Bitcoin Forum
July 23, 2019, 11:22:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 284 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns  (Read 16835 times)
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1717



View Profile WWW
April 08, 2015, 04:55:15 PM
 #3181

You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?

FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active

Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.

They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
did they ever actually ever close their campaign? Looking through the change log the last mention of them is from January when they were "updated". I am fairly certain that they just created a new thread (with different rules?). I understand that if a campaign were to have closed, then the company potentially chsnged ownership it is possible that the new owners could run away with free advertising but I don't think that would really apply if only a new thread was made.

By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.

Click Here to See Alex Morgan Twerking||2nd Video
(Videos Suchmoon doesn’t want you to see)
1563924175
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563924175

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563924175
Reply with quote  #2

1563924175
Report to moderator
1563924175
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563924175

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563924175
Reply with quote  #2

1563924175
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
abyrnes81
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 08, 2015, 05:22:56 PM
 #3182

You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?

FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active

Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.

They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
did they ever actually ever close their campaign? Looking through the change log the last mention of them is from January when they were "updated". I am fairly certain that they just created a new thread (with different rules?). I understand that if a campaign were to have closed, then the company potentially chsnged ownership it is possible that the new owners could run away with free advertising but I don't think that would really apply if only a new thread was made.

By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.


No I don't think you are right, because the new signature campaign is always managed by the same "team" so there will not exist any type of problem (if they will stay honest).
pawel7777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1084


We're all gonna make it


View Profile WWW
April 08, 2015, 06:52:03 PM
 #3183

You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?

FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active

Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.

They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
did they ever actually ever close their campaign? Looking through the change log the last mention of them is from January when they were "updated". I am fairly certain that they just created a new thread (with different rules?). I understand that if a campaign were to have closed, then the company potentially chsnged ownership it is possible that the new owners could run away with free advertising but I don't think that would really apply if only a new thread was made.

By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.

Exactly.


I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this

As Quickseller wrote, it's not actually new campaign. They just called it 'new campaign' and got somewhat penalised with 'PNYC' mark.
Would it really make any difference trust-wise if they change the wording to 'new thread' (instead of 'new campaign')?

▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████▄███████████
██████▀████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▄████▄██████████████▄█████
█████████████████▄██▀███
▀██▄▄███████████████████
████▀██████▄██▄████████████
██▄▄████████████▀██▄██
▀█▀██▀████████████▀████▀

P O K E R
▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄██████████▄▄▄██████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
████████▄▄▄▀█▀▄▄▄████████
▐███████████████████████████▌
████████▀▀▀▐█▌▀▀▀████████
▀██████████▄███▄██████████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀▀





██████
███▀▀▀
███
███




███
███
███▄▄▄
██████
Bad Beat Jackpot
Multiple Clients
New Software
NLH Tournaments
Krill Rakeback
Run It Twice

██████
▀▀▀███
   ███
   ███




   ███
   ███
▄▄▄███
██████

.♣ Play Now! ♣.
arallmuus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1005


View Profile
April 08, 2015, 07:16:49 PM
 #3184


I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this

As Quickseller wrote, it's not actually new campaign. They just called it 'new campaign' and got somewhat penalised with 'PNYC' mark.
Would it really make any difference trust-wise if they change the wording to 'new thread' (instead of 'new campaign')?

penalize? not really as FortuneJack doesnt get any disadvantage due to being put in the PYNC for 1 week IMO, as they only accepts Sr. Member and upper rank, and their campaign have been around for quite some time, people should already knew their campaign are trusted, and Personally I dont even realize that they are in PYNC until you bring this up so yeah

and also as I have stated, today is their payday, they will be move back to active sig campaign soon after they pay
pawel7777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1084


We're all gonna make it


View Profile WWW
April 08, 2015, 07:30:13 PM
 #3185


penalize? not really as FortuneJack doesnt get any disadvantage due to being put in the PYNC for 1 week IMO, as they only accepts Sr. Member and upper rank, and their campaign have been around for quite some time, people should already knew their campaign are trusted, and Personally I dont even realize that they are in PYNC until you bring this up so yeah

and also as I have stated, today is their payday, they will be move back to active sig campaign soon after they pay

Yes, penalised. It's not severe disadvantage, but anyone new, without much experience with sig campaigns could see it as untrusted and risky.

