495   0.02650
enemyzealot1.08        X16r       33.13 MH/s    0.878 0.00088   8.426   0.02650
ccminerRaven           X16r       31.16 MH/s    0.826 0.00083   7.924   0.02650
ccminerenemy1.03       X17        35.50 MH/s    0.800 0.00080   7.677   0.02253
ccminerAlexis78        X17        34.54 MH/s    0.778 0.00078   7.469   0.02253
ccminerAlexis78        Skein       1.71 GH/s    0.699 0.00070   6.710   0.00041
ccminerKlausT          C11        39.82 MH/s    0.689 0.00069   6.617   0.01731
ccminerSp              Skein       1.68 GH/s    0.684 0.00068   6.566   0.00041
ccminerAlexis78phi     Phi        62.59 MH/s    0.663 0.00066   6.363   0.01059
ccminerAlexis78        Hsr        36.37 MH/s    0.589 0.00059   5.657   0.01620
ccminerAlexis78        Lyra2RE2  129.20 MH/s    0.520 0.00052   4.993   0.00403
ccminerNanashi         Lyra2RE2  123.25 MH/s    0.496 0.00050   4.763   0.00403
ccminerTpruvotskunk    Skunk      84.07 MH/s    0.490 0.00049   4.705   0.00583
ccminerAlexis78xevan   Xevan      10.27 MH/s    0.475 0.00047   4.558   0.04623
ccminerTpruvotx64      Lyra2z      6.26 MH/s    0.475 0.00047   4.555   0.07575
enemyzealot1.08        X16s       33.37 MH/s    0.399 0.00040   3.834   0.01197
ccminerTpruvotcuda9    Bitcore    45.46 MH/s    0.398 0.00040   3.821   0.00876
ccminerSuprminer       X16s       31.62 MH/s    0.378 0.00038   3.633   0.01197
ccminerTpruvotx64      Tribus    182.12 MH/s    0.363 0.00036   3.489   0.00200
ccminerKlausT          NeoScrypt   2.50 MH/s    0.338 0.00034   3.244   0.13513
ccminerAlexis78keccakc Keccakc     2.38 GH/s    0.101 0.00010   0.973   0.00004
ccminerAlexis78        Nist5     140.74 MH/s    0.026 0.00003   0.249   0.00018
ccminerAlexis78        Sib        39.81 MH/s    0.000 0.00000   0.000   0.00000

As you can see, there is no way im earning even 4 USD/day...

i also do some tests recently for over 5 days, and actual earnings is around 2 times less than predicted.
rechecking my rigs twice or even more often per hour, and I`ve never seen less than 0.0008 btc/day prediction, usually it`s 0.001 BTC/day or slighlty more, but actual earnings are twice less.
now i have to mine with nemos for min payouts, but something is definately wrong

Finally i had to correct zergpool stats with "pricepenaltyfactor" parameter on poolconfigs.json
i set it to 0.7 which equals to my average daily earning

Code:

{
   "default":  {
                    "PricePenaltyFactor":  1,
                    "Wallet":  "my wallet adress",
                    "UserName":  "nemo",
                    "WorkerName":  "ID=NemosMiner3.1",
                    "APIKey":  ""
   },
   "zergpoolplus":  {
                    "PricePenaltyFactor":  0.7,
                    "Wallet":  "my wallet adress",
                    "UserName":  "nemo",
                    "WorkerName":  "ID=NemosMiner3.1",
                    "APIKey":  ""
                }
}

[Lubrifiant]

Where are you mining guys currently ?
Which pool/algo or which coin ?

I'm on blazepool with nemosminer on current. Not very good results
1,5 week ago I switched to zergpool to focus Verge. Greats results first 24hours, after that it dropped badly
So I switched to x16r on zergpool, average results...

[Max3k]

Gentlemen, have you finally reached a consensus on the most honest pool, or still undecided? =)

[richdmz]

are we due for a 3.2 release soon? love the miner btw