Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Stargazer]

I think ill see if bit-x works since i dont really want to post more than i normally would do. Though now i wonder if they have a limit regarding a minimum. I posted in their thread now and see what they see.

Bitmixer is a similar campaign you might want to check out that has no minimum post requirements to get paid and you also don't need to verify your account with a cell phone but the payments are half the price of bit-x so that could be a deal breaker.

He can try to use a google voice numbers, I have seen here in the forum that one is selling it for 2 dollars .

I heard that the phone requirement will be taken down, but now it's on hold because the OP got banned. He could join any other campaign for the time being and see what happens.

[polynesia]

I think ill see if bit-x works since i dont really want to post more than i normally would do. Though now i wonder if they have a limit regarding a minimum. I posted in their thread now and see what they see.

Bitmixer is a similar campaign you might want to check out that has no minimum post requirements to get paid and you also don't need to verify your account with a cell phone but the payments are half the price of bit-x so that could be a deal breaker.

He can try to use a google voice numbers, I have seen here in the forum that one is selling it for 2 dollars .

I heard that the phone requirement will be taken down, but now it's on hold because the OP got banned. He could join any other campaign for the time being and see what happens.

Marco said it might take a month or two here.
Noting the way timelines are met here, wouldn't be surprised if it is in 2016. 

[Rampton]

Marco said it might take a month or two here.
Noting the way timelines are met here, wouldn't be surprised if it is in 2016. 

Ha. Most can stick to deadlines but I'd take dates announced as speculation not concrete dates state in stone, though it seems to be only Primedice and this forum that misses them MASSIVELY  .

[tspacepilot]

the payout will depends on your constructive post counts, if you are able to make 1000 constructive post / week, according to the thread, they will pay for 1.6 BTC for your rank because it is mention that there is no limit the to the post count

I doubt ill be able to do that. I only made 39 posts in the last 30 days. So if only constructive posts are taken and 1000 of them for 1.6btc... then this would mean actual real hard work and the payment wouldnt be worth it then. I only would think about it when i dont really have to change my behaviour very much. Up to 100 posts are possible for sure though i wonder if constructive isnt a very stretchy term anyway. Is constructive needed for the other campaigns too? I mean i cant imagine someone sitting there, reading all posts and decide which is constructive.

If you can do a little over 50 choose a fixed rate like Luckybit (0.125). More than 100 choose a pay per post like bit x (0.16 for hundred but you can make much more than that but posting that much is no easy task as you mentioned). Constructive basically means just don't spam or post pointless rubbish for the sake of it. I've had a quick look over your posts and all or most should be fine and counted as 'constructive' so you probably would be ok if you just continued on as normal providing you made the minimum 50 posts for payout.

I think ill see if bit-x works since i dont really want to post more than i normally would do. Though now i wonder if they have a limit regarding a minimum. I posted in their thread now and see what they see.

I think that the only trouble with these guys is that they require a mobile phone number in order to create an account on their website and they only pay to accounts on their website---not to your personal btc address.  Apparently withdrawal from their website also requires that you reply to a text message.  I don't know if there are withdrawal fees.

[redsn0w]

the payout will depends on your constructive post counts, if you are able to make 1000 constructive post / week, according to the thread, they will pay for 1.6 BTC for your rank because it is mention that there is no limit the to the post count

I doubt ill be able to do that. I only made 39 posts in the last 30 days. So if only constructive posts are taken and 1000 of them for 1.6btc... then this would mean actual real hard work and the payment wouldnt be worth it then. I only would think about it when i dont really have to change my behaviour very much. Up to 100 posts are possible for sure though i wonder if constructive isnt a very stretchy term anyway. Is constructive needed for the other campaigns too? I mean i cant imagine someone sitting there, reading all posts and decide which is constructive.

If you can do a little over 50 choose a fixed rate like Luckybit (0.125). More than 100 choose a pay per post like bit x (0.16 for hundred but you can make much more than that but posting that much is no easy task as you mentioned). Constructive basically means just don't spam or post pointless rubbish for the sake of it. I've had a quick look over your posts and all or most should be fine and counted as 'constructive' so you probably would be ok if you just continued on as normal providing you made the minimum 50 posts for payout.

I think ill see if bit-x works since i dont really want to post more than i normally would do. Though now i wonder if they have a limit regarding a minimum. I posted in their thread now and see what they see.

I think that the only trouble with these guys is that they require a mobile phone number in order to create an account on their website and they only pay to accounts on their website---not to your personal btc address.  Apparently withdrawal from their website also requires that you reply to a text message.  I don't know if there are withdrawal fees.

No for a withdrawal is not requested the SMS confirm, in the old two months I have only received a message when I have requested the withdrawal and another one when I have received the bitcoin to my personal address.

The fee is 0.5 % (if I remember correct).

[tspacepilot]

Thanks for the info, redisn0w.  Someone else had mentioned that bit-x was sending text messages whenever they wanted to withdrawal, I thought, but maybe I misunderstood.  IMO, the 0.5% fee should be subtracted from the advertized pay rates of the campaign since you can't really get your btc to your wallet without paying the fee.

[redsn0w]

Thanks for the info, redisn0w.  Someone else had mentioned that bit-x was sending text messages whenever they wanted to withdrawal, I thought, but maybe I misunderstood.  IMO, the 0.5% fee should be subtracted from the advertized pay rates of the campaign since you can't really get your btc to your wallet without paying the fee.