And it's not solely about FJ but about principle. Bit-x is about to start 'new campaign' in mid April, possibly with monthly payments, so if the same logic is applied they'll stuck with 'PNYC' badge for the whole month.


▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████▄███████████
██████▀████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▄████▄██████████████▄█████
█████████████████▄██▀███
▀██▄▄███████████████████
████▀██████▄██▄████████████
██▄▄████████████▀██▄██
▀█▀██▀████████████▀████▀

P O K E R
▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄██████████▄▄▄██████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
████████▄▄▄▀█▀▄▄▄████████
▐███████████████████████████▌
████████▀▀▀▐█▌▀▀▀████████
▀██████████▄███▄██████████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀▀





██████
███▀▀▀
███
███




███
███
███▄▄▄
██████
Bad Beat Jackpot
Multiple Clients
New Software
NLH Tournaments
Krill Rakeback
Run It Twice

██████
▀▀▀███
   ███
   ███




   ███
   ███
▄▄▄███
██████

.♣ Play Now! ♣.
ticoti
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 08, 2015, 09:00:06 PM
 #3186

You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?

FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active

Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.

They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.

I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this

I didn't know why it was set as an untrusted, as it only had increased the payment rates, but I can confirm now I have received the payment
marcotheminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013


Newbies: Feel free to message me!


View Profile
April 09, 2015, 11:29:12 AM
 #3187

Code:
[b]BitcoinPoker[/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] BiWeekly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 30
[i]Payments:[/i] FM: 0.04 SM: 0.065 HM: 0.08
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: Yes, Quickseller (well, it depends if Quickseller is making payouts too)
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Other information that might be important

Sorting myself out.
fox19891989
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 10, 2015, 10:41:51 AM
 #3188


I didn't know why it was set as an untrusted, as it only had increased the payment rates, but I can confirm now I have received the payment

"payment not yet confirmed" is not equal to "untrusted", so you guys don't need to argue here, and when you guys get first payment of the new Fj campaign, OP will move it to Payment confirmed.

Although we all know FJ sig campaign pays well, michell has his own estimation.
BitcoinINV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 11, 2015, 06:21:04 AM
 #3189

is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks

arallmuus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1005


View Profile
April 11, 2015, 07:34:36 AM
 #3190

is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks

No there is none.

One new Campaign

AllInCrypto (AllInCrypto Sig Campaign)
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04 SM BTC: 0.06 BTC HM: 0.075 BTC
Escrow: Yes, Blazedout419
hilariousandco
Below Average Member
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1625


1 merit = 1 hug


View Profile WWW
April 11, 2015, 07:51:37 AM
 #3191

is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks

Does the one you're in now not? Think I saw some people with neg trust say they still get paid from it. I think Luckybit might take them on a case by case basis but there other rules can be strict.

Searing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1151


Clueless!


View Profile
April 11, 2015, 08:44:01 AM
 #3192




CryptoVPN campaign is only 60/30m posts now needed. No longer 80/40m.  If you do 30/m you get 1/2 the full monthly payment. The classifications and the amounts are still the same thou.
If you want to change the table on the 1st page with this new info...

Try out www.synchro.net An 'Old School' BBS (Bulletin Board System) works on Win /10/8/7 and Linux!
Three-minute install. The last upgrade was Jan 1st, 2019. I think you will be impressed with this project!
fox19891989
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 12, 2015, 04:16:15 AM
 #3193

Find a new Campaign

BitcoinPoker.gg   link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04BTC(10 slots)  SM BTC: 0.065 BTC(10 slots) HM: 0.08 BTC(5 slots)
Escrow: Quickseller
marcotheminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013


Newbies: Feel free to message me!