You are welcome ; maybe better , the manager (marcotheminer) can add these 0.05% fee at each sig. payment, so when someone will withdraw from the site he will receive the exact amount (in a nutshell : bit-x.com will pay the 0.05% fee).

[tspacepilot]

Indeed, I think that would be a good thing.  I don't know if they'd agree to it and I can't join their campaign since I'm not willing to give out a mobile number---so it's no skin off my nose personally.  But if I were enrolled, I think I would be demanding something like this since it amounts to a subtraction from the advertized rate (unless, as you say, they go ahead and pay it for you).

[bitkilo]

CryptoVPN has made a couple of small changes to it's campaign.
Maximum post for the month has been dropped from 100 to 80
They will also make a half payment for members that can only make 40 posts for the months.

[Mitchell]

CryptoVPN has made a couple of small changes to it's campaign.
Maximum post for the month has been dropped from 100 to 80
They will also make a half payment for members that can only make 40 posts for the months.

Those are some nifty changes. Updating the OP right now.
EDIT: Done.

[Mudd]

CryptoVPN has made a couple of small changes to it's campaign.
Maximum post for the month has been dropped from 100 to 80
They will also make a half payment for members that can only make 40 posts for the months.

Those are some nifty changes. Updating the OP right now.
EDIT: Done.

What do you mean by nifty? I still think this campaign needs to drop its minimum posts down compared to the other deals. Thanks for keeping this topic up to date though. I will try join a campaign when I become a Member.

[Mitchell]

I was talking about the fact that you get paid half if you get to 40 posts. That's a nice update. It's better than not getting paid at all.

[Malin Keshar]

the payout will depends on your constructive post counts, if you are able to make 1000 constructive post / week, according to the thread, they will pay for 1.6 BTC for your rank because it is mention that there is no limit the to the post count

I doubt ill be able to do that. I only made 39 posts in the last 30 days. So if only constructive posts are taken and 1000 of them for 1.6btc... then this would mean actual real hard work and the payment wouldnt be worth it then. I only would think about it when i dont really have to change my behaviour very much. Up to 100 posts are possible for sure though i wonder if constructive isnt a very stretchy term anyway. Is constructive needed for the other campaigns too? I mean i cant imagine someone sitting there, reading all posts and decide which is constructive.

If you can do a little over 50 choose a fixed rate like Luckybit (0.125). More than 100 choose a pay per post like bit x (0.16 for hundred but you can make much more than that but posting that much is no easy task as you mentioned). Constructive basically means just don't spam or post pointless rubbish for the sake of it. I've had a quick look over your posts and all or most should be fine and counted as 'constructive' so you probably would be ok if you just continued on as normal providing you made the minimum 50 posts for payout.

I think ill see if bit-x works since i dont really want to post more than i normally would do. Though now i wonder if they have a limit regarding a minimum. I posted in their thread now and see what they see.

I think that the only trouble with these guys is that they require a mobile phone number in order to create an account on their website and they only pay to accounts on their website---not to your personal btc address.  Apparently withdrawal from their website also requires that you reply to a text message.  I don't know if there are withdrawal fees.

you don't have to reply.

You need to write in the site the code you get from the SMS.

Of course if your number gets inaccessible for you for any reason you most probably will lose your payment forever, so if it is worth is something to think about

[tspacepilot]

So Malin Keshar seems to be insinuating that you *do* have to enter an SMS code in order to withdrawal (or perhaps I misunderstand him).

[redsn0w]

So Malin Keshar seems to be insinuating that you *do* have to enter an SMS code in order to withdrawal (or perhaps I misunderstand him).

I think he is wrong, I have never put a confirmation code when I have withdrawn my bitcoins from the site (because the site doesn't send you a SMS, but maybe I don't remember correct).

[Quickseller]

So Malin Keshar seems to be insinuating that you *do* have to enter an SMS code in order to withdrawal (or perhaps I misunderstand him).

to withdraw from bit-x you will need to either receive a SMS text message or a phone call with a code. You need to enter that code on the bit-x website in order to confirm your identity.

[Mitchell]

I just tried to login on Bit-X and they send me a text message with a confirmation code. I don't have any balance there so I couldn't test the withdrawal part.

[tspacepilot]

So it seems quite confirmed that redisn0w was incorrect about needing the phone number only for sign-up.  You do need it for withdrawal and other actions which means that finding an internet one-time sms wouldn't help.  Anyway, I don't know if it's worth it to put a note on your OP about the .5% fee and the telephone number for the bit-x campaign.

[Malin Keshar]

So Malin Keshar seems to be insinuating that you *do* have to enter an SMS code in order to withdrawal (or perhaps I misunderstand him).

I think he is wrong, I have never put a confirmation code when I have withdrawn my bitcoins from the site (because the site doesn't send you a SMS, but maybe I don't remember correct).

you have to log in to withdraw

and to log in you need sms verification

[Mitchell]

So it seems quite confirmed that redisn0w was incorrect about needing the phone number only for sign-up.  You do need it for withdrawal and other actions which means that finding an internet one-time sms wouldn't help.  Anyway, I don't know if it's worth it to put a note on your OP about the .5% fee and the telephone number for the bit-x campaign.

Good idea, added.