View Profile
April 12, 2015, 05:11:13 AM
 #3194

Find a new Campaign

BitcoinPoker.gg   link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04BTC(10 slots)  SM BTC: 0.065 BTC(10 slots) HM: 0.08 BTC(5 slots)
Escrow: Quickseller

I have the code up there ^.

Sorting myself out.
secondstrade.com
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 13, 2015, 01:55:00 AM
 #3195

www.secondstrade.com raised signature rate as of 04/13.

below is a new signature rate.

★★★ Signature Rate ★★★
 JR Member :   0.0001 BTC per constructive post.              - payout increased as of 04/13
 Member :       0.0002 BTC per constructive post.                   - payout increased as of 04/13
 Full Member :  0.00027 BTC per constructive post.             - payout increased as of 04/13  
 Senior :          0.0003 BTC per constructive post.                     - payout increased as of 04/13
 Hero / Legendary : 0.00035 BTC per constructive post.      - payout decreased as of 02/23
 No limited.


thank you.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1717



View Profile WWW
April 13, 2015, 01:59:09 AM
 #3196

There is no reason to update the OP however cryptosplit has started a campaign and scammed its investors/customers. As a result I (as escrow) has offered partial payments to participants if they wish to remove their signature.

Click Here to See Alex Morgan Twerking||2nd Video
(Videos Suchmoon doesn’t want you to see)
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1315


No I dont escrow anymore.


View Profile WWW
April 14, 2015, 07:46:36 PM
 #3197

Update for dadice.

Highlighted the changes.

Da Dice (Thread)
Payment period: Weekly
Minimum posts: 20 posts/week
Payments: F: 0.0009BTC per post, S: 0.0013BTC per post, H/L: 0.0015BTC per post.
Escrow: No
Miscellaneous: Maximum 100 posts per week will be paid. There is a bonus of 0.4BTC for the top ten constructive posters each week. There is also a bonus programm that allows long term participants to get a bonus every 4 weeks.

posted here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973949.msg11087932#msg11087932

copy pasta:
Code:
[b]Da Dice[/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973949.0]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] Weekly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 20 posts/week
[i]Payments:[/i] F: 0.0009BTC per post, S: 0.0013BTC per post, H/L: 0.0015BTC per post.
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: No
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Maximum 100 posts per week will be paid. There is a bonus of 0.4BTC for the top ten constructive posters each week. There is also a bonus programm that allows long term participants to get a bonus every 4 weeks.
arallmuus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1005


View Profile
April 16, 2015, 03:41:00 AM
 #3198


64 Blocks (64 Blocks Signature Campaign)
Payment period: Weekly
Minimum posts: 10 posts/week
Payments: N : 0.000047 BTC per post ; Jr. M : 0.000065 BTC per post ; 0.00015 BTC per post ; FM : 0.00045 BTC per post, Sr. M: 0.00073 BTC per post ;  H/L: 0.00073 BTC per post.
Escrow: Dabs, but since Dabs is a co-owner of the project, so No escrow in this case
Miscellaneous: Maximum 50 posts per week will be paid. For FM, Sr. M and H/L there will only be 3 spots each, along with avatar campaign gains 6.4 % more and post in gambling section gains 5 % more
teamcorona
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2015, 07:45:50 AM
 #3199

Corona's signature campaign is launched

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026177

Come and join!

★☆★   CORONA.INFO   |   Dapp Development Network   |   Hybrid Proof of Participation (HPoP)    ★☆★
hilariousandco
Below Average Member
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1625


1 merit = 1 hug


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2015, 07:47:17 AM
 #3200

Corona's signature campaign is launched

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026177

Come and join!

If you're just paid in alt coins it doesn't belong in Services nor will it be included on this list as it's for bitcoin deals only.

Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 284 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